1. 吉林农业大学资源与环境学院, 吉林省商品粮基地土壤资源可持续利用重点实验室,长春,130118
2. 中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所,北京,100081
[ "刘奕(1991-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事作物养分综合管理与施肥研究。E-mail:liuyi9109@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
刘奕, 王寅, 李春林, 等. 吉林省中部一季稻区推荐施肥方法研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(4):273-278.
LIU Yi, WANG Yin, LI Chunlin, et al. Study on Recommended Fertilization Method in One-season Rice Area of Central Jilin Province[J]. 2018, 32(4): 273-278.
刘奕, 王寅, 李春林, 等. 吉林省中部一季稻区推荐施肥方法研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(4):273-278. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.04.043.
LIU Yi, WANG Yin, LI Chunlin, et al. Study on Recommended Fertilization Method in One-season Rice Area of Central Jilin Province[J]. 2018, 32(4): 273-278. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.04.043.
基于2013—2016年在吉林省永吉县、九台区、梨树县和前郭县开展的40组田间试验,通过研究稻谷产量、养分吸收量、肥料利用效率及养分平衡等指标,比较了测土配方(ST)与NE养分专家系统(NE)两种推荐施肥方法在吉林省中部一季稻区的应用效果与适用性。结果表明:农民习惯施肥(FP)处理稻谷产量平均为9.17 t/hm2,ST (9.21 t/hm2)和NE (9.24 t/hm2)处理产量均高于FP处理但并无显著差异。氮肥农学利用率以NE处理显著高于FP处理,磷肥农学利用率以ST处理显著高于FP、NE处理,而钾肥农学利用率无显著差异。FP、ST和NE处理的地上部养分吸收及肥料回收利用率方面均无显著差异。养分表观平衡方面,FP、ST和NE处理的土壤氮素均为盈余,其中FP > ST > NE。磷素则为小幅亏缺,而钾素大幅亏缺。不同区域处理间表现存在差异,与其他3个地区不同,前郭县ST处理的产量、植株养分吸收量及肥料农学利用率总体上低于NE处理。综上,ST和NE推荐施肥方法在吉林省中部一季稻区均有减肥、稳产、增效的良好效果,两种方法在半湿润地区(永吉、九台和梨树)适用性均较好,而半干旱地区(前郭)以NE方法相对较好。
Based on 40 field experiments carried out in Yongji
Jiutai
Lishu and QianGuo counties of central Jilin province from 2013 to 2016
the application effects and applicability of two recommended fertilization methods (i.e. soil testing and formulated fertilization (ST)
and nutrient expert system (NE)) were compared by investigating grain yield
plant nutrient uptake
fertilizer use efficiency and apparent nutrient balance in one-season rice area. The results showed that the average rice grain yield was 9.17 t/hm2 in the farmer practice fertilization (FP) treatment
the average grain yield was 9.21 and 9.24 t/hm2 in ST and NE treatment
respectively
which were higher than that of FP
but there were no significant difference. The agronomic efficiency of nitrogen fertilizer in NE treatment was higher than that in ST treatment
and agronomic efficiency of phosphorus fertilizer in ST treatment was higher than those in FP and NE treatments
while there was no significant difference in agronomic efficiency of potassium fertilizer. Overall
no significant difference was observed in plant nutrient uptake and fertilizer recovery efficiency among the FP
ST and NE treatments. For the apparent balance of nutrients
soil nitrogen in three treatments all showed evident surplus
and the value followed the order of FP > ST > NE
while soil phosphorus and potassium showed slight and dramatical deficit
respectively. There were differences in the performance between different regions
the grain yield
plant nutrient uptake and fertilizer agronomic efficiency were relatively lower in ST treatment than those in NE treatment in Qianguo county
and this was different from the other three regions. In conclusion
both ST and NE methods showed well application effects on reducing fertilizer rate
maintaining high grain yield and increasing fertilizer use efficiency in the one-season rice area of central Jilin Province. The applicability of two methods were both well in semi-humid region (i.e. Yongji
Jiutai and Lishu)
however it was relatively better for NE than ST in semi-arid region (i.e. Qianguo).
朱兆良,金继运.保障我国粮食安全的肥料问题[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2013,19(2):259-273.
张福锁,王激清,张卫峰,等.中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径[J].土壤学报,2008,45(5):915-924.
Peng S B, Tang Q Y, Ying Z. Current status and challenges of rice production in China[J]. Plant Production Science,2009,12(1):3-8.
李娟,李松昊,邬奇峰,等.不同施肥处理对稻田氮素径流和渗漏损失的影响[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(5):23-28.
串丽敏,何萍,赵同科.作物推荐施肥方法研究进展[J].中国农业科技导报,2016,18(1):95-102.
白由路,杨俐苹.我国农业中的测土配方施肥[J].中国土壤与肥料,2006(2):3-7.
陈新平,张福锁.通过"3414"试验建立测土配方施肥技术指标体系[J].中国农技推广,2006,22(4):36-39.
何萍,金继运,Pampolino,等.基于作物产量反应和农学效率的推荐施肥方法[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2012,18(2):499-505.
Xu X P, He P, Yang F Q, et al. Methodology of fertilizer recommendation based on yield response and agronomic efficiency for rice in China[J]. Field Crops Research,2017,206:33-42.
张大瑜,邵玺文,凌凤楼,等.吉林省水稻生产省域尺度比较优势分析与建议[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(2):289-293.
沈娟,高强.吉林省水稻施肥现状的调查分析[J].东北农业科学,2011,36(2):40-43.
焉莉,冯国忠,兰唱,等.基于GIS的吉林省水稻种植区施氮效果及减排潜力分析[J].中国农业科学,2017,50(17):3365-3374.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析.[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
彭少兵,黄见良,钟旭华,等.提高中国稻田氮肥利用率的研究策略[J].中国农业科学,2002,35(9):1095-1103.
刘瑞,戴相林,郑险峰,等.半旱地不同栽培模式及施氮下农田土壤养分表观平衡状况研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2011,17(4):934-941.
黄琦.基于"3414"田间试验的吉林省水稻施肥效果分析.长春:吉林农业大学,2016.
巩超.吉林省主要地区测土配方施肥对玉米、水稻肥料利用率的影响.长春:吉林大学,2016.
Chuan L M, He P, Jin J Y, et al. Estimating nutrient uptake requirements for wheat in China[J]. Field Crops Research,2013,146:96-104.
Xu X B, He P, Zhang J J, et al. Spatial variation of attainable yield and fertilizer requirements for maize at the regional scale in China[J]. Field Crops Research,2017,203:8-15.
徐新朋,魏丹,李玉影,等.基于产量反应和农学效率的推荐施肥方法在东北春玉米上应用的可行性研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2016,22(6):1458-1467.
Yang F Q, Xu X P, Ma J C, et al. Experimental validation of a new approach for rice fertilizer recommendations across smallholder farms in China[J]. Soil Research,2017,55:579-589.
Wang W N, Lu J W, Ren T, et al. Evaluating regional mean optimal nitrogen rates in combination with indigenous nitrogen supply for rice production[J]. Field Crops Research,2012,137:37-48.
0
浏览量
1213
下载量
9
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621