雨水花园对实际降雨径流的调控效果研究

蒋春博; 李家科; 马越; 李怀恩; 阮添舜

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.04.019

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

雨水花园对实际降雨径流的调控效果研究

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 雨水花园对实际降雨径流的调控效果研究
- Regulating Effect of Rain Garden on Actual Rainfall Runoff
- 水土保持学报 2018年32卷第4期页码：122-127
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西安理工大学省部共建西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室,西安,710048
  2. 陕西省西咸新区沣西新城开发建设(集团)有限公司海绵城市技术中心,西安,712000
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "蒋春博(1990-),男,在读博士研究生,主要从事非点源污染与海绵城市研究。E-mail:1254043839@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  陕西省重点研发计划（2017ZDXM-SF-073）西咸新区沣西新城海绵城市应用基础研究与技术开发计划项目（2017610002000089）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.04.019
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
蒋春博, 李家科, 马越, 等. 雨水花园对实际降雨径流的调控效果研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(4):122-127.

JIANG Chunbo, LI Jiake, MA Yue, et al. Regulating Effect of Rain Garden on Actual Rainfall Runoff[J]. 2018, 32(4): 122-127.
蒋春博, 李家科, 马越, 等. 雨水花园对实际降雨径流的调控效果研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(4):122-127. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.04.019.

JIANG Chunbo, LI Jiake, MA Yue, et al. Regulating Effect of Rain Garden on Actual Rainfall Runoff[J]. 2018, 32(4): 122-127. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.04.019.

摘要

基于海绵城市倡导的雨水自然积存、自然渗透、自然净化理念，根据西安地区降雨特征，设计建造了入渗型和防渗型两套雨水花园。2015~2017年对33场次降雨事件径流调控效果进行了监测分析。结果表明：（1）以原状土为填料的防渗型雨水花园设施水量削减率为11.2%~100%（中位数=69.14%）；（2）污染物浓度超越概率分析结果显示，径流雨水经过雨水花园系统后，总氮、氨氮、总磷和化学需氧量出流浓度超过地表水环境质量标准Ⅳ类限制的概率，与入流浓度超过地表Ⅳ限制的概率相比，分别降低了58.57%，2.71%，20.57%和29.71%；（3）雨水花园设施场次径流水量削减率与污染物负荷削减率的相关关系在0.857以上；（4）通过监测的场次降雨量及系统进水和出水水质水量，估算的雨水花园系统年径流污染物浓度去除率为11.93%~60.97%，径流污染物年负荷削减率基本在70%以上。

Abstract

Based on the concept of natural storage

natural infiltration

natural purification for rainwater advocated the sponge city

infiltration and seepage-proof rainwater gardens were designed and built according to the rainfall characteristics in Xi'an. We monitored the runoff regulating effects in 33 rainfall events from 2015 to 2017. The results showed that:(1) Seepage-proof rain garden filled with undisturbed soil reduced runoff volumes by 11.2%~100% (medium=69.14%). (2) The results of pollutant concentration exceedance probability analysis showed that the probabilities of concentrations of total nitrogen

ammonia nitrogen

total phosphorus and chemical oxygen demand exceed the limit standard IV of the surface water quality decreased by 58.57%

2.71%

20.57% and 29.71%

respectively

in the rainwater flows through the garden system

compared with the exceedance probabilities of inflow concentration. (3) The correlation coefficient between the runoff reduction rate and the pollutant load reduction rate was more than 0.857 for 33 rainfall events. (4) Through monitoring the precipitation

water qualities of inflow and outflow

we estimated that the annual pollutant concentration removal was 11.93%~60.97%

and the annual load of pollutants reduced more than 70% in the rainwater garden.

关键词

Keywords

references

戎贵文,沈齐婷,戴会超,等.基于海绵城市理念的屋面雨水源头调控技术探讨[J].水利学报,2017,48(8):1002-1008.

Davis A P. Green engineering principles promote low-impact development[J].Environmental Science and Technology,2005,39(16):338-344.

Barbosa A, Fernandes J, David L. Key issues for sustainable urban stormwater management[J].Water Research,2012,46(20):6787-6798.

Vaze J, Chiew F H. Experimental study of pollutant accumulation on an urban road surface[J].Urban Water,2002,4(4):379-389.

李春林,胡远满,刘淼,等.城市非点源污染研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(3):492-500.

Hatt B E, Fletcher T D, Deletic A. Hydrologic and pollutant removal performance of stormwater biofiltration systems at the field scale[J].Journal of Hydrology,2009,365(3):310-321.

Winston R J, Dorsey J D, Hunt W F. Quantifying volume reduction and peak flow mitigation for three bioretention cells in clay soils in northeast Ohio[J].Science of the Total Environment,2016,553:83-95.

Hunt W F, Jarrett A, Smith J, et al. Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina[J].Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering,2006,132(6):600-608.

Chaha M K, She Z Q, Flury M. Nutrient leaching and copper speciation in compost-amended bioretention systems[J].Science of the Total Environment,2016,556:302-309.

Flint K R, Davis A P. Pollutant mass flushing characterization of highway stormwater runoff from an ultra-urban area[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering,2007,133(6):616-626.

王书敏,何强,徐强,等.生物滞留系统去除地表径流中的氮素研究评述[J].水科学进展,2015,26(1):140-150.

Li L, Davis A P. Urban stormwater runoff nitrogen composition and fate in bioretention systems[J].Environmental Science and Technology,2014,48(6):3403-3410.

Brown R A,Hunt W F. Impacts of media depth on effluent water quality and hydrologic performance of undersized bioretention cells[J].Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering,2011,137(3):132-143.

Li M H,Swapp M,Kim M H, et al. Comparing bioretention designs with and without an internal water storage layer for treating highway runoff[J].Water Environment Research,2014,86(5):387-397.

卢金锁,程云,郑琴,等.西安市暴雨强度公式的推求研究[J].中国给水排水,2010,26(17):82-84.

高建平,潘俊奎,谢义昌.生物滞留带结构层参数对道路径流滞蓄效应影响[J].水科学进展,2017,28(5):702-711.

Payne E G, Fletcher T D, Cook P L, et al. Processes and drivers of nitrogen removal in stormwater biofiltration[J].Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology,2014,44(7):796-846.

Mangangka I R, Liu A, Egodaeatta P, et al. Performance characteristation of a stormwater treatment bioretention basin[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2015,150:173-178.

Davis A P, Hunt W F, Traver R G, et al. Bioretention technology:Overview of current practice and future needs[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering,2009,135(3):109-117.

Sun X L, Davis A P. Heavy metal fates in laboratory bioretention systems[J].Chemosphere,2007,66(9):1601-1609.

侯立柱,冯绍元,丁跃元,等.多层渗滤介质系统对城市雨水径流氮磷污染物的净化作用[J].环境科学学报,2009,29(5):960-967.

Chen X L, Edward P, Belinda S M, et al. Nitrogen removal and nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria quantification in a stormwater bioretention system[J].Water Research,2013,47:1691-1700.

浏览量

1364

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

不同耕作年限对耕地土壤质地和有机碳垂直分布的影响