1. 北京师范大学地理科学学部,北京,100875
2. 北京师范大学地表过程与生态环境重点实验室,北京,100875
3. 防沙治沙教育部工程研究中心,北京,100875
[ "董苗(1989-),女,汉族,山西吕梁人,博士研究生,主要从事干旱区地貌研究。E-mail:miaodong@mail.bnu.edu.cn" ]
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
董苗, 严平, 孟小楠, 等. 青藏高原爬坡沙丘地表沉积物特征分析——以柴达木盆地托拉海河为例[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(4):101-108.
DONG Miao, YAN Ping, MENG Xiaonan, et al. Characteristics of Surface Sediments of the Climbing Dunes on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau——Taking the Tola Hai River in the Qaidam Basin as an Example[J]. 2018, 32(4): 101-108.
董苗, 严平, 孟小楠, 等. 青藏高原爬坡沙丘地表沉积物特征分析——以柴达木盆地托拉海河为例[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(4):101-108. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.04.016.
DONG Miao, YAN Ping, MENG Xiaonan, et al. Characteristics of Surface Sediments of the Climbing Dunes on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau——Taking the Tola Hai River in the Qaidam Basin as an Example[J]. 2018, 32(4): 101-108. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.04.016.
为了阐明青藏高原爬坡沙丘的物源及沉积学意义并揭示其形成机理,对托拉海河爬坡沙丘进行断面采样,分析爬坡沙丘不同地形部位的粒度与地球化学元素特征。结果表明,托拉海河爬坡沙丘地表沉积物的粒度组成总体以极细砂、细砂、中砂为主,粒度特征表现出明显的风成特点;不同地形部位,粒度特征呈现不同的递变规律,自河床到迎风坡顶粒径变粗,分选变好,迎风坡顶到背风坡,粒径粗细混杂,分选变差。沉积物地球化学元素组成以Si、Al、Ca为主,和上陆壳(UCC)相比,除Co、As、CaO、SiO2以外,其余元素都有一定的亏损,不同部位化学元素分布具有一定相似性,且常量氧化物之间有较好的相关性,表明其具有相似的沉积环境。A-CN-K图解及CIA值揭示了托拉海河爬坡沙丘地表沉积物化学风化处于较低程度,大部分化学元素没有显著的风化或迁移,整体属于早期去Na、Ca的阶段;A-CNK-FM图则表明整个断面Fe、Mg元素在空间分布上存在一定的差异,Fe、Mg流失主要是差异风力风选的结果。从化学风化指标来看,不同地形部位风化程度不同,河床风化程度最弱,山地迎风坡的风化程度最强;河床与河流阶地的物源呈现多样性,而迎风坡和背风坡物源较为单一,可能是古沙翻新和就地起沙。因此,初步认为托拉海河爬坡沙丘的形成经历了两个阶段:一是古沙丘形成阶段;二是现代爬坡沙丘形成阶段。在不同空间尺度上,托拉海河爬坡沙丘地表沉积物的理化特征差异与风动力和水动力的差异有关,反映出沉积物对风、水交互作用的响应。
In order to clarify the source and sedimentological significance of the climbing dunes on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and reveal its formation mechanism
the climbing dunes section samples were collected in the Tola Hai River
and the grain size and geochemical characteristics of the different terrain parts of the climbing dunes were analyzed. The results showed that the grain size of the climbing dunes of Tola Hai River mainly consisted of very fine
fine and medium sand with an obvious aeolian sedimentary characteristic. The characteristic of particles varied in different terrain; the mean grain size became coarser from the riverbed to upwind slope
meanwhile
the sorting trended to be better
but the opposite trend was observed from the upwind slope to the leeward slope. The geochemical evidence indicated that in the climbing dunes of Tola Hai River
Si
Al and Ca were the dominant elements. Compared with the upper continental crust (UCC)
all the elements except Co
As
CaO and SiO2 appeared to a depletion status. The distribution of chemical elements in different terrain was similar
and there was a good correlation between constant oxides
indicating that they had similar sedimentary environment. The A-CN-K ternary diagram and the CIA index showed that chemical weathering of the surface sediments in the climbing dunes was in a low degree
most of the chemical elements had no significant weathering or migration
and the whole was in the stage of early Na and Ca. Moreover
A-CNK-FM ternary diagram showed that the spatial distributions of Fe and Mg were different in the whole section and the loss of Fe and Mg was mainly caused by sorting action of wind. All the chemical weathering index
including CIA
A-CN-K and A-CNK-FM
presented that different topographic parts were in different weathering degrees
the weathering degree of the river bed was the weakest
the weathering degree of the upwind slope was the strongest. The source of the riverbed and river terrace was diverse
while the source of windward slope and leeward slope was relatively single
which may be caused by ancient dunes activated and local sand source or local accumulation. Therefore
we preliminarily believed that the formation of the climbing dunes in the Tola Hai River has undergone two stages:the first was the formation of the ancient dunes and the second was the formation of modern climbing dunes. On different spatial scale
the physical and chemical characteristics of the surface sediment of climbing dunes were related to the difference between power of wind and hydrodynamic force
reflecting the response of the sediment to the interaction of wind and water.
崔徐甲,孙虎,董治宝,等.巴丹吉林沙漠高大沙山沉积物地球化学元素组成及其环境意义[J].中国沙漠,2017,37(1):17-25.
徐志伟,鹿化煜,赵存法,等.库姆塔格沙漠地表物质组成、来源和风化过程[J].地理学报,2010,65(1):53-64.
刘英俊,王鹤年,曹励明,等.元素地球化学[M].北京:科学出版社,1984.
刘东生.黄土与环境[M].北京:科学出版社,1985.
尚媛,鲁瑞洁,贾飞飞,等.青海湖湖东风成剖面化学元素特征及其环境指示意义[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(2):463-469.
谢远云,孟杰,郭令芬,等.松嫩平原杜蒙沙地地表物质的地化组成及风化特征[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(4):1009-1018.
刘佳.兰州市大气降尘粒度分布特征与来源研究.兰州:兰州大学,2012.
王斌,曾琳,赵万苍,等.对黄土高原风尘搬运动力与沉积控制因素的新认识[J].中国沙漠,2017,37(2):237-246.
李恩菊.巴丹吉林沙漠与腾格里沙漠沉积物特征的对比研究.西安:陕西师范大学,2011.
Xie J, Ding Z L. Compositions of heavy minerals in northeastern China sandlands and provenance analysis[J]. Science in China:Series D,2007,50(11):1715-1723.
王峰,刘玄春,邓秀芹,等.鄂尔多斯盆地纸坊组微量元素地球化学特征及沉积环境指示意义[J].沉积学报,2017,35(6):1265-1273.
陈鹏飞,李潮流,康世昌,等.雅鲁藏布江表层沉积物地球化学元素研究[J].地球化学,2012,41(4):387-392.
高文华,高抒,王丹丹,等.废黄河沉积记录中来自不同河流物质的信息:基于重矿物与地球化学元素分析[J].地理科学,2015,35(12):1631-1639.
毛沛妮,庞奖励,黄春长,等.汉江上游黄土常量元素地球化学特征及区域对比[J].地理学报,2017,72(2):279-291.
李小妹,严平,吴伟,等.克里雅河中下游流域地表沉积物的粒度与化学元素空间分布[J].地理科学,2016,36(8):1269-1276.
梁丽,师育新,戴雪荣,等.苏州澄湖湖底硬粘土地球化学特征及其成因意义[J].地球与环境,2010,38(4):449-455.
魏志强,钟巍,陈永强,等.亚热带季风区湖沼流域表生地球化学元素研究:以江西定南大湖为例[J].地理科学进展,2015,34(7):909-917.
颜永毫,周杰,何忠,等.3万年来卤阳湖沉积物地球化学元素变化特征及其环境意义[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(3):208-212,219.
罗万银,董治宝,钱广强,等.戈壁表层沉积物地球化学元素组成及其沉积意义[J].中国沙漠,2014,34(6):1441-1453.
龙黎,董玉祥,孙忠.海岸沙丘表面现代风成沙地球化学元素分异的典型研究:以河北昌黎黄金海岸横向沙脊为例[J].沉积学报,2012,30(4):724-730.
杨纫章.柴达木盆地托拉海河西地区的自然景观[J].地理学报,1959(6):422-434.
Folk R L, Ward W C. Brazos River bar:A study in the signification of grain size parameters[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology,1957,27:3-27.
Taylor S R, McLennan S M. Continental crust:Its composition and evolution[M]. London:Blackwell,1985:277.
邵菁清,杨守业.化学蚀变指数(CIA)反映长江流域的硅酸盐岩化学风化与季风气候?[J].科学通报,2012,57(11):933-942.
Muhs D R, Lancaster N, Skipp G L. A complex origin for the Kelso Dunes, Mojave National Preserve, California, USA:A case study using a simple geochemical method with global applications[J]. Geomorphology,2017,276:222-243.
0
浏览量
1315
下载量
7
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621