北京林业大学水土保持学院, 国家林业局水土保持与荒漠化防治重点实验室,北京,100083
[ "柳晓娜(1992-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:liuxiaona1007@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
柳晓娜, 樊登星, 余新晓, 等. 大粗糙单元对坡面流水动力学特性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(4):43-50.
LIU Xiaona, FAN Dengxing, YU Xinxiao, et al. Influence of Large-scale Roughness Element on Hydraulic Characteristics of Overland Flow[J]. 2018, 32(4): 43-50.
柳晓娜, 樊登星, 余新晓, 等. 大粗糙单元对坡面流水动力学特性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(4):43-50. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.04.008.
LIU Xiaona, FAN Dengxing, YU Xinxiao, et al. Influence of Large-scale Roughness Element on Hydraulic Characteristics of Overland Flow[J]. 2018, 32(4): 43-50. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.04.008.
通过室内定床冲刷试验,选用砂布床面模拟土壤下垫面,选用砂布+塑料半球体(直径为40 mm)床面模拟大粗糙单元下垫面,在较大流量(2.81~84.43 L/min)、坡度(2°~10°)范围内,系统研究了大粗糙单元对坡面流水动力学特性的影响。结果表明:(1)大粗糙单元床面的平均流速、平均水深和弗劳德数与流量之间均呈幂函数正相关关系;平均流速和弗劳德数与坡度之间均呈幂函数正相关关系,而平均水深与坡度之间呈幂函数负相关关系;阻力系数随雷诺数的增大而逐渐减小。(2)大粗糙单元增加了坡面流阻力,延缓了坡面流流速,雍高了坡面流水深,并使得水流流型由急流趋向缓流发展。(3)坡面流绕流现象明显,大粗糙单元周围水深的大小为迎水深(h1)>侧水深(h2)>背水深(h3),在较小坡度下(2°和4°),h1-h3随流量的增大先增大后趋于稳定,在较大坡度下(6°,8°和10°),h1-h3随流量的增大先增大后减小。(4)坡面流阻力由颗粒阻力和绕流阻力组成,绕流阻力占总阻力的29%~77%,绕流阻力随流量的增加而减小。研究结果可为坡面土壤侵蚀物理模型的构建提供一定理论依据。
Large-scale roughness element plays an important role in soil erosion control
but few studies have been performed to quantify the effects of large-scale roughness element on hydraulics of overland flow. Laboratory flume experiments were conducted to investigate the potential effects of large-scale roughness element on flow velocity
water depth
Froude number
and hydraulic resistance of overland flow. The plastic hemispherical were glued onto the flume bed to simulate the large-scale roughness element
and a sand cloth bed was used as control. The flow discharges varied from 2.81 L/min to 84.43 L/min and the slope gradients ranged from 2° to 10°. Results showed that:(1) The mean flow velocity
mean water depth and Froude number had power function relationships with the flow discharges and slope gradients. However
the resistance coefficient decreased as Reynolds number increased. (2) The variation trend of water depth around the large-scale roughness element was water depth in front of the large-scale roughness element (h1)>water depth on both sides of the large-scale roughness element (h2)>water depth behind the large-scale roughness element (h3). At a smaller slope gradient
h1-h3 increased first and then became stable with the increasing flow discharges. At a larger slope gradient
h1-h3 increased first and then decreased with the increasing flow discharges. (3) Compared with the sand cloth bed surface
the large-scale roughness element had a function of reducing flow velocity
increasing resistance
and changing flow regime. (4) The total resistance on large-scale roughness element was partitioned into grain resistance and form resistance
and form resistance accounted for 29%~77% of the total resistance. In a word
the large-scale roughness element cloud retards the flow
reduce soil erosion and have obvious effect on soil and water conservation.
罗榕婷,张光辉,曹颖.坡面含沙水流水动力学特性研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2009,28(4):567-574.
张光辉,卫海燕,刘宝元.坡面流水动力学特性研究[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(1):58-61.
王俊杰,张宽地,杨苗,等.雨强和糙度对坡面薄层流水动力学特性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(9):147-154.
戴矜君,程金花,张洪江,等.野外放水条件下坡面流水动力学特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2016,14(3):52-59.
郭明明,王文龙,李建明,等.野外模拟降雨条件下矿区土质道路径流产沙及细沟发育研究[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(24):155-163.
Roche N, Daan J, Lawrence D S L. Hydraulic modeling of runoff over a rough surface under partial inundation[J]. Water Resources Research,2007,43(8):159-164.
Myers T G. Modeling laminar sheet flow over rough surfaces[J]. Water Resources Research,2002,38(11):1230.
张光辉.退耕驱动的近地表特性变化对土壤侵蚀的潜在影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2017,15(4):143-154.
张宽地,王光谦,孙晓敏,等.坡面薄层水流水动力学特性试验[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(15):182-189.
刘青泉,李家春,陈力,等.坡面流及土壤侵蚀动力学(Ⅰ)坡面流[J].力学进展,2004,34(3):360-372.
Pagliara S P, Das R D, Carnacina I C. Flow resistance in large-scale roughness condition[J]. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering,2008,35(11):1285-1293.
张宽地,王光谦,王占礼,等.人工加糙床面薄层滚波流水力学特性试验[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(4):28-34.
Giménez R, Govers G. Interaction between bed roughness and flow hydraulics in eroding rills[J]. Water Resources Research,2001,37(3):791-799.
余冰,王军光,蔡崇法,等.不同模拟糙度定床坡面集中水流水力学特性研究[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(2):50-54.
Ali M, Sterk G, Seeger M, et al. Effect of flow discharge and median grain size on mean flow velocity under overland flow[J].Journal of Hydrology,2012,452/453(1):150-160.
翟艳宾,吴发启,张一,等.人工模拟粗糙度对坡面流阻力的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2014,33(1):93-95.
姚文艺.坡面流流速计算的研究[J].中国水土保持,1993(3):21-25.
Zhang G H, Luo R T, Ying C, et al. Correction factor to dye-measured flow velocity under varying water and sediment discharges[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2010,389(1/2):205-213.
江忠善,宋文经.坡面流速的试验研究[J].水土保持研究,1988(1):46-52.
Meyer L D, Foster G R, Huggins L F. A laboratory study of rill hydraulics:1. Velocity relationships[J]. Transactions of the Asabe, 1984,27(3):790-796.
赵春红,高建恩,徐震.牧草调控绵沙土坡面侵蚀机理[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(1):113-121.
杨帆,张宽地,杨明义,等.植物茎秆影响坡面径流水动力学特性研究[J].泥沙研究,2016(4):22-27.
Bunte K, Poesen J. Effects of rock fragment covers on erosion and transport of no cohesive sediment by shallow overland flow[J]. Water Resources Research,2010,29(5):1415-1424.
施明新,吴发启,田国成,等.地表粗糙度对坡面流水动力学参数的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2015,34(7):83-87.
高延良,董旭,杨帆,等.坡面植被水流水动力学特性研究[J].水力发电学报,2016,35(9):38-47.
张宽地. 坡面径流水动力学特性及挟沙机理研究.陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2011.
刘文剑,张会兰,王玉杰,等.模拟植被地表覆盖率和粗糙度对坡面流水动力特性的影响[J].水土保持报,2017,31(6):1-7.
张宽地,王光谦,孙晓敏,等.模拟植被覆盖条件下坡面流水动力学特性[J].水科学进展,2014,25(6):825-834.
Abrahams A D, Parsons A J, Wainwright J. Resistance to overland flow on semiarid grassland and shrub land hillslopes, Walnut Gulch, southern Arizona[J]. Journal of Hydrology,1994,156(1/4):431-446.
吴淑芳,吴普特,原立峰.坡面径流调控薄层水流水力学特性试验[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(3):14-19.
Zhao C H, Gao J N, Huang Y F, et al. Effects of vegetation stems on hydraulics of overland flow under varying water discharges[J].Land Degradation and Development,2016,27(3):748-757.
0
浏览量
1206
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621