江苏省农业科学院循环农业研究中心,南京,210014
[ "郭智(1981-),男,博士研究生,主要从事农业生态与资源利用研究。E-mail:Guozhi703@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
郭智, 刘红江, 张岳芳, 等. 不同施肥模式对菜地氮素径流损失与表观平衡的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(4):37-42.
GUO Zhi, LIU Hongjiang, ZHANG Yuefang, et al. Effects of Different Fertilization Modes on Nitrogen Loss by Surface Runoff and the Apparent Nitrogen Balance in the Vegetable Fields of Taihu Lake Region, China[J]. 2018, 32(4): 37-42.
郭智, 刘红江, 张岳芳, 等. 不同施肥模式对菜地氮素径流损失与表观平衡的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(4):37-42. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.04.007.
GUO Zhi, LIU Hongjiang, ZHANG Yuefang, et al. Effects of Different Fertilization Modes on Nitrogen Loss by Surface Runoff and the Apparent Nitrogen Balance in the Vegetable Fields of Taihu Lake Region, China[J]. 2018, 32(4): 37-42. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.04.007.
采用田间小区定位试验(2014—2015年)研究了自然降雨条件下农户习惯性施肥、减量施肥及减量施肥配施生物炭等不同施肥模式对太湖流域蔬菜地氮素径流流失、蔬菜产量及氮素表观平衡的影响。结果表明:甘蓝种植季内菜地径流水量达1 729.20 m3/hm2,且与降雨量呈显著线性正相关关系。农户习惯性施肥(T1)处理条件下,菜地TN径流流失量达47.66 kg/hm2。减量施肥(T2)和减量施肥配施生物炭(T3)处理显著减少了氮素径流流失量,分别达13.95%和23.68%。与T2相比,配施生物炭(T3)可显著降低菜地氮素径流流失量达11.31%。菜地径流氮素以NO3-—N损失为主,各处理条件下,其流失量占TN的比例达81.11%~85.94%。菜地氮素平衡盈余量达158.24 kg/hm2,且随着氮素输入量的减少,氮素盈余量显著降低。T2、T3处理条件下,盈余量显著降低29.03%~39.81%。同时,T2、T3处理显著降低甘蓝叶球产量达16.12%~19.11%,而球形指数则显著增加6.17%~7.41%,氮素偏生产力也显著提高24.39%~28.98%。与T2相比,配施生物炭(T3)处理可小幅提高甘蓝产量及氮肥偏生产力,但处理间差异不显著。
Under natural rainfall conditions
a field plot experiment (2014-2015) was conducted to study the effects of different fertilization modes (i.e. conventional fertiliser application
T1; reduced fertiliser application
T2; optimized fertiliser application
reduced fertiliser application and wheat straw biochar application
T3) on nitrogen (N) loss by surface runoff
the apparent N balance
and vegetable yield in the vegetable field of cabbage (Brassica Oleracea L.) in Taihu Lake Basin
China. The results showed that total volume of surface runoff reached up to 1 729.20 m3/hm2 during the vegetable growing season
which showed a significant positive linear correlation with rainfall capacity. In T1 treatment
total nitrogen (TN) loss by surface runoff reached up to 47.66 kg/hm2 during the vegetable growing season. Compared with T1
T2 and T3 significantly reduced TN losses by 13.95% and 23.68%
respectively. Compared with T2
TN loss decreased significantly by 11.31%
after application of wheat straw biochar (T3). The lost N was mainly nitrate nitrogen (NO3--N)
which accounted for 81.11%~85.94% of TN loss. Meanwhile
N surplus amount in the vegetable field of cabbage reached up to 158.24 kg/hm2 under T1 treatment. With decreasing N application in the vegetable field
N surplus significantly decreased. Compared with T1
N surplus decreased significantly by 29.03%~39.81%. Furthermore
T2
T3 significantly reduced cabbage head yield by 16.12%~19.11%
but the sphericity index increased significantly by 6.17%~7.41%
and the partial factor productivity of nitrogen (PFPN) for cabbage head increased significantly by 24.39%~28.98%. And
compared with T2 treatment
after application of wheat straw biochar (T3) in the vegetable field
cabbage head yield and PFPN increased slightly
but no significant difference was found.
王彩绒,吕家珑,胡正义,等.太湖流域典型蔬菜地土壤氮及pH空间变异特征[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(3):17-20.
严建民,柳军,罗克勇,等.江苏设施蔬菜机械化生产发展思路探讨[J].江苏农业学报,2014,30(6):1480-1483.
杨意成,梁燕,傅俊毅,等.江苏"菜篮子"工程蔬菜基地建设的思考[J].长江蔬菜,2014(22):72-75.
谢建昌,陈际型.菜园土壤肥力与蔬菜合理施肥[M].南京:河海大学出版社,1997:41-46.
赵其国.发展与创新现代土壤科学[J].土壤学报,2003,40(3):321-327.
杨林章.中国农田生态系统养分循环与平衡及其管理[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
王敬国,林杉,李保国.氮循环与中国农业氮管理[J].中国农业科学,2016,49(3):503-517.
Boesch D F, Brinsfield R B, Magnien R E. Chesapeake bay eutrophication:Scientific understanding, ecosystem restoration, and challenges for agriculture[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,2000,30(2):303-320.
金相灿,叶春,颜昌宙,等.太湖重点污染控制区综合治理方案研究[J].环境科学研究,1999,12(5):1-5.
张维理,武淑霞,冀宏杰,等.中国农业面源污染形势估计及控制对策I.21世纪初期中国农业面源污染的形势估计[J].中国农业科学,2004,37(7):1008-1017.
于红梅,李子忠,龚元石.传统和优化水氮管理对蔬菜地土壤氮素损失与利用效率的影响[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(2):54-59.
姜慧敏,张建峰,李玲玲,等.优化施氮模式下设施菜地氮素的利用及去向[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2013,19(5):1146-1154.
王春梅,蒋治国,赵言文.太湖流域典型蔬菜地地表径流氮磷流失[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(4):36-40.
李艾芬,章明奎.浙北平原不同种植年限蔬菜地土壤氮磷的积累及环境风险评价[J].农业环境科学学报,2010,29(1):122-127.
鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
朱莲,杨春霞,柳林景,等.氮、钾肥用量对春甘蓝产量和品质的影响[J].蔬菜,2002(1):29-31.
孙传范,曹卫星,戴廷波.土壤-作物系统中氮肥利用率的研究进展[J].土壤,2001,33(2):64-69.
姜甜甜,高如泰,夏训峰,等.北京市农田生态系统氮素养分平衡与负荷研究:以密云县和房山区为例[J].农业环境科学学报,2009,28(11):2428-2435.
黄东风,王果,李卫华,等.菜地土壤氮磷面源污染现状、机制及控制技术[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(4):991-1001.
郭智,刘红江,陈留根,等.不同施肥模式对冬瓜氮素利用及菜地氮素表观平衡的影响[J].上海农业学报,2016,32(4):92-98.
王辉,董元华,安琼,等.高度集约化利用下蔬菜地土壤养分累积状况:以南京市南郊为例[J].土壤,2006,38(1):61-65.
冀宏杰,张认连,武淑霞,等.太湖流域农田肥料投入与养分平衡状况分析[J].中国土壤与肥料,2008(5):70-75.
鲁如坤,刘鸿祥,闻大钟,等.我国典型地区农业生态系统养分循环和平衡研究Ⅳ.农田养分平衡的评价方法和原则[J].土壤通报,1996,27(5):197-199.
李强坤,胡亚伟,孙娟.农业非点源污染物在排水沟渠中的迁移转化研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报,2010,18(1):210-214.
郑少文,郭智,王子臣,等.太湖流域典型蔬菜地氮素径流流失特征[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(3):204-208.
吴永红,胡正义,杨林章.农业面源污染控制工程的"减源—拦截—修复"(3R)理论与实践[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(5):1-6.
张刚,王德建,陈效民.稻田化肥减量施用的环境效应[J].中国生态农业学报,2008,16(2):327-330.
李大伟,周加顺,潘根兴,等.生物质炭基肥施用对蔬菜产量和品质以及氮素农学利用率的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2016,39(3):433-440.
武玉,徐刚,吕迎春,等.生物炭对土壤理化性质影响的研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2014,29(1):68-79.
Yao Y, Gao B, Zhang M, et al. Effect of biochar amendment on sorption and leaching of nitrate, ammonium, and phosphate in a sandy soil[J].Chemosphere,2013,89(11):1467-1471.
贾俊香,熊正琴.秸秆生物炭对菜地N
2
O、CO
2
与CH
4
排放及土壤化学性质的影响[J].生态与农村环境学报,2016,32(2):283-288.
仓龙,朱向东,汪玉,等.生物质炭中的污染物含量及其田间施用的环境风险预测[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(15):163-167.
石红蕾,周启星.生物炭对污染物的土壤环境行为影响研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2014,33(2):486-494.
0
浏览量
1547
下载量
9
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621