中亚热带地区常绿阔叶林地表径流和产沙影响机制

曹光秀; 王克勤; 赵洋毅; 段旭

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.04.006

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

中亚热带地区常绿阔叶林地表径流和产沙影响机制

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 中亚热带地区常绿阔叶林地表径流和产沙影响机制
- The Mechanism of Surface Runoff and Sediment Yield of Evergreen Broad-leaved Forest in the Middle Subtropical Region
- 水土保持学报 2018年32卷第4期页码：30-36
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西南林业大学生态与水土保持学院,昆明,650224
  2. 国家林业局云南玉溪森林生态系统国家定位观测研究站,昆明,650224
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "曹光秀(1993-),女,在读硕士研究生,主要从事森林生态学研究。E-mail:2207043897@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（31560233，31760149）云南省教育厅重点项目（2015Z141）国家林业局林业科技创新平台运行项目（2018-LYPT-DW-162）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.04.006
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
曹光秀, 王克勤, 赵洋毅, 等. 中亚热带地区常绿阔叶林地表径流和产沙影响机制[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(4):30-36.

CAO Guangxiu, WANG Keqin, ZHAO Yangyi, et al. The Mechanism of Surface Runoff and Sediment Yield of Evergreen Broad-leaved Forest in the Middle Subtropical Region[J]. 2018, 32(4): 30-36.
曹光秀, 王克勤, 赵洋毅, 等. 中亚热带地区常绿阔叶林地表径流和产沙影响机制[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(4):30-36. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.04.006.

CAO Guangxiu, WANG Keqin, ZHAO Yangyi, et al. The Mechanism of Surface Runoff and Sediment Yield of Evergreen Broad-leaved Forest in the Middle Subtropical Region[J]. 2018, 32(4): 30-36. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.04.006.

摘要

为探究中亚热带地区常绿阔叶林地的地表径流和侵蚀产沙的影响机制，于2016年和2017年的5—9月在天然降雨条件下，采用野外定位观测结合室内试验分析方法，得到磨盘山常绿阔叶林林外降雨和林内穿透雨及其雨滴特性数据，采用RDA排序及CANOCO的Forward分析筛选出主导环境影响因子。结果表明：（1）产沙量与林外降雨量和林内穿透雨量存在正相关关系。当径流量>0.064 mm时，研究区内形成的地表径流才开始携带泥沙；林冠层对降雨动能的缓冲作用在降雨强度小的情况下较明显。（2）林冠缓冲动能、叶面积指数和树干茎流量与径流量产沙量存在负相关关系，降雨历时、林外降雨量、林内降雨量、平均雨强、雨滴个数、雨滴直径、雨滴速度、林内降雨动能、降雨总动能对径流量产沙量产生正相关影响。（3）对12个环境因子进行主导因子筛选，降雨总动能、林外降雨量、平均雨强、林冠缓冲动能、降雨历时对径流量产沙量的影响效果较为显著。从典范特征值分析结果显示，仅选择这5个主环境影响变量可解释环境影响因子与径流量产沙关系73.2%的信息量，比12个变量所解释的信息量仅少16.8%。

Abstract

To explore the mechanism of surface runoff and sediment yield of evergreen broad-leaved forest in the middle subtropical region

the natural rainfall and raindrop characteristics from May to September in 2016 and 2017 were observed by field observation and indoor test analysis Also

the leading environmental factors were selected by RDA sequencing and the Forward analysis of CANOCO. The results showed that:(1) Sediment yield was positively correlated with rainfall outside forest and throughfall in forest area. When runoff was greater than 0.064 mm in the study area

sediment occurred. The buffer effect of canopy layer on rainfall kinetic energy was more obvious when rainfall intensity was small. (2) Canopy buffering energy

leaf area index and stemflow and sediment yield had a negative correlation

rainfall duration

rainfall outside the forest

forest rainfall

average rainfall intensity

raindrop number

raindrop diameter

raindrop velocity

rainfall kinetic energy and rainfall kinetic energy on runoff sediment produced positive influence. (3) Through the screening of the leading factors of 12 environmental factors

we got the most significant influences of total rainfall

total rainfall

average rainfall intensity

canopy buffer kinetic energy and rainfall duration on the runoff and sediment yield of 12 environmental factors. The results from canonical eigenvalues analysis showed that choosing only 5 main environmental variables could explain 73.2% of the information content of the relationship between environmental factors and runoff and sediment yield

which was only 16.8% less than that explained by 12 variables.

关键词

Keywords

references

张颖,牛健植,谢宝元,等.森林植被对坡面土壤水蚀作用的动力学机理[J].生态学报,2008,28(10):5084-5094.

Carroll C, Merton L, Burger P, et al. Impact of vegetative cover and slope on runoff, erosion, and water quality for field plots on a range of soil and spoil materials on central Queensland coal mines[J].Australian Journal of Soil Research,2000,38(2):313-328.

陈三雄,沈义.黄浦江源头区主要植被类型土壤入渗特征及模拟分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(6):59-63.

Garciaestringana P, Alonsoblázquez N, Marques M J, et al. Direct and indirect effects of Mediterranean vegetation on runoff and soil loss[J].European Journal of Soil Science,2010,61(2):174-185.

李锐,上官周平,刘宝元,等.近60年我国土壤侵蚀科学研究进展[J].中国水土保持科学,2009,7(5):1-6.

Gumiere S J, Bissonnais Y L, Raclot D, et al. Vegetated filter effects on sedimentological connectivity of agricultural catchments in erosion modelling:A review[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2011,36(1):3-19.

Rey F. Effectiveness of vegetation barriers for marly sediment trapping[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2010,29(9):1161-1169.

Raya A M, Zuazo V H D, Martínez J R F. Soil erosion and runoff response to plant-cover strips on semiarid slopes (SE Spain)[J].Land Degradation and Development,2010,17(1):1-11.

徐海燕,赵文武,朱恒峰,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区坡耕地与草地不同配置方式的侵蚀产沙特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2009,7(3):35-41.

张晓明,余新晓,武思宏,等.黄土区森林植被对坡面径流和侵蚀产沙的影响[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(9):1613-1617.

方瑜.区域森林生态系统水文调节功能空间特征评价.北京:中国科学院研究生院,2012.

杞金华,章永江,张一平,等.哀牢山常绿阔叶林水源涵养功能及其在应对西南干旱中的作用[J].生态学报,2012,32(6):1692-1702.

李振新,欧阳志云,郑华,等.卧龙地区针叶林及亚高山灌丛对降雨的雨滴谱及能量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(4):125-129.

王学民.偏度和峰度概念的认识误区[J].统计与决策,2008(12):145-146.

杨帅,尹忠,郑子成,等.四川黄壤区玉米季坡耕地自然降雨及其侵蚀产沙特征分析[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(4):7-12.

张兴奇,顾礼彬,张科利,等.坡度对黔西北地区坡面产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(4):18-22.

艾宁,魏天兴,朱清科,等.基于通径分析的陕北黄土坡面径流产沙影响因素[J].北京林业大学学报,2015,37(6):77-84.

郭继成,张科利,董建志,等.西南地区黄壤坡面径流冲刷过程研究[J].土壤学报,2013,50(6):1102-1108.

张赫斯,张丽萍,朱晓梅,等.红壤坡地降雨产流产沙动态过程模拟试验研究[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(5):1210-1214.

张海涛,宫渊波,付万权,等.次降雨对马尾松低效林改造初期坡面产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(3):51-55.

林锦阔,李子君,许海超,等.降雨因子对沂蒙山区不同土地利用方式径流小区产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持通报,2016,30(5):7-12.

郭敏.基于SWAT模型的土地利用变化对流域产流产沙的影响研究.北京:中国科学院大学,2016.

浏览量

1485

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

晋西北黄土区典型人工林草本多样性与土壤理化性质

太湖流域江苏片区水质时空特征及其与景观格局的关联机制

北方土石山区冻融与水力复合作用对土壤侵蚀的影响

氮磷添加对常绿阔叶林土壤团聚体

无机溶液对土壤侵蚀的影响