1. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌,712100
2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨凌,712100
3. 西安理工大学水利水电学院,西安,710048
[ "白玉洁(1990-),女,陕西神木人,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀研究。E-mail:woshibyj999@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
白玉洁, 张风宝, 杨明义, 等. 急陡黄土坡面土壤剥蚀率变化的水动力学机制研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(4):1-6.
BAI Yujie, ZHANG Fengbao, YANG Mingyi, et al. Hydrodynamic Mechanism of Variation in Soil Erosion Rate on Steep Loess Slopes[J]. 2018, 32(4): 1-6.
白玉洁, 张风宝, 杨明义, 等. 急陡黄土坡面土壤剥蚀率变化的水动力学机制研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(4):1-6. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.04.001.
BAI Yujie, ZHANG Fengbao, YANG Mingyi, et al. Hydrodynamic Mechanism of Variation in Soil Erosion Rate on Steep Loess Slopes[J]. 2018, 32(4): 1-6. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.04.001.
为探明模拟降雨条件下急陡黄土坡面侵蚀产沙的水动力学特征,采用室内模拟降雨的方法研究了6个坡度(25°,30°,35°,40°,45°,50°)和3个雨强(1.0,1.5,2.0 mm/min)组合条件下急陡黄土坡面土壤剥蚀率变化规律以及土壤剥蚀率与各水动力学参数之间的关系。结果表明:同坡度下土壤剥蚀率随雨强的增加而增大,相同雨强下坡度对土壤剥蚀率的影响存在临界效应(40°~45°),当坡度小于临界坡度时,土壤剥蚀率随着坡度的增加而增大,当坡度大于临界坡度时,土壤剥蚀率随坡度的增加而减小;径流剪切力、径流功率与过水断面单位能随坡度和雨强的增大均呈增加趋势,其中规律最好的是径流功率;急陡黄土坡面土壤剥蚀率与平均径流剪切力、平均径流功率与平均过水断面单位能均呈幂函数关系,就拟合优度而言,R2(ω) > R2(τ) > R2(E)。因此本试验条件下平均径流功率是描述急陡黄土坡面径流侵蚀的最优水力学参数。
This paper oriented to study hydrodynamic characteristics of steep loess slopes (25°~50°)
in an attempt to lay down a foundation for elucidating the in-depth relationships of the hydrodynamic characteristics of shallow water flow on slopes with soil erosion. An indoor experiment was carried out to simulate rainfalls on steep loess slopes. The experiment was designed to have only one soil type (loessal soil)
three rainfall intensities (1.0 mm/min
1.5 mm/min and 2.0 mm/min) and six slope gradients (25°
30°
35°
40°
45° and 50°). Results showed that:(1) Soil erosion rate increased with rising rainfall intensities on slopes with the same gradient
and under the same rainfall intensity
the effects of slope gradients on soil erosion rate exhibited a critical point in gradient
that was
between 40° and 45°. On slopes with gradient lower than the critical point
soil erosion rate increased with rising slope gradients
whereas on slopes with gradient higher than the point
soil erosion rate decreased with rising slope gradients. (2) Flow shear stress
stream power and unit energy of water-carrying section were increased with the rising rainfall intensities and slope gradients
while stream power had the best regularity. (3) The increasing power functions were found between soil erosion rate with flow shear stress
unite stream power and unit energy of water-carrying section
with the determining coefficient of R2(ω)>R2(τ)>R2(E). So stream power was the best one of all the hydrodynamic parameters tested to describe the soil erosion process on the steep loess slopes.
郭太龙,卓慕宁,李定强,等.华南红壤坡面侵蚀水动力学机制试验研究[J].生态环境学报,2013,22(9):1556-1563.
丁文斌,史东梅,何文健,等.放水冲刷条件下工程堆积体边坡径流侵蚀水动力学特性[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(18):153-161.
刘俊娥,王占礼,高素娟,等.黄土坡面片蚀过程动力学机理试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(7):144-149.
谭贞学,王占礼,刘俊娥,等.黄土坡面细沟径流输沙对水动力学参数的响应[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(5):1-6.
张乐涛,高照良,田红卫.工程堆积体陡坡坡面土壤侵蚀水动力学过程[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(24):94-102.
王瑄,李占斌,尚佰晓,等.坡面土壤剥蚀率与水蚀因子关系室内模拟试验[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(9):22-26.
Foster G R, Huggins L F, Meyer L D. A laboratory study of rill hydraulics:Ⅱ. Shear stress relationships[J].Transactions of the ASAE,1984,27(3):797-804.
张光辉,刘宝元,何小武.黄土区原状土壤分离过程的水动力学机理研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(4):48-52.
张光辉,刘宝元,张科利.坡面径流分离土壤的水动力学实验研究[J].土壤学报,2002,39(6):882-886.
黄炎和,赵淦,蒋芳市,等.崩岗崩积体陡坡侵蚀的水动力学特征[J].森林与环境学报,2015,35(4):304-309.
李鹏,李占斌,郑良勇,等.坡面径流侵蚀产沙动力机制比较研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(3):66-69.
刘元保,唐克丽.国内外坡度分级和王东沟试验区的坡度组成[J].水土保持通报,1987,8(3):59-65.
郑粉莉,赵军.人工模拟降雨大厅及模拟降雨设备简介[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(4):177-178.
黄自立.陕北地区黄绵土分类的研究[J].土壤学报,1987,24(3):266-271.
张光辉.土壤分离能力测定的不确定性分析[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(2):1-6.
Sadeghi S H, Moosavi V, Karami A, et al. Soil erosion assessment and prioritization of affecting factors at plot scale using the Taguchi method[J].Journal of Hydrology,2012,S448/449(15):174-180.
张光辉.冲刷时间对土壤分离速率定量影响的实验模拟[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(2):1-4.
王秋霞,丁树文,邓羽松,等.花岗岩崩岗区不同土层的侵蚀水动力学特征[J].土壤学报,2017,54(3):570-580.
0
浏览量
1779
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621