1. 北京林业大学林学院, 精准林业北京市重点实验室, 省部共建森林培育与保护教育部重点实验室,北京,100083
2. 北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
3. 水利部水土保持监测中心,北京,100053
4. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨凌,712100
[ "刘二佳(1987-),女,山西临汾人,博士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀监测和遥感应用研究。E-mail:ejlovesmile@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
刘二佳, 罗志东, 张晓丽, 等. 面向GF-1数据不同融合方法对扰动地块的提取[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(3):358-363.
LIU Erjia, LUO Zhidong, ZHANG Xiaoli, et al. Comparison of Fusion Algorithms for GF-1 Data from Extracted of Distribution Information on Production and Construction Projects[J]. 2018, 32(3): 358-363.
刘二佳, 罗志东, 张晓丽, 等. 面向GF-1数据不同融合方法对扰动地块的提取[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(3):358-363. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.054.
LIU Erjia, LUO Zhidong, ZHANG Xiaoli, et al. Comparison of Fusion Algorithms for GF-1 Data from Extracted of Distribution Information on Production and Construction Projects[J]. 2018, 32(3): 358-363. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.054.
以GF-1影像为数据源,采用HPF变换(High-Pass fusion,高通滤波变换)、Ehlers变换(空间滤波变换)、Brovey变换(彩色标准变换)、GS变换(Gram-Schmidt,正交化变换)、PC变换(Principle Components,主成分变换)等5种常用融合算法,根据视觉分析和数理统计分析对融合后的影像进行质量评价,并通过面向对象分类方法对扰动图斑信息进行提取,研究适用于生产建设项目集中区扰动地表信息提取的融合算法。结果表明:基于PC和GS算法的融合结果影像视觉效果好,细节清晰,色调自然,纹理增强明显,较好的融合了多光谱影像的光谱信息和全色影像的空间信息。通过定量分析可知,PC变换最大程度地保持原多光谱影像的光谱特性,GS融合算法在增益效果上具有优势,融合影像信息量最大,纹理最为细致。总体而言,PC变换和GS变换影像融合算法在生产建设项目扰动图斑信息提取上具有很大的优势,在煤炭覆盖区提取正确率均为100%,在裸露地表和在建建筑用地混合区大于80%,较原始多光谱影像分类精度提高了约10%。该研究为推进国产高分遥感数据在生产建设项目水土保持监管中的高效应用奠定数据基础,对提升生产建设项目水土保持监管效率和信息化水平具有非常重要的意义。
Based on the GF-1 satellite images
the study used five different methods including high-pass fusion
Ehlers transformation
Brovey transformation
Gram-Schmidt spectral sharpening
and principle components spectral sharpening to obtain an optimal method for image enhancement of production and construction projects. To access the performance of these fusion methods
the quality of the fused image was evaluated by the visual and statistical analyses. Moreover
the object-oriented classification method was used to examine the accuracy of extracting the disturbance information on production and construction projects in the central area. Results showed that the principle components and gram-schmidt fusion algorithm achieved better fusion of multispectral spectral information and panchromatic image spatial information
and therefore
higher spectral fidelity
richer spatial information and better visual effect were obtained. Quantitative analysis showed that the principle components transform preserved the spectral characteristics of the original multispectral image to the maximum extent. The gram-schmidt fusion algorithm had the advantage of gain
and the fused image had the largest amount of information and the most detailed texture. Overall
the principle components and Gram-Schmidt image fusion algorithms had great advantages in information extraction of disturbance information on production and construction projects. The extraction accuracy in the coal-covering area was 100%
and greater than 80% in the mixed area of bare land and construction land and the classification accuracy was 10% higher than that of the original multispectral image. This research provide a solid foundation for promoting the efficient application of domestic high-resolution remote sensing data in water and soil conservation regulation of production and construction projects
and is of great significance to advance the efficiency and informationization of soil and water conservation supervision on production and construction projects.
李智广,王敬贵.生产建设项目"天地一体化"监管示范总体实施方案[J].中国水土保持,2015(2):14-17.
王龑,宋立旺,王琦.基于3S技术的生产建设项目水土保持监督检查[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(增刊1):92-94.
云影.高分辨率对地观测系统重大专项首发星:高分一号卫星[J].卫星应用,2013(3):72.
王华斌,李国元,张本奎,等.资源三号卫星影像融合算法对比分析[J].测绘科学,2015,40(1):47-51.
孙攀,董玉森,陈伟涛,等.高分二号卫星影像融合及质量评价[J].国土资源遥感,2016,28(4):108-113.
赵英时.遥感应用分析原理与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2013.
李爽.融合方法及空间分辨率比率对遥感影像融合结果影响的研究[D].武汉:武汉大学,2010.
周嘉男, 艾海滨, 张力.高分一号遥感影像融合方法比较研究[J].地理空间信息,2016(2):47-49.
林雪.面向林地信息的高分一号遥感影像融合与分类研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2016.
王晓绵,姜芸.高分一号遥感卫星影像融合及质量评价方法研究[J].测绘与空间地理信息,2015,38(8):178-179,182.
郭会敏,洪运富,李营,等.基于高分一号卫星影像的多种融合方法比较[J].地理与地理信息科学,2015,31(1):23-26,40.
陈发军,陈坤浩,谢永贵,等.黔西北喀斯特生态系统中主要植物物候格局[J].山地学报,2010,28(6):57-65.
李存军,刘良云,王纪华,等.2种高保真遥感影像融合方法比较[J].中国图象图形学报,2004,9(11):1376-85.
胡曼,彭道黎.面向林地分类的GF-2影像融合算法评价[J].浙江农林大学学报,2017,34(2):340-348.
郑中,祁元,张金龙.基于光谱角和光谱距离评价指标的遥感影像融合方法比较研究:以QuickBird数据为例[J].遥感技术与应用,2013,28(3):437-443.
李霖,佘梦媛,罗恒. ZY-3卫星全色与多光谱影像融合方法比较[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(16):157-165.
Li S, Li Z L, Gong J Y. Multivariate statistical analysis of measures for assessing the quality of image fusion[J]. International Journal of Image & Data Fusion. 2010,1(1):47-66.
王乐.遥感影像融合及其质量评价[D].长春:吉林大学,2012.
杨亦宁.基于优度准则的遥感影像最优分割参数组合选择研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2013.
黄慧萍.面向对象影像分析中的尺度问题研究[D].北京:中国科学院遥感应用研究所,2003.
于文婧,刘晓娜,孙丹峰,等.基于HJ-CCD数据和决策树法的干旱半干旱灌区土地利用分类[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(2):212-219.
马娜,胡云锋,庄大方,等.基于最佳波段指数和J-M距离可分性的高光谱数据最佳波段组合选取研究:以环境小卫星高光谱数据在东莞市的应用为例[J].遥感技术与应用,2010,25(3):358-365.
Nussbaum S, Niemeyer I, Canty M J. SEaTH-A new tool for automated feature extraction in the context of object-based image analysis[C]//. Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio). International Conference on Object-Based Image Analysis, Brazilian:Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), 2012:434-439.
朱永森,曾永年,张猛.基于HJ卫星数据与面向对象分类的土地利用/覆盖信息提取[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(14):258-265.
姜德文,郭索彦,赵永军,等.生产建设项目水土保持准入条件通用条款[J].中国水土保持科学,2010,8(3):43-54.
0
浏览量
1392
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621