渭北旱塬区不同坡向土地利用类型对土壤性质的影响

赵妮; 金晶炜; 程光庆; 程积民

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.041

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

渭北旱塬区不同坡向土地利用类型对土壤性质的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 渭北旱塬区不同坡向土地利用类型对土壤性质的影响
- Effects of Land Use Types with Different Slope Aspect on Soil Properties in Weibei Highlands
- 水土保持学报 2018年32卷第3期页码：271-279
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西北农林科技大学动物科技学院, 陕西杨凌,712100
  2. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
  3. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
  4. 世纪龙信息网络有限责任公司,广州,510630
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "赵妮(1995-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事恢复生态研究。E-mail:yczhaonijy@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（31601987，41230852）国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0500700）陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目（2016JM3019，2013JQ3013）中国典型自然保护区保护成效评估项目（KFJ-SW-YW028-07）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.041
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
赵妮, 金晶炜, 程光庆, 等. 渭北旱塬区不同坡向土地利用类型对土壤性质的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(3):271-279.

ZHAO Ni, JIN Jingwei, CHENG Guangqing, et al. Effects of Land Use Types with Different Slope Aspect on Soil Properties in Weibei Highlands[J]. 2018, 32(3): 271-279.
赵妮, 金晶炜, 程光庆, 等. 渭北旱塬区不同坡向土地利用类型对土壤性质的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(3):271-279. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.041.

ZHAO Ni, JIN Jingwei, CHENG Guangqing, et al. Effects of Land Use Types with Different Slope Aspect on Soil Properties in Weibei Highlands[J]. 2018, 32(3): 271-279. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.041.

摘要

为了研究不同坡向土地利用类型对土壤性质的影响，以渭北旱塬区5种土地利用类型（不同坡向）为研究对象，系统分析该区不同坡向土地利用类型剖面土壤物理、化学和生物性质的差异。结果表明：（1）除土壤pH和土壤颗粒组成外，5种土地利用类型土壤含水量、总孔隙度、有机质、全氮、微生物量碳和氮含量总体随土层加深呈下降趋势，土壤容重则相反。（2）0-30 cm土层，阳坡农用地土壤含水量、黏粒含量和pH最高，粉粒和全氮含量最低；人工草地砂粒和全氮含量最高，黏粒含量最低；人工林地土壤总孔隙度、土壤有机质、微生物量碳和氮含量最高，土壤含水量、土壤容重和pH最低；天然草地土壤容重和粉粒含量最高，总孔隙度和砂粒含量最低；退耕地有机质、微生物量碳和氮含量最低。阴坡农用地土壤含水量、粉粒含量和pH最高，黏粒和全氮含量最低；人工草地土壤容重、黏粒和微生物量氮含量最高，土壤总孔隙度、粉粒、砂粒和有机质含量最低；人工林地有机质含量和微生物量碳含量最高；天然草地土壤总孔隙度、砂粒和全氮含量最高，土壤容重和pH最低；退耕地土壤含水量、微生物量碳和氮含量最低。（3）5种土地利用类型中，土壤容重、细黏粒、粗黏粒、细粉粒、粗砂粒、土壤pH和有机质（退耕地除外）表现为阳坡 > 阴坡，土壤含水量（退耕地和农用地除外）、总孔隙度、粗粉粒、细砂粒、土壤质地粗化度、全氮（人工草地除外）、土壤微生物量碳和氮含量则为阴坡>阳坡。

Abstract

In order to explore the effects of land use types with different slope aspects on soil properties

five land use types (different slope aspect) in Weibei highlands were selected to analyze the differences of soil physical

chemical and biological properties in different land use types. The results showed that:(1)Soil water content

soil total porosity

soil organic matter content

total nitrogen content

microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen content decreased with the increase of soil depth

soil bulk density was the opposite except soil pH and particle composition in different land use types. (2)In 0-30 cm soil layer

on the sunny slope

soil water content

clay content and pH were the highest

while silt and total nitrogen content were the lowest in farmland; sand and total nitrogen content were the highest

while clay content was the lowest in artificial grassland; soil total porosity

soil organic matter content

microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen content were the highest

while soil water content

soil bulk density and pH were the lowest in artificial forest; soil bulk density and silt content were the highest

while soil total porosity and sand content were the lowest in natural grassland; soil organic matter content

microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen content were the lowest in abandoned farmland. On the shady slope

soil water content

silt content and pH were the highest

while clay content and total nitrogen content were the lowest in farmland; soil bulk density

clay content and microbial biomass nitrogen content were the highest

while soil total porosity

silt

sand and soil organic matter content were the lowest in artificial grassland; soil organic matter content and microbial biomass carbon content were the highest in artificial forest; soil total porosity

sand and total nitrogen content were the highest

while soil bulk density and pH were the lowest in natural grassland; soil water content

microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen content were the lowest in abandoned farmland. (3)Among the 5 types of land use

soil bulk density

fine clay

coarse clay

fine silt

coarse sand

soil pH

soil organic matter content (except abandoned farmland) of sunny slope were higher than those of shady slope. Soil water content (except abandoned farmland and farmland)

soil total porosity

the coarse silt

fine sand

soil texture coarsening degrees

soil total nitrogen content (except artificial grassland)

soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen content of shady slope were higher than those of sunny slope.

关键词

Keywords

references

Fleskens L, Duarte F, Eicher I. A conceptual framework for the assessment of multiple functions of agro-ecosystems:A case study of Trás-os-Montes olive groves[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2009, 25(1):141-155.

秦红,李昌晓,任庆水.不同土地利用方式对三峡库区消落带土壤细菌和真菌多样性的影响[J].生态学报,2017,37(10):3494-3504.

赵其国,孙波,张桃林.土壤质量与持续环境:I.土壤质量的定义及评价方法[J].土壤,1997,29(3):113-120.

United States Department of Agriculture. Natural resources conservation service. American's private land:A geography of hope[M]. Washington D. C.:U. S. Government Office, 1997:16-17.

Foley J A, De Fries R, Asner G P, et al. Global consequences of land use[J]. Science, 2005, 309(5734):570-574.

包睿,邹养军,马锋旺,等.种植年限及密度对渭北旱塬苹果园深层土壤干燥化的影响[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(15):143-149.

甘卓亭,张蓓蓓,张掌权,等.渭北塬区不同龄苹果园土壤微生物空间分布特征[J].生态学报,2015,35(21):6965-6973.

张露,王益权,石宗琳,等.干旱季节渭北果园土壤水分时空变化特征[J].干旱地区农业研究,2012,30(1):83-89.

张卫青,庞奖励,张彩云.陕西渭北旱塬典型苹果园土壤基本性质与微形态特征研究[J].干旱区地理,2010,33(4):564-571.

鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000:180-192.

王雪梅,柴仲平,毛东雷,等.不同土地利用方式下渭-库绿洲土壤质量评价[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(4):319-323.

Wei W, Chen L D, Fu B J, et al. The effect of land uses and rainfall regimes on runoff and soil erosion in the semi-arid loess hilly area, China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2007, 335(3):247-258.

邹文秀,韩晓增,江恒,等.东北黑土区降水特征及其对土壤水分的影响[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(9):196-202.

张玉翠,孙宏勇,沈彦俊,等.氢氧稳定同位素技术在生态系统水分耗散中的应用研究进展[J].地理科学,2012,32(3):289-293.

黄奕龙,陈利顶,傅伯杰,等.黄土丘陵小流域土壤水分空间格局及其影响因素[J].自然资源学报,2005,20(4):483-492.

胡伟,邵明安,王全九.黄土高原退耕坡地土壤水分空间变异性研究[J].水科学进展,2006,17(1):74-81.

Albiach R, Canet R, Pomares F, et al. Organic matter components and aggregate stability after the application of different amendments to a horticultural soil[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2001, 76(2):125-129.

杨婷,景航,姚旭,等.黄土丘陵不同土地利用方式下土壤颗粒组成及其分形维数特征[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(3):2-5,24.

Philip H, Rebekka R, Peter Z, et al. Soil changes under different land-uses in the Cerrado of Mato Grosso, Brazil[J]. Geoderma Regional, 2015, 4:31-43.

Deng Y S, Xia D, Cai C F, et al. Effects of land uses on soil physic-chemical properties and erodibility in collapsing-gully alluvial fan of Anxi County, China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 15(8):1863-1873.

邹文秀,韩晓增,陆欣春,等.不同土地利用方式对黑土剖面土壤物理性质的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(5):187-193,199.

王洪杰,李宪文,史学正,等.不同土地利用方式下土壤养分的分布及土壤颗粒组成关系[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(2):44-50.

胡婵娟,傅伯杰,靳甜甜,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区植被恢复对土壤微生物生物量碳和氮的影响[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(1):45-50.

于博威,刘高焕,刘庆生,等.晋西黄土丘陵区不同退耕年限刺槐林土壤养分效应[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(4):188-193.

Li C L, Li Q, Zhao L, et al. Land-use effects on organic and inorganic carbon patterns in the topsoil around Qinghai Lake basin, Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Catena, 2016, 147:345-355.

Sidzabda D D, Houria D, Mathurin Z, et al. Biodiversity and carbon stocks in different land use types in the Sudanian Zone of Burkina Faso, West Africa[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 2016, 216:61-72.

Li Z W, Liu C, Dong Y T, et al. Response of soil organic carbon and nitrogen stocks to soil erosion and land use types in the Loess hilly-gully region of China[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2017, 166: 1-9.

吕金林,闫美杰,宋变兰,等.黄土丘陵区刺槐、辽东栎林地土壤碳、氮、磷生态化学计量特征[J].生态学报,2017,37(10):3385-3393.

南雅芳,郭胜利,张彦军,等.坡向和坡位对小流域梯田土壤有机碳、氮变化的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2012,18(3):595-601.

王泽,颜安,张文太.区域绿洲农田土壤有机碳分布及其影响因子研究[J].农业资源与环境学报,2014,31(4):308-312.

邰继承,杨恒山,张庆国,等.种植年限对紫花苜蓿人工草地土壤碳、氮含量及根际土壤固氮力的影响[J].土壤通报,2010,41(3):603-607.

李龙,姚云峰,秦富仓,等.黄花甸子流域土壤全氮含量空间分布及其影响因素[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(5):1306-1312.

Sudeshna B, Debarati B, Swati C, et al. Comparative evaluation of three contrasting land use systems for soil carbon, microbial and biochemical indicators in North-Western Himalaya[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2017, 103: 21-30.

Van Leeuwen J P, Djukic I, Bloem J, et al. Effects of land use on soil microbial biomass, activity and community structure at different soil depths in the Danube floodplain[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2017, 79: 14-20.

付勇,庄丽,王仲科,等.新疆野生多伞阿魏生境土壤理化性质和土壤微生物[J].生态学报,2012,32(10):3279-3287.

薛萐,刘国彬,戴全厚,等.不同植被恢复模式对黄土丘陵区侵蚀土壤微生物量的影响[J].自然资源学报,2007,22(1):20-27.

吴然,康峰峰,韩海荣,等.环境因子对山西太岳山土壤微生物量的影响[J].土壤通报,2016,47(5):1126-1133.

赵彤,闫浩,蒋跃利,等.黄土丘陵区植被类型对土壤微生物量碳氮磷的影响[J].生态学报,2013,33(18):5615-5622.

Shipra S, Masto R E, Ram L C, et al. Rhizosphere soil microbial index of tree species in a coal mining ecosystem[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2009, 41(9): 1824-1832.

浏览量

1679

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

模拟侵蚀、施肥和采样时间对东北黑土区土壤性质和质量的影响

藏东南干旱河谷土壤有机碳组分空间分布及稳定性特征

冻融条件下土壤侵蚀阻力影响因素

重庆石漠化和非石漠化区植被绿度时空变化特征

宁南山区植被自然恢复中土壤团聚体特征及其与土壤性质关系