东祁连山不同干扰生境草地土壤养分时空变化特征

李海云; 姚拓; 张建贵; 高亚敏; 杨晓玫; 李琦; 冯影; 李昌宁

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.038

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

东祁连山不同干扰生境草地土壤养分时空变化特征

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 东祁连山不同干扰生境草地土壤养分时空变化特征
- Temporal and Spatial Variation Characteristics of Grassland Soil Nutrients in Different Disturbed Habitats of East Qilian Mountains
- 水土保持学报 2018年32卷第3期页码：249-257
- 作者机构：
  
  甘肃农业大学草业学院, 草业生态系统教育部重点实验室,兰州,730070
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "李海云(1989-),男,博士研究生,主要从事草地微生物多样性研究。E-mail:lihaiyun0923@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（31660688）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.038
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李海云, 姚拓, 张建贵, 等. 东祁连山不同干扰生境草地土壤养分时空变化特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(3):249-257.

LI Haiyun, YAO Tuo, ZHANG Jiangui, et al. Temporal and Spatial Variation Characteristics of Grassland Soil Nutrients in Different Disturbed Habitats of East Qilian Mountains[J]. 2018, 32(3): 249-257.
李海云, 姚拓, 张建贵, 等. 东祁连山不同干扰生境草地土壤养分时空变化特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(3):249-257. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.038.

LI Haiyun, YAO Tuo, ZHANG Jiangui, et al. Temporal and Spatial Variation Characteristics of Grassland Soil Nutrients in Different Disturbed Habitats of East Qilian Mountains[J]. 2018, 32(3): 249-257. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.038.

摘要

为探究东祁连山不同干扰高寒草地土壤养分及其生态化学计量学特征时空变化特征规律。研究了2017年8月在东祁连山不同干扰高寒草地土壤养分含量及其生态计量学特征，以及与2003年和2011年在相同地点、相同研究方法对该地区的土壤理化性质进行比较。结果表明：（1）在同一干扰生境不同土层下，土壤pH、电导率、含水量、土壤全量和速效养分均随着土层深度增加而逐渐减小，变化各异；在同一土层不同干扰生境下土壤养分间变化差异各不相同。（2）不同干扰生境土壤C/N为7.64~18.21，与我国陆地土壤平均值（10~12）基本接近，土壤C/P和N/P分别为109.16~144.79和7.52~15.65，远高于中国陆地土壤的C/P平均值52.7和N/P平均值3.9。（3）主成分分析结果表明，土壤理化性质（pH、电导率、含水量、全磷、全钾、速效磷、有机质、有机碳和速效氮）和土壤生态化学计量比（C/N、C/P和N/P）可以敏感的反映出不同干扰对草地土壤质量影响状况。土壤质量综合评价可知，不同干扰生境下草地土壤质量水平差异较大，多年生草地土壤质量较高，围栏外草地质量最差，在0-20，20-40 cm土层中，均表现为多年生>围栏内 > 一年生 > 围栏外。（4）与2003年和2011年相比较，4种不同干扰生境高寒草地土壤pH和含水量，总体呈上升的趋势，土壤有机质、全氮和全磷含量则呈现出明显下降趋势。综上，放牧干扰、人为种植对东祁连山4种干扰生境草地土壤养分含量有很大影响，为此应对该地区草地的利用和保护给予足够的重视，合理利用和科学管理草地。

Abstract

In order to explore the temporal and spatial variation characteristics of soil nutrients and their ecological stoichiometry in different disturbed alpine grasslands in East Qilian Mountains. The soil nutrient content and its ecometrics characteristics of different disturbed alpine grasslands in Eastern Qilian Mountains in August 2017 were studied. Compared with the same sites in 2003 and 2011

the same research methods were used to compare the soil physical and chemical properties in this area. Results showed that:(1) Soil pH value

electroconductibility

water content

soil total amount and available nutrient all decreased with the depth of soil and varied with different soil layers in the same disturbed habitat. (2) The soil C/N ranged from 7.64 to 18.21 in different disturbed habitats

which was basically close to the average value (10~12) of land soils in China. The soil C/P and N/P that ranged from 109.16 to 144.79 and 7.52 to 15.65 respectively

was much higher than the average C/P of 52.7 and N/P of 3.9 in China. (3) The principal component analysis showed that the physical and chemical properties of soil (pH

electrical conductivity

water content

total phosphorus

total potassium

available phosphorus

organic matter

organic carbon and available nitrogen) and ecological stoichiometry ratio (C/N

C/P and N/P) in the soil could sensitively reflected the different disturbance on grassland soil quality. The comprehensive evaluation of soil quality showed that the difference of grassland soil quality under different disturbed habitat vary greatly

the perennial grassland soil quality is higher

and the grass quality outside the fence is the worst. At 0-20 cm and 20- 40 cm soil layer

soil quality ranged as perennial cultivated grassland> inside the fence grassland> Annual cultivated grassland> outside the fence grassland. (4) Compared with 2003 and 2011

the pH value and water content of four different disturbed alpine grasslands showed an overall upward trend

while the content of soil organic matter

total nitrogen and total phosphorus showed a significant downward trend. In summary

grazing disturbance and artificial planting had a great impact on the soil nutrient content of four disturbed grasslands in the eastern Qilian Mountains. Therefore

adequate attention should be paid to the utilization and conservation of the grassland in this area

and the grasslands should be rationally utilized and scientifically managed.

关键词

Keywords

references

Merbold L, Eugster W, Stieger J, et al. Greenhouse gas budget (CO

, CH

and N

O) of intensively managed grassland following restoration[J]. Global Change Biology, 2014, 20(6):1913-1928.

Porensky L M, Mueller K E, Augustine D J, et al. Thresholds and gradients in a semi-arid grassland:Long-term grazing treatments induce slow, continuous and reversible vegetation change[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 53(4):1013-1022.

Irisarri G N J, Derner J D, Porensky L M, et al. Grazing intensity differentially regulates ANPP response to precipitation in North American semiarid grasslands[J]. Ecological Applications, 2016, 26(5):1370-1380.

Li X R, Jia X H, Dong G R. Influence of desertification on vegetation pattern variations in the cold semi-arid grasslands of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, North-West China[J]. Journal of Arid Environments. 2006, 64(3):505-522.

Li A, Wu J, Huang J. Distinguishing between human-induced and climate-driven vegetation changes:A critical application of RESTREND in Inner Mongolia[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2012, 27(7):969-982.

He C, Zhang Q, Li Y, et al. Zoning grassland protection area using remote sensing and cellular automata modeling:A case study in Xilingol steppe grassland in northern China[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2005, 63(4):814-826.

Cutler N A, Belyea L R, Dugmore A J. The spatiotemporal dynamics of a primary degradation[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2007, 96(2):231-246.

Luis M D, Raventós J, González-Hidalgo J C. Post-fire vegetation succession in Mediterranean gorse shrublands[J]. Acta Oecologica, 2006, 30(1):54-61.

Gos P, Loucougaray G, Colace M P, et al. Relative contribution of soil, management and traits to co-variations of multiple ecosystem properties in grasslands[J]. Oecologia, 2016, 180(4):1001-1013.

张生楹,张德罡,柳小妮,等.东祁连山不同退化程度高寒草甸土壤养分特征研究[J].草业科学,2012,29(7):1029-1032.

王一博,王根绪,吴青柏,等.植被退化对高寒土壤水文特征的影响[J].冰川冻土,2010,32(5):989-998.

张玉霞,姚拓,王国基,等.高寒生态脆弱区不同扰动生境草地植被及土壤无机氮变化特征[J].草业学报,2014,23(4):245-252.

杨成德,龙瑞军,陈秀蓉,等.东祁连山高寒草甸土壤微生物量及其与土壤物理因子相关性特征[J].草业学报,2007,16(4):62-68.

姚拓,王刚,张德罡,等.天祝高寒草地植被、土壤及土壤微生物时间动态的比较[J]生态学报,2006,26(6):1926-1932.

卢虎,姚拓,李建宏,等.高寒地区不同退化草地植被和土壤微生物特性及其相关性研究[J].草业学报,2015,24(5):34-43.

卢虎,姚拓,曹莉,等.高寒生态脆弱区不同扰动生境土壤微生物数量的变化[J].土壤通报,2013,44(5):1140-1145.

赵云,陈伟,李春鸣,等.东祁连山不同退化程度高寒草甸土壤有机质含量及其与主要养分的关系[J].草业科学,2009,26(5):20-25.

蒋永梅,师尚礼,田永亮,等.高寒草地不同退化程度下土壤微生物及土壤酶活性变化特征[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(3):244-249.

马丽萍.天祝高寒草地不同扰动生境土壤微生物数量时空动态研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2004.

卢虎.高寒生态脆弱区不同干扰生境土壤微生物数量特征及时间动态研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2011.

鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2001.

Zhao Y, Peth S, Krümmelbein J, et al. Spatial variability of soil properties affected by grazing intensity in Inner Mongolia grassland[J]. Ecological Modeling, 2007, 205(1/2):241-254.

周华坤,赵新全,周立,等.青藏高原高寒草甸的植被退化与土壤退化特征研究[J].草业学报,2005,14(3):31-40.

张蕴薇,韩建国,李志强.放牧强度对土壤物理性质的影响[J].草地学报,2002,10(1):74-78.

Gan L, Peng X, Peth S, et al. Effects of grazing intensity on soil water regime and flux in Inner Mongolia Grassland, China[J]. Pedosphere, 2012, 22(22):165-177.

冯瑞章,周万海,龙瑞军,等.江河源区不同退化程度高寒草地土壤物理、化学及生物学特征研究[J].土壤通报,2010,41(2):263-269.

范国艳,张静妮,张永生,等.放牧对贝加尔针茅草原植被根系分布和土壤理化特征的影响[J].生态学杂志,2010,29(9):1715-1721.

任灵,袁子茹,陈建纲,等.东祁连山不同利用方式下高寒草甸草原土壤养分特征[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2016,51(6):70-75.

王绍强,于贵瑞.生态系统碳氮磷元素的生态化学计量学特征[J].生态学报,2008,28(8):3937-3947.

王绍强,周成虎,李克让,等.中国土壤有机碳库及空间分布特征分析[J].地理学报,2000,55(5):533-542.

张秋芳,陈奶寿,陈坦,等.不同恢复年限侵蚀红壤生态化学计量特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2016,14(2):60-66.

赵锦梅,张德罡,刘长仲,等.祁连山东段高寒地区土地利用方式对土壤性状的影响[J].生态学报,2012,32(2):548-556.

田风霞,赵传燕,王瑶.祁连山东段土壤水分时空分布特征及其与环境因子的关系[J].干旱地区农业研究,2010,28(6):23-29.

赵锦梅,徐长林,马瑞,等.东祁连山不同高寒灌丛草地土壤抗蚀性研究[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(5):119-123.

浏览量

1477

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

东祁连山不同退化草地植物群落特征与土壤养分特性

高寒矿区煤炭开采对植被土壤的损伤及修复效果

丛枝菌根真菌接种对喀斯特石漠化人工林土壤特性的影响

黄土塬区土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征对果园还耕的响应及影响因素