间作对玉米根系分泌物及团聚体稳定性的影响

王婷; 李永梅; 王自林; 肖靖秀; 白录顺; 范茂攀

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.029

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

间作对玉米根系分泌物及团聚体稳定性的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 间作对玉米根系分泌物及团聚体稳定性的影响
- Effects of Intercropping on Maize Root Exudates and Soil Aggregate Stability
- 水土保持学报 2018年32卷第3期页码：185-190
- 作者机构：
  
  云南农业大学资源与环境学院,昆明,650201
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "王婷(1993-),女,在读硕士研究生,主要从事坡耕地水土保持研究。E-mail:15559907783@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（41661063，41461059）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.029
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王婷, 李永梅, 王自林, 等. 间作对玉米根系分泌物及团聚体稳定性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(3):185-190.

WANG Ting, LI Yongmei, WANG Zilin, et al. Effects of Intercropping on Maize Root Exudates and Soil Aggregate Stability[J]. 2018, 32(3): 185-190.
王婷, 李永梅, 王自林, 等. 间作对玉米根系分泌物及团聚体稳定性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(3):185-190. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.029.

WANG Ting, LI Yongmei, WANG Zilin, et al. Effects of Intercropping on Maize Root Exudates and Soil Aggregate Stability[J]. 2018, 32(3): 185-190. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.029.

摘要

通过田间小区试验种植玉米（玉米单作、玉米//大豆、玉米//马铃薯），测定3个生育期（拔节期、大喇叭口期、抽雄期）玉米根系分泌总糖含量、总有机酸含量和土壤团聚体状况，分析间作对玉米根系分泌物及团聚体稳定性的影响。结果表明：玉米根系分泌总糖含量和总有机酸含量随生育期的推移而增加，间作显著提高玉米根系分泌总糖含量和总有机酸含量，玉米//马铃薯>玉米//大豆。在抽雄期，玉米//大豆、玉米//马铃薯相比玉米单作>0.25 mm水稳性团聚体含量（R0.25）分别显著提高6.19%，8.17%；平均质量直径（MWD）分别提高5.04%，10.08%；几何平均直径（GMD）分别提高6.12%，12.24%；分形维数（D）分别显著降低0.72%，1.09%；团聚体破坏率（PAD）分别显著降低16.77%，26.08%。在根系分泌物最大的抽雄期，玉米根系分泌总糖含量、总有机酸含量与R0.25，GMD，D，PAD呈极显著相关关系（P<0.01）。因此，间作可通过增加玉米根系分泌总糖含量和总有机酸含量，进而提高土壤团聚体的稳定性。

Abstract

The field experiment with different planting patterns (maize monoculture

maize//soybean intercropping and maize//potato intercropping) of maize was carried out

and root exudates of total sugars and total organic acids and soil aggregates at jointing

bell-mouthed

and tasseling stages of maize growth were measured. The influence of intercropping on maize root exudates and soil aggregate stability was explored. The results showed that root exudates of total sugars and total organic acids increased with maize growth. Intercropping significantly increased maize root exudates of total sugars and total organic acids. Maize//potato intercropping was better than maize//soybean intercropping. Compared with maize monoculture

maize//soybean intercropping and maize//potato intercropping have increased >0.25 mm water stable aggregate (R0.25) by 6.19% and 8.17%

mean weight diameter (MWD) by 5.04% and 10.08%

geometric mean diameter (GMD) by 6.12% and 12.24%

have significantly decreased fractal dimension (D) by 0.72% and 1.09%

and portion of aggregate destruction (PAD) by 16.77% and 26.08%

respectively at tasseling stage. At tasseling stage with maximum root exudates

total sugars content and total organic acids content were significantly correlated with R0.25

GMD

and PAD (P<0.01). These results indicate that intercropping can enhance maize root exudates of total sugars and total organic acids and thus improve soil aggregate stability.

关键词

Keywords

references

An S S, Mentler A, Mayer H, et al. Soil aggregation, aggregate stability, organic carbon and nitrogen in different soil aggregate fractions under forest and shrub vegetation on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Catena, 2010, 81:226-233.

Kuijken R C, Van Eeuwijk F A, Marcelis L F, et al. Root phenotyping:From component trait in the lab to breeding[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2015, 66(18):5389-5401.

Czarnes S, Hallett P D, Bengough A G, et al. Root- and microbial-derived mucilages affect soil structure and water transport[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2000, 51(3):435-443.

李春俭.高级植物营养学[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2008:61-65.

苑亚茹,韩晓增,李禄军,等.低分子量根系分泌物对土壤微生物活性及团聚体稳定性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(6):96-99.

宋日,刘利,马丽艳,等.作物根系分泌物对土壤团聚体大小及其稳定性的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2009,32(3):93-97.

Mao L, Zhang L, Zhao X, et al. Crop growth, light utilization and yield of relay intercropped cotton as affected by plant density and a plant growth regulator[J]. Field Crops Research, 2014, 155:67-76.

Li L, Tilman D, Lambers H, et al. Plant diversity and overyielding:Insights from belowground facilitation of intercropping in agriculture[J]. New Phytologist, 2014, 203(1):63-69.

肖靖秀,郑毅,汤利,等.小麦-蚕豆间作对根系分泌糖和氨基酸的影响[J].生态环境学报,2015,24(11):1825-1830.

肖靖秀,郑毅,汤利.小麦-蚕豆间作对根系分泌低分子量有机酸的影响[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(6):1739-1744.

Seran T H, Brintha I. Review on maize based intercropping[J]. Journal of Agronomy, 2010, 9(3):135-145.

周晓晨,李永梅,王自林,等.坡耕地红壤农作物根系与团聚体稳定性的关系[J].山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2017,37(11):818-824.

Kemper W D, Rosenau R C. Aggregate stability and size distribution[J]. Methods of Soil Analysis Part. Physical & Mineralogical Methods, 1986:425-442.

杨培岭,罗远培,石元春.用粒径的重量分布表征的土壤分形特征[J].科学通报,1993,38(20):1896-1896.

陈山,杨峰,林杉,等.土地利用方式对红壤团聚体稳定性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(5):211-216.

姜敏,刘毅,刘闯,等.丹江口库区不同土地利用方式土壤团聚体稳定性及分形特征[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(6):265-270.

Ström L, Olsson T, Tyler G. Differences between calcifuge and acidifuge plants in root exudation of low-molecular organic acids[J]. Plant and Soil, 1994, 167(2):239-245.

尹元萍,张雅琼,申毓晗,等.玉米//大豆间作中大豆根系生长及氮磷养分吸收的特点[J].西南农业学报,2014,27(6):2305-2310.

马心灵,朱启林,耿川雄,等.不同氮水平下作物养分吸收与利用对玉米//马铃薯产量优势的贡献[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(4):1265-1273.

杨智仙,汤利,郑毅,等.不同品种小麦与蚕豆间作对蚕豆枯萎病发生、根系分泌物和根际微生物群落功能多样性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2014,20(3):570-579.

李欣雨,夏建国,田汶艳.稻田植茶后土壤团聚体水稳性变化特征及影响因素分析[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(4):148-153.

王英俊,李同川,张道勇,等.间作白三叶对苹果//白三叶复合系统土壤团聚体及团聚体碳含量的影响[J].草地学报,2013,21(3):485-493.

李娟,韩霁昌,陈超,等.黄土高原丘陵沟壑区土地利用方式对土壤团聚体特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(1):248-253.

Pirmoradian N, Sepaskhah A R, Hajabbasi M A. Application of fractal theory to quantify soil aggregate stability as influenced by tillage treatments[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2005, 90(2):227-234.

Ahmadi A, Neyshabouri M R, Rouhipour H, et al. Fractal dimension of soil aggregates as an index of soil erodibility[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2011, 400(3/4):305-311.

浏览量

1632

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

耕作措施对吉林省坡耕地玉米土壤团聚体腐殖质分布的影响

东北黑土区林草地开垦为农田70 a后对土壤性质和土壤可蚀性的影响

水肥与间作对设施黄瓜、芹菜品质的调控机制

氮磷添加对常绿阔叶林土壤团聚体

等高反坡台阶整地对不同耕作系统根土微生态的影响