1. 山东省土壤侵蚀与生态修复重点实验室, 山东农业大学林学院,山东,泰安,271018
2. 南京林业大学林学院, 江苏省水土保持与生态修复重点实验室, 南方现代林业协同创新中心,南京,210037
3. 淮河水利委员会淮河流域水土保持监测中心站,安徽,蚌埠,233001
[ "张荣华(1984-),女,山东威海人,副教授,主要从事水土保持监测与评价研究。E-mail:zrhua5766@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
张荣华, 荆莎莎, 张洪达, 等. 胶东铁路弃土弃渣体产流产沙特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(3):80-85.
ZHANG Ronghua, JING Shasha, ZHANG Hongda, et al. Runoff and Sediment Yield Characteristics on Waste Soil and Slag Formed from Railway Construction in Jiaodong Peninsula Region[J]. 2018, 32(3): 80-85.
张荣华, 荆莎莎, 张洪达, 等. 胶东铁路弃土弃渣体产流产沙特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(3):80-85. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.013.
ZHANG Ronghua, JING Shasha, ZHANG Hongda, et al. Runoff and Sediment Yield Characteristics on Waste Soil and Slag Formed from Railway Construction in Jiaodong Peninsula Region[J]. 2018, 32(3): 80-85. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.013.
通过人工模拟降雨试验,研究降雨强度和坡度对胶东铁路弃土弃渣体产流产沙的影响。根据青荣铁路沿线降雨和弃土弃渣体堆积特点,设计3种雨强(20,40,60 mm/h)和3个坡度(20°,30°,40°)。结果表明:(1)当降雨强度由20 mm/h增加到60 mm/h,产流开始时间可缩短11~20 s;当坡度由20°变化到40°,产流开始时间可提前17~22 s。(2)径流量、产沙率在降雨初期剧增到峰值,之后径流量逐渐趋于稳定,而产沙率波动减小后逐渐趋于稳定。(3)相同坡度条件下,雨强40 mm/h下的径流量较20 mm/h时增加37.3%~122.6%,产沙率约为20 mm/h时的1.5~19.5倍;而雨强60 mm/h下的径流量较40 mm/h时仅增加19.1%~26.7%,产沙率仅为40 mm/h时的62.5%~151.8%。(4)相同雨强条件下,坡度对径流量、产沙率的影响存在临界坡度(30°~40°),径流量、产沙率随坡度的增大先增加后减小。(5)弃土弃渣体坡度为30°时坡度对坡面侵蚀量的贡献率大于雨强贡献率;而40°时雨强贡献率明显超过坡度。研究结果可为胶东半岛区域铁路项目建设期间弃土弃渣体的水土流失监测及防治提供技术支撑。
In order to study the effect of runoff and sediment yield on waste and slag formed from railway construction in Jiaodong Peninsula region
the artificial simulated rainfall experiments were conducted. According to the characteristics of rainfall and waste soil and slag in the study area
three different rainfall intensities with 20 mm/h
40 mm/h
60 mm/h and three slope gradients with 20°
30°
40° were designed. The results showed that both rainfall intensity and slope gradient affected initial runoff time
runoff
sediment yield
erosion amount and so on. (1) The initial runoff time decreased by 11~20 s with rainfall intensity increasing from 20 mm/h to 60 mm/h and shortened 17~22 s with the slope changing from 20° to 40°
respectively. (2) The runoff and sediment yield increased sharply to the peak during the early period of rainfall
and then the runoff gradually stabilized and the sediment yield decreased with the fluctuation and finally gradually stabilized. (3) Under the same slope gradient
the runoff in rainfall intensity with 40 mm/h increased 37.3%~122.6% compared with 20 mm/h and sediment yield was 1.5~19.5 times of that in 20 mm/h. However
the runoff in the rainfall intensity with 60 mm/h just increased 19.1%~26.7% compared with 40 mm/h
and the sediment yield was only accounting for 62.5%~151.8% of that in 40 mm/h. (4) Under the same rainfall intensity
the effect of slope gradient on runoff and sediment yield had a critical slope between 30° and 40°
and the runoff and sediment yield increased first and then decreased with the increase of slope. (5) When the slope gradient was 30°
the contribution of slope gradient to soil erosion was greater than the rainfall intensity
while the contribution of rainfall intensity obviously exceeded the slope gradient at 40°. The results can provide technical support for the soil and water loss monitoring and control during the construction process of the railway project in Jiaodong Peninsula region.
赵暄,谢永生,景民晓,等.生产建设项目弃土堆置体下垫面仿真模拟标准化参数[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(5):229-234.
赵暄,谢永生,景民晓,等.生产建设项目弃土堆置体的类型与特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2013,11(1):88-94.
张乐涛,高照良,田红卫.工程堆积体陡坡坡面土壤侵蚀水动力学过程[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(24):94-102.
康宏亮,王文龙,薛智德,等.陕北风沙区含砾石工程堆积体坡面产流产沙试验[J].水科学进展,2016,27(2):256-265.
杨波,王文龙,郭明明,等.模拟降雨条件下弃渣体边坡不同防护措施的减水减沙效益[J].土壤学报,2017,54(6):1357-1368.
Dong J Z, Zhang K L, Guo Z L. Runoff and soil erosion from highway construction spoil deposits:A rainfall simulation study[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2012, 17:8-14.
郭明明,王文龙,李建明,等.神府矿区弃土弃渣体侵蚀特征及预测[J].土壤学报,2015,52(5):1044-1057.
李宏伟,王文龙,黄鹏飞,等.土石混合堆积体土质可蚀性K因子研究[J].泥沙研究,2014(2):49-54.
史倩华,王文龙,郭明明,等.模拟降雨条件下含砾石红壤工程堆积体产流产沙过程[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(9):2673-2680.
史倩华,李垚林,王文龙,等.不同植被措施对露天煤矿排土场边坡径流产沙影响[J].草地学报,2016,24(6):1263-1271.
Peng X D, Shi D M, Jiang D, et al. Runoff erosion process on different underlying surfaces from disturbed soils in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China[J]. Catena, 2014, 123:215-224.
丁文斌,史东梅,何文健,等.放水冲刷条件下工程堆积体边坡径流侵蚀水动力学特性[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(18):153-161.
丁文斌,李叶鑫,史东梅,等.2种工程堆积体边坡模拟径流侵蚀对比研究[J].土壤学报,2017,54(3):558-569.
刘瑞顺,王文龙,廖超英,等.露天煤矿排土场边坡防护措施减水减沙效益分析[J].西北林学院学报,2014,29(4):59-64.
山东省水利厅(鲁水保字[2016] 1号).山东省水利厅关于发布省级水土流失重点预防区和重点治理区的通告[Z].2016-01-25.
刘震.水土保持监测技术[M].北京:中国大地出版社,2004.
张光辉,梁一民.黄土丘陵区人工草地径流起始时间研究[J].水土保持学报,1995,9(3):78-83.
吴发启,范文波.土壤结皮对降雨入渗和产流产沙的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2005,3(2):97-101.
耿晓东,郑粉莉,张会茹.红壤坡面降雨入渗及产流产沙特征试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(4):36-43.
吴冰,朱元骏,邵明安.含砾石土壤坡面流速及产流产沙过程研究[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(1):99-103.
符素华,路炳军,叶芝菡.地表砾石对降雨径流及土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(2):15-18,34.
Wilcox B P, Wood M K, Tromble J M. Factors influencing infiltrability of semiarid mountain slopes[J].Journal of Range Management, 1988, 41:197-206.
0
浏览量
1674
下载量
5
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621