1. 西北农林科技大学, 黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌,712100
2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨凌,712100
[ "路荣(1992-),女,甘肃庆阳人,在读硕士研究生,主要从事植被格局与侵蚀研究。E-mail:lurong_eco@126.com" ]
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
路荣, 贾超, 郝红敏, 等. 水蚀风蚀交错带灌丛沙堆形态演替及水养特征变化[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(3):74-79.
LU Rong, JIA Chao, HAO Hongmin, et al. Changes in Morphological Succession and Moisture-nutrient Characteristics of Mound Under Shrub Patch in Water-wind Erosion Crisscross Region[J]. 2018, 32(3): 74-79.
路荣, 贾超, 郝红敏, 等. 水蚀风蚀交错带灌丛沙堆形态演替及水养特征变化[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(3):74-79. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.012.
LU Rong, JIA Chao, HAO Hongmin, et al. Changes in Morphological Succession and Moisture-nutrient Characteristics of Mound Under Shrub Patch in Water-wind Erosion Crisscross Region[J]. 2018, 32(3): 74-79. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.012.
灌丛沙堆是水蚀风蚀交错带典型的风积地貌景观。在黄土高原典型水蚀风蚀交错带,选择4种常见不同大小级的灌丛沙堆(小、中、大型和枯死灌丛沙堆),对灌丛沙堆的基本形态、土壤特性、差异性及相关性进行定量分析。结果表明:(1)灌丛演替变化显著影响沙堆发育,随着灌丛生物量的增加,沙堆体积也增大,当灌丛演替到稳定阶段时灌丛沙堆的发育也趋于稳定(P<0.05)。(2)灌丛沙堆的固沙量、高度及土壤容重因位置而异,灌丛沙堆主根处的固沙量和高度均为最大,边缘处相对较小,土壤容重反之。(3)枯死、大、中和小型灌丛沙堆土壤的有机质含量分别是裸地的1.54,1.92,1.46,1.30倍;土壤湿度分别是裸地的2.05,1.93,1.79,1.52倍。(4)灌丛沙堆边缘与主根3/4处水分、养分含量高于灌丛内其他位置。
The shrub mound is a typical aeolian landform in the cross areas of wind-water erosion on Loess Plateau in China. Four sizes scale shrub mounds were selected to analyze the mound basic form
soil properties and correlations. The results showed:(1) The shrub succession significantly affected the development of mound. The mound volume was increased as the shrub biomass expansion. Until the shrubs succeeds in the stabilization phase
the mound volume tends to be stable (P < 0.05). (2) The amount
height and soil bulk density of the mound varied in the different position:the binding-sand quantity and height of the mound were the largest at the trap root
but were lowest in the edge. The soil bulk density showed the opposite characteristics. (3) The soil organic matter content of mound under the death
large
medium and small shrub patches were 1.54
1.92
1.46 and 1.30 times than the bare land
respectively; the soil moisture were 2.05
1.93
1.79 and 1.52 times than that of the bare land
respectively. (4) The soil moisture and soil organic matter content in the edge of the mound to three quarters of the trap root were higher than those in other positions of the mound.
Yizhaq H, Sela S, Svoray T, et al. Effects of heterogeneous soil-water diffusivity on vegetation pattern formation[J]. Water Resources Research, 2015, 50(7):5743-5758.
Buis E, Temme A J A M, Veldkamp A, et al. Shrub mound formation and stability on semi-arid slopes in the Northern Negev Desert of Israel:A field and simulation study[J]. Geoderma, 2010, 156(3/4):363-371.
王利兵,胡小龙,余伟莅,等.沙粒粒径组成的空间异质性及其与灌丛大小和土壤风蚀相关性分析[J].干旱区地理,2006,29(5):688-693.
杨帆,王雪芹,何清,等.绿洲-沙漠过渡带柽柳灌丛沙堆形态特征及空间分布格[J].干旱区研究,2014,31(3):556-563.
刘冰,赵文智.荒漠绿洲过渡带泡泡刺灌丛沙堆形态特征及其空间异质性[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(12):2814-2820.
刘冰,赵文智,杨荣.荒漠绿洲过渡带柽柳灌丛沙堆特征及其空间异质性[J].生态学报,2008,28(4):1446-1455.
杜建会,严平,展秀丽,等.民勤绿洲白刺灌丛沙堆不同演化阶段表面抗蚀性及其影响因素[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(4):763-768.
杨帆,王雪芹,杨东亮,等.不同沙源供给条件下柽柳灌丛与沙堆形态的互馈关系:以策勒绿洲沙漠过渡带为例[J].生态学报,2012,32(9):2707-2719.
杨帆, 王雪芹, 杨东亮, 等. 不同沙源供给条件下柽柳灌丛与沙堆形态的互馈关系-以策勒绿洲沙漠过渡带为例[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(9):2707-2719.
马瑞,王继和,屈建军,等.民勤绿洲-荒漠过渡带植被梯度特征及其土壤水环境[J].生态学杂志,2010,29(6):1075-1080.
于春堂,慈龙骏,杨晓晖,等.基于样带的唐古特白刺灌丛沙包空间格局尺度研究[J].生态科学,2007,26(5):394-400.
何志斌,赵文智.黑河流域荒漠绿洲过渡带两种优势植物种群空间格局特征[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(6):947-952.
贾宝全,蔡体久,高志海,等.白刺灌丛沙包生物量的预测模型[J].干旱区资源与环境,2002,16(1):96-99.
崔向慧,冯强,王学全.荒漠-绿洲过渡区灌丛沙包的蒸散特征及模拟[J].中国水土保持科学,2007,5(1):44-48.
赵娟,赵元杰,夏训诚.罗布泊红柳沙包记录的极端气候事件及影响因素[J].干旱区研究,2012,29(6):1094-1099.
张媛媛,马成仓,韩磊,等.内蒙古高原荒漠区4种锦鸡儿属植物灌丛沙包形态和固沙能力比较[J].生态学报,2012,32(11):3343-3351.
Yang Y S, Bu C F, Mu X M, et al. Interactive effects of moss-dominated crusts and
Artemisia ordosica
on wind erosion and soil moisture in Mu Us sandland, China[J]. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 2014(4):649816.
霍竹.黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错带土壤-灌木系统水分运动试验研究[D].北京:中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,2006.
Wu G L, Wang D, Liu Y, et al. Mosaic-pattern vegetation formation and dynamics driven by the water-wind crisscross erosion[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2016, 538:355-362.
Yang H X, Zhang J T, Li Z D, et al. Comparative study on spatial patterns of the
Artemisia ordosica
population in the Mu Us sandy land[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(5):1901-1910.
郝红敏,路荣,贾超,等.水蚀风蚀交错带黑沙蒿灌丛沙堆种群结构及动态特征研究[J].西北植物学报,2017,37(4):773-781.
傅子洹,王云强,安芷生.黄土区小流域土壤容重和饱和导水率的时空动态特征[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(13):128-134.
唐克丽,候庆春,王斌科,等.黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错带和神木试区的环境背景及整治方向[J].中国科学院水利部西北水土保持研究所集刊,1993,18:1-15.
She D L, Liu D D, Xia Y Q, et al. Modeling effects of land use and vegetation density on soil water dynamics: Imlications on water resource management[J]. Water Resources Management,2014,28:2063-2076.
樊军,邵明安,王全九.陕北水蚀风蚀交错区苜蓿地土壤水分过耗与恢复[J].草地学报,2006,14(3):261-264.
Shaltout K H, Sheded M G, El-Kady H F, et al. Phytosociology and size structure of Nitraria retusa along the Egyptian Red Sea coast[J]. Journal of Arid Environment, 2003, 53: 331-345.
高永,党晓宏,虞毅,等.乌兰布和沙漠东南缘白沙蒿(
Artemisia sphaerocphala
)灌丛沙堆形态特征与固沙能力[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(1):1-7.
Mc Claran M P, Moore-Kucera J, Martens D A, et al. Soil carbon and nitrogen in relation to shrub size and death in a semi-arid grassland[J]. Geoderma, 2008, 145(1/2): 60-68.
Du H D, Jiao J Y, Jia Y F, et al. Phytogenic mounds of four typical shoot architecture species at different slope gradients on the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Geomorphology, 2013, 193: 57-64.
樊瑞霞,李学斌,陈林,等.荒漠草原油蒿(
Artemisia ordosica
)种群的空间分布格局特征[J].北方园艺,2016(1):45-50.
韩磊,张媛媛,解李娜,等.狭叶锦鸡儿和小叶锦鸡儿灌丛沙堆的形态和发育及灌丛固沙能力的比较研究[J].天津师范大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(3):65-70.
杜建会,严平,董玉祥.干旱地区灌丛沙堆研究现状与展望[J].地理学报,2010,65(3):339-350.
郝红敏.水蚀风蚀交错带灌丛斑块结构及动态特征研究[D].陕西 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2017.
陈东,张宇清,吴斌,等.毛乌素沙地南缘油蒿(
Artemisia ordosica
)灌丛沙堆形态特征[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(3):565-572.
刘金伟,李志忠,武胜利,等.新疆艾比湖周边白刺沙堆形态特征空间异质性研究[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(4):628-635.
许文强,罗格平,陈曦.干旱区绿洲-荒漠过渡带灌丛土壤属性研究[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(4):583-586.
Ravi S, Breshears D D, Huxman T E, et al. Land degradation in drylands: Interactions among hydrologic-aeolian erosion and vegetation dynamics[J]. Geomorphology, 2010, 116(3/4): 236-245.
Ravi S, D’Odorico P, Okin G S. Hydrologic and aeolian controls on vegetation patterns in arid landscapes[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2007, 34(24): 1061-1064.
0
浏览量
1561
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621