汇水面积阈值对土壤侵蚀定量评价的影响

丁琳; 于现举; 符素华; 吴思南

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.010

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

汇水面积阈值对土壤侵蚀定量评价的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 汇水面积阈值对土壤侵蚀定量评价的影响
- Effect of Contributing Area Threshold on the Evaluation of Soil Erosion
- 水土保持学报 2018年32卷第3期页码：61-67
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 北京师范大学地理科学学部,北京,100875
  2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨凌,712100
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "丁琳(1990-),女,山西阳泉人,博士,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:1341572940@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（41530858，41571259）长江学者和创新团队发展计划项目（IRT_15R06）中国科学院"西部之光"人才培养引进计划项目
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.010
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
丁琳, 于现举, 符素华, 等. 汇水面积阈值对土壤侵蚀定量评价的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(3):61-67.

DING Lin, YU Xianju, FU Suhua, et al. Effect of Contributing Area Threshold on the Evaluation of Soil Erosion[J]. 2018, 32(3): 61-67.
丁琳, 于现举, 符素华, 等. 汇水面积阈值对土壤侵蚀定量评价的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(3):61-67. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.010.

DING Lin, YU Xianju, FU Suhua, et al. Effect of Contributing Area Threshold on the Evaluation of Soil Erosion[J]. 2018, 32(3): 61-67. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.010.

摘要

土壤侵蚀预报模型是定量评价水土流失和评估水土保持措施效益的重要手段。通用土壤流失方程（Universal Soil Loss Equation，USLE）和中国土壤流失方程（Chinese Soil Loss Equation，CSLE）被广泛应用于土壤侵蚀定量评价。这些模型中坡长的计算受汇水面积阈值的影响较大。为揭示汇水面积阈值对土壤侵蚀定量评价的影响，选取北方土石山区、西北黄土高原区、东北黑土区、南方红壤丘陵区、西南紫色土区、西南山地区和西南岩溶区210个流域面积在0.2~3.0 km2的小流域，以1∶10 000地形图10 m分辨率DEM为数据源，分别计算了1 000，1 500，2 000，2 500，3 000，5 000，7 000，9 000，11 000，13 000，15 000 m2共11个汇水面积阈值下各小流域不同坡长、土壤侵蚀强度级别以及土壤侵蚀的面积比例，分析了它们对汇水面积阈值变化的敏感性。结果表明：平均坡长、土壤侵蚀面积和轻度以上各级别的侵蚀强度面积比例都随汇水面积阈值的增加先增加而后趋于稳定。微度侵蚀面积比例随汇水面积阈值的增加逐渐减小并趋于稳定。当汇水面积阈值由1 000 m2增加到15 000 m2时，北方土石山区、西北黄土高原区、东北黑土区、南方红壤丘陵区、西南紫色土区、西南山地区和西南岩溶区的平均坡长分别增至阈值为1 000 m2时的1.53，4.16，1.95，1.90，1.69，1.57，1.47倍；土壤侵蚀面积比例分别增至阈值为1 000 m2时的1.20，1.85，1.43，1.37，1.77，1.44，1.30倍。汇水面积阈值对各分区的影响程度存在差异。从平均坡长和土壤侵蚀面积来看，东北黑土区受汇水面积阈值的影响最大。研究结果不仅为精确评价土壤侵蚀提供了数据支撑，而且对水土保持综合防治措施的评价和优化具有指导意义。

Abstract

Soil erosion model is a technical tool to calculate the soil loss and assess the efficiency of soil and water conservation practice. The universal soil loss equation (USLE) and Chinese soil loss equation (CSLE) were widely used to calculate the soil loss. The slope length in these models is significantly affected by the contributing area threshold. In this study

210 small watersheds which area varied from 0.2 km2 to 3.0 km2 were selected to investigate the effect of contributing area threshold on the slope length and then the soil loss. The small watersheds are located in Northern rocky mountain area

Northwestern loess plateau

Northeastern black soil area

Southern red soil hilly area

Southwestern purple soil area

Southwestern mountainous area and Southwestern karst area. The 1:10 000 scale topographical map and 10 m×10 m DEM of the small watersheds were collected. 11 contributing area thresholds

namely

1 000

1 500

2 000

2 500

3 000

5 000

7 000

9 000

11 000

13 000

15 000 m2 were used to calculate the slope length and soil loss. The characteristics of slope length

soil erosion intensity and soil erosion area with the different contributing area thresholds were analyzed. The results showed that the average slope length and soil loss area firstly rose with the increase of contributing area threshold and then tended to keep constant. In the Northern rocky mountain area

Northwestern loess plateau

Northeastern black soil area

Southern red soil hilly area

Southwestern purple soil area

Southwestern mountainous area and Southwestern karst area

the average slope length with contributing area threshold of 15 000 m2 was 1.53

4.16

1.95

1.90

1.69

1.57

1.47 times those of contributing area threshold with 1 000 m2 and the soil loss area percentage with contributing area threshold of 15 000 m2 was 1.20

1.85

1.43

1.37

1.77

1.44

1.30 times those of contributing area threshold with 1 000 m2. The contributing area threshold had different effects in the different area. The average slope length and soil loss area in Northeastern black soil area was significantly affected by the contributing area threshold. The results will be helpful for calculating soil loss and for selecting the soil and water conservation practices.

关键词

Keywords

references

刘震.我国水土保持的目标与任务[J].中国水土保持科学,2003,1(4):1-5.

中华人民共和国水利部.第一次全国水利普查公报[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2013.

Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Predicting rainfall erosion losses from cropland east of the Rocky Mountains:A guide for soil and water conservation planning[M]. Washington DC:Agriculture Handbook, 1978, 537.

李婷,张世熔,廖明辉,等.基于3S和USLE的沱江流域中游土壤侵蚀定量评价[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(1):24-27.

张有全,宫辉力,赵文吉,等.基于GIS和USLE的密云县土壤侵蚀评价及空间特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(3):358-362,364.

王文娟,张树文,李颖,等.基于GIS和USLE的三江平原土壤侵蚀定量评价[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2008,22(9):112-117.

Fistikoglu O, Harmancioglu N B. Integration of GIS with USLE in assessment of soil erosion[J]. Water Resources Management, 2002, 16(6):447-467.

Dabral P P, Baithuri N, Pandey A. Soil erosion assessment in a hilly catchment of North Eastern India using USLE, GIS and Remote Sensing[J]. Water Resources Management, 2008, 22(12):1783-1798.

Renard K G, Foster G R, Weesies G A, et al. Predicting rainfall erosion by water:A guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE)[M]. Washington DC:Agriculture Handbook, 1997, 730.

刘宝元,郭索彦,李智广,等.中国水力侵蚀抽样调查[J].中国水土保持,2013(10):26-34.

Liu B Y, Zhang K L, Xie Y. An empirical soil loss equation[C]//Proceedings 12th International Soil Conservation Organization Conference. Beijing:Tsinghua Press, 2002:143-149.

陈晓安,蔡强国,郑明国,等.岔巴沟流域次暴雨坡面土壤侵蚀经验模型[J].地理科学进展,2011,30(3):325-329.

程琳,杨勤科,谢红霞,等.基于GIS和CSLE的陕西省土壤侵蚀定量评价方法研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(5):61-66.

王凯,夏燕秋,马金辉,等.基于CSLE和高分辨率航空影像的孤山川流域土壤侵蚀定量评价[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(1):26-32.

俱战省,文安邦,严冬春,等.基于

137

Cs、

210

Pb和CSLE的三峡库区小流域土壤侵蚀评估[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(3):75-80.

符素华,刘宝元,周贵云,等.坡长坡度因子计算工具[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(5):105-110.

Fu S H, Cao L X, Liu B Y, et al. Effects of DEM grid size on predicting soil loss from small watersheds in China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 73(5): 2141-2151.

Hickey R, Smith A, Jankowski P. Slope length calculations from a DEM within ARC/INFO grid[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 1994, 18(5): 365-380.

Fu S H, Wu Z P, Liu B Y, et al. Comparison of the effects of the different methods for computing the slope length factor at a watershed scale[J]. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2013, 1(2): 64-71.

中华人民共和国水利部水土保持司.土壤侵蚀分类分级标准(SL 190-2007)[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社,2008.

李秀彬,马志尊,姚孝友,等.北方土石山区水土流失现状与综合治理对策[J].中国水土保持科学, 2008,6(1):9-15.

刘宝元,阎百兴,沈波,等.东北黑土区农地水土流失现状与综合治理对策[J].中国水土保持科学, 2008,6(1):1-8.

刘宪春,温美丽,刘洪鹄.东北黑土区水土流失及防治对策研究[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(2):74-76,79.

尹忠东,李余波,刘伟泽.西南紫色土区水土流失调控原理与范式[J].人民长江,2009,40(3):25-26.

凡非得,王克林,熊鹰,等.西南喀斯特区域水土流失敏感性评价及其空间分异特征[J].生态学报,2011,31(21):6353-6362.

Foster G R, Wischmeier W H. Evaluating irregular slopes for soil loss prediction[J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 1974, 17(2): 305-309.

Liu B Y, Nearing M A, Risse L M. Slope gradient effects on soil loss for steep slopes[J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 1994, 37(6): 1835-1840.

张宏鸣,杨勤科,王猛,等.沟道截断对分布式土壤侵蚀学坡长提取的影响[J].水利学报,2017,48(5):568-575.

浏览量

1647

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

土壤结皮对乌拉山矿山废弃地客土坡面侵蚀特征的影响

短坡坡长变化对坡地风沙土产流产沙及氮磷流失的影响

青藏高原坡度坡长因子(

短坡条件下侵蚀产沙与坡长的关系

基于KINEROS2模型的降雨和坡长因子对土壤侵蚀过程影响的研究