施用包膜尿素对水稻生长和氮磷流失的影响

斯圆丽; 朱少威; 王季丰; 林森; 倪吾钟

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.008

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

施用包膜尿素对水稻生长和氮磷流失的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 施用包膜尿素对水稻生长和氮磷流失的影响
- Effects of Coated Urea Application on Rice Growth and Runoff Losses of Nitrogen and Phosphorus from Paddy Field
- 水土保持学报 2018年32卷第3期页码：48-53
- 作者机构：
  
  浙江大学环境与资源学院, 浙江省农业资源与环境重点实验室,杭州,310058
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "斯圆丽(1993-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事农业面源污染研究。E-mail:570689253qq@.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项（2014ZX07101-012）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.008
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
斯圆丽, 朱少威, 王季丰, 等. 施用包膜尿素对水稻生长和氮磷流失的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(3):48-53.

SI Yuanli, ZHU Shaowei, WANG Jifeng, et al. Effects of Coated Urea Application on Rice Growth and Runoff Losses of Nitrogen and Phosphorus from Paddy Field[J]. 2018, 32(3): 48-53.
斯圆丽, 朱少威, 王季丰, 等. 施用包膜尿素对水稻生长和氮磷流失的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(3):48-53. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.008.

SI Yuanli, ZHU Shaowei, WANG Jifeng, et al. Effects of Coated Urea Application on Rice Growth and Runoff Losses of Nitrogen and Phosphorus from Paddy Field[J]. 2018, 32(3): 48-53. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.008.

摘要

施用新型肥料是减少养分径流损失的重要途径。采用田间试验研究了施用包膜尿素对水稻生长和径流氮磷损失的影响，试验设置CK （习惯施肥）、PU1（减磷41%、减氮20%、施普通尿素）、PU2（PU1基础上减氮13%）、UR1（PU2基础上施包膜尿素）和UR2（UR1基础上减氮13%）5个处理。结果表明：PU1和UR1处理水稻氮磷含量与CK处理相近，PU1成熟期氮、磷总积累量比CK增加11.21，2.69 kg/hm2。PU1和UR1处理成熟期地上部生物量和籽粒产量高于CK处理，籽粒产量分别提高7.68%，5.77%。PU1、PU2、UR1和UR2处理径流总磷含量和累积流失量比CK处理低，减少13.18%~21.51%。施用包膜尿素（PU1、PU2）处理径流总氮、铵氮和硝氮含量低于施用普通尿素（CK、UR1、UR2）处理；稻田径流总氮、铵氮和硝氮累积流失量分别减少12.90%~26.91%，54.52%~49.38%和4.03%~15.95%，其中包膜尿素处理铵氮累积流失量显著（P<0.05）小于普通尿素处理。施用包膜尿素和优化施肥能促进水稻对氮磷养分的吸收，提高水稻籽粒产量，显著减少稻田氮磷流失量，值得在水稻生产中推广应用。

Abstract

The application of new type fertilizer is of great importance to reduce nutrient runoff losses. A field experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of coated urea application on rice growth and runoff losses of nitrogen and phosphorus from paddy field. The experiment included five treatments such as CK (conventional fertilization)

PU1 (59% P

80% N with conventional urea)

PU2 (59% P

67% N with conventional urea)

UR1 (59% P

67% N with coated urea) and UR2 (59% P

54% N with coated urea). Results showed that nitrogen and phosphorus contents in rice of PU1 and UR1 treatments were similar to CK

but the total nitrogen and phosphorus uptake of PU1 increased by 11.21 kg/hm2 and 2.69 kg/hm2

respectively with the comparison to CK. The shoot dry weight and grain yield of rice of PU1 and UR1 were higher than CK

as grain yield increased by 7.68% and 5.77%

respectively. Moreover

the content and the discharge of total phosphorus through runoff from paddy field of PU1

PU2

UR1 and UR2 treatments were lower than CK

which decreased by 13.18%~21.51%. The total nitrogen (TN)

ammonium-N (NH4+-N) and nitrate-N (NO3--N) concentrations in runoff of the treatments with coated urea (PU1

PU2) were lower than that with normal urea (CK

UR1

UR2)

and TN

NH4+-N and NO3--N cumulative losses decreased by 12.90%~26.91%

54.52%~49.38% and 4.03%~15.95%

respectively

while the NH4+-N cumulative losses of the treatments with normal urea were significant lower than that with coated urea (P<0.05). The application of coated urea and optimized fertilization can promote the uptake of nitrogen and phosphorus by rice

increase rice grain yield

significantly reduce the runoff losses of nitrogen and phosphorus in paddy field

which is worthy of application in rice production.

关键词

Keywords

references

张福锁,王激清,张卫峰,等.中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径[J].土壤学报,2008,45(5):915-924.

叶玉适,梁新强,周柯锦,等.节水灌溉与控释肥施用对太湖地区稻田土壤氮素渗漏流失的影响[J].环境科学学报,2015,35(1):270-279.

李娟.不同施肥处理对稻田氮磷流失风险及水稻产量的影响[D].杭州:浙江大学,2016.

Mclsaac G F, David M B, Gertner G Z, et al. Eutrophication:Nitrate flux in the Mississippi River[J]. Nature, 2001, 414(6860):166-167.

Karl D M. Aquatic ecology:Phosphorus, the staff of life[J]. Nature, 2000, 406(6791):31-33.

Owens L, Edwards W M, Van Keuren R W. Nitrate leaching from grassed lysimeters treated with ammonium nitrate or slow-release nitrogen fertilizer[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 1999, 28(6):1810-1816.

朱兆良.农田中氮肥的损失与对策[J].土壤与环境,2000,9(1):1-6.

蒋曦龙,陈宝成,张民,等.控释肥氮素释放与水稻氮素吸收相关性研究[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(1):215-220.

陈贤友,吴良欢,韩科峰,等.包膜尿素和普通尿素不同掺混比例对水稻产量与氮肥利用率的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(4):918-923.

张永春,汪吉东,梁永红,等.硫包衣尿素对水稻的增产效应及氮素利用率的影响研究[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(4):108-111.

Carreres R, Sendra J, Ballesteros R, et al. Assessment of slow release fertilizers and nitrification inhibitors in flooded rice[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2003, 39(2):80-87.

鲁艳红,聂军,廖育林,等.不同控释氮肥减量施用对双季水稻产量和氮素利用的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2016, 30(2):155-161,174.

徐明岗, 李菊梅, 李冬初, 等.控释氮肥对双季水稻生长及氮肥利用率的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2009,15(5):1010-1015.

纪德智,王端,赵京考,等.不同氮肥形式对玉米氮、磷、钾吸收及氮素平衡的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(4):104-109.

刘秀梅,冯兆滨,侯红乾,等.包膜控释掺混尿素对双季稻生长及氮素利用率的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2010,29(9):1737-1743.

杜加银,茹美,倪吾钟.减氮控磷稳钾施肥对水稻产量及养分积累的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2013,19(3):523-533.

田玉华,贺发云,尹斌,等.不同氮磷配合下稻田田面水的氮磷动态变化研究[J].土壤,2006,38(6):727-733.

纪雄辉,郑圣先,鲁艳红,等.控释氮肥对洞庭湖区双季稻田表面水氮素动态及其径流损失的影响[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(7):1432-1440.

张爱平,刘汝亮,杨世琦,等.基于缓释肥的侧条施肥技术对水稻产量和氮素流失的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2012,31(3):555-562.

Seneviratne R, Wild A. Effect of mild drying on the mineralization of soil nitrogen[J]. Plant and Soil, 1985, 84(2):175-179.

梁新强,田光明,李华,等.天然降雨条件下水稻田氮磷径流流失特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(1):59-63.

王小治,高人,朱建国,等.稻季施用不同尿素品种的氮素径流和淋溶损失[J].中国环境科学,2004,24(5):600-604.

叶玉适,梁新强,金熠,等.节水灌溉与控释肥施用对稻田田面水氮素变化及径流流失的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(5):105-112,118.

Sharpley A N, Charpa S, Wedepohl R, et al. Managing agriculture phosphorus for protection of surface waters:Issues and options[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 1994, 23(3):437-451.

区惠平,周柳强,黄美福,等.不同施磷量下稻田土壤磷素平衡及其潜在环境风险评估[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2016,22(1):40-47.

浏览量

1813

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

三峡库区临库水稻田氮磷径流流失过程与强度

2010-2018年我国14个典型湖泊氮、磷变化特征及受人类活动的影响

稻秸还田对稻麦两熟农田麦季养分径流流失的影响

不同土地类型氮磷的输出及富营养化风险分析

施坡缕石对红芪田土壤氮、磷转化及分布的影响