1. 湖南农业大学资源环境学院, 土壤肥料资源高效利用国家工程实验室,长沙,410128
2. 南方粮油作物协同创新中心,长沙,410128
3. 湖南省土壤肥料研究所,长沙,410125
[ "田昌(1986-),男,湖南浏阳人,博士研究生,实验师,主要从事农业面源污染防控研究。E-mail:chtian12@126.com" ]
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
田昌, 周旋, 谢桂先, 等. 控释尿素减施对双季稻田径流氮素变化、损失及产量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(3):21-28.
TIAN Chang, ZHOU Xuan, XIE Guixian, et al. Effects of Controlled-release Urea Application on Dynamics and Loss of Nitrogen in Runoff and Yield in Double-rice Cropping Field[J]. 2018, 32(3): 21-28.
田昌, 周旋, 谢桂先, 等. 控释尿素减施对双季稻田径流氮素变化、损失及产量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(3):21-28. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.004.
TIAN Chang, ZHOU Xuan, XIE Guixian, et al. Effects of Controlled-release Urea Application on Dynamics and Loss of Nitrogen in Runoff and Yield in Double-rice Cropping Field[J]. 2018, 32(3): 21-28. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.03.004.
为了探究双季稻田典型自然降雨径流过程中氮(N)的输出特点,采用田间径流池法,通过长期田间定位试验,比较普通尿素(U)和控释尿素(CRU)减施稻田径流水中总氮(TN)、铵态氮(NH4+-N)和硝态氮(NO3--N)的动态变化及N素径流流失量和流失率。结果表明:稻田施肥初期出现N素径流峰值,是防控N素径流损失的关键时期。早、晚稻季生育期间施N处理径流水中以NH4+-N为主要形态,分别占TN径流损失量的64.5%~66.3%,61.0%~68.6%。早、晚稻季U处理径流水TN流失量(率)分别为5.6(2.2%),5.0(1.7%) kg/hm2;CRU处理较U处理径流水TN流失量分别降低17.4%~34.1%,17.3%~37.7%;且随着N肥用量的减少,TN流失量(率)逐渐降低。受降雨强度的影响,早稻季N素径流损失较晚稻季高,且晚稻季CRU处理N素径流损失减排效果优于早稻季。早、晚稻季及连作周期CRU处理TN径流累计损失量和籽粒产量与施N量呈显著线性关系,随着N用量的增加而增加。总之,U处理显著提高径流水中N素浓度以及NH4+-N占TN的比例。CRU处理有效减缓N素释放速度,降低施肥初期N素径流损失量,实现增产;而CRU减施有利于进一步防控稻田N素流失风险,促进农业面源污染减排,且以减N 10%效果较好。
In order to explore nitrogen (N) output characteristics in double-rice cropping field during the process of the typical natural rainfall runoff
the long-term experiment with common urea (U) and reduction of controlled-release urea (CRU) was conducted to study the dynamics of total nitrogen (TN)
ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N) and nitrate nitrogen (NO3--N) loss and loss ratio of runoff in paddy field. The results showed that N loss peaked in the early time of fertilization
which was the critical period to control N loss. NH4+-N was the main form of N-applied treatments to runoff during early and late rice season
accounting for 64.5%~66.3% and 61.0%~68.6% in TN loss
respectively. The TN loss and loss ratios of runoff in U treatment during early and late rice season were 5.6 kg/hm2 (2.2%)
and 5.0 kg/hm2 (1.7%)
respectively. Compared with U treatment
TN loss in CRU treatments were reduced by 17.4%~34.1% and 17.3%~37.7%
and the TN loss and loss rates of runoff decreased with the decrease of N fertilizer rate. N loss in early rice season was higher than that in late rice season
and the inhibition of CRU treatments in N loss in late season rice was better than that of early rice season as affected by rainfall intensity. TN loss and grain yield in CRU treatments for earlyseason
late-season rice and the continuous cropping cycle had significant linear relationships with N fertilizer rate
which increased with the increasing N fertilizer rate. In conclusion
U treatment significantly increased N concentration and the ratio of NH4+-N to TN in runoff. CRU effectively reduced N release rate and N loss in the early time of fertilization
and thus increased grain yield. The findings indicate that the reduction of CRU is helpful for further control of N loss risk in paddy field
and promote the reduction of agricultural non-point source pollution
especially in reduction of 10% N treatment.
张维理,徐爱国,冀宏杰,等.中国农业面源污染形势估计及控制对策Ⅲ.中国农业面源污染控制中存在问题分析[J].中国农业科学,2004,37(7):1026-1033.
高懋芳,邱建军,刘三超,等.基于文献计量的农业面源污染研究发展态势分析[J].中国农业科学,2014,47(6):1140-1150.
周伟,吕腾飞,杨志平,等.氮肥种类及运筹技术调控土壤氮素损失的研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(9):3051-3058.
胡玉婷.中国农田氮素径流、淋溶损失影响因素子分析与损失值估算[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院,2010.
田玉华,尹斌,贺发云,等.太湖地区稻季的氮素径流损失研究[J].土壤学报,2007,44(6):1070-1075.
梁新强,田光明,李华,等.天然降雨条件下水稻田氮磷径流流失特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(1):59-63.
曹志洪,林先贵,杨林章,等.论"稻田圈"在保护城乡生态环境中的功能Ⅱ.稻田土壤氮素养分的累积、迁移及其生态环境意义[J].土壤学报,2006,43(2):256-260.
Zhao X, Zhou Y, Min J, et al. Nitrogen runoff dominates water nitrogen pollution from rice-wheat rotation in the Taihu Lake Region of China[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2012, 156(1):1-11.
夏小江,胡清宇,朱利群,等.太湖地区稻田田面水氮磷动态特征及径流流失研究[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(4):21-25.
樊小林,刘芳,廖照源,等.我国控释肥料研究的现状和展望[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2009,15(2):463-473.
Xue L, Yu Y, Yang L. Maintaining yields and reducing nitrogen loss in rice-wheat rotation system in Taihu Lake region with proper fertilizer management[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2014, 9(11):115010-115020.
杜建军,毋永龙,田吉林,等.控/缓释肥料减少氨挥发和氮淋溶的效果研究[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(2):49-52.
Chien S H, Prochnow L I, Cantarella H. Recent developments of fertilizer production and use to improve nutrient efficiency and minimize environmental impacts[J]. Advances in Agronomy, 2009, 102(9):267-322.
纪雄辉,郑圣先,鲁艳红,等.控释氮肥对洞庭湖区双季稻田表面水氮素动态及其径流损失的影响[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(7):1432-1440.
宫亮,隽英华,王建忠,等.盘锦地区稻田田面水氮素动态变化及化学氮肥投入阈值研究[J].农业资源与环境学报,2013,30(6):96-100.
Yang S H, Peng S Z, Xu J Z, et al. Nitrogen loss from paddy field with different water and nitrogen managements in Taihu Lake Region of China[J]. Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis, 2013, 44(16):2393-2407.
Yoshinaga I, Miura A, Hitomi T, et al. Runoff nitrogen from a large sized paddy field during a crop period[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2007, 87(2):217-222.
吴俊,樊剑波,何园球,等.不同减量施肥条件下稻田田面水氮素动态变化及径流损失研究[J].生态环境学报,2012,21(9):1561-1566.
赵冬,颜廷梅,乔俊,等.稻季田面水不同形态氮素变化及氮肥减量研究[J].生态环境学报,2011,20(4):743-749.
李娟,李松昊,邬奇峰,等.不同施肥处理对稻田氮素径流和渗漏损失的影响[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(5):23-28.
张志剑,董亮,朱荫眉.水稻田面水氮素的动态特征、模式表征及排水流失研究[J]环境科学学报,2001,21(4):475-480.
王静,郭熙盛,王允青,等.保护性耕作与平衡施肥对巢湖流域稻田氮素径流损失及水稻产量的影响研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2010,29(6):1164-1171.
张丽娟,马中文,马友华,等.优化施肥和缓释肥对水稻田面水氮磷动态变化的影响[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(1):90-94.
鲁艳红,纪雄辉,郑圣先,等.施用控释氮肥对减少稻田氮素径流损失和提高水稻氮素利用率的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2008,14(3):490-495.
王小治,朱建国,宝川靖和,等.施用尿素稻田表层水氮素的动态变化及模式表征[J].农业环境科学学报,2004,23(5):852-856.
田发祥,纪雄辉,石丽红,等.不同缓控释肥料减氮对洞庭湖区双季稻田氮流失与作物吸收的影响[J].农业现代化研究,2010,31(2):220-223.
姚建武,宁建凤,李盟军,等.广东稻田氮素径流流失特征[J].农业环境科学学报,2015,34(4):728-737.
0
浏览量
1963
下载量
12
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621