1. 中国林业科学研究院林业研究所 国家林业局林木培育重点实验室,北京,100091
2. 国家林业局华东林业调查规划设计院,杭州,310019
3. 内蒙古林业科学研究院生态功能与森林碳汇研究所,呼和浩特,010010
纸质出版:2017
移动端阅览
唐学君, 王伟峰. 不同林龄序列杉木实生林和萌芽林碳储量分配特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017,31(1):127-133.
TANG Xuejun1, 2. Carbon Storage and Its Allocation Characters of Chinese Fir Seedling Forest and Sprout forest in Different Stand Ages[J]. 2017, 31(1): 127-133.
唐学君, 王伟峰. 不同林龄序列杉木实生林和萌芽林碳储量分配特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017,31(1):127-133. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2017.01.022.
TANG Xuejun1, 2. Carbon Storage and Its Allocation Characters of Chinese Fir Seedling Forest and Sprout forest in Different Stand Ages[J]. 2017, 31(1): 127-133. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2017.01.022.
杉木林是我国南方地区的主要造林树种,研究不同更新方式的杉木林固碳及水土保持功能对科学评价森林生态系统的生态服务功能具有重要意义。以赣西南杉木实生林和萌芽林为研究对象,通过野外样地调查和室内化学分析方法,揭示了不同龄组实生林和萌芽林的碳储量分配特征,为其可持续经营提供科学依据。结果表明:不同龄组杉木实生林乔木层碳储量均高于萌芽林乔木层碳储量。杉木实生幼龄林乔木层碳储量为9.63 t/hm2,中龄林为42.14 t/hm2,近熟林为69.15 t/hm2,成熟林为105.21 t/hm2;年均固碳量分别为1.69,2.63,3.01,3.39 t/hm2,不同龄组的树干碳储量分别占整个乔木层的50.36%,70.60%,73.86%,77.58%。杉木萌芽幼龄林乔木层碳储量为8.42 t/hm2,中龄林为23.58 t/hm2,近熟林为48.54 t/hm2,成熟林为75.26 t/hm2;年均固碳量分别为1.21,1.57,2.11,2.59 t/hm2,不同龄组的树干碳储量分别占整个乔木层的54.28%,66.12%,71.92%,73.70%。杉木实生林和萌芽林的土壤碳储量均是中龄林最低,成熟林最高。实生林各龄组土壤碳储量大小为:成熟林(153.21 t/hm2)>近熟林(138.17 t/hm2)>幼龄林(128.30 t/hm2)>中龄林(113.11 t/hm2)。萌芽林各龄组土壤碳储量大小为:成熟林(154.03 t/hm2)>近熟林(138.28 t/hm2)>幼龄林(130.20 t/hm2)>中龄林(117.05 t/hm2)。在密度相近的情况下,除幼龄林外,同一龄组的萌芽林总碳储量均小于实生林。同一龄组实生林和萌芽林的乔木层碳储量均有显著性差异(p<0.05),而总碳储量幼龄林与中龄林无显著性差异,近熟林与成熟林有显著性差异。引起杉木实生林和萌芽林碳储量分配差异性的主要原因是生长规律和经营管理的不同。总体而言,萌芽林的林下植被组成丰富,灌木层、草本层和凋落物层的固碳能力较强,在水土保持功能方面要优于实生林。
Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) was the main tree species in afforestation in southern China. Evaluating the ability of carbon sequestration and conservation of water and soil of Chinese fir with different regeneration patterns was very important for scientific evaluation of forest ecosystem functions. Combining the field plot survey and laboratory chemical analysis method
Chinese fir seedling forest and sprout forest in southwest of Jiangxi were studied to reveal the carbon storage allocation characters of different stand ages and regeneration pattern
and to provide a scientific basis for the sustainable management of plantations. Our results showed that the carbon storage in tree layer of seedling plantation within different stand ages was generally higher than that of sprout forest. The carbon storage in tree layer of Chinese fir seedling forest within young
mid-mature
nearly mature
mature forest were 9.63 t/hm2
42.14 t/hm2
69.15 t/hm2 and 105.21 t/hm2
respectively
and the average annual amount of carbon sequestration were 1.69 t/hm2
2.63 t/hm2
3.01 t/hm2 and 3.39 t/hm2
and the trunk carbon storage of those accounted for 50.36%
70.60%
73.86% and 77.58% of the whole tree layer. The carbon storage in tree layer of Chinese fir sprout forest within young
mid-maturation
nearly mature
mature forest were 8.42 t/hm2
23.58 t/hm2
48.54 t/hm2
and 75.26 t/hm2
respectively
the annual average amount of carbon storage of those were 1.21 t/hm2
1.57 t/hm2
2.11 t/hm2 and 2.59 t/hm2
and the trunk carbon storage of those accounted for 54.28%
66.12%
71.92% and 73.70% of the whole tree layer. The lowest soil carbon sequestration of both Chinese fir seedling forest and sprout forest were found in young forest
and the highest of those were found in mature forest. The ranking order of soil carbon storage of Chinese fir seedling forest were mature forest (153.21 t/hm2)>nearly mature forest (138.17 t/hm2)>young forest (128.30 t/hm2)>mid-maturation forest (113.11 t/hm2)
while that of sprout forest were mature forest (154.03 t/hm2)>nearly mature forest (138.28 t/hm2)>young forest (130.20 t/hm2)>mid-maturation forest (117.05 t/hm2). Under the condition of the same stand density
the total carbon storage of sprout forest was lower than that of seedling forest except for young forest. There were significant difference of carbon storage within different stand ages between Chinese fir seedling forest and sprout forest (P<0.05)
however
the total carbon storage was not significantly different between the young and mid-mature forest
while significant difference was found between nearly and mature forest. Different growth rules and management caused different carbon storage allocation characters between Chinese fir seedling forest and sprout forest. In general
Chinese fir sprout forest were rich in understory species
and the ability for carbon sequestration of shrub
herb and litter layer were stronger
which were better than Chinese fir seedling forest in the aspect of soil and water conservation function.
0
浏览量
1287
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621