1. 1.内蒙古农业大学生态环境学院,呼和浩特,010019
2. 2.水利部牧区水利科学研究所,呼和浩特,010010
3. 3.内蒙古鄂尔多斯市水土保持科学研究所,内蒙古,鄂尔多斯,017000
4. 4.内蒙古赤峰市敖汉旗水保站,内蒙古,赤峰,024300
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
李有芳, 刘, 张, 等. 4种植物生长旺盛期根系易受损的外力类型研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016,30(6):339-344.
LI Youfang1, LIU Jing1, ZHANG Xin2, et al. The Vulnerability of the Roots by Exogenetic Forces of 4 Plants in Vigorous Growth Period[J]. 2016, 30(6): 339-344.
李有芳, 刘, 张, 等. 4种植物生长旺盛期根系易受损的外力类型研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016,30(6):339-344. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2016.06.056.
LI Youfang1, LIU Jing1, ZHANG Xin2, et al. The Vulnerability of the Roots by Exogenetic Forces of 4 Plants in Vigorous Growth Period[J]. 2016, 30(6): 339-344. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2016.06.056.
在植物生长旺盛期,采用材料试验机测定3~4 a生柠条、沙柳、沙棘、白沙蒿在1~4 mm径级范围内的侧根分支处、相邻上级直根的抗拉力与抗折力,研究4种植物根系易受损的外力类型。结果表明:同径级条件下,柠条和沙柳的侧根分支处、相邻直根均表现为抗拉力小于抗折力,而沙棘和白沙蒿侧根分支处和相邻直根均表现为抗拉力大于抗折力。侧根分支处抗拉强度和抗折强度分别为:柠条(23.70±3.97)<(33.66±7.74) MPa,沙柳(14.86±1.28)<(17.31±1.91) MPa,沙棘(10.61±2.40)>(3.97±1.23) MPa,白沙蒿(5.07±1.25)>(2.18±0.39) MPa;相邻直根的抗拉强度和抗折强度分别为:柠条(28.02±4.40)<(47.06±4.41) MPa,沙柳(20.33±1.76)<(27.54±3.82) MPa,沙棘(15.86±3.90)>(8.75±1.71) MPa,白沙蒿(8.80±1.74)>(6.15±1.01) MPa。在生长旺盛期,造成柠条和沙柳根系易损的外力形式为轴向拉力,造成沙棘和白沙蒿根系易损的外力形式为径向折力。同一径级下,4种植物根系的抗拉强度、抗折强度均为侧根分支处小于相邻上级直根。4种植物根系抗拉强度和抗折强度的种间差异均为柠条>沙柳>沙棘>白沙蒿。在4种植物根系固土作用中,1~1.5 mm范围内的细根起主导作用。
To investigate the vulnerability of the roots by exogenetic forces
the anti-fracture force and the anti-tension force of lateral-root branches and adjacent upper straight roots diameters of 1~4 mm of 4 shrub species at the age of 3~4 years were measured with the testing machine in vigorous growing period. The 4 species were Caragana Korshinskii Kom.
Salix psammophila C. Wang et Chang Y. Yang
Hippophae rhamnoides Linn. and Artemisia sphaerocephala Krasch. The results showed that the anti-fracture force of lateral-root branches was higher than anti-tension force for C. Korshinskii and S. psammophila
while the anti-fracture force of lateral-root branches were lower than the anti-tension force for H. rhamnides and A. Sphaerphala. The same tendency was observed for the adjacent upper straight roots of 4 plants. The anti-tension strength and anti-fracture strength of lateral-root branches were as follows: C. Korshinskii were (23.70±3.97<33.66±7.74) MPa
S. psammophila were (14.86±1.28<17.31±1.91) MPa
H. rhamnides were (10.61±2.40>3.97±1.23) MPa
and A. Sphaerphala were (5.07±1.25>2.18±0.39) MPa. The anti-tension strength and anti-fracture strength of adjacent upper straight roots were as follows: C. Korshinskii were 28.02±4.40<47.06±4.41) MPa
S. psammophila were (20.33±1.76<27.54±3.82) MPa
H. rhamnides were (15.86±3.90>8.75±1.71) MPa
and A. Sphaerphala were (8.80±1.74>6.15±1.01) MPa. For C. Korshinskii and S. psammophila
the roots were be liable to be damaged by anti-tension force in vigorous growing period. For H. rhamnides and A. Sphaerphala
the roots were liable to be damaged by anti-fracture force. The anti-tension strength and anti-fracture strength of lateral-root branches were lesser than those of adjacent upper straight roots with the same diameter. The anti-tension strength and anti-fracture strength between lateral-root branches and adjacent upper straight roots for the 4 species followed the sequence of C. Korshinski>S. psammophila>H. rhamnides>A. Sphaerphala. The roots with 1 to 1.5 mm played a leading role in the soil-fixing of 4 kinds of plants.
0
浏览量
1498
下载量
8
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621