纸质出版:2005
移动端阅览
黄奕龙 陈利顶 傅伯杰 张利萍 王仰麟. 黄土丘陵小流域植被生态用水评价[J]. 水土保持学报, 2005,19(2):152-155.
HUANG Yi-long~. Assessment on Vegetation Ecological Water Consumption in Gully Catchment of Loess Plateau, China[J]. 2005, 19(2): 152-155.
以黄土丘陵区安家沟小流域为例
计算了植被最小需水量
评价了不同植被类型的生态用水量。研究结果表明:(1)土壤含水量、蒸散量均与植被类型和降雨量密切相关。对于相同年份
乔灌林地的土壤含水量和蒸散量都显著地大于农地;对于相同的植被类型
干旱年份(2 0 0 2年)的土壤含水量和蒸散量都显著小于湿润年份(2 0 0 3年)。(2 )从月尺度来说
不论是干旱年还是湿润年
植被生态用水在生长季节旺季均低于其最小生态需水量;从年尺度来说
干旱年份所有植被生态用水均低于其最小生态需水量
但湿润年份所有植被(除小麦外)生态用水都可以达到其最小生态需水量;以多年平均降雨量为标准
马铃薯和沙棘可以达到其最小生态需水标准
其它4种植被类型都不能达到其最小生态需水标准。本文建议:对于半干旱黄土丘陵地区
植被恢复不宜以乔灌林为主
并注意斑块形状和种植密度;在植被恢复的过程中
可以采用人工方法
促进自然恢复
以加快植被恢复的过程
The least ecological water demand was calculated and the ecological water consumption of different vegetation types was assessed in this paper. The results exhibited that (1) soil moisture and evapotranspiration were closely relative to vegetation types and rainfall. For the same year
soil moisture and evapotranspiration of woodland and shrubland were significantly higher than that of cropland. For the same vegetation types
soil moisture and evapotranspiration in dry year (2002) were lower than that in wet year (2003). (2) Whether wet or dry years
monthly vegetation ecological water using was lower than the least ecological water demand in some months. For yearly scale
the ecological water using of all the six vegetation types in dry year all lower than the least ecological water demand
but higher than the least ecological water demand in wet year (except for wheat). For the averaged rainfall year
ecological water using of potato and H.rhamnoides can reach their least ecological water demand
but the other 4 vegetation types all cannot reach their least ecological water demand. This paper suggested that (1) Arbor and shrub
especially forest
could not be adopted as the major vegetation type. (2) Artificial also can be used to increase the vegetation restoration process.
0
浏览量
4
下载量
16
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621