Wind Tunnel Test Study on Effect Contrast of Wind-breaking and Sand-fixing of Three Sand-barriers[J]. 2008, 22(6).DOI:
3种沙障防风固沙效益比较的风洞实验研究
摘要
通过风洞实验
研究了土工格室、石方格、不同盖度植被3种不同沙障的防沙机理
分析了各种沙障下的风速廓线、风速流场及风沙流结构特征
比较了3种不同沙障的防沙效果。结果表明:植被具有显著的防风作用
随着盖度的增加其防风作用逐渐增强
同时
风速的变化还与植株的茂密程度有关。对于石方格沙障
由于构成石方格的石块不规则
计算结果与总体变化规律有一定差异。总的来讲
植被沙障的防护效果远较土工格室和石方格沙障为优
对于低风速地区
采用土工格室和石方格沙障治沙是有效的
而对于高风速地区
只能采用植被沙障防护才有良好效果。相比较土工格室和石方格沙障
石方格沙障的防护效率又略优于土工格室。
Abstract
By wind tunnel test
the sand preventing mechanism of geo-grid cell sand-barrier
stone-checker sand-barrier and vegetation sand-barrier are studied.The wind velocity profile
wind velocity flow field and structural features of wind sand flows are analyzed.The sand preventing effects of three different sand-barriers are compared.The results showed that the vegetation has prominent effect on wind prevention
and the affection enhanced gradually with the increase of the coverage.Meanwhile
the change of wind speed also related to the luxuriance degree of plants.But to stone-checker sand-barrier
because stone block composing stone-checker is irregular
the experimental result had certain differences on the general regularity.Generally speaking
the protection effect of vegetation is far superior to geocell and stone-checker.To the low wind speed
the geocell and stone-checker is effective
but to the high wind speed
the vegetation is much suitable.For stone-checker and geocell
the protective efficiency of stone-checker is slightly better than geocell.