

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.西北农林科技大学水土保持科学与工程学院(水土保持研究所), 水土保持与荒漠化整治全国重点实验室,陕西 杨陵712100
2.中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨陵712100
Received:03 January 2026,
Revised:2026-02-18,
Accepted:15 March 2026,
Online First:25 March 2026,
Published:28 August 2026
移动端阅览
李欣雨,郑粉莉,毋冰龙,等.基于4种机器学习模型的东北黑土区沟蚀敏感性[J].水土保持学报,2026,40(4):420-429.
Li Xinyu, Zheng Fenli, Wu Binglong, et al. Gully erosion susceptibility in black soil region of northeast China based on four machine learning models[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2026, 40(4):420-429.
李欣雨,郑粉莉,毋冰龙,等.基于4种机器学习模型的东北黑土区沟蚀敏感性[J].水土保持学报,2026,40(4):420-429. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2026.04.013. CSTR: 32310.14.stbcxb.2026.04.013.
Li Xinyu, Zheng Fenli, Wu Binglong, et al. Gully erosion susceptibility in black soil region of northeast China based on four machine learning models[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2026, 40(4):420-429. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2026.04.013. CSTR: 32310.14.stbcxb.2026.04.013.
目的
2
构建沟蚀敏感评价模型,为东北黑土区沟蚀发生预警及其精准治理提供重要科学依据。
方法
2
以典型厚层黑土区的黑龙江省克东县为研究区,基于0.4 m高分辨率遥感影像提取侵蚀沟,通过方差膨胀因子剔除冗余变量,选取涵盖线性、非线性及集成学习架构的4种机器学习模型(逻辑回归-LR、支持向量机-SVM、随机森林-RF、极端梯度提升-XGBoost)进行对比,并引入SHAP(Shapley Additive exPlanations)可解释性模型量化各影响因子对沟蚀敏感性的贡献作用。
结果
2
1) XGBoost对沟蚀敏感性的预测能力最佳(训练集AUC=0.81,测试集AUC=0.75),其次是SVM与RF(测试集AUC=0.74),而LR对沟蚀敏感性的预测能力最弱(AUC=0.67)。2) 4个模型预测的沟蚀敏感性在县域尺度均呈周边低、中部高的空间分布特征,但沟蚀敏感性等级则存在明显差异。RF模型预测的高沟蚀敏感性占比最大,其值为45.0%;SVM和XGBoost模型预测的研究区沟蚀敏感性均以中、极低为主,二者占比分别为56.2%和59.2%;而LR预测结果则研究区以低沟蚀敏感性为主,其值为39.4%。3) SHAP分析结果表明,DEM(数字高程模型)是影响沟蚀敏感性的主导因子(SHAP为0.55),且具有显著正向作用;SPI(径流功率指数)对沟蚀敏感性的正向驱动作用仅次于DEM(SHAP为0.30),NDVI则对沟蚀敏感性呈现明显负向作用(SHAP为0.37)。
结论
2
在厚层黑土区克东县,基于4种机器学习模型评价的沟蚀敏感性等级存在明显差异,XGBoost模型与SHAP方法融合,增强机器学习模型预测沟蚀敏感性的可解释性;且沟蚀敏感性受“地形主控-植被调控-汇流水动力触发”耦合作用的共同驱动,研究结果加深对沟蚀发生的认知,并为黑土区侵蚀沟治理的措施优化提供理论指导。
Objective
2
This study aims to construct a gully erosion susceptibility assessment model in order to provide an important scientific basis for early warning of gully erosion occurrence and its precise management in the black soil region of Northeast China.
Methods
2
Kedong County in Heilongjiang Province, a typical thick-layer black soil region, was selected as the study area. Erosion gullies were extracted based on 0.4 m high-resolution remote sensing images. Redundant variables were eliminated using the variance inflation factor (VIF). Four machine learning models covering linear, nonlinear, and ensemble learning architectures-logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)-were compared. The SHAP (Shapley Additive exPlanations) interpretability model was introduced to quantify the contribution of each influencing factor to gully erosion susceptibility.
Results
2
1) XGBoost demonstrated the best predictive capability for gully erosion susceptibility (training set AUC=0.81, test set AUC=0.75), followed by the SVM and RF (test set AUC=0.74), while LR showed the weakest predictive capability (AUC=0.67). 2) The gully erosion susceptibility predicted by the four models all exhibited a spatial distribution pattern of "low in the periphery and high in the center" at the county scale, but there were significant differences in the susceptibility levels. The RF model predicted the largest proportion of high gully erosion susceptibility, accounting for 45.0%. The gully erosion susceptibility predicted by the SVM and XGBoost models in the study area was predominantly moderate and very low levels, accounting for 56.2% and 59.2%, respectively. In contrast, the LR prediction results indicated that low gully erosion susceptibility was dominant, covering 39.4% of the study area. 3) SHAP analysis revealed that the digital elevation model (DEM) was the dominant factor influencing gully erosion susceptibility (SHAP value=0.55), exhibiting a significant positive effect. The stream power index (SPI) had the second strongest positive driving effect on gully erosion susceptibility (SHAP value=0.30), while the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) showed a clear negative effect on gully erosion susceptibility (SHAP value=0.37).
Conclusion
2
In the thick-layer black soil region of Kedong County, significant differences are observed in the gully erosion susceptibility levels evaluated by the four machine learning models. The integration of the XGBoost model with the SHAP method enhances the interpretability of machine learning models in predicting gully erosion susceptibility. Moreover, gully erosion susceptibility is jointly driven by the coupled effects of "terrain-dominated control, vegetation regulation, and confluence hydrodynamics triggering". These findings deepen the understanding of gully erosion occurrence and provide theoretical guidance for optimizing gully erosion control measures in black soil regions.
Valentin C , Poesen J , Li Yong . Gully erosion: Impacts, factors and control [J]. Catena , 2005 , 63 ( 2/3 ): 132 - 153 .
Poesen J , Nachtergaele J , Verstraeten G , et al . Gully erosion and environmental change: Importance and research needs [J]. Catena , 2003 , 50 ( 2/3/4 ): 91 - 133 .
Nyssen J , Poesen J , Moeyersons J , et al . Dynamics of soil erosion rates and controlling factors in the northern Ethiopian Highlands-towards a sediment budget [J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms , 2008 , 33 ( 5 ): 695 - 711 .
Gordon L M , Bennett S J , Alonso C V , et al . Modeling long-term soil losses on agricultural fields due to ephemeral gully erosion [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation , 2008 , 63 ( 4 ): 173 - 181 .
Yang Jiuchun , Zhang Shuwen , Chang Liping , et al . Gully erosion regionalization of black soil area in northeastern China [J]. Chinese Geographical Science , 2017 , 27 ( 1 ): 78 - 87 .
李姗 . 水利部组织完成东北黑土区侵蚀沟调查(节选) [J]. 水利科学与寒区工程 , 2023 , 6 ( 8 ): eF0003 .
Li Shan . The Ministry of Water Resources organized the investigation of erosion gully in the black soil area of Northeast China (excerpt) [J]. Hydro Science and Cold Zone Engineering , 2023 , 6 ( 8 ): eF0003 .
Dong Yifan , Wu Yongqiu , Qin Wei , et al . The gully erosion rates in the black soil region of northeastern China: Induced by different processes and indicated by different indexes [J]. Catena , 2019 , 182 : e104146 .
李珊珊 , 王春梅 , 唐杰 , 等 . 东北黑土区典型小流域浅沟向切沟发育及其地形临界研究 [J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版) , 2026 , 51 ( 2 ): 345 - 356 .
Li Shanshan , Wang Chunmei , Tang Jie , et al . Development processes from ephemeral to permanent gullies and their critical terrain thresholds in a typical watershed of the mollisol region, Northeast China [J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University , 2026 , 51 ( 2 ): 345 - 356 .
刘从坦 , 范昊明 . 基于统计学模型的沟道侵蚀敏感性评估的研究进展与展望 [J]. 农业工程学报 , 2024 , 40 ( 4 ): 29 - 40 .
Liu Congtan , Fan Haoming . Research advances and prospects on gully erosion susceptibility assessment based on statistical modeling [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering , 2024 , 40 ( 4 ): 29 - 40 .
Hitouri S , Meriame M , Sk Ajim A , et al . Gully erosion mapping susceptibility in a Mediterranean environment: A hybrid decision-making model [J]. International Soil and Water Conservation Research , 2024 , 12 ( 2 ): 279 - 297 .
Gao Ruilu , Gao Maofang , Yao Shuihong , et al . Gully erosion susceptibility mapping considering seasonal variations of NDVI using a machine learning approach in the mollisol region of China [J]. Soil and Tillage Research , 2025 , 245 : e106322 .
Liu Congtan , Fan Haoming , Jiang Yanyan , et al . Gully erosion susceptibility assessment based on machine learning: A case study of watersheds in Tuquan County in the black soil region of Northeast China [J]. Catena , 2023 , 222 : e106798 .
Li Jianjun , Chen Yulan , Jiao Juying , et al . Gully erosion susceptibility maps and influence factor analysis in the Lhasa River basin on the Tibetan Plateau, based on machine learning algorithms [J]. Catena , 2024 , 235 : e107695 .
Shapley L S . 17 . a value for n-person games [M]∥ Contributions to the Theory of Games (AM-28) , Volume II. Princeton : Princeton University Press , 1953: 307 - 318 .
Lundberg S M , Lee S I . A unified approach to interpreting model predictions [C]∥ Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems . 2017 : 4768 - 4777 .
白建宏 . 东北黑土区侵蚀沟分级初探 [J]. 中国水土保持 , 2017 ( 10 ): 41 - 42 .
Bai Jianhong . Preliminary study on classification of erosion gully in black soil area of Northeast China [J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China , 2017 ( 10 ): 41 - 42 .
Arabameri A , Saha S , Roy J , et al . Landslide susceptibility evaluation and management using different machine learning methods in the gallicash river watershed, Iran [J]. Remote Sensing , 2020 , 12 ( 3 ): e475 .
Jr Hosmer D W , Lemeshow S , Sturdivant R X . Applied logistic regression [M]. Hoboken : Wiley , 2013 .
Pourghasemi H R , Yousefi S , Kornejady A , et al . Performance assessment of individual and ensemble data-mining techniques for gully erosion modeling [J]. Science of the Total Environment , 2017 , 609 : 764 - 775 .
Breiman L . Random forests [J]. Machine Learning , 2001 , 45 ( 1 ): 5 - 32 .
Ho T K . The random subspace method for constructing decision forests [J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 1998 , 20 ( 8 ): 832 - 844 .
Cortes C , Vapnik V . Support-vector networks [J]. Machine Learning , 1995 , 20 ( 3 ): 273 - 297 .
Pumain D , Kanevski M , Pozdnoukhov A , et al . 2009,Machine learning for spatial environmental data: Theory, applications and software, EPFL Press, 2009,377 p [J]. Cybergeo , 2010 : 371 - 377 .
Kanevski M , Timonin V , Pozdnukhov A . Machine learning for spatial environmental data: Theory, applications, and software [M]. EPFL press , 2009 .
Friedman J H . Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine [J]. The Annals of Statistics , 2001 , 29 ( 5 ): 1189 - 1232 .
Li Sijin , Xiong Liyang , Hu Guanghui , et al . Extracting check dam areas from high-resolution imagery based on the integration of object-based image analysis and deep learning [J]. Land Degradation and Development , 2021 , 32 ( 7 ): 2303 - 2317 .
Arabameri A , Chen Wei , Loche M , et al . Comparison of machine learning models for gully erosion susceptibility mapping [J]. Geoscience Frontiers , 2020 , 11 ( 5 ): 1609 - 1620 .
Garosi Y , Sheklabadi M , Conoscenti C , et al . Assessing the performance of GIS- based machine learning models with different accuracy measures for determining susceptibility to gully erosion [J]. Science of the Total Environment , 2019 , 664 : 1117 - 1132 .
Huang Donghao , Zhao Xinrui , Yin Zhe , et al . Utilizing geodetectors to identify conditioning factors for gully erosion risk in the black soil region of Northeast China [J]. International Soil and Water Conservation Research , 2024 , 12 ( 4 ): 808 - 827 .
Liu Xin , Wang Dichen , Guo Mingming , et al . Determination of future gully erosion risk and its spatially quantitative interpretability of driving factors in regional scale using machine learning algorithms [J]. Geoderma , 2025 , 459 : e117396 .
李建军 , 陈玉兰 , 焦菊英 , 等 . 基于多元非线性空间建模的拉萨河流域沟蚀发生风险探测 [J]. 农业工程学报 , 2022 , 38 : 73 - 82 .
Li Jianjun , Chen Yulan , Jiao Juying , et al . Detecting gully occurrence risks using multivariate nonlinear spatial modeling in the Lhasa River basin of China [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering , 2022 , 38 : 73 - 82 .
Liu Congtan , Fan Haoming , Wang Yixuan . Gully erosion susceptibility assessment using three machine learning models in the black soil region of Northeast China [J]. Catena , 2024 , 245 : e108275 .
Sørensen R , Zinko U , Seibert J . On the calculation of the topographic wetness index: Evaluation of different methods based on field observations [J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences , 2006 , 10 ( 1 ): 101 - 112 .
0
Views
18
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621