Analysis of Soil Erosion Intensity Change Trajectories and Their Driving Factors in Yunnan Province Based on An Improved Stability Mapping Method

MA Dongling; PENG Shuangyun; HUANG Bangmei; ZHANG Rui; LI Ting

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.01.035

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Analysis of Soil Erosion Intensity Change Trajectories and Their Driving Factors in Yunnan Province Based on An Improved Stability Mapping Method

更新时间：2025-03-14

- Analysis of Soil Erosion Intensity Change Trajectories and Their Driving Factors in Yunnan Province Based on An Improved Stability Mapping Method
- Vol. 39, Issue 1, Pages: 102-112(2025)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 云南师范大学地理学部,昆明,650500
  2. 西部资源环境地理信息技术教育部工程研究中心,昆明,650500
  3. 昆明市第十中学,昆明,650500
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.01.035
  CLC： S154.2
- Published：2025
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
MA Dongling, PENG Shuangyun, HUANG Bangmei, et al. Analysis of Soil Erosion Intensity Change Trajectories and Their Driving Factors in Yunnan Province Based on An Improved Stability Mapping Method[J]. 2025, 39(1): 102-112.
DOI：

MA Dongling, PENG Shuangyun, HUANG Bangmei, et al. Analysis of Soil Erosion Intensity Change Trajectories and Their Driving Factors in Yunnan Province Based on An Improved Stability Mapping Method[J]. 2025, 39(1): 102-112. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.01.035.

摘要

目的揭示云南省1990—2022年土壤侵蚀强度的变化轨迹，分析其变化类型及驱动因素，为制定有效的土壤侵蚀防治策略提供科学依据。方法基于RUSLE模型定量评估云南省土壤侵蚀强度状况，并引入年际变化速率捕捉其动态特征；采用改进的稳定映射法(STD)，结合变化速率和变化频率，识别土壤侵蚀强度变化轨迹类型；利用随机森林模型分析驱动因素的贡献度，并比较不同轨迹类型分区的驱动因子特征。结果1) 云南省土壤侵蚀年际变化趋势以基本稳定为主，大幅减少和大幅增加区域面积变化显著；2)土壤侵蚀强度变化轨迹呈显著空间分异，周期型轨迹占比最高(53.90%)，其次为非连续阶梯型(14.78%)和波动型(14.08%)；3)降水、坡度、人口密度、GDP和植被覆盖度是影响土壤侵蚀强度轨迹变化的主要驱动因素，贡献度分别为17.92%、14.56%、12.52%、12.67%和9.41%；4)不同轨迹类型分区的驱动因素存在差异，周期型轨迹和非连续阶梯型轨迹分区降水量和坡度较大，阶梯型轨迹分区农田覆盖比例高、森林覆盖比例低。结论云南省土壤侵蚀强度的轨迹变化特征显著，驱动机制具有空间异质性。因此，土壤侵蚀防治策略应体现区域差异化和针对性，并针对不同区域的特点采取因地制宜的措施。基于变化速率的STD轨迹分区方法可有效刻画土壤侵蚀的动态变化过程，为土壤侵蚀的监测、预警和分区防治提供新的思路。

Abstract

ObjectiveTo elucidate the change trajectories of soil erosion intensity in Yunnan Province from 1990 to 2022

and analyze the types of changes and their driving factors

in order to provide a scientific foundation for effective soil erosion control strategies.MethodsSoil erosion intensity conditions in Yunnan Province was quantitatively assessed based on the RUSLE model

and the dynamic characteristics were captured by introducing interannual change rates. Soil erosion intensity change trajectory types were identified by combining change rates and frequencies using an improved Stability Mapping Method (STD). The contribution of driving factors were analyzed

and the characteristics of driving factors across different trajectory types were compared using the Random Forest model.ResultsThe interannual change trend of soil erosion in Yunnan Province was mainly stable

with significant changes observed in areas with substantial decrease and increase. Soil erosion intensity change trajectories exhibited significant spatial differentiation

with cyclical trajectories being the most prevalent (53.90%)

followed by non-continuous stepwise (14.78%) and fluctuating types (14.08%). Precipitation

slope

population density

GDP

and vegetation cover were the main driving factors affecting soil erosion intensity trajectory changes

which contributed 17.92%

14.56%

12.52%

12.67% and 9.41%

respectively. There were differences in driving factors across different trajectory types. Areas with cyclical and non-continuous stepwise trajectories had higher precipitation and greater slopes

while stepwise trajectory areas had higher farmland coverage and lower forest coverage.ConclusionThe characteristics of soil erosion intensity trajectory changes in Yunnan Province are significant

with spatial heterogeneity in driving mechanisms. Therefore

soil erosion control strategies should reflect regional differentiation and specificity

and adopt location-specific measures based on regional characteristics. The STD trajectory partitioning method based on change rates effectively captures the dynamic changes in soil erosion

and can provide new insights for monitoring

early warning

and partitioned control of soil erosion.

关键词

Keywords

references

ZHOU Y, YI Y J, LIU H X, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamic of soil erosion and the key factors impact processes over semi-arid catchments in Southwest China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2024, 201: e107217.

SONDEREGGER T, PFISTER S. Global assessment of agricultural productivity losses from soil compaction and water erosion[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2021, 55(18): 12162-12171.

WANG L, YAN H, WANG X W, et al. The potential for soil erosion control associated with socio-economic development in the hilly red soil region, Southern China[J]. Catena, 2020, 194: e104678.

ZHENG F L, WANG Z L, YANG Q K. The retrospection and prospect on soil erosion research in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Nature, 2008, 30(1): 12-16. 郑粉莉, 王占礼, 杨勤科. 我国土壤侵蚀科学研究回顾和展望[J]. 自然杂志, 2008, 30(1): 12-16.

RAO W G, SHEN Z H, DUAN X W. Spatiotemporal patterns and drivers of soil erosion in Yunnan, Southwest China: Rulse assessments for recent 30 years and future predictions based on CMIP6[J]. Catena, 2023, 220: e106703.

SHEN J, YUE C R, GUO X L, et al. Analysis of LULC changes and driving factors in Yunnan Province from 1995 to 2022 based on GEE platform[J]. Forest Engineering, 2024, 40(4): 58-70. 沈健, 岳彩荣, 郭喜龙, 等. 基于GEE平台1995—2022年云南省LULC变化及驱动因素分析[J]. 森林工程, 2024, 40(4): 58-70.

SENANAYAKE S, PRADHAN B, WEDATHANTHIRIGE H, et al. Monitoring soil erosion in support of achieving SDGs: A special focus on rainfall variation and farming systems vulnerability[J]. Catena, 2024, 234: e107537.

TAN T H, JIAO X, PING Y, et al. Ecological carrying capacity evaluation based on spatial and temporal evolution of soil erosion at county scale[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 30(4): 210-216. 澹腾辉, 焦雄, 平原, 等. 基于土壤侵蚀时空演变的县域生态承载力评价[J]. 水土保持研究, 2023, 30(4): 210-216.

PING Y D, TIAN P, REN Q, et al. Spatiotemporal evolution of soil erosion and quantitative evaluation of its influencing factors in northeast Hubei[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2024, 41(1): 61-71. 平耀东, 田培, 任茜, 等. 鄂东北土壤侵蚀时空演变及其影响因子定量评价[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2024, 41(1): 61-71.

XIAO Y, GUO B, LU F, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution patterns of soil erosion in the Yellow River Basin from 1990 to 2015: Impacts of natural factors and land use change[J]. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 2021, 12(1): 103-122.

MA Y, HE H M, ZHAO H F. Spatiotemporal change of soil erosion in Gannan Tibetan autonomous prefecture based on GIS and RUSLE[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 30(3): 37-46. 马悦, 何洪鸣, 赵宏飞. 基于GIS和RUSLE的甘南州土壤侵蚀时空演变[J]. 水土保持研究, 2023, 30(3): 37-46.

XIE M Y, JIAO C M, HAN X Y, et al. Evolution and spatial-temporal shift characteristics of soil erosion in Yan'An city during 1990-2020[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 42(5): 187-192. 谢明阳, 焦春萌, 韩小雨, 等. 1990—2020年延安市土壤侵蚀演变及其时空偏移特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022, 42(5): 187-192.

MA T L, LIU B Y, HE L, et al. Response of soil erosion to vegetation and terrace changes in a small watershed on the Loess Plateau over the past 85 years[J]. Geoderma, 2024, 443: e116837.

SHI X J, ZHANG B, GUO J L, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution of soil erosion in a typical watershed of the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2024, 79(7): 1787-1803. 石学瑾, 张彪, 郭家龙, 等. 黄土高原典型小流域土壤侵蚀时空演变[J]. 地理学报, 2024, 79(7): 1787-1803.

XU L Y, GUO W L, JIA J A. Spatial and temporal variability and driving factors of soil erosion in hilly areas of Southeast China[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2024, 44(1): 218-226. 徐刘洋, 郭伟玲, 贾纪昂. 东南丘陵地区土壤侵蚀时空变化及其驱动因素: 以湖南省张家界市为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024, 44(1): 218-226.

BENAVIDEZ R, JACKSON B, MAXWELL D, et al. A review of the(Revised) Universal Soil Loss Equation((R)USLE): With a view to increasing its global applicability and improving soil loss estimates[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2018, 22(11): 6059-6086.

ZHANG W B, FU J S. Rainfall erosivity estimation under different rainfall amount[J]. Resources Science, 2003, 25(1): 35-41. 章文波, 付金生. 不同类型雨量资料估算降雨侵蚀力[J]. 资源科学, 2003, 25(1): 35-41.

ZHANG K L, SHU A P, XU X L, et al. Soil erodibility and its estimation for agricultural soils in China[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2008, 72(6): 1002-1011.

WISCHMEIER W H, SMITH D D. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: A guide to conservation planning[M]. Department of Agriculture, Science and Education Administration, 1978.

MCCOOL D K, FOSTER G R, MUTCHLER C K, et al. Revised slope length factor for the universal soil loss equation[J]. Transactions of the Asae, 1989, 32(5): 1571-1576.

LIU B Y, NEARING M A, RISSE L M. Slope gradient effects on soil loss for steep slopes[J]. Transactions of the Asae, 1994, 37(6): 1835-1840.

YANG D W, KANAE S, OKI T, et al. Global potential soil erosion with reference to land use and climate changes[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2003, 17(14): 2913-2928.

SHI P J, CHEN J, PAN Y Z. Landuse change mechanism in Shenzhen City[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2000, 55(2): 151-160. 史培军, 陈晋, 潘耀忠. 深圳市土地利用变化机制分析[J]. 地理学报, 2000, 55(2): 151-160.

SWETNAM R D. Rural land use in England and Wales between 1930 and 1998: Mapping trajectories of change with a high resolution spatio-temporal dataset[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, 81(1/2): 91-103.

BREIMAN L. Random forests[J]. Machine Learning, 2001, 45: 5-32.

LYU Y, JU Q R, LV F M, et al. Spatiotemporal variations of air pollutants and ozone prediction using machine learning algorithms in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region from 2014 to 2021[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2022, 306: e119420.

WANG S D, FENG Z Y, YU Y, et al. Land use/cover change trajectory analysis based on improved stable mapping method[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2020, 51(8): 152-162. 王世东, 冯正英, 余洋, 等. 基于改进稳定映射法的土地利用/覆被变化轨迹分析[J]. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(8): 152-162.

GUO L J, LIU R M, MEN C, et al. Multiscale spatiotemporal characteristics of landscape patterns, hotspots, and influencing factors for soil erosion[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 779: e146474.

ZHANG X Q, HU M C, GUO X Y, et al. Effects of topographic factors on runoff and soil loss in Southwest China[J]. Catena, 2018, 160: 394-402.

WANG H, GAO J B, HOU W J. Quantitative attribution analysis of soil erosion in different morphological types of geomorphology in karst areas: Based on the geographical detector method[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(9): 1674-1686. 王欢, 高江波, 侯文娟. 基于地理探测器的喀斯特不同地貌形态类型区土壤侵蚀定量归因[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(9): 1674-1686.

BORRELLI P, PANAGOS P. An indicator to reflect the mitigating effect of common agricultural policy on soil erosion[J]. Land Use Policy, 2020, 92(C): e104467.

NASIR AHMAD N S B, MUSTAFA F B, MUHAMMAD YUSOFF S@Y, et al. A systematic review of soil erosion control practices on the agricultural land in Asia[J]. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2020, 8(2): 103-115.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Spatial-temporal Characteristics and Driving Mechanism of Ecological Land ChangeTrajectories in Central Yunnan Urban Agglomeration in Recent 30 Years

Spatial Characteristics of Slope Soil Erosion Intensity and Susceptibility in Small Watershed of Shandong Province Middle Part

Related Author

ZHU Jiaying

PENG Shuangyun

DONG Yuan-jie

SHI Yan-xi

Related Institution

GIS Technology Research Center of Resourceand Environmentin Western China of Ministry of Education, Yunnan Normal University

⁰