

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 东华理工大学水资源与环境工程学院,南昌,330013
2. 地下水污染成因与修复江西省重点实验室,南昌,330013
Published:2025
移动端阅览
GUO Qiaoling, HU Qian, DAI Bin, et al. Soil Preferential Flow Characteristics in Coal Mine Subsidence Area under Different Rainfall Duration[J]. 2025, 39(1): 130-140.
GUO Qiaoling, HU Qian, DAI Bin, et al. Soil Preferential Flow Characteristics in Coal Mine Subsidence Area under Different Rainfall Duration[J]. 2025, 39(1): 130-140. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.01.026.
目的 为研究采煤塌陷区裂缝引发的优先流特征,为科学合理地开展矿区水资源管理及生态治理实践工作提供支撑。方法 在神府-东胜煤田采煤塌陷区选取3条同一宽度(3 cm)的裂缝,开展相同降雨强度、不同降雨历时的染色示踪试验。采用Adobe Photoshop 2020、Image Pro Plus 6.0、SketchUp Pro 2019、Auto CAD 2019等处理软件,分析不同降雨历时下的裂缝优先流特征。结果 1) 神府-东胜采煤塌陷区优先流发生区域的土壤水分体积分数、孔隙度、饱和导水率大于非优先流区域,体积质量和田间持水量小于非优先流区域;2)降雨历时分别为10、20、30 min时,相应的基质流深度分别为5、8、10 cm;优先流发育深度分别为26.4、47.7、44.3 cm。降雨历时越长,基质流和优先流发育越深;3)各试验点染色面积比均随着土层深度增加呈减小趋势,形态上表现为S形状。当降雨历时较短时,染色面积比随着土层深度变化的幅度较小;当降雨历时较长时,染色面积比曲线波动增大。4)总体上,随着土层深度增加,宽染色路径的数量在减少,细小染色路径数量增加,染色路径总数呈先增加后减小趋势。且降雨历时越长,相同深度处土壤染色路径越宽,宽路径数量越多。结论 研究成果可为煤炭矿区土地复垦和生态治理提供科学依据。
Objective Research on the preferential flow characteristics triggered by cracks in coal mining subsidence areas can provide support for scientific and rational development of water resource management and ecological management practice in the mining area.Methods Three cracks of the same width (3 cm) were selected in the coal mining subsidence area of Shenfu-Dongsheng Coal Field to carry out the staining tracer test under the same rainfall intensity and different rainfall durations. Processing software such as Adobe Photoshop 2020
Image Pro Plus 6.0
SketchUp Pro 2019
and Auto CAD 2 019 were used to analyze the preferential flow characteristics of cracks under different rainfall durations.Results 1) Soil volumetric water content
porosity
and saturated hydraulic conductivity in the preferential flow occurrence area of the Shenfu-Dongsheng coal mining subsidence area were greater than those in the non-preferential flow area
and the volumetric weight and field water-holding capacity were less than those in the non-preferential flow area zone. 2) When the rainfall duration was 10
20 and 30 min
the corresponding depths of substrate flow were 5
8 and 10 cm
respectively
while the depths of preferential flow were 26.4
47.7 and 44.3 cm
respectively. The longer the rainfall duration
the deeper the development of substrate and preferential flow. 3) The staining area ratio at each test site showed a decreasing trend with the increase of soil depth
and the morphology showed an S shape. When the rainfall duration was short
the magnitude of change in the coloring area ratio with soil depth was small; when the rainfall duration was long
the fluctuation of the coloring area ratio curve increased. 4) In general
with the increase of soil depth
the number of wide staining paths decreased
the number of fine staining paths increased
and the total number of staining paths showed a tendency of increasing first and then decreasing. The longer the rainfall duration
the wider the soil staining paths at the same depth was
and there were more wide paths.Conclusion The findings can provide a scientific basis for land reclamation and ecological management in coal mining areas.
ZHANG Y, ZHANG M, NIU J, et al. The preferential flow of soil: A widespread phenomenon in pedological perspectives[J]. Eurasian Soil Science, 2016, 49(6): 661-672.
JOHNSON A C, HARIA A H, BHARDWAJ C L, et al. Water movement and isoproturon behaviour in a drained heavy clay soil: 2. Persistence and transport[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1994, 163: 217-231.
CAO Z A. Soil preferential flow and its influence on nitrogen and fertilizer transport in paddy fields[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2003. 曹顺爱. 稻田土壤优先流及其对氮肥运移的影响研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2003.
WU Q H, ZHANG J F, LIN W J, et al. Appling dyeing tracer to investigate patterns of soil water flow and quantify preferential flow in soil columns[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(7): 82-90. 吴庆华, 张家发, 蔺文静, 等. 土壤水流模式染色剂示踪及优先流程度评估[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(7): 82-90.
DUAN J, WANG L Y, WANG L, et al. A review of researches on plant root channel architecture and soil preferential flow process[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 21(2): 117-123. 段剑, 王凌云, 王玲, 等. 植物根孔构型与土壤优先流过程研究进展[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2023, 21(2): 117-123.
WU Q, DONG D L, FU Y J, et al. Research on water pollution induced by coal mining[J]. Journal of China University of mining and Technology, 2002, 31(1): 19-22. 武强, 董东林, 傅耀军, 等. 煤矿开采诱发的水环境问题研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2002, 31(1): 19-22.
YANG J H, YU X, YANG Y, et al. Physical simulation and theoretical evolution for ground fissures triggered by underground coal mining[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(3): e0192886.
NOVÁK V, ŠIMÅUNEK J, VAN GENUCHTEN M T. Infiltration of water into soil with cracks[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 2000, 126(1): 41-47.
BENEGAS L, ILSTEDT U, ROUPSARD O, et al. Effects of trees on infiltrability and preferential flow in two contrasting agroecosystems in Central America[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2014, 183: 185-196.
LIU M X, DU W Z. To investigate soil preferential flow paths in mountain area using dye tracer[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2013, 50(5): 871-880. 刘目兴, 杜文正. 山地土壤优先流路径的染色示踪研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2013, 50(5): 871-880.
SOHRT J, RIES F, SAUTER M, et al. Significance of preferential flow at the rock soil interface in a semi-arid karst environment[J]. Catena, 2014, 123: 1-10.
ZHU Z C, LIU B, LIU C, et al. Characteristics of preferential flow and water infiltration in desert oasis wetland[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(12): 3979-3990. 朱钊岑, 刘冰, 刘婵, 等. 荒漠绿洲湿地土壤优先流与水分入渗特征[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(12): 3979-3990.
LIPIEC J, TURSKI M, HAJNOS M, et al. Pore structure, stability and water repellency of earthworm casts and natural aggregates in loess soil[J]. Geoderma, 2015, 243/244: 124-129.
LI W L, JIN C J, WANG A Z, et al. Research progress in soil macropore flow[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007, 18(4): 888-894. 李伟莉, 金昌杰, 王安志, 等. 土壤大孔隙流研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(4): 888-894.
YUAN L. Study on the influence of priority flow to the widened embankment of silty sand[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan University, 2019. 袁龙. 粉砂土路堤拓宽优先流影响研究[D]. 郑州: 河南大学, 2019.
MENG C, NIU J Z, YU H L, et al. Research progress in influencing factors and measuring methods of three-dimensional characteristics of soil macropores[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(11): 9-16. 孟晨, 牛健植, 余海龙, 等. 土壤大孔隙三维特征影响因素和测定方法研究进展[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(11): 9-16.
LIU W P, LIU Z Z, LI S F. Influence of grain size distribution on infiltration and dry shrinkage cracking of granite residual soil[J]. Journal of Nanchang University(Engineering and Technology), 2023, 45(1): 30-37. 刘伟平, 刘子彰, 李邵峰. 颗粒级配对花岗岩残积土入渗及干缩开裂的影响[J]. 南昌大学学报(工科版), 2023, 45(1): 30-37.
YU H L, FAN J, NIU Y B, et al. Review on the influence of bushwood stem flow and root-induced preferential flow on the"soil fertile island effect"of Nebkha[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(1): 1-7. 余海龙, 樊瑾, 牛玉斌, 等. 灌丛树干茎流与根区优先流对灌丛沙堆"土壤沃岛效应"的影响研究[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(1): 1-7.
LI Z C, ZHAO Y Y, WANG K Q, et al. Soil preferential flow characteristics in active and stable gully catchment areas of the dry-hot valleys of the Jinsha River[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 36(6): 119-127. 李志成, 赵洋毅, 王克勤, 等. 金沙江干热河谷活跃和稳定冲沟集水区土壤优先流特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(6): 119-127.
ZHANG Y Y, FU L, ZHAO W Z, et al. A review of researches on preferential flow in desert-oasis region[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2017, 37(6): 1189-1195. 张勇勇, 富利, 赵文智, 等. 荒漠绿洲土壤优先流研究进展[J]. 中国沙漠, 2017, 37(6): 1189-1195.
ZHU L, CHEN J H, LIU D D. Preferential flow model coupling soil matrix with fracture network and its validation[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(14): 15-21. 朱磊, 陈玖泓, 刘德东. 耦合基质区与裂隙网络的土壤优先流模型及验证[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(14): 15-21.
SHENG F, FANG Y. Study on preferential soil water flow using iodine-starch staining method[J]. Soils, 2012, 44(1): 144-148. 盛丰, 方妍. 土壤水非均匀流动的碘-淀粉染色示踪研究[J]. 土壤, 2012, 44(1): 144-148.
MENG Z J. Micropatch development and soil preferential flow response mechanism in central Inner Mongolia[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2022. 蒙仲举. 内蒙古中部荒漠草原微斑块发育与土壤优先流响应机制[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2022.
CHEN J P, ZHU Z, WU L. Physical model test on moisture diffusion in discontinuous homogeneous soil with collapse-fissure[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2018, 29(2): 66-72. 陈建平, 朱哲, 吴丽. 基于塌陷裂缝非连续均质的土壤水分扩散物理模拟[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2018, 29(2): 66-72.
GUO Q L, SU N, DING B, et al. Characteristics of preferential flow in the soil cracks of a coal mining subsidence area[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 16(3): 112-120. 郭巧玲, 苏宁, 丁斌, 等. 采煤塌陷区裂隙优先流特征[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2018, 16(3): 112-120.
LV S, WANG X G, CHEN Y P. Talking about green mine construction in Shangwan Coal mine[J]. China Coal, 2023, 49(S1): 41-45. 吕帅, 王新国, 陈宇鹏. 上湾煤矿绿色矿山建设实践[J]. 中国煤炭, 2023, 49(S1): 41-45.
GAO C. Soil priority flow characteristics of main forest types and its influencing factors[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2015. 高超. 凤阳山主要林分类型土壤优先流特征及其影响因素[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2015.
LV J, FAN X F, WU Z X. Research on macropore flow characteristics based on rainfall dyeing tracer experiment[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2021, 38(5): 109-114. 吕捷, 樊秀峰, 吴振祥. 基于降雨染色示踪试验的大孔隙流特性研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2021, 38(5): 109-114.
WEI L. Effect of straw covering on soil priority path and water flow movement in Guangxi paddy field[D]. Guilin, Guangxi: Guilin University of Technology, 2020. 韦灵. 秸秆覆盖对广西稻田土壤优先路径与水流运动的影响[D]. 广西桂林: 桂林理工大学, 2020.
ZHENG X, CHEN J H, ZHANG H J, et al. Characteristics and influencing factors of preferential flow dyeing morphology of two soils in Beijing[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 32(3): 113-119. 郑欣, 程金花, 张洪江, 等. 北京地区2种类型土壤优先流染色形态特征及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(3): 113-119.
YAO J J. Scale soil preferential flow characteristics and its influence on nutrient transport in the Siwan Mountain catchment area in Chongqing[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2018. 姚晶晶. 重庆四面山集水区尺度土壤优先流特征及其对养分运移的影响[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2018.
LIU X. Study on soil preferential flow in four kinds of stands in Purple Mountain, Nanjing[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2018. 刘璇. 南京紫金山4种林分土壤优先流研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2018.
WANG Z N, XIN Y, ZHAO Y S. Analysis on soil characters of preferential pathways and soil matrix in water-source area of Heilongjiang Province[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 31(1): 49-54. 王赵男, 辛颖, 赵雨森. 黑龙江省水源地优先流区与基质流区土壤特性分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(1): 49-54.
CHEN J F, YAN J L, XU M H, et al. Preferential flow characteristics and its influencing factors on slope positions in different vegetation types in Guandi Mountain, Lüliang[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2021, 40(12): 3890-3900. 程竞锋, 闫加亮, 徐满厚, 等. 吕梁关帝山不同植被坡面土壤优先流特征及其影响因素[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(12): 3890-3900.
GUAN N, CHEN J H, HOU F, et al. Priority flow characteristics of artificial forest soil in southwest karst area at different water seepage levels[J]. Soil Bulletin, 2023, 54(3), 587-595. 管凝, 程金花, 侯芳, 等. 不同入渗水量下的西南喀斯特地区人工林土壤优先流特征[J]. 土壤通报, 2023, 54(3), 587-595.
SONG Y L, BI H X, ZHAO D Y, et al. Characteristic of preferential flow in robinia pseudoacacia forests in Loess Plateau in western Shanxi Province under different infiltration conditions[J]. Soils, 2024, 56(2): 448-456. 宋艺琳, 毕华兴, 赵丹阳, 等. 晋西黄土区不同入渗水量下刺槐林地优先流特征[J]. 土壤, 2024, 56(2): 448-456.
YOU J, WANG S Q. Impacts of soil fracture on cropland soil preferential flow and its controlling factors[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2022(9): 71-75. 尤今, 王树谦. 土壤裂隙对农田土壤优先流的影响及其控制因子[J]. 节水灌溉, 2022(9): 71-75.
0
Views
38
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621