Impulse Response Mechanism of Agricultural Drought to Local Climate Factor at Different Time Scales in Karst Region

YU Huan; HE Zhonghua; GU Xiaolin; XU Mingjin; TAN Hongmei; YANG Shuping; YANG Qiuyun

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.05.027

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Impulse Response Mechanism of Agricultural Drought to Local Climate Factor at Different Time Scales in Karst Region

更新时间：2025-02-18

- Impulse Response Mechanism of Agricultural Drought to Local Climate Factor at Different Time Scales in Karst Region
- Vol. 38, Issue 5, Pages: 296-304(2024)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 贵州师范大学地理与环境科学学院,贵阳,550001
  2. 贵州师范大学国家喀斯特石漠化防治工程技术研究中心,贵阳,550001
  3. 贵州省山地资源与环境遥感应用重点实验室,贵阳,550001
  4. 贵州省水文水资源局,贵阳,550000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.05.027
  CLC： S423
- Published：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
YU Huan, HE Zhonghua, GU Xiaolin, et al. Impulse Response Mechanism of Agricultural Drought to Local Climate Factor at Different Time Scales in Karst Region[J]. 2024, 38(5): 296-304.
DOI：

YU Huan, HE Zhonghua, GU Xiaolin, et al. Impulse Response Mechanism of Agricultural Drought to Local Climate Factor at Different Time Scales in Karst Region[J]. 2024, 38(5): 296-304. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.05.027.

摘要

[目的] 为定量解析喀斯特地区农业干旱对单因子的响应机制。[方法] 利用泰森多边形及K阶均值聚类对贵州省83个站点年平均降雨量进行面积计算及分类

将贵州省划分为5个区域

并基于各分区降雨量(Pre)、平均气温(T)、潜在蒸散发(E)、风速(W)、气压(P)、土壤水分(SW)、标准化土壤水分指数(SSI)建立向量自回归(VAR)模型

通过脉冲响应与方差分解分析不同时间尺度农业干旱对各气象因子及土壤水分含量的响应机制。[结果] (1)农业干旱呈现西高东低

总体由南往北逐渐减轻;春、夏季农业干旱强于秋冬季。(2)年尺度各因子对SSI脉冲响应达峰值所需时间为Pre＜E=W＜P＜SW＜T

恢复平稳期则为Pre＞W＞T＞E＞P＞SW。由月尺度到年尺度

岩溶发育较强区域E对SSI脉冲达峰值所需时间缩短2期;SW与之相反

且非岩溶地区比岩溶地区恢复平稳期短。(3)降雨量在农业干旱中占主导地位

降雨与风速随时间尺度增加在农业干旱中作用增强

其农业干旱贡献比例月、季、年分别为31.88%

34.25%

58.33%和1.07%

3.15%

12.88%。[结论] 研究成果可为喀斯特地区农业干旱预警提供参考理论依据。

Abstract

[Objective] In order to quantitatively analyze the response mechanism of agricultural drought to single factor in karst areas. [Methods] In this study

Delaunay triangulation and K-means clustering were employed to calculate the area and classify the annual rainfall data of 83 stations in Guizhou Province

resulting in the division of Guizhou into 5 regions. Subsequently

a vector autoregressive (VAR) model was established based on the meteorological factors including precipitation (Pre)

average temperature (T)

potential evapotranspiration (E)

wind speed (W)

air pressure (P)

soil moisture content (SW)

and standardized soil moisture index (SSI) for each region. The response mechanism of agricultural drought to various time scales of meteorological factors and soil moisture content was analyzed using pulse response and variance decomposition. [Results] (1) The agricultural drought was higher in the west and lower in the east

and gradually decreased from south to north; The agricultural drought is more severe in spring and summer than in autumn and winter. (2) The time required for the impulse response of each variable on the annual scale to reach the peak of SSI is Pre＜E=W＜P＜SW＜T

and the recovery period is Pre＞W＞T＞E＞P＞SW. From the monthly scale to the annual scale

in areas with strong karst development

the time required for SSI pulse to reach its peak value is shortened by 2 periods for factor E; while SW is opposite to this

and the non-karst area has a shorter recovery period than karst area. (3) Rainfall plays a dominant role in agricultural drought

and rainfall and wind speed played a stronger role in agricultural drought with the increase of time scale. The contribution ratio of agricultural drought was 31.88%

34.25%

58.33%

1.07%

3.15% and 12.88%

respectively. [Conclusion] The research results can provide a theoretical basis for the early warning of agricultural drought in karst areas.

关键词

Keywords

references

刘哲琼,佘敦先,夏军,等.黄土高原地区气象干旱动态格局演变及其对植被的影响[J].地理科学,2023,43(9):1659-1671. LIU Z Q, SHE D X, XIA J, et al. Impacts of meteorological drought on vegetation and their dynamic pattern evolutions on the Loess Plateau[J].Scientia Geographica Sinica,2023,43(9):1659-1671.

XU S X, WANG Y H, LIU Y, et al. Evaluating the cumulative and time-lag effects of vegetation response to drought in Central Asia under changing environments[J].Journal of Hydrology,2023,627:e130455.

陈莉会,贺中华,潘杉,等.基于不同时间尺度的喀斯特农业干旱时空演变特征及驱动探测:以贵州省为例[J].水土保持学报,2023,37(2):136-148. CHEN L H, HE Z H, PAN S, et al. Spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of karst agricultural drought based on different time scales and driving detection: A case study of Guizhou Province[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,37(2):136-148.

袁淑杰,何兴潼,谷晓平,等.贵州喀斯特区域土壤湿度持续下降时期气象要素对土壤湿度影响研究[J].土壤通报,2018,49(2):320-328. YUAN S J, HE X T, GU X P, et al. Response of declining soil moisture on meteorological factors over karst area of Guizhou Province[J].Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2018,49(2):320-328.

张浪,贺中华,杨铭珂,等.气象干旱-水文干旱传播过程特征及其影响因素:以贵州黔中水利工程区为例[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(1):142-152. ZHANG L, HE Z H, YANG M K, et al. Characteristics of meteorological drought-hydrological drought propagation process and its influencing factors: Taking Guizhou Qianzhong water conservancy project area as an example[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,36(1):142-152.

ZHOU R X, JIN J L, CUI Y, et al. Agricultural drought vulnerability assessment and diagnosis based on entropy fuzzy pattern recognition and subtraction set pair potential[J].Alexandria Engineering Journal,2022,61(1):51-63.

HUANG S Z, LI P, HUANG Q, et al. The propagation from meteorological to hydrological drought and its potential influence factors[J].Journal of Hydrology,2017,547:184-195.

LI F W, ZHANG M J, ZHAO Y, et al. Influence of irrigation and groundwater on the propagation of meteorological drought to agricultural drought[J].Agricultural Water Management,2023,277:e108099.

陈令仪,朱秀芳,唐谊娟,等.黄河流域气象水文干旱时滞效应与影响因素分析[J].地理科学,2023,43(10):1861-1868. CHEN L Y, ZHU X F, TANG Y J, et al. Time lag effect and influencing factors of meteorological and hydrological drought in the Yellow River Basin[J].Scientia Geographica Sinica,2023,43(10):1861-1868.

LIU Y, SHAN F Z, YUE H, et al. Global analysis of the correlation and propagation among meteorological, agricultural, surface water, and groundwater droughts[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2023,333:e117460.

WANG H L, ZHU Y J, QIN T L, et al. Study on the propagation probability characteristics and prediction model of meteorological drought to hydrological drought in basin based on copula function[J].Frontiers in Earth Science,2022,10:e961871.

GUO Y, HUANG S Z, HUANG Q, et al. Propagation thresholds of meteorological drought for triggering hydrological drought at various levels[J].The Science of the Total Environment,2020,712:e136502.

HE Z H, PAN S, GU X L, et al. Study on the driving mechanism of lagged effects based on different time scales in a karst drainage basin in South China[J].Scientific Reports,2023,13(1):e9347.

DENG S M, TAN X Z, TAN X J, et al. On the development and recovery of soil moisture deficit drought events[J].Journal of Hydrology,2024,632:e130920.

张文强,刘若男,张含笑,等.基于向量自回归和动态模式分解的城市轨道交通短时OD预测[J].北京交通大学学报,2023,47(6):41-49. ZHANG W Q, LIU R N, ZHANG H X, et al. Short-term prediction of OD for urban rail transit using vector autoregression and dynamic mode decomposition[J].Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University,2023,47(6):41-49.

王丹,吴琳娜,冯紫微,等.1995年以来贵州省土地利用变化对地表径流的影响研究[J].贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),2023,41(5):44-55. WANG D, WU L N, FENG Z W, et al. Study on the influence of land use change on surface runoff in Guizhou Province since 1995[J].Journal of Guizhou Normal University (Natural Sciences),2023,41(5):44-55.

彭大为,周秋文,谢雪梅,等.下垫面因素对喀斯特地区水分利用效率的影响[J].地理科学进展,2021,40(12):2086-2100. PENG D W, ZHOU Q W, XIE X M, et al. Effect of underlying surface factors on water use efficiency in the karst area[J].Progress in Geography,2021,40(12):2086-2100.

钱莉莉,贺中华,梁虹,等.基于降水Z指数的贵州省农业干旱时空演化特征[J].贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),2019,37(1):10-14. QIAN L L, HE Z H, LIANG H, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution characteristics of agricultural drought based on precipitation Z index in Guizhou[J].Journal of Guizhou Normal University (Natural Sciences),2019,37(1):10-14.

HAO Z C, AGHAKOUCHAK A. Multivariate standardized drought index: A parametric multi-index model[J].Advances in Water Resources,2013,57:12-18.

OUMA Y O, MOALAFHI D B, ANDERSON G, et al. Dam water level prediction using vector AutoRegression, random forest regression and MLP-ANN models based on land-use and climate factors[J].Sustainability,2022,14(22):e14934.

SHI P, TANG H, QU S M, et al. Drought propagation in karst and non-karst regions in Southwest China compared on a daily scale[J].Journal of Hydrology:Regional Studies,2024,51:e101628.

CHEN L H, HE Z H, GU X L, et al. Construction of an agricultural drought monitoring model for karst with coupled climate and substratum factors: A case study of Guizhou Province, China[J].Water,2023,15(9):e1795愮氼?潲显??礳摝爠潌汕漠杘礠?水????????攠?休??????戠牥?嬠??崮?奓啰???塯??婭??乲????奡??坡??????敯瑦?慤汲???浨灴愠捡瑮?漠晤?獩潶楩汮?琠敦硡瑣畴牯敲獳?潢湡?慥杤爠楯据甠汭瑵畬牴慩汰?摥爠潲略杭桯瑴?攠癳潥汮畳瑩楮潧渠?慲湯摵?晨楴攠汩摮?捩慣灥慳挺椠瑁礠?敡獳瑥椠浳慴瑵楤潹渠?楮渠?桡畲浳楴搠?牲敥条楳漠湯獦嬠?嵯??潨畷牥湳慴氠?潨晩??祛摊牝漮汊潯杵祲??ぬ㈠??????敮??ど????ience,2023,20(11):3215-3232.

贺中华,陈晓翔.基于土壤因素耦合的喀斯特流域水文干旱模拟:以贵州省为例[J].地理科学,2013,33(6):724-734. HE Z H, CHEN X X. The hydrological drought simulating in karst basin based on coupled soil factors: Taking Guizhou Province as a case[J].Scientia Geographica Sinica,2013,33(6):724-734.

陈正发,李靖,相彪,等.基于SPI的云南省多尺度干旱时空演变特征识别[J]. 灌溉排水学报,2023,42(4):92-99. CHEN Z F, LI J, XIANG B, et al. Spatiotemporal variation of drought in Yunnan Province calculated using the standardized precipitation index[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage,2023,42(4):92-99.

尹航,张泽中,张伟杰,等.基于植被健康指数的内蒙古干旱时空特征分析及驱动因素研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2023,42(8):80-89. YIN H, ZHANG Z Z, ZHANG W J, et al. Using vegetation health index to calculate spatiotemporal variation in drought and its determinants in Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage,2023,42(8):80-89.

TONI A T, MALCHEREK A, KASSA A K. Agroclimatic zone-based analysis of rainfall variability and trends in the wabi shebele river basin, Ethiopia[J].Water,2022,14(22):e3699.

游漫,贺中华,张浪,等.贵州省农业与气象干旱特征及其响应关系[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(5):255-264. YOU M, HE Z H, ZHANG L, et al. Characteristics of agricultural and meteorological drought in Guizhou Province and their response relationship[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,36(5):255-264.

SHAH D, SHAH H L, DAVE H M, et al. Contrasting influence of human activities on agricultural and hydrological droughts in India[J].Science of the Total Environment,2021,774:e144959.

WU J J, GU Y H, SUN K X, et al. Correlation of climate change and human activities with agricultural drought and its impact on the net primary production of winter wheat[J].Journal of Hydrology,2023,620:e129504.

REZAEI A. Ocean-atmosphere circulation controls on integrated meteorological and agricultural drought over Iran[J].Journ

Views

275

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Comparison of Spatial Interpolation Methods for Potential Soil Erosion in Guizhou Province Based on Census Sampling Units

Effects of Climate Change and Human Activities on Vegetation Change in Guizhou Province from 2001 to 2020

Synergistic Evolution and Interaction of Soil Erosion and Rocky Desertification in Karst Area

Wind Erosion Climatic Erosivity and Its Response to Climate Change in Northeast China in Recent 39 Years

Spatial and Temporal Evolution Characteristics of Karst Agricultural Drought Based on Different Time Scales and Driving Detection—A Case Study of Guizhou Province

Related Author

YANG Qinke

ZHANG Keli

YUAN Ruilin

YANG Mingke

ZHANG Lang

YOU Man

HE Zhonghua

PI Guining

Related Institution

College of Urban and Environmental Sciences， Northwest University

State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology

Faculty of Geographical Science， Beijing Normal University

Guizhou Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Application of Mountain Resources and Environment

National Engineering Technology Research Center for Karst Rocky Desertification Control, Guizhou Normal University

⁰