Ecological Stoichiometry and Carbon Storage Under Different Vegetation Types in Mountainous Area of Southern Ningxia, China

DING Xinli; MA Zhenhua; ZHAO Huixue; KANG Long; CAO Yang

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.05.008

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Ecological Stoichiometry and Carbon Storage Under Different Vegetation Types in Mountainous Area of Southern Ningxia, China

更新时间：2025-02-18

- Ecological Stoichiometry and Carbon Storage Under Different Vegetation Types in Mountainous Area of Southern Ningxia, China
- Vol. 38, Issue 5, Pages: 364-373(2024)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心, 陕西杨凌,712100
  2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
  3. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
  4. 国家林业和草原局西北调查规划院,西安,710048
  5. 西北农林科技大学林学院, 陕西杨凌,712100
  6. 西北农林科技大学黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨凌,712100
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.05.008
  CLC： S714.5
- Published：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
DING Xinli, MA Zhenhua, ZHAO Huixue, et al. Ecological Stoichiometry and Carbon Storage Under Different Vegetation Types in Mountainous Area of Southern Ningxia, China[J]. 2024, 38(5): 364-373.
DOI：

DING Xinli, MA Zhenhua, ZHAO Huixue, et al. Ecological Stoichiometry and Carbon Storage Under Different Vegetation Types in Mountainous Area of Southern Ningxia, China[J]. 2024, 38(5): 364-373. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.05.008.

摘要

[目的] 为了阐明不同植被类型的土壤养分状况与固碳能力差异。[方法] [HTSS] 以宁夏南部山区具有代表性的乔木纯林(山杏林和刺槐林)、乔木混交林(刺槐+山杏)、乔灌混交林(山桃+柠条)、灌木林(沙棘)、草地共6种植被类型为研究对象

通过野外调查和室内分析相结合的方式

研究各植被类型0—100 cm土层的生态化学计量特征与碳储量。[结果] 研究区土壤C、N、P变化分别为19.74~35.11

1.74~3.19

1.60~1.69 g/kg

C、N均表现为随土层深度的增加而递减

其中刺槐+山杏林地的C、N在0—80 cm土层显著高于其他类型

P在各类型和土层间均无显著性差异。土壤C∶N在0—40 cm土层刺槐林显著较低

40—100 cm土层不同植被类型间无显著差异

土壤C∶P和N∶P受植被类型影响较大

表现为刺槐+山杏林地最高。各植被类型的C∶N在不同土层间没有明显差异

C∶P和N∶P表现为随着土层的增加而降低。土壤0—100 cm土层碳储量为5.98~38.21 t/hm2

各植被类型间差异较大

总体表现为刺槐+山杏＞刺槐＞山杏＞沙棘＞山桃+柠条＞草地

刺槐+山杏林显著高于其他植被类型。[结论] 宁南山区乔灌林地养分循环模式与固碳能力优于草地

且刺槐+山杏混交林造林模式最佳

营造混交林是提高土壤固碳能力的一个重要途径。

Abstract

[Objective] To elucidate the differences in soil nutrient status and carbon sequestration capabilities among various vegetation types. [Methods] This study focused on six representative vegetation types in the southern mountainous areas of Ningxia: pure tree plantations (Prunus sibirica L. and Robinia pseudoacacia L.)

mixed tree plantations (Robinia pseudoacacia L.+ Prunus sibirica L.)

mixed tree and shrub plantations (Prunus davidiana (Carrière) Franch.+ Caragana korshinskii Kom.)

shrub plantations (Hippophae rhamnoides L.)

and grasslands. Through a combination of field surveys and laboratory analyses

we investigated the ecological stoichiometry and carbon storage of the 0—100 cm soil layer across these vegetation types. [Results] C

and P contents varied between 19.74~35.11 g/kg

1.74 ~3.19 g/kg

and 1.60~1.69 g/kg

respectively

with both C and N contents decreasing with increasing soil depth. Furthermore

the C and N contents in the Robinia pseudoacacia L.+ Prunus sibirica L. were significantly higher than those in other types up to a depth of 80 cm

while P content showed no significant differences among types or soil layers. Soil C∶N ratio were significantly lower in Robinia pseudoacacia L.+ Prunus sibirica L. within the 0—40 cm layer

with no significant differences observed among vegetation types from 40—100 cm. Soil C∶P and N∶P ratios were significantly influenced by vegetation type

showing the highest values in the mixed forest of Robinia pseudoacacia L.and Prunus sibirica L.; Soil C∶N of these vegetation types showed no significant differences among layers . Soil C∶P and N∶P ratios were decreased with soil depth. Soil carbon storage 0—100 cm varied between 5.98~38.21 t/hm2 and had significant differences among these types

with all of them showed the order: Robinia pseudoacacia L.+ Prunus sibirica L.> Robinia pseudoacacia L.> Prunus sibirica L.>Hippophae rhamnoides L.>Prunus davidiana (Carrière) Franch.+ Caragana korshinskii Kom.>grassland. In addition

the mixed plantation of Robinia pseudoacacia L. and Prunus sibirica L. had significantly higher carbon storage than other vegetation types. [Conclusion] Tree and shrub lands in the southern Ningxia mountainous region have superior nutrient cycling patterns and carbon sequestration capabilities compared to grasslands

with the mixed planting model of Robinia pseudoacacia L.and Prunus sibirica L. being the most effective. Therefore

creating mixed plantations is an important approach to enhance soil carbon sequestration capacity.

关键词

Keywords

references

TANG B, ROCCI K S, LEHMANN A, et al. Nitrogen increases soil organic carbon accrual and alters its functionality[J].Global Change Biology,2023,29(7):1971-1983.

YE C L, HUANG W J, HALL S J, et al. Association of organic carbon with reactive iron oxides driven by soil pH at the global scale[J].Global Biogeochemical Cycles,2022,36(1):e2021GB007128.

XIANG Y Z, LI Y, LUO X, et al. Mixed plantations enhance more soil organic carbon stocks than monocultures across China[J].Science of the Total Environment,2022,821:e153449.

宋瑞朋,杨起帆,郑智恒,等.3种林下植被类型对杉木人工林土壤有机碳及其组分特征的影响[J].生态环境学报,2022,31(12):2283-2291.SONG R P, YANG Q F, ZHENG Z H, et al. Effects of three understory vegetation types on soil organic carbon and its components in

Cunninghamia lanceolata

plantation[J].Ecology and Environmental Sciences,2022,31(12):2283-2291.

YU Z J, WANG K B, LI J W, et al. Mixed plantations have more soil carbon sequestration benefits than pure plantations in China[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2023,529:e120654.

XIAO L M, ZHANG W, HU P L, et al. The formation of large macroaggregates induces soil organic carbon sequestration in short-term cropland restoration in a typical karst area[J].Science of the Total Environment,2021,801:e149588.

申继凯,黄懿梅,黄倩,等.黄土高原不同植被类型土壤微生物残体碳的积累及其对有机碳的贡献[J].应用生态学报,2024,35(1):124-132.SHEN J K, HUANG Y M, HUANG Q, et al. Accumulation of microbial necromass carbon and their contribution to soil organic carbon in different vegetation types on the Loess Plateau, Northwest China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2024,35(1):124-132.

衣鹏慧,吴会峰,胡保安,等.黄土高原地区退耕还林后土壤有机碳储量变化特征及影响因素[J].生态学报,2023,43(24):10054-10064.YI P H, WU H F, HU B A, et al. Variation characteristics and influencing factors of soil organic carbon storage after returning farmland to forest on the Loess Plateau[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2023,43(24):10054-10064.

CAO Y, LI Y N, ZHANG G Q, et al. Fine root C[DK]∶N[DK]∶P stoichiometry and its driving factors across forest ecosystems in northwestern China[J].Science of the Total Environment,2020,737:e140299.

李明,秦洁,红雨,等.氮素添加对贝加尔针茅草原土壤团聚体碳、氮和磷生态化学计量学特征的影响[J].草业学报,2019,28(12):29-40.LI M, QIN J, HONG Y, et al. Effects of nitrogen addition on ecological stoichiometric characteristics of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in

Stipa baicalensis

grassland soil aggregates[J].Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2019,28(12):29-40.

李欣阳,张娟娟,周建云,等.宁南山区人工混交林叶片-凋落物-细根生态化学计量特征[J].应用生态学报,2023,34(11):2889-2897.LI X Y, ZHANG J J, ZHOU J Y, et al. Ecological stoichiometry of leaf-litter-fine roots in mixed plantations in mountainous area of Southern Ningxia, China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2023,34(11):2889-2897.

刘若莎,王冬梅.黄土高原高寒区不同人工林土壤养分及生态化学计量特征[J].北京林业大学学报,2021,43(1):88-95.LIU R S, WANG D M. Soil nutrients and ecostoichiometric characteristics of different plantations in the alpine region of the Loess Plateau[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2021,43(1):88-95.

田地,严正兵,方精云.植物生态化学计量特征及其主要假说[J].植物生态学报,2021,45(7):682-713.TIAN D, YAN Z B, FANG J Y. Review on characteristics and main hypotheses of plant ecological stoichiometry[J].Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2021,45(7):682-713.

吴贤忠,李毅,张世才,等.甘南高原城市面山绿化林土壤生态化学计量特征[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2023,58(6):145-154.WU X Z, LI Y, ZHANG S C, et al. Soil ecological stoichiometric characteristics of urban green forest in Gannan Plateau[J].Journal of Gansu Agricultural University,2023,58(6):145-154.

姜红梅,李明治,王亲,等.祁连山东段不同植被下土壤养分状况研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(5):166-170.JIANG H M, LI M Z, WANG Q, et al. Dynamics of soil nutrients under different vegetation types in the eastern Qilian Mountains[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(5):166-170.

王佳璇,寇再兴.毛乌素沙地南缘不同植被类型土壤生态化学计量特征[J].农业与技术,2023,43(14):105-108.WANG J X, KOU Z X. Soil eco-stoichiometric characteristics of different vegetation types in the southern margin of Mu Us Sandy Land[J].Agriculture and Technology,2023,43(14):105-108.

TILMAN D, KNOPS J, WEDIN D, et al. The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes[J].Science,1997,277(5330):1300-1302.

王国梁,刘国彬,许明祥.黄土丘陵区纸坊沟流域植被恢复的土壤养分效应[J].水土保持通报,2002,22(1):1-5.WANG G L, LIU G B, XU M X. Effect of vegetation restoration on soil nutrient changes in Zhifanggou watershed of Loess Hilly Region[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,22(1):1-5.

刘国彬,上官周平,姚文艺,等.黄土高原生态工程的生态成效[J].中国科学院院刊,2017,32(1):11-19.LIU G B, SHANGGUAN Z P, YAO W Y, et al. Ecological effects of soil conservation in Loess Plateau[J].Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2017,32(1):11-19.

ZHANG Q Y, JIA X X, WEI X R, et al. Total soil organic carbon increases but becomes more labile after afforestation in China’s Loess Plateau[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2020,461:e117911.

张智勇,王瑜,艾宁,等.陕北黄土区不同植被类型土壤有机碳分布特征及其影响因素[J].北京林业大学学报,2020,42(11):56-63.ZHANG Z Y, WANG Y, AI N, et al. Distribution characteristics of soil organic carbon and its influencing factors in different vegetation types in loess region of northern Shaanxi Province, northwestern China[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2020,42(11):56-63.

于欢,魏天兴,陈宇轩,等.黄土丘陵区典型人工林土壤有机碳储量的分布特征[J].北京林业大学学报,2023,45(12):100-107.YU H, WEI T X, CHEN Y X, et al. Distribution characteristics of soil organic carbon stocks in typical plantations in Loess Hilly Region of northwestern China[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2023,45(12):100-107.

胡亚伟,孙若修,申明爽,等.晋西黄土区土地利用方式对土壤C∶N∶P化学计量特征及土壤理化性质的影响[J].干旱区研究,2021,38(4):990-999.HU Y W, SUN R X, SHEN M S, et al. Effects of land use types on the stoichiometric characteristics of soil C∶N∶P and the physical and chemical properties of soil in western Shanxi loess region[J].Arid Zone Research,2021,38(4):990-999.

张穗粒,盛茂银,王霖娇,等.西南喀斯特长期植被修复对土壤有机碳组分的影响[J].生态学报,2023,43(20):8476-8492.ZHANG S L, SHENG M Y, WANG L J, et al. Effects of long term vegetation restorations on soil organic carbon fractions in the karst rocky desertification ecosystem, Southwest China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2023,43(20):8476-8492.

刘瑞龙,杨万勤,吴福忠,等.川西亚高山/高山森林凋落物分解过程中土壤动物群落结构及其多样性动态[J].应用与环境生物学报,2014,20(3):499-507.LIU R L, YANG W Q, WU F Z, et al. Soil fauna community structure and diversity during foliar litter decomposition in the subalpine/alpine forests of western Sichuan[J].Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology,2014,20(3):499-507.

朱秋莲,邢肖毅,张宏,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同植被区土壤生态化学计量特征[J].生态学报,2013,33(15):4674-4682.ZHU Q L, XING X Y, ZHANG H, et al. Soil ecological stoichiometry under different vegetation area on loess hillygully region[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2013,33(15):4674-4682.

XIANG T, QIANG F F, LIU G Q, et al. Soil quality evaluation of typical vegetation and their response to precipitation in loess hilly and gully areas[J].Forests,2023,14(9):e1909.

FENG Y H, SCHMID B, LOREAU M, et al. Multispecies forest plantations outyield monocultures across a broad range of conditions[J].Science,2022,376(6595):865-868.

罗婷,黄甫昭,李健星,等.广西漓江流域喀斯特地区植被不同恢复阶段植物优势种叶片和土壤的生态化学计量特征[J].植物资源与环境学报,2024,33(2):80-90.LUO T, HUANG F Z, LI J X, et al. Ecological stoichiometry characteristics of plant dominant species leaf and soil at different restoration stages of vegetation in the karst area of the Lijiang River Basin in Guangxi[J].Journal of Plant Resources and Environment,2024,33(2):80-90.

崔高阳,曹扬,陈云明.陕西省森林各生态系统组分氮磷化学计量特征[J].植物生态学报,2015,39(12):1146-1155.CUI G Y, CAO Y, CHEN Y M. Characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across components of forest ecosystem in Shaanxi Province[J].Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2015,39(12):1146-1155.

全国土壤普查办公室.中国土种志[M].1卷.北京:农业出版社,1993.National Land Resources Investigation Office. Chinese soil record[M].1 Roll. Beijing: Agricultural Publishing House,1993.

魏孝荣,邵明安.黄土高原沟壑区小流域坡地土壤养分分布特征[J].生态学报,2007,27(2):603-612.WEI X R, SHAO M A. The distribution of soil nutrients on sloping land in the Gully Region watershed of the Loess Plateau[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2007,27(2):603-612.

李鑫,曾全超,安韶山,等.黄土高原纸坊沟流域不同植物叶片及枯落物的生态化学计量学特征研究[J].环境科学,2015,36(3):1084-1091.LI X, ZENG Q C, AN S S, et al. Ecological stoichiometric characteristics in leaf and litter under different vegetation types of Zhifanggou watershed on the Loess Plateau, China[J].Environmental Science,2015,36(3):1084-1091.

彭少麟,刘强.森林凋落物动态及其对全球变暖的响应[J].生态学报,2002,22(9):1534-1544.PENG S L, LIU Q. The dynamics of forest litter and its responses to global warming[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2002,22(9):1534-1544.

马寰菲,解梦怡,胡汗,等.秦岭不同海拔森林土壤-植物-凋落物化学计量特征对土壤氮组分的影响[J].生态学杂志,2020,39(3):749-757.MA H F, XIE M Y, HU H, et al. Effects of stoichiometric characteristics of soil-plant-litter on soil nitrogen components in different forests along an elevational gradient of Qinling Mountains[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2020,39(3):749-757.

李树斌,周丽丽,陈宝英,等.亚热带树种转换对林地土壤碳氮磷计量比的影响[J].森林与环境学报,2019,39(6):575-583.LI S B, ZHOU L L, CHEN B Y, et al. Effects of tree species transition on stoichiometric ratios of soil carbon,nitrogen and phosphorus in subtropical areas[J].Journal of Forest and Environment,2019,39(6):575-583.

李子阳,刘伟,李春培,等.紫色土丘陵区退耕还林对坡地土壤碳氮空间分布的影响[J].环境科学,2024,45(7):4206-4217.LI Z Y, LIU W, LI C P, et al. Effects of "Grain for Green" on the spatial distribution of soil carbon and nitrogen in purple hilly area of China[J].Environmntal Science,2024,45(7):4206-4217.

TIAN H Q, WANG S Q, LIU J Y, et al. Patterns of soil nitrogen storage in China[J].Global Biogeochemical Cycles,2006,20(1):eGB1001.

CLEVELAND C C, LIPTZIN D. C∶N∶P stoichiometry in soil: Is there a "Redfield ratio" for the microbial biomass?[J].Biogeochemistry,2007,85(3):235-252.

何博.巨桉纯林皆伐后营造混交林对土壤生态酶及化学计量特征初期的影响[D]. 四川雅安:四川农业大学,2023.HE B. Effects of planting mixed forests after clear cutting of Eucalyptus grandis pure forests on soil ecological enzyme activities and stoichiometry in the early stage of afforestation[D].Yaan, Sichuan: Sichuan Agricultural University,2023.

TIAN L M, ZHAO L, WU X D, et al. Soil moisture and texture primarily control the soil nutrient stoichiometry across the Tibetan grassland[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,622:192-202.

赵雅洁,张静,宋海燕,等.不同土壤厚度、水分和种植方式对喀斯特两种草本凋落物分解质量损失和化学计量特征的影响[J].生态学报,2018,38(18):6549-6558.ZHAO Y J, ZHANG J, SONG H Y, et al. Effects of different soil thickness, water and planting patterns on the litter mass loss and stoichiometry characteristics of two herbs in the karst regions[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2018,38(18):6549-6558.

曾全超,李鑫,董扬红,等.黄土高原延河流域不同植被类型下土壤生态化学计量学特征[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(11):1881-1891.ZENG Q C, LI X, DONG Y H, et al. Ecological stoichiometry of soils in the Yanhe watershed in the Loess Plateau: The influence of different vegetation zones[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2016,31(11):1881-1891.

RAY T, DELORY B M, BEUGNON R, et al. Tree diversity increases productivity through enhancing structural complexity across mycorrhizal types[J].Science Advances,2023,9(40):eadi2362.

徐国荣,马维伟,宋良翠,等.植被不同退化状态下尕海湿地土壤氮含量及酶活性特征[J].生态学报,2020,40(24):8917-8927.XU G R, MA W W, SONG L C, et al. Characteristics of soil nitrogen content and enzyme activity in Gahai wetland under different vegetation degradation conditions[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2020,40(24):8917-8927.

ZHANG J J, LI X Y, CHEN M, et al. Response of plant, litter, and soil C∶N∶P stoichiometry to growth stages in

Quercus

secondary forests on the Loess Plateau, China[J].Journal of Forestry Research,2023,34(3):595-607.

李龙波,涂成龙,赵志琦,等.黄土高原不同植被覆盖下土壤有机碳的分布特征及其同位素组成研究[J].地球与环境,2011,39(4):441-449.LI L B, TU C L, ZHAO Z Q, et al. Distribution characteristics of soil organic carbon and its isotopic composition for soil profiles of Loess Plateau under different vegetation conditions[J].Earth and Environment,2011,39(4):441-449.

廖洪凯,龙健.喀斯特山区不同植被类型土壤有机碳的变化[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(9):2253-2258.LIAO H K, LONG J. Variation of soil organic carbon under different vegetation types in karst mountain areas of Guizhou Province, Southwest China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2011,22(9):2253-2258.

GONG C, TAN Q Y, LIU G B, et al. Mixed-species plantations enhance soil carbon stocks on the Loess Plateau of China[J].Plant and Soil,2021,464(1):13-28.

ZHANG W, LIU W C, XU M P, et al. Response of forest growth to C∶N∶P stoichiometry in plants and soils during Robinia pseudoacacia afforestation on the Loess Plateau, China[J].Geoderma,2019,337:280-289.

苗蕾.太行山南麓山区典型森林类型土壤有机碳特征[D].北京:北京林业大学,2016.MIAO L. Characteristic of soil organic carbon of typical forest in Taihang Mountains’ southern foot forest[D].Beijing: Beijing Forestry University,2016.

REGELINK I C, STOOF C R, ROUSSEVA S, et al. Linkages between aggregate formation, porosity and soil chemical properties[J].Geoderma,2015,247:24-37.

LU X F, HOU E Q, GUO J Y, et al. Nitrogen addition stimulates soil aggregation and enhances carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems of China: A meta-analysis[J].Global Change Biology,2021,27(12):2780-2792.

WANG B R, ZHAO X D, LIU Y, et al. Using soil aggregate stability and erodibility to evaluate the sustainability of large-scale afforestation of Robinia pseudoacacia and Caragana korshinskii in the Loess Plateau[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2019,450:e117491.

Views

568

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Composition and Influencing Factors of Carbon Storage and Sequestration in Subtropical Forests ——A Case Study of Wuning County

Dynamic Response and Driver Analysis of Carbon Storage in Typical Natural Vegetation over China under Climate Change

Soil Physicochemical Properties and Enzyme Activity Characteristics of Four Typical Vegetation Types in Saline-alkali Lands of the Hexi Corridor

Spatial and Temporal Correlation Analysis and Prediction of Land Use Ecological Risk and Carbon Stock in Yunnan Province

Spatial Differentiation and Correlation of Ecological Stoichiometric Characteristics of

Related Author

XIONG Yuanqiao

YI Yang

WANG Yujie

LIU Min

ZHANG Guilian

XU Shulei

ZHANG Na

ZHU Jinqi

Related Institution

Southwest Electric Power Design Institute CO.，LTD. of China Power Engineering Consulting Group

Shanghai Academy of Landscape Architecture Science and Planning

School of Soil and Water Conservation， Beijing Forestry University

Engineering Research Center of Watershed Carbon Neutralization， Ministry of Education， Nanchang University

Jiangxi Institute of Ecological Civilization， Nanchang University

⁰