

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 北京师范大学地理科学学部,北京,100875
2. 北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室,北京,100875
Published:2024
移动端阅览
ZHANG Ning, ZHANG Guanghui, XING Shukun. Soil Resistance and Its Influencing Factors Under Different Land Use Types in the Black Soil Region of Northeast China[J]. 2024, 38(5): 40-48.
ZHANG Ning, ZHANG Guanghui, XING Shukun. Soil Resistance and Its Influencing Factors Under Different Land Use Types in the Black Soil Region of Northeast China[J]. 2024, 38(5): 40-48. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.05.002.
[目的] 土壤侵蚀阻力反映了土壤抵抗侵蚀的性能
包括细沟可蚀性(Kr)和土壤临界剪切力(τc)。通过水槽冲刷试验探究不同土地利用类型下土壤侵蚀阻力差异及其主控因素
为揭示东北黑土区土壤侵蚀动力机制提供理论基础。[方法] 在黑龙江省嫩江市鹤山农场鹤北小流域选取7种典型的土地利用类型
利用水槽冲刷试验测定土壤分离能力
拟合了Kr和τc
采用相关分析和偏最小二乘回归方法
确定影响土壤侵蚀阻力的主要因素。[结果] (1)不同土地利用类型样地Kr为0.003~0.372 s/m
道路Kr最高
与农地相比
草地、横向林带、林地、纵向林带和灌木的Kr分别降低94.00%
86.20%
84.00%
83.60%和71.60%;τc为4.84~13.85 Pa
农地和道路较低
分别为4.84
9.80 Pa
其他样地τc均>10.00 Pa
且无显著差异。(2)相关分析结果表明
Kr与黏粒、团聚体稳定性和有机质呈极显著负相关(p <0.01)
与砂粒、黏结力、根系质量密度和混入表土层的枯落物密度呈显著负相关(p <0.05)
与粉粒呈极显著正相关(p <0.01);τc与粉粒呈极显著负相关(p <0.01)
与砂粒和混入表土层的枯落物密度呈极显著正相关(p <0.01)
与有机质和根系质量密度呈显著正相关(p <0.05)。(3)偏最小二乘回归结果表明
Kr主要受土壤黏粒、粉粒、团聚体稳定性、根系质量密度、有机质和混入表土层的枯落物密度影响;τc主要受土壤有机质、混入表土层的枯落物密度、粉粒和根系质量密度影响。[结论] 土地利用类型显著影响土壤侵蚀阻力
草地减缓侵蚀效果最佳
减少农地水土流失至关重要。根系质量密度、枯落物密度、土壤质地、团聚体稳定性和有机质是影响土壤侵蚀阻力的关键因子。研究结果为揭示东北黑土区土地利用类型影响土壤侵蚀动力机制及土地利用优化提供理论基础。
[Objective] Soil resistance reflects the characteristics of soil to mitigate erosion and is quantified by rill erodibility (Kr) and critical shear stress (τc). To investigate the difference of soil resistance and its main controlling factors under different land use types through the flume scouring test
which provided a theoretical basis for revealing the dynamic mechanism of soil erosion in Northeast black soil area. [Methods] Seven typical land use types were selected in the Hebei small watershed of Heshan farm
located in Nenjiang city of Heilongjiang Province. Kr and τc were determined using the measured soil detachment capacity by scouring test in a large hydraulic flume. The dominant factors influencing soil resistance were determined by correlation analysis and partial least square regression. [Results] (1) The estimated Kr varied from 0.003 to 0.372 s/m among different land use types. Krof road was the highest. Compared to cropland
Kr of grassland
transverse forest belt
woodland
longitudinal forest belt
and shrub land decreased by 94.00%
86.20%
84.00%
83.60%
and 71.60%. The fitted τc ranged from 4.84 and 13.85 Pa. Cropland and road had lowest τc (4.84 and 9.80 Pa). The differences in τc were not significant between other land use types and were greater than 10.00 Pa. (2) Correlation analysis showed that Kr was significantly correlated with clay content
aggregate stability and organic matter content (p<0.01)
and sand content
soil cohesion
root mass density and litter density mixed within topsoil layer negatively (p<0.05). It was significantly correlated with silt content positively (p<0.01). τc was significantly related to silt content negatively (p<0.01). It was significantly correlation with sand content and topsoil litter density (p<0.01)
and organic matter content and root mass density positively (p<0.05). (3) The results of PLSR analysis demonstrated that the dominant factors influencing Kr were soil clay content
silt content
aggregate stability
root mass density
organic matter content and litter density mixed within topsoil layer. The key factors affecting τc were soil organic matter content
litter density mixed within topsoil layer
silt content and root mass density. [Conclusion] Land use type significantly affects soil resistance. Grassland is most effective at mitigating erosion and is critical for reducing erosion on cropland. Root mass density
litter density
soil texture
aggregate stability and organic matter content are key factors influencing soil resistance. The results of the study provide a theoretical basis for understanding the mechanism of land use type impacting soil erosion dynamics and land use optimization in the black soil area.
刘兴土,阎百兴.东北黑土区水土流失与粮食安全[J].中国水土保持,2009(1):17-19. LIU X T, YAN B X. Soil erosion and food security in black soil region of Northeast China[J].Soil and Water Conservation in China,2009(1):17-19.
李发鹏,李景玉,徐宗学.东北黑土区土壤退化及水土流失研究现状[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(3):50-54. LI F P, LI J Y, XU Z X. The status quo of black soil degradation and water and soil loss in Northeast China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(3):50-54.
郑粉莉,张加琼,刘刚,等.东北黑土区坡耕地土壤侵蚀特征与多营力复合侵蚀的研究重点[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(4):314-319. ZHENG F L, ZHANG J Q, LIU G, et al. Characteristics of soil erosion on sloping farmlands and key fields for studying compound soil erosion caused by multi-forces in mollisol region of Northeast China[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,39(4):314-319.
刘宝元,阎百兴,沈波,等.东北黑土区农地水土流失现状与综合治理对策[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(1):1-8. LIU B Y, YAN B X, SHEN B, et al. Current status and comprehensive control strategies of soil erosion for cultivated land in the Northeastern black soil area of China[J].Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,6(1):1-8.
张光辉.对土壤侵蚀研究的几点思考[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(4):21-30. ZHANG G H. Several ideas related to soil erosion research[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,34(4):21-30.
ZHANG G H, LIU B Y, LIU G B, et al. Detachment of undisturbed soil by shallow flow[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2003,67(3):713-719.
卢进波,李子健.水力侵蚀的土壤分离能力影响因素述评[J].水土保持应用技术,2022(2):40-42. LU J B, LI Z J. Review on factors affecting soil separation ability of hydraulic erosion[J].Technology of Soil and Water Conservation,2022(2):40-42.
LI Z W, ZHANG G H, GENG R, et al. Rill erodibility as influenced by soil and land use in a small watershed of the Loess Plateau, China[J].Biosystems Engineering,2015,129:248-257.
张光辉,杨扬,刘瑛娜,等.东北黑土区土壤侵蚀研究进展与展望[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(2):1-12. ZHANG G H, YANG Y, LIU Y N, et al. Research progress and prospect of soil erosion in black soil region of Northeast China[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,36(2):1-12.
郑世清,周佩华.土壤容重和降雨强度与土壤侵蚀和入渗关系的定量分析[J].中国科学院西北水土保持研究所集刊,1988(1):53-56. ZHENG S Q, ZHOU P H. A quantitative study of relationship between soil density and soil erosion[J].Memoir of Northwestern Institute of Soil and Water Conservation Academia Sinica,1988(1):53-56.
GHEBREIYESSUS Y T, GANTZER C J, ALBERTS E E, et al. Soil erosion by concentrated flow: Shear stress and bulk density[J].Transactions of the ASAE,1994,37(6):1791-1797.
BRYAN R B. Soil erodibility and processes of water erosion on hillslope[J].Geomorphology,2000,32(3/4):385-415.
蔡强国.坡面细沟发生临界条件研究[J].泥沙研究,1998(1):54-61. CAI Q G. Study on critical conditions of rill occurrence on slope surface[J].Journal of Sediment Research,1998(1):54-61.
魏朝富,高明,谢德体,等.有机肥对紫色水稻土水稳性团聚体的影响[J].土壤通报,1995,26(3): 114-116. WEI C F, GAO M, XIE D T, et al. Effect of organic fertilizer on water-stable aggregates in purple paddy soil[J].Chinese Journal of Soil Science,1995,26(3):114-116.
ZHANG G H, TANG K M, REN Z P, et al. Impact of grass root mass density on soil detachment capacity by concentrated flow on steep slopes[J].Transactions of the ASABE,2013,56:927-934.
徐秋芳,钱新标,桂祖云.不同林木凋落物分解对土壤性质的影响[J].浙江林学院学报,1998,15(1): 29-33. XU Q F, QIAN X B, GUI Z Y. Effects of litter decomposition of different trees on soil properties[J].Journal of Zhejiang A&F University,1998,15(1):29-33.
SUN L, ZHANG G H, LIU F, et al. Effects of incorporated plant litter on soil resistance to flowing water erosion in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Biosystems Engineering,2016,147:238-247.
ZHANG G H, LIU G B, TANG K M, et al. Flow detachment of soils under different land uses in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Transactions of the ASABE,2008,51(3):883-890.
WANG B, ZHANG G H, SHI Y Y, et al. Soil detachment by overland flow under different vegetation restoration models in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Catena,2014,116:51-59.
孙龙,张光辉,王兵,等.黄土高原不同退耕年限刺槐林地土壤侵蚀阻力[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(10):191-197. SUN L, ZHANG G H, WANG B, et al. Soil erosion resistance of black locust land with different ages of returning farmland on Loess Plateau[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2017,33(10):191-197.
刘刚,邢婉君,焦剑.典型黑土区坡耕地次产流径流曲线数计算方法[J].中国水土保持科学(中英文),2021,19(1):28-34. LIU G, XING W J, JIAO J. A method for calculating curve number of each runoff event on a sloping cropland in the Typical Black Soil Region[J].Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,19(1):28-34.
WANG C S, ZHANG G H, ZHU P Z, et al. Spatial variation of soil functions affected by land use type and slope position in agricultural small watershed[J].Catena,2023,225:e107029.
张小真,宋媛,胡亚鲜.黑土层不同粒级结构下有机碳矿化的模拟研究[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(2):74-80. ZHANG X Z, SONG Y, HU Y X. Simulation of organic carbon mineralization in black soil layers with different particle size structures[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(2):74-80.
苏子龙,张光辉,于艳.东北典型黑土区不同土地利用方式土壤水分动态变化特征[J].地理科学,2013,33(9):1104-1110. SU Z L, ZHANG G H, YU Y. Soil moisture characteristic of different land use types in the typical black soil region of Northeast China[J].Scientia Geographica Sinica,2013,33(9):1104-1110.
李骜,段兴武.利用黑土层厚度评价东北黑土区土壤生产力:以鹤北小流域为例[J].水土保持通报,2014,34(1):154-159. LI A, DUAN X W. Productivity assessment for black soil region in northeastern China using black soil thickness: A case study of Hebei watershed[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,34(1):154-159.
TANG J, LIU G, XIE Y, et al. Annual variation of ephemeral gully erosion in a cultivated catchment[J].Geoderma, 2021,401:e115166.
王库.植物根系对土壤抗侵蚀能力的影响[J].土壤与环境,2001,10(3):250-252. WANG K. Effects of plant roots on soil anti-erosion[J].Soil and Environmental Sciences,2001,10(3):250-252.
SHERIDAN G J, SO H B, LOCH R J, et al. Estimation of erosion model erodibility parameters from media properties[J].Soil Research,2000,38(2):e265.
GENG R, ZHANG G H, MA Q H, et al. Effects of landscape positions on soil resistance to rill erosion in a small catchment on the Loess Plateau[J].Biosystems Engineering,2017,160:95-108.
WANG H, ZHANG G H, LI N N, et al. Soil erodibility influenced by natural restoration time of abandoned farmland on the Loess Plateau of China[J].Geoderma,2018,325:18-27.
李振炜.黄土丘陵区小流域土壤分离能力空间变异[D].北京:中国科学院大学,2015. LI Z W. Spatial variability of soil detachment capacity in a small watershed on the hilly Loess Plateau[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2015.
0
Views
640
下载量
4
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621