

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
2. 北京林业大学水土保持与荒漠化防治教育部重点实验室,北京,100083
3. 西藏农牧学院资源与环境学院,拉萨,860000
4. 中国铁道科学研究院集团有限公司节能环保劳卫研究所,北京,100081
Published:2024
移动端阅览
ZHEN Ziyun, ZHAO Yang, JIANG Qun'ou, et al. Field Simulation of Runoff and Sand Production on Degraded and Revegetated Slopes in Alpine Meadows Under Rainfall Conditions[J]. 2024, 38(4): 153-161.
ZHEN Ziyun, ZHAO Yang, JIANG Qun'ou, et al. Field Simulation of Runoff and Sand Production on Degraded and Revegetated Slopes in Alpine Meadows Under Rainfall Conditions[J]. 2024, 38(4): 153-161. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.04.039.
[目的] 青藏高原是我国重要生态屏障
高寒草甸是其重要组成部分
水土保持功能是高寒草甸重要生态服务功能。开展青藏高原高寒草甸区水土流失过程研究对减少人为扰动水土流失、保障西南地区生态安全具有重要意义。[方法] 选取青藏高原高寒草甸未退化、轻度退化、中度退化、裸坡与人工植被恢复5种不同类型坡面
通过野外模拟降雨试验
分析不同雨强条件下
不同植被退化与恢复坡面产流产沙过程
揭示植被退化与人工植被恢复坡面土壤侵蚀机理与水沙关系。[结果] (1)高寒草甸未退化坡面与人工植草恢复坡面因其根系较为致密
其水分下渗能力相对较弱
故初始产流时间相对较短;而对于轻度退化坡面
侧流与纵向入渗能力相对较强
初始产流时间相对较长。(2)在常规降雨条件下(30
60 mm/h)
轻度退化坡面产流量最小
减流效益最高
达到77.13%;人工恢复坡面产流量与未退化坡面接近
略高于轻度退化坡面;而裸土坡面累计产流量最大
且显著高于其他坡面;极端降雨条件下(90 mm/h)未退化坡面产流量激增
仅低于裸坡并明显高于人工植被恢复坡面。(3)在常规降雨条件下(30
60 mm/h)
人工恢复植被坡面减沙效益最高
分别达到81.97%和89.82%
其次是未退化坡面
且随着植被退化程度增大
减沙效益逐渐降低;但在极端降雨条件下
人工恢复植被和未退化坡面减沙效益几乎相同
而中度退化坡面产沙量是未退化坡面的4.59倍;轻度退化坡面虽然具有较好的减流效益
但是减沙效益相对较差。[结论] 研究结果可为高寒草甸区植被恢复与生态安全提供重要科学依据。
[Objective] The Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau is an important ecological barrier in China
and alpine meadows are an important part of it
and the function of soil and water conservation is an important ecological service function of alpine meadows. Therefore
it is of great significance to carry out the study of soil erosion process in alpine meadows on the Tibetan Plateau to reduce anthropogenic disturbance of soil erosion and to safeguard the ecological security of the southwest region. [Methods] In this study
five different types of slopes
namely
undegraded
mildly degraded
moderately degraded
bare slopes and artificially restored slopes in alpine meadows of the Tibetan Plateau
were selected to analyze the process of flow and sand production on degraded and restored slopes under different rainfall intensities
and to reveal the relationship between the erosion mechanism and water-sand relationship between degraded slopes and restored slopes with artificial vegetation through the simulated rainfall test in the field. [Results] (1) The initial flow production time is relatively short on the undegraded slopes of alpine meadows and the restored slopes with artificial vegetation because of their dense root system
and the water infiltration ability is relatively weak; while on the mildly degraded slopes
the lateral flow and vertical infiltration ability are relatively strong
and the initial flow production time is relatively long. (2) Under regular rainfall conditions (30 and 60 mm/h)
the flow rate of mildly degraded slopes is the smallest
and the flow reduction benefit is the highest
reaching 77.13%
the flow rate of artificially restored slopes is close to that of undegraded slopes and is slightly higher than that of mildly degraded slopes; the cumulative flow rate of bare soil slopes is the largest
and it is significantly higher than other slopes; the flow rate of undegraded slopes under extreme rainfall conditions (90 mm/h) is surging
only lower than that of bare slopes and significantly higher than other slopes. Under extreme rainfall conditions (90 mm/h)
the flow rate of undegraded slopes increased
which was only lower than that of bare slopes and significantly higher than that of artificially restored slopes. (3) Under regular rainfall conditions (30 and 60 mm/h)
the sand reduction benefit of the artificially restored vegetated slopes was the highest
reaching 81.97% and 89.82%
followed by the undegraded slopes
and with the increase of the degradation degree of the vegetation
the sand reduction benefit was gradually reduced; however
under extreme rainfall conditions
the sand reduction benefit of the artificially restored vegetation and the undegraded slopes was almost the same
and the sand production of the moderately degraded slopes was higher than the undegraded slopes
which is significantly higher than the other slopes. However
under extreme rainfall conditions
the sand reduction benefits of artificially restored vegetation and undegraded slopes are almost the same
while the sand production of moderately degraded slopes is 4.59 times of that of undegraded slopes. [Conclusion] The results of these studies can provide important scientific basis for vegetation restoration and ecological security in alpine meadow area.
李军豪,杨国靖,王少平.青藏高原区退化高寒草甸植被和土壤特征[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(6):2109-2118. LI J H, YANG G J, WANG S P. Vegetation and soil characteristics of degraded alpine meadows on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China: A review[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2020,31(6):2109-2118.
LIU X, ZHANG W, WU M, et al. Changes in soil nitrogen stocks following vegetation restoration in a typical Karst Catchment[J].Land Degradation and Development, 2019,30(1):60-72.
BORRELLI P, ROBINSON D A, FLEISCHER L R, et al. An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion[J].Nature Communications,2017,8:e2013.
BORRELLI P, ROBINSON D A, PANAGOS P, et al. Land use and climate change impacts on global soil erosion by water (2015—2070)[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2020,117(36):21994-22001.
ROBINSON D A, PANAGOS P, BORRELLI P, et al. Soil natural capital in Europe: A framework for state and change assessment[J].Scientific Reports,2017,7:e6706.
TIAN Q L, ZHANG X P, HE J, et al. Potential risk of soil erosion on the Tibetan Plateau during 1990—2020: Impact of climate change and human activities[J]. Ecological Indicators,2023,154:e110669.
TANG C J, LIU Y, LI Z W, et al. Effectiveness of vegetation cover pattern on regulating soil erosion and runoff generation in red soil environment, Southern China[J].Ecological Indicators, 2021,129:e107956.
WANG G X, LIU G S, LI C J. Effects of changes in alpine grassland vegetation cover on hillslope hydrological processes in a permafrost watershed[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2012,444/445:22-33.
LIU Y, WANG D, CUI Z, et al. Alpine meadow patches unevenly regulate runoff and sediment yield generation on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J].Journal of Hydrology,2023,623:e129848.
NIU Y L, LI S Y, LIU Y, et al. Regulation of alpine meadow patch coverage on runoff and sediment under natural rainfall on the eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2021,603:e127101.
YANG K J, LU C H. Evaluation of land-use change effects on runoff and soil erosion of a hilly basin:The Yanhe River in the Chinese Loess Plateau[J].Land Degradation and Development,2018,29(4):1211-1221.
VALENTE M L, REICHERT J M, CAVALCANTE R B L, et al. Afforestation of degraded grasslands reduces sediment transport and may contribute to streamflow regulation in small catchments in the short-run[J].Catena,2021,204:e105371.
MIEHE G, SCHLEUSS P M, SEEBER E, et al. The
Kobresia pygmaea
ecosystem of the Tibetan highlands-Origin, functioning and degradation of the world’s largest pastoral alpine ecosystem[J].Science of the Total Environment,2019,648:754-771.
ZENG C, ZHANG F, WANG Q J, et al. Impact of alpine meadow degradation on soil hydraulic properties over the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2013,478:148-156.
蒋秋玲,信忠保,余新晓,等.北京山区侧柏林地坡面初始产流时间影响因素[J].中国水土保持科学,2019,17(4):1-8. JIANG Q L, XIN Z B, YU X X, et al. Factors affecting the initial runoff time of
Platycladus orientalis
plantation hillslope in Beijing mountainous area[J].Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,17(4):1-8.
陈泽勋,刘廷玺,王怡璇,等.模拟降雨条件下典型草原坡面初始产流时间及产流产沙量[J].生态学杂志,2022,41(7):1316-1323. CHEN Z X, LIU T X, WANG Y X, et al. Quantitative analysis of the contribution of different rainfall conditions to runoff and sediment yield on typical grassland slope[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2022,41(7):1316-1323.
林丽,张德罡,曹广民,等.高寒嵩草草甸植物群落数量特征对不同利用强度的短期响应[J].生态学报,2016,36(24):8034-8043. LIN L, ZHANG D G, CAO G M, et al. Plant functional groups numerical characteristics responses to different grazing intensities under different community succession stages of
Alpine Kobresia
meadow in spring[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2016,36(24):8034-8043.
马海霞,张德罡,陈瑾,等.祁连山东段高寒草甸模拟放牧下的坡面土壤水蚀特征[J].草地学报,2019,27(5):1347-1354. MA H X, ZHANG D G, CHEN J, et al. Soil erosion on slopes of alpine meadow in the eastern Qilian Mountains under simula?潥畤爠湧慲污?潩普??祊摝爮潁汣潴条礠??ひ?????????????有??戹爬?嬷㈨?崩??匳匴伷唭??丵??匼???啛?????奦??剬疉滿漬暽曺?昬牉漮淄?梐攺瓘旒牉漸服攌渍斫漟畩珏?猟淤慻氆沶?戔慶牛敊?挮慉琰捦梥洬攲渰琱猱?搱甹爨椱温机?猭漶椮氠?獁畎片映慙挠敌?猠敍慁氠楙渠杓嬬?嵓?坉愠瑊攠牊?删敥獴漠畡牬挮攠獉?剶敥獳整慩牧捡桴??の??????????坳ㄠ??つ???扩牬?孮??嵲????乮??塦????婦?啲?塮????奧啥?乡?婩?兮??数瑥?慡汴???慰瑩敮牥愠汭?晡汤潯睷?扩敮琠睙敥敬湬?扷愠汒摩?慥湲搠?癥敡杤敷瑡慴瑥楲漠湡?灥慡瑛捊桝攮獁?楴湡搠畁捧敲獥?瑴桩敡?摓敩杮物慣摡愬琲椰漱渱?漱昹?愱氩瀺椱渭收?洼敢慲搾潛眲‰楝渠?充楎湇朠桌愠楚?吠楓払敎琠慔渠?倬氠慆瑅敉愠畋嬬?嵥?匠捡楬攮渠捅敦?潥晣?瑳栠敯?吠潥瑲慯汳??湮瘠楤牥潧湲浥敥測琠??ど?????ㄠ?敮??????? and slope gradient on runoff and sediment yield for the bare soils from the weathered granite slopes of SE China[J].Geomorphology,2019,352(11):e106997.
王瑞红,李明鑫,张瀚,等.不同植被盖度对三峡库区边坡减蚀的室内模拟降雨研究[J].水土保持学报,2023,37(1):59-64. WANG R H, LI M X, ZHANG H, et al. Study on indoor simulated rainfall with different vegetation coverage on slope erosion reduction in the Three Gorges Reservoir area[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,37(1):59-64.
CHEN H, ZHANG X P, ABLA M, et al. Effects of vegetation and rainfall types on surface runoff and soil erosion on steep slopes on the Loess Plateau, China[J].Catena,2018,170:141-149.
王晗生,刘国彬,王青宁.防蚀有效植被的结构特征探讨[J].中国生态农业学报,2001,9(2):54-56. WANG H S, LIU G B, WANG Q N. Structural characteristics of effective vegetation for preventing soil erosion[J].Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,2001,9(2):54-56.
樊博,林丽,曹广民,等.不同演替状态下高寒草甸土壤物理性质与植物根系的相互关系[J].生态学报,2020,40(7):2300-2309. FAN B, LIN L, CAO G M, et al. Relationship between plant roots and physical soil properties in alpine meadows at different degradation stages[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2020,40(7):2300-2309.
ZHANG G L, YANG F, LONG H. Save the life-sustaining mattic layer on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J].The Innovation,2023,4(3):e100418.
WANG C T, LONG R J, WANG Q J. et al. Effects of altitude on plant-species diversity and productivity in an alpine meadow, Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J].Australian Journal of Bontany,2007,55(2):110-117.
BONNEAU J, FLETCHER T D, COSTELLOE J F, et al. Where does infiltrated stormwater go? Interactions with vegetation and subsurface anthropogenic features[J].
0
Views
25273
下载量
2
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621