Identification of Key Areas for Ecological Restoration and Division of Restoration Zones in Qinghai Province

MA Zeyu; LI Peng; XIAO Lie; WANG Bo; XU Yaotao; PAN Jinjin

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.03.032

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Identification of Key Areas for Ecological Restoration and Division of Restoration Zones in Qinghai Province

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Identification of Key Areas for Ecological Restoration and Division of Restoration Zones in Qinghai Province
- Vol. 38, Issue 3, Pages: 252-265(2024)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西安理工大学省部共建西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室,西安,710048
  2. 西安理工大学旱区生态水文与灾害防治国家林业局重点实验室,西安,710048
  3. 中国地质调查局西安矿产资源调查中心,西安,710100
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.03.032
  CLC： X171.1
- Published：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
MA Zeyu, LI Peng, XIAO Lie, et al. Identification of Key Areas for Ecological Restoration and Division of Restoration Zones in Qinghai Province[J]. 2024, 38(3): 252-265.
DOI：

MA Zeyu, LI Peng, XIAO Lie, et al. Identification of Key Areas for Ecological Restoration and Division of Restoration Zones in Qinghai Province[J]. 2024, 38(3): 252-265. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.03.032.

摘要

[目的] 基于“整体保护、系统修复、综合治理”的治理思路识别生态修复优先空间抑制生态退化

是区域社会—经济协调发展、筑牢生态安全屏障和推进生态文明建设的重要举措。[方法] 以青海省为研究区

通过土地利用强度、土地利用重心迁移反映城市化进程

定量评估2005—2020年7项生态系统服务、生态敏感性和生境退化度

提出基于“生态系统服务簇—生态敏感性-生境退化度”识别生态修复优先空间

将内部缺陷和外界胁迫相结合

划定5类生态修复优先区并提出相应修复策略。[结果] 青海省2005—2020年产水深度分别为125.1

106.9

80.0

135.4 mm

水源涵养深度稳定在15 mm左右。粮食产量由1.42 t/hm2提升至2.02 t/hm2

防风固沙能力由2.42 t/hm2提升至4.59 t/hm2

土壤保持能力由85.90 t/hm2下降至65.30 t/hm2;青海省生态系统服务簇可划分为生态宜居和谐簇、水土耦合协调簇、生态源地保育簇、自然生态修复簇、防风固沙功能簇5类。基于双变量自相关识别生态恢复优先点结果可知

青海省主要关键生态恢复点和自然生态恢复点面积分别占5.26%和2.55%

其中关键生态恢复点和生态宜居簇增加区域在空间上分布基本吻合。[结论] 青海省生态修复优先区集中在生态环境脆弱的西北荒漠地区、高海拔山区、水源地和河流沿岸及人类活动较频繁的河湟谷地和天峻县、兴海-玛多—曲麻莱县一带。

Abstract

[Objective] Identifying priority spaces for ecological restoration and curbing ecological degradation based on the governance idea of "holistic protection

systematic restoration and comprehensive management" is an important measure for the coordinated development of regional socio-economics

the construction of a firm ecological security barrier

and the promotion of ecological civilization. [Methods] This paper took Qinghai Province as the study area

reflects the urbanization process through land use intensity and the land use center of gravity shift

quantitatively evaluates seven ecosystem services

ecological sensitivity

and habitat degradation from 2005 to 2020

and proposes to identify the priority space for ecological restoration based on the cluster of ecosystem services

ecological sensitivity

and habitat degradation. We proposed to identify ecological restoration priority spaces based on "ecosystem service cluster

ecological sensitivity and habitat degradation degree"

and combined internal defects and external coercion to delineate five types of ecological restoration priority zones and propose corresponding restoration strategies. [Results] The depth of water production in Qinghai province from 2005 to 2020 were 125.1 mm

106.9 mm

80.0 mm and 135.4 mm respectively

and the depth of water retention was stabilized at about 15 mm. Grain output increased from 1.42 t/hm2 to 2.02 t/hm2

wind and sand control capacity increased from 2.42 t/hm2 to 4.59 t/hm2

and soil conservation capacity decreased from 85.90 t/hm2 to 65.30 t/hm2; The ecosystem service clusters in Qinghai province were classified into five categories: harmony of habitat

harmony of soil and water

conservation of ecological sources

restoration of natural ecology

and functional cluster of wind and sand conservation. Based on the results of bivariate autocorrelation to identify the ecological restoration priority points

it can be seen that the key ecological restoration points and natural ecological restoration points are the main ones in Qinghai province

accounting for 5.26% and 2.55% of the area

respectively

in which the key ecological restoration points and ecological livability clusters increase the area of the spatial distribution of the basic coincides with each other. [Conclusion] The priority areas for ecological restoration in Qinghai province are concentrated in the ecologically fragile northwestern desert areas

high-altitude mountainous areas

water sources and river coasts and the river valley where human activities are more frequent

and in the area around Tianjun county and Xinghai-Mado-Qumalai county.

关键词

Keywords

references

燕守广,李辉,李海东,等.基于土地利用与景观格局的生态保护红线生态系统健康评价方法:以南京市为例[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(5):1109-1118. YAN S G, LI H, LI H D, et al. Ecosystem health assessment method of eco-redline based on land use and landscape pattern in Nanjing[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2020,35(5):1109-1118.

王文丽,张安录,刘蒙罢.长江经济带城市土地利用效率与生态系统健康耦合时空格局分析[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(6):352-362. WANG W L, ZHANG A L, LIU M B. Analysis on the spatial-temporal pattern of coupling between urban land use efficiency and ecosystem health in the Yangtze River economic belt[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(6):352-362.

谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254. XIE G D, ZHANG C X, ZHANG L M, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2015,30(8):1243-1254.

PIYATHILAKE I D U H, UDAYAKUMARA E P N, RANAWEERA L V, et al. Modeling predictive assessment of carbon storage using InVEST model in Uva province, Sri Lanka[J].Modeling Earth Systems and Environment,2022,8(2):2213-2223.

RAUDSEPP-HEARNE C, PETERSON G D, BENNETT E M. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2010,107(11):5242-5247.

HONG Y Y, DING Q, ZHOU T, et al. Ecosystem service bundle index construction, spatiotemporal dynamic display, and driving force analysis[J].Ecosystem Health and Sustainability,2020,6(1):e15.

QUINTAS-SORIANO C, GARCÍA-LLORENTE M, NORSTRÖM A, et al. Integrating supply and demand in ecosystem service bundles characterization across Mediterranean transformed landscapes[J].Landscape Ecology,2019,34(7):1619-1633.

DITTRICH A, SEPPELT R, VÁCLAVÍK T, et al. Integrating ecosystem service bundles and socioenvironmental conditions: A national scale analysis from Germany[J].Ecosystem Services,2017,28:273-282.

祁宁,赵君,杨延征,等.基于服务簇的东北地区生态系统服务权衡与协同[J].生态学报,2020,40(9):2827-2837. QI N, ZHAO J, YANG Y Z, et al. Quantifying ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in Northeast China based on ecosystem service bundles[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2020,40(9):2827-2837.

张碧天,闵庆文,焦雯珺,等.生态系统服务权衡研究进展[J].生态学报,2021,41(14):5517-5532. ZHANG B T, MIN Q W, JIAO W J, et al. Research progress and perspective on ecosystem services trade-offs[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2021,41(14):5517-5532.

LAPOINTE M, GURNEY G G, CUMMING G S. Urbanization affects how people perceive and benefit from ecosystem service bundles in coastal communities of the Global South[J].Ecosystems and People,2021,17(1):57-68.

PUTWAIN P D, CAIRNS J. The recovery process in damaged ecosystems[J].The Journal of Ecology,1981,69(3):e1062.

李恒凯,李淑芳,郑春燕,等.基于生态系统服务功能的东江流域关键性生态空间识别[J].农业工程学报,2022,38(3):257-266,323. LI H K, LI S F, ZHENG C Y, et al. Identification of the critical ecological spaces in the Dongjiang River Basin based on ecosystem service function[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2022,38(3):257-266,323.

窦寒梅,赵锐锋,陈喜东,等. 西北干旱区国土空间生态修复优先区识别:以黑河流域张掖市为例.应用生态学报,1-12. https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.202402.025. DOU H M, ZHAO R F, CHEN X D, et al. Identification of priority areas for territorial space ecological restoration in arid area of Northwest China: A case study of Zhangye City in Heihe River basin.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,1-12.https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.202402.025.

向爱盟,岳启发,赵筱青,等.国土空间生态修复关键区识别及修复分区:以西南喀斯特山区开远市为例[J].中国环境科学,2023,43(12):6571-6582. XIANG A M, YUE Q F, ZHAO X Q, et al. Identification and restoration zoning of key areas for ecological restoration of territorial space in southwestern Karst mountainous areas: A case study of Kaiyuan City in karst mountainous area of Southwest China[J].China Environmental Science,2023,43(12):6571-6582.

STRASSBURG B B N, IRIBARREM A, BEYER H L, et al. Global priority areas for ecosystem restoration[J].Nature,2020,586:724-729.

SAIDI N, SPRAY C. Ecosystem services bundles: Challenges and opportunities for implementation and further research[J].Environmental Research Letters,2018,13(11):e113001.

LIU Z H, HUANG Q D, ZHOU Y, et al. Spatial identification of restored priority areas based on ecosystem service bundles and urbanization effects in a megalopolis area[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2022,308:e114627.

FAN Y P, FANG C L. Evolution process and obstacle factors of ecological security in Western China, a case study of Qinghai province[J].Ecological Indicators,2020,117:e106659.

ANSELIN L, REY S J. Modern spatial econometrics in practice: A guide to GeoDa, GeoDa Space and PySAL[M].Chicago, IL: GeoDa Press LLC,2014.

郭珊珊.黄河流域生态系统健康与城镇化耦合协调研究[D].北京:中国矿业大学,2022. GUO S S. Research on the coupling and coordination of ecosystem health and urbanization in the Yellow River Basin[D].Beijing: China University of Mining and Technology,2022.

范晓敏.青海海南、海北州生态系统服务时空格局、权衡与协同关系研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2023. FAN Y M. The spatial-temporal patterns, trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in Hainan and Haibei, Qinghai province[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University,2023.

赖锋,乔占明,熊增连.青海省风蚀量及防风固沙量时空特征分析[J].测绘科学,2023,48(1):148-156. LAI F, QIAO Z M, XIONG Z L. Spatiotemporal characteristics of wind erosion and wind prevention and sand fixation in Qinghai province[J].Science of Surveying and Mapping,2023,48(1):148-156.

范昕.黄河上游生态脆弱区土地利用/覆被变化及生态系统服务权衡与协同研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2022. FAN X. Land use/cover change and the tradeoff and synergy of ecosystem services in ecologically fragile regions of upper Yellow River:A case study in Hehuang Valley[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences,2022.

赵万梅.关于优化全省国土空间开发保护格局的研究[J].青海国土经略,2020(6):18-22. ZHAO W M. Research on optimizing the spatial development and protection pattern of the province’s land[J].Management and Strategy of Qinghai Land and Resources,2020(6):18-22.

KONG L Q, WU T, XIAO Y, et al. Natural capital investments in China undermined by reclamation for cropland[J].Nature Ecology and Evolution,2023,7:1771-1777.

Views

456

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Analysis of Ecosystem Service Function Changes and TheirDriving Factors in the Kuye River Basin

Related Author

WEI Leihanbing

SHI Peng

WEI Yong

LI Ning

CHEN Ao

LI Shenglin

SUN Weiyun

Related Institution

Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region of China, Xian University of Technology, Xian

Key Laboratory of National Forestry Administration on Ecological Hydrology and Disaster Prevention in Arid Regions, Xian University of Technology, Xian

Kangbashi District Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Water Conservancy Development Center

⁰