

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 林木遗传育种全国重点实验室(东北林业大学),哈尔滨,150040
2. 辽宁省本溪市城市运行服务中心,辽宁,本溪,117099
3. 大兴安岭林业集团公司阿木尔林业局, 黑龙江 漠河,165302
Published:2024
移动端阅览
WEI Ziqiang, ZHENG Lei, HE Huaiyu, et al. Nutrient Characteristics of Soil Aggregates in[J]. 2024, 38(1): 347-356.
WEI Ziqiang, ZHENG Lei, HE Huaiyu, et al. Nutrient Characteristics of Soil Aggregates in[J]. 2024, 38(1): 347-356. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.01.024.
[目的] 为探寻大兴安岭重度火烧迹地植被恢复后不同林龄落叶松人工林下土壤团聚体养分含量与分布的变化。[方法] 以大兴安岭1987年发生特大森林火灾形成的重度火烧迹地上分别在1989年、2000年、2010年种植的落叶松人工林(11
21
32年)作为研究对象
通过测定土壤团聚体各粒级有机碳、全氮、全磷、碱解氮、速效磷和速效钾的含量
开展土壤团聚体养分分布特征研究。[结果] (1)在重度火烧迹地上不同林龄的落叶松人工林中
土壤各粒级团聚体有机碳、全氮、全磷、碱解氮和速效钾的含量均随着粒径的减小逐渐上升
<0.5 mm粒级含量最大。(2)随着落叶松人工林林龄的增长
土壤各粒级团聚体有机碳、全氮、全磷、碱解氮和速效磷含量均逐渐上升。32年落叶松人工林土壤团聚体有机碳、全氮、全磷、碱解氮和速效磷含量相较于11年落叶松人工林分别显著增加77.35%~130.24%
77.61%~143.36%
105.84%~147.98%
94.58%~155.96%
206.98%~537.09%(p<0.05)。21年落叶松人工林土壤各粒级团聚体有机碳含量高于11年落叶松人工林
但二者无明显差异。(3)土壤各粒级团聚体有机碳与全氮和碱解氮极显著相关(p<0.01)
土壤有机碳和碱解氮含量与<0.25 mm粒级含量相关性最强
全氮、全磷、速效磷和速效钾与>0.25 mm粒级含量极显著相关(p<0.01)。[结论] 落叶松人工林土壤团聚体养分呈表聚现象。大兴安岭重度火烧迹地上种植的落叶松人工林
随着林龄的增大土壤团聚体养分含量增加
种植32年的落叶松人工林显著提升土壤团聚体的养分含量
研究结果可为大兴安岭重度火烧迹地人工植被恢复工作提供科学依据。
[Objective] In order to know the changes of nutrient content and distribution of soil aggregates under Larix gmelinii plantation of different forest ages after vegetation restoration in severely burned areas of Greater Khingan Mountains.[Methods] Takes the Larix gmelinii plantation (11
21 and 32 years) planted in 1989
2000 and 2010 on the severely burned areas formed by the severe forest fire in Greater Khingan Mountains in 1987 as the research object. By measuring the contents of organic carbon
total nitrogen
total phosphorus
alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen
available phosphorus and available potassium in soil aggregates
the nutrient distribution characteristics of soil aggregates were studied. [Results] (1) The contents of organic carbon
total nitrogen
total phosphorus
alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen and available potassium in soil aggregates of different particle sizes increased gradually with the decrease of particle size
and the content of < 0.5 mm particle size was the largest. (2) As the age of forest increased
the content of organic carbon
total nitrogen
total phosphorus
alkali hydrolyzed nitrogen and available phosphorus in soil aggregates gradually increased. The nutrient content of soil aggregates in 32 years Larix gmelinii plantation was significantly higher than that in 11 years Larix gmelinii plantation. The contents of organic carbon
total nitrogen
total phosphorus
alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen and available phosphorus in soil aggregates were significantly increased by 77.35%~130.24%
77.61%~143.36%
105.84%~147.98%
94.58%~155.96% and 206.98% ~ 537.09%
respectively
compared with 11 years Larix gmelinii plantation (p < 0.05). The organic carbon content of soil aggregates at different particle sizes in 21 years was higher than that in 11 years Larix gmelinii plantation
but there was no significant difference. (3) There was a strong correlation between organic carbon and total nitrogen and alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen in soil aggregates (p < 0.01). Soil organic carbon and alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen content had the strongest correlation with < 0.25 mm fraction content. Total nitrogen
total phosphorus
available phosphorus and available potassium had the strongest correlation with > 0.25 mm fraction content (p < 0.01). [Conclusion] The nutrient of soil aggregates in Larix gmelinii plantation showed surface aggregation. The nutrient content of soil aggregates in Larix gmelinii plantations planted on severely burned areas in Greater Khingan Mountains increased with the increase of forest age. The Larix gmelinii plantation planted for 32 years significantly increased the nutrient content of soil aggregates. The results provide a scientific basis for the restoration of artificial vegetation in the severely burned area of Greater Khingan Mountains.
纪平,邵全琴,王敏,等.中国三北防护林工程第二阶段生态效益综合评价[J].林业科学,2022,58(11):31-48. JI P, SHAO Q Q, WANG M, et al. Monitoring and assessment of ecological benefits of the shelter forest program in the three-north region during 2001—2020[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2022,58(11):31-48.
张顺祥.渭北黄土高原刺槐人工林健康评价经营计算机辅助系统的构建[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2015. ZHANG S X. Construction of computer-aided system for health evaluation and management of
Robinia acacia
plantation in Weibei Loess Plateau[D].Yangling, Shaanxi: Northwest A&F University,2015.
施昆山.当代世界林业[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2001. SHI K S. Contemporary world forestry[M].Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House,2001.
韦惠兰,张可荣.自然保护区综合效益评估理论与方法:甘肃白水江国家级自然保护区案例研究[M].北京:科学出版社, 2006. WEI H L, ZHANG K R. Theory and method of comprehensive benefit assessment of nature reserves: A case study of Baishuijiang National Nature Reserve in Gansu Province[M].Beijing: Science Press,2006.
邵全琴,刘树超,宁佳,等.2000—2019年中国重大生态工程生态效益遥感评估[J].地理学报,2022,77(9):2133-2153. SHAO Q Q, LIU S C, NING J, et al. Assessment of ecological benefits of key national ecological projects in China in 2000—2019 using remote sensing[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2022,77(9):2133-2153.
BATEMAN I J. Household willingness to pay and farmers'willingness to accept compensation for establishing a recreational woodland[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,1996,39(1):21-44.
DURIANCIK L F, BUCKS D, DOBROWOLSKI J P, et al. The first five years of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,63(6):185-197.
侯元兆,王琦.中国森林资源核算研究[J].世界林业研究,1995,8(3):51-56. HOU Y Z, WANG Q. Study on forest resources accounting in China[J].World Forestry Research,1995,8(3):51-56.
康永祥,刘建军,康博文,等.陕西省森林生态系统服务功能及其评估[M].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学出版社,2010. KANG Y X, LIU J J, KANG B W, et al. Forest ecosystem service function and its assessment in Shaanxi Province[M].Yangling, Shaanxi:Northwest A&F University Press,2010.
李艳春.铁西自然保护区森林生态效益价值评估的研究[J].林业勘查设计,2020,49(2):79-81. LI Y C. Study on evaluation of forest ecological benefit value in Tiexi nature reserve[J].Forest Investigation Design, 2020,49(2):79-81.
柴济坤.南木林区森林资源生态效益价值评估的研究[D].兰州:兰州财经大学2016. CHAI J K, Research on the evaluation of ecological benefit value of forest resources in Nanmu Forest Area[D].Lanzhou:Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics,2016.
ROGER A S. Economics of forestry[J].Journal of Forest Economics,2003,9(3):241-243.
XU Z H, WEI H J, DONG X B, et al. Evaluating the ecological benefits of plantations in arid areas from the perspective of ecosystem service supply and demand-based on emergy analysis[J].The Science of the Total Environment,2020,705:e135853.
GOUHARI S, FORREST A, ROBERTS M. Cost-effectiveness analysis of forest ecosystem services in mountain areas in Afghanistan[J].Land Use Policy,2021,108:e105670.
刘广全,唐德瑞,罗伟祥.黄土高原渭北生态经济型防护林体系综合效益计量与经济评价[J].西北林学院学报,1997,12(2): 25-30. LIU G Q, TANG D R, LUO W X. Evaluation on comprehensive benefits eco-economical protection forest system on Weibei Loess Plateau[J].Journal of Northwest Forestry University,1997,12(2):25-30.
王秋贤,孙根年,任志远.渭北高原植被保土保肥生态效益的计量研究[J].资源科学,2002,24(5):58-63. WANG Q X, SUN G N, REN Z Y. Calculation on vegetation's soil and fertilization conservation benefits in Weibei Plateau[J].Resources Science,2002,24(5):58-63.
鲁绍伟,李少宁,刘逸菲,等.北京市退耕还林生态效益评估[J].生态学报,2021,41(15):6170-6181. LU S W, LI S N, LIU Y F, et al. Ecological benefit evaluation of the Grain for Green Project in Beijing[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2021,41(15):6170-6181.
刘艳,温玉红,窦俊杰,等.甘肃省麦积区退耕还林生态效益评价[J].温带林业研究,2022,5(1):41-47. LIU Y, WEN Y H, DOU J J, et al. Evaluation on ecological benefits of returning farmland to forest in Maiji district of Gansu Province[J].Journal of Temperate Forestry Research,2022,5(1):41-47.
杨致远,刘琪璟,秦立厚,等.延安市退耕还林工程生态效益评价[J].西北林学院学报,2022,37(1):259-266. YANG Z Y, LIU Q J, QIN L H, et al. Ecological benefit assessment of the Grain for Green Project in Yan'an[J].Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2022,37(1):259-266.
罗佳,黎蕾,姜芸,等.湖南省森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].生态科学,2022,41(4):70-77. LUO J, LI L, JIANG Y, et al. Evaluation of service function of forest ecosystem in Hunan Province[J].Ecological Science,2022,41(4):70-77.
朱芬萌.陕西黄土高原生态环境重建技术对策研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2001. ZHU F M. Study on technical countermeasures of ecological environment reconstruction on Loess Plateau in Shaanxi[D].Yangling,Shaanxi: Northwest A&F University,2001.
苟斌.渭北黄土高原抗旱造林技术研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2008. GOU B. Research on drought-resistant afforestation technology in Weibei Loess Plateau[D].Yangling, Shaanxi: Northwest A&F University,2008.
宋西德.渭北黄土高原2种景观及其界面的生态特征研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2008. SONG X D. Ecological characteristics of two landscapes and their interfaces in Weibei Loess Plateau[D].Yangling, Shaanxi: Northwest A&F University,2008.
易亮,李凯荣,张冠华,等.渭北黄土高原经济林地土壤养分特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(2):186-190. YI L, LI K R, ZHANG G H, et al. Research on soil nutrients characteristics of economic forest in Weibei Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(2):186-190.
于泽群,刘金良,杨婷婷,等.渭北黄土高原侧柏人工林种子雨和种子库研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2014,42(6):85-92. YU Z Q, LIU J L, YANG T T, et al. Seed rain and soil seed bank of
Platycladus orientalis
plantation in Weibei Loess Plateau[J].Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition),2014,42(6):85-92.
陕西省统计局.2018年陕西统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2018. Shaanxi Provincial Bureau of Statistics.2018 Shaanxi statistical yearbook[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press,2018.
咸阳市统计局.2018年咸阳统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2018. Xianyang Statistical Bureau.2018 Xianyang statistical yearbook[M]. Beijing:China Statistics Press,2018.
铜川市统计局.2018年铜川统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2018. Tongchuan Municipal Bureau of Statistics.2018 Tongchuan statistical yearbook[M]. Beijing:China Statistics Press,2018.
宝鸡市统计局.2018年宝鸡统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2018. Baoji Bureau of Statistics.2018 Baoji statistical yearbook[M]. Beijing:China Statistics Press,2018.
陕西省林业局.陕西省森林资源二类调查[Z].陕西省林业局,2010. Forestry Bureau of Shaanxi Province. Second class survey of forest resources in Shaanxi Provinc[Z]. Shaanxi Forestry Bureau,2010.
陕西省林业局.陕西省林地变更调查成果统计表[Z].陕西省林业局,2018. Shaanxi Forestry Bureau. Statistical table of surveyresults of forest land change in Shaanxi Province[Z]. Shaanxi Forestry Bureau,2018. XU Y X. Evaluation on ecological benefits of returning farmland to forest in Baoji City[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,37(6):248-255.
刘胜涛,牛香,王兵,等.陕西省退耕还林工程生态效益评估[J].生态学报,2018,38(16):5759-5770. LIU S T, NIU X, WANG B, et al. An ecological benefit assessment of the Grain for Green Project in Shaanxi Province[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2018,38(16):5759-5770.
刘增力,胡理乐,闫伯前,等.北京市自然保护地生态效益及其影响因素[J].生态学报,2022,42(24):10060-10071. LIU Z L, HU L L, YAN B Q, et al. Ecological benefit evaluation and influencing factors analysis of the Protected Areas in Beijing[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2022,42(24):10060-10071.
赖亚飞,朱清科.黄土高原丘陵沟壑区退耕还林(草)工程实施综合效益评价:以陕西省吴起县为例[J].西北林学院学报,2009,24(3):219-223. LAI Y F, ZHU Q K. Assessment on the comprehensive benefits of converting farmland to forest project in loess hilly regions: A case study of Wuqi County, Shaanxi Province[J].Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2009,24(3):219-223.
吴旭,唐亚坤,陈晨,等.黄土丘陵区沙棘、油松和刺槐光合生理特性及其环境适应性[J].生态学报,2019,39(21):8111-8125. is, and
Robinia pseudoacacia
in the Loess hilly region of China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019,39(21):8111-8125.
王丹丹. 陕北黄土区退耕经济林综合效益评价[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2010. WANG D D. Evaluation on comprehensive benefit of returning farmland to economic forest in loess area of northern Shaanxi[D]. Yangling, Shaanxi: Northwest A&F University,2010.
杨晓毅,李凯荣,李苗,等.陕西省淳化县人工刺槐林林分结构及林下植物多样性研究[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(3):194-201. YANG X Y, LI K R, LI M, et al. Forest structure and diversity of
Robinia pseudoacacia
L. plantations in Chunhua County of Shaanxi Province[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,31(3):194-201.
周美超.清水河县公益林生态效益评价[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2018. ZHOU M C. Ecological benefit evaluation of public welfare forest in Qingshuihe County[D].Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,2018.
刘跃钧,蒋燕锋,葛永金,等.锥栗-多花黄精不同复合经营模式经济生态效益评价[J].经济林研究,2020,38(4):72-81. LIU Y J, JIANG Y F, GE Y J, et al. Economic and ecological benefits evaluation of different compound management modes of
Castanea henryi
and
Polygonatum cyrtonema
.Non-wood Forest Research,2020,38(4):72-81.
0
Views
852
下载量
2
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621