Multiple Scenario Perspective of Production-Living-Ecological Space Change Simulation and Effect Evaluation in Yunnan Province

LIN Zhi; LI Shihua; YI Bangjin; FU Tao; GAO Qisuan; SUN Xinyue; QIU Lidan

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.01.005

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Multiple Scenario Perspective of Production-Living-Ecological Space Change Simulation and Effect Evaluation in Yunnan Province

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Multiple Scenario Perspective of Production-Living-Ecological Space Change Simulation and Effect Evaluation in Yunnan Province
- Vol. 38, Issue 1, Pages: 220-230(2024)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 昆明理工大学国土资源工程学院,昆明,650093
  2. 云南省基础地理信息中心,昆明,650034
  3. 云南省地质科学研究所,昆明,650051
  4. 云南师范大学地理学部,昆明,650500
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.01.005
  CLC： F301.24
- Published：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
LIN Zhi, LI Shihua, YI Bangjin, et al. Multiple Scenario Perspective of Production-Living-Ecological Space Change Simulation and Effect Evaluation in Yunnan Province[J]. 2024, 38(1): 220-230.
DOI：

LIN Zhi, LI Shihua, YI Bangjin, et al. Multiple Scenario Perspective of Production-Living-Ecological Space Change Simulation and Effect Evaluation in Yunnan Province[J]. 2024, 38(1): 220-230. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.01.005.

摘要

[目的] 优化国土空间开发格局和统筹协调"三生"空间格局配置

是实现未来可持续发展的重点任务和根本途径。[方法] 以云南省土地利用为基础

结合自然和社会发展因素

采用MOP-PLUS耦合模型模拟2030年经济优先、生态优先和协同发展3种情景下"三生"空间及效应变化。[结果] (1)3种情景下经济效益分别增长40.29%

32.10%

34.79%

生态效益分别减少0.89%

0(未变)

0.06%

生境质量均值分别下降0.78%

0.38%

0.43%

空间冲突强度均值分别增长2.79%

下降1.21%

下降2.32%;(2)3种情景生活空间均呈上升、生态空间呈下降趋势

生产空间仅在经济优先情景有较小增长;均存在生活空间侵占生产空间、生产空间再掠夺生态空间的情况

生活空间扩张呈中心向四周蚕食趋势;(3)不同发展情景下均伴随一定程度的生境质量下降

通过优化空间布局可平衡空间冲突;相较于其他情景

协同发展情景经济效益增幅适中

生境质量变化幅度相对均衡

空间冲突强度下降最多

符合兼顾生态保护、经济发展、社会进步的多重目标。[结论] 形成的模拟-效应-优化的反馈调控机制

可与不同尺度、不同目标结合开展土地利用变化模拟与效应分析

为国土空间配置提供决策依据。

Abstract

[Objective] To optimizing the pattern of territorial space development and coordinating the pattern of production-living-ecological space is the key task and fundamental way to achieve sustainable development in the future. [Methods] Based on the land use in Yunnan Province and combined with the natural and social development factors

the MOP-PLUS coupling model was used to simulate the changes of production-living-ecological space and its effects under three scenarios of economic priority

ecological priority and collaborative development in 2030. [Results] (1) Under the three scenarios

the economic benefit increased by 40.29%

32.10% and 34.79%

the ecological benefit decreased by 0.89%

0 (unchanged) and 0.06%

the average habitat quality decreased by 0.78%

0.38% and 0.43%

and the average spatial conflict intensity increased by 2.79%

decreased by 1.21% and decreased by 2.32%. (2) Living space increased and ecological space decreased in the three scenarios. Production space only increased slightly in the economic priority scenario. In all cases

living space encroached on production space

and then production space plagued ecological space. The expansion of living space showed a trend of encroaching from the center to the periphery. (3) Habitat quality decreased to some extent under different development scenarios

and spatial conflicts could be balanced by optimizing spatial layout. Compared with other scenarios

the growth of economic benefits in the collaborative development scenario was moderate

the variation range of habitat quality was relatively balanced

and the intensity of spatial conflicts decreased the most

which was in line with the multiple goals of ecological protection

economic development and social progress. [Conclusion] The simulation-effect-optimization feedback regulation mechanism formed in this paper can be combined with different scales and objectives to carry out land use change simulation and effect analysis

and provide a basis for decision-making of territorial space allocation.

关键词

Keywords

references

刘纪远,宁佳,匡文慧,等.2010—2015年中国土地利用变化的时空格局与新特征[J].地理学报,2018,73(5):789-802. LIU J Y, NING J, KUANG W H, et al. Spatio-temporal patterns and characteristics of land-use change in China during 2010-2015[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2018,73(5):789-802.

匡文慧,张树文,杜国明,等.2015—2020年中国土地利用变化遥感制图及时空特征分析[J].地理学报,2022,77(5):1056-1071. KUANG W H, ZHANG S W, DU G M, et al. Remotely sensed mapping and analysis of spatio-temporal patterns of land use change across China in 2015—2020[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2022,77(5):1056-1071.

何春阳,张金茜,刘志锋,等.1990—2018年土地利用/覆盖变化研究的特征和进展[J].地理学报,2021,76(11):2730-2748. HE C Y, ZHANG J X, LIU Z F, et al. Characteristics and progress of land use/cover change research during 1990—2018[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2021,76(11):2730-2748.

Estoque R C, Johnson B A, Dasgupta R, et al. Rethinking forest monitoring for more meaningful global forest landscape change assessments[J].Science of the Total Environment,2022,317:e115478.

乔治,蒋玉颖,贺曈,等.土地利用变化模拟研究进展[J].生态学报,2022,42(13):5165-5176. QIAO Z, JIANG Y Y, HE T, et al. Land use change simulation:Progress, challenges, and prospects[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2022,42(13):5165-5176.

付慧,刘艳军,孙宏日,等.京津冀地区耕地利用转型时空分异及驱动机制[J].地理科学进展,2020,39(12):1985-1998. FU H, LIU Y J, SUN H R, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics and dynamic mechanism of cultivated land use transition in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J].Progress in Geography,2020,39(12):1985-1998.

胡昕利,易扬,康宏樟,等.近25年长江中游地区土地利用时空变化格局与驱动因素[J].生态学报,2019,39(6):1877-1886. HU X L, YI Y, KANG H Z, et al. Temporal and spatial variations of land use and the driving factors in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River in the past 25 years[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2019,39(6):1877-1886.

张宇硕,吴殿廷,吕晓.土地利用/覆盖变化对生态系统服务的影响:空间尺度视角的研究综述[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(5):1172-1189. ZHANG Y S, WU D T, LÜ X. A review on the impact of land use/land cover change on ecosystem services from a spatial scale perspective[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2020,35(5):1172-1189.

LI J, JIANG Z, MIAO H, et al. Identification of cultivated land change trajectory and analysis of its process characteristics using time-series Landsat images: A study in the overlapping areas of crop and mineral production in Yanzhou City, China[J].Science of the Total Environment,2022,806:e150318.

CHEN L, ZHAO H, SONG G, et al. Optimization of cultivated land pattern for achieving cultivated land system security: A case study in Heilongjiang Province, China[J].Land Use Policy,2021,108:e105589.

ZHOU Y, ZHONG Z, CHENG G. Cultivated land loss and construction land expansion in China: Evidence from national land surveys in 1996, 2009 and 2019[J].Land Use Policy,2023,125:e106496.

程维明,高晓雨,马廷,等.基于地貌分区的1990—2015年中国耕地时空特征变化分析[J].地理学报,2018,73(9):1613-1629. CHENG W M, GAO X Y, MA T, et al. Spatial-temporal distribution of cropland in China based on geomorphologic regionalization during 1990—2015[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2018,73(9):1613-1629.

刘纪远,刘文超,匡文慧,等.基于主体功能区规划的中国城乡建设用地扩张时空特征遥感分析[J].地理学报,2016,71(3):355-369. LIU J Y, LIU W C, KUANG W H, et al. Remote sensing-based analysis of the spatiotemporal characteristics of built-up area across China based on the plan for major function-oriented zones[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2016,71(3):355-369.

OMID G, LOTFI A, MORADI H, et al. Area-based scenario development in land-use change modeling: A system dynamics-assisted approach for mixed agricultural-residential landscapes[J].Ecological Informatics,2023,76:e102129.

XU Q L, ZHU A X, LIU J. Land-use change modeling with cellular automata using land natural evolution unit[J].Catena,2023,224:e106998.

CHASIS S, OLANG L O, SITOKI L. Modelling of land-use/cover change trajectories in a transboundary catchment of the Sio-Malaba-Malakisi Region in East Africa using the CLUE-s model[J].Ecological Modelling,2023,476:e110256.

TARIQ A, YAN J, MUMTAZ F. Land change modeler and CA-Markov chain analysis for land use land cover change using satellite data of Peshawar, Pakistan[J].Physics and Chemistry of the Earth,2022,128:e103286.

龙花楼.土地利用转型的解释[J].中国土地科学,2022,36(4):1-7. LONG H L. Explanation of land use transitions[J].China Land Science,2022,36(4):1-7.

田俊峰,王彬燕,王士君.东北地区土地利用转型特征测度与机制探索[J].经济地理,2020,40(9):184-195. TIAN J F, WANG B Y, WANG S J. Land use transition in Northeast China: Features measurement and mechanism exploration[J].Economic Geography,2020,40(9):184-195.

刘永强,龙花楼,李加林.长江中游经济带土地利用转型及其生态服务功能交叉敏感性研究[J].地理研究,2018,37(5):1009-1022. LIU Y Q, LONG H L, LI J L. Study on the land use transition and its cross-sensitivity of ecological service function in the Middle of Yangtze River Economic Belt[J].Geographical Research,2018,37(5):1009-1022.

陈万旭,李江风,朱丽君.长江中游地区生态系统服务价值空间分异及敏感性分析[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(2):325-337. CHEN W X, LI J F, ZHU L J. Spatial heterogeneity and sensitivity analysis of ecosystem services value in the middle Yangtze River region[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2019,34(2):325-337.

CHEN W X, ZHAO H B, LI J F, et al. Land use transitions and the associated impacts on ecosystem services in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China based on the geo-informatic Tupu method[J].Science of the Total Environment,2020,701:e134690.

李全峰,胡守庚,瞿诗进.1990—2015年长江中游地区耕地利用转型时空特征[J].地理研究,2017,36(8):1489-1502. LI Q F, HU S G, QU S J. Spatiotemporal characteristics of cultivated land use transition in the Middle Yangtze River from 1990 to 2015[J].Geographical Research,2017,36(8):1489-1502.

陈立恒,龚健,王雄,等.长江中游地区生态系统服务平衡与城镇化的空间关系[J].生态学报,2021,41(14):5546-5556. CHEN L H, GONG J, WANG X, et al. Spatial relationship between ecosystem services balance and urbanization in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2021,41(14):5546-5556.

国家统计局.中国统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2001—2019. National Bureau of Statistics of China. China statistical yearbook[M].Beijing: China Statistics Publishing House,2001—2019.

湖北统计局.湖北统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2001—2019. Statistics Bureau of Hubei Province. Hubei statistical yearbook[M].Beijing: China Statistics Publishing House, 2001—2019.

湖南统计局.湖南统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2001—2019. Statistics Bureau of Hunan Province. Hunan statistical yearbook[M].Beijing: China Statistics Publishing House,2001—2019.

江西统计局.湖南统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2001—2019. Statistics Bureau of Jiangxi Province. Jianxi statistical yearbook[M].Beijing: China Statistics Publishing House, 2001—2019.

唐常春,李亚平.多中心城市群土地利用/覆被变化地学信息图谱研究:以长株潭城市群为例[J].地理研究,2020,39(11):2626-2641. TANG C C, LI Y P. Geo-information Tupu process of land use/cover change in polycentric urban agglomeration:A case study of Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration[J].Geographical Research,2020,39(11):2626-2641.

路昌,周浩,张凤,等.基于地学信息图谱的山东省国土空间转型分析[J].农业机械学报,2021,52(7):222-230. LU C, ZHOU H, ZHANG F, et al. Land spatial transformation analysis in Shandong Province based on Geo Information Map[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery,2021,52(7):222-230.

史洋洋,吕晓,黄贤金,等.江苏沿海地区耕地利用转型及其生态系统服务价值变化响应[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(6):961-976. SHI Y Y, LYU X, HUANG X J, et al. Arable land use transitions and its response of ecosystem services value change in Jiangsu coastal areas[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2017,32(6):961-976.

Views

895

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Dynamic Simulation of Production-Living-Ecological Space and Habitat Quality in Hunan Province Based on MOP-PLUS

Current Status of Habitat Quality in Xiliugou Basin Based on InVEST Model

Construction of Ecological Networks in Yunnan Province from the Perspective of Main Functional Zones

Analysis of Spatio-temporal Evolution of Habitat Quality and Its Driving Factors in the Wujiang River Basin Based on the InVEST Model

Spatial and Temporal Correlation Analysis and Prediction of Land Use Ecological Risk and Carbon Stock in Yunnan Province

Related Author

ZHAO Xianchao

JIN Xinyu

FU Hang

ZHANG Jinxin

FU Yuzhong

XU Delu

CHEN Wenchao

KANG Bin

Related Institution

School of Urban and Environmental Studies， Hunan University of Technology

Water Resources Development Center of Ordos， Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region

College of Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering， Northwest A&F University， Yangling

State Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control， Northwest A&F University， Yangling

College of Grassland Agriculture， Northwest A&F University， Yangling

⁰