

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 广西师范大学珍稀濒危动植物生态与环境保护教育部重点实验室,广西,桂林,541000
2. 广西漓江流域景观资源保育与可持续利用重点实验室,广西,桂林,541000
3. 桂林电子科技大学生命与环境科学学院,广西,桂林,541000
Published:2023
移动端阅览
ZHONG Jianjun, LI Lin, WEI Shiguang, et al. Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Soil Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Storage in Karst Forest in the Lijiang River Basin[J]. 2023, 37(6): 180-186.
ZHONG Jianjun, LI Lin, WEI Shiguang, et al. Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Soil Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Storage in Karst Forest in the Lijiang River Basin[J]. 2023, 37(6): 180-186. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.023.
以探明漓江流域喀斯特森林土壤的碳氮磷储量分布为目的
为保护漓江流域脆弱的喀斯特生态系统提供理论依据。在漓江上中下游各流域段的典型喀斯特森林共设置20 m×20 m的15块天然林样方
对森林植被进行每木检尺调查
采用五点采集法采集0-20
20-40 cm土层土壤
分析土壤碳氮磷储量空间分布情况及驱动因子作用途径
量化各类生物和非生物因子对区域喀斯特森林土壤养分储量分布格局形成的作用贡献。结果表明:(1)漓江流域喀斯特森林土壤碳氮磷储量平均分布表现为上游>下游>中游
在漓江流域喀斯特森林土壤中碳、氮、磷储量分别为55.8~192.0
3.1~14.8
6.0~12.0 kg/m2。在同一流域土壤中
0-20 cm土层碳氮含量均显著高于同流域20-40 cm土层
磷元素在漓江流域不同深度土层中未表现出显著差异。(2)碳储量与C/P、N/P、森林物种多样性Shannon-Wiener指数和Simpson指数均呈现出显著正相关关系;氮储量与C/P、N/P、Shannon-Wiener指数和Simpson指数均呈现显著正相关关系
与C/N呈现显著负相关关系;磷储量与C/N呈现显著负相关关系
与森林物种多样性不存在显著相关关系。(3)漓江流域喀斯特森林土壤化学计量特征是驱动土壤碳氮磷储量分布的直接驱动因子
且深层土壤化学计量特征是最重要的直接驱动因子
其次森林物种多样性对于土壤养分的固定和输入起到重要作用
直接影响并驱动土壤碳氮储量分布格局
磷储量不受森林植被状况的影响。漓江流域喀斯特森林土壤中
化学计量特征与森林植物多样性对土壤碳氮磷储量起到重要影响
提倡通过提升漓江流域森林物种多样性
改善流域森林土壤蓄水保肥功能
以此保护漓江流域脆弱的喀斯特森林生态系统。
In order to explore the distribution of soil carbon
nitrogen and phosphorus storage in Karst forest in the Lijiang River Basin
and to provide a theoretical basis for protecting the fragile Karst ecosystem in the Lijiang River Basin
a total of 15 natural forest quadrats of 20 m × 20 m were set up in the typical Karst forests in the upper
middle and lower reaches of the Lijiang River
and the forest vegetation was surveyed for each tree. The 0-20
20-40 cm soil layers were collected by five-point collection method to analyze the spatial distribution of soil carbon
nitrogen and phosphorus storage and driving factors
and to quantify the contribution of various biological and abiotic factors to the formation of soil nutrient storage pattern in karst forest. The results showed that: (1) The average distribution of soil carbon
nitrogen and phosphorus storage in the Karst forest in the Lijiang River Basin was upstream > downstream > midstream. In the Karst forest soil of the Lijiang River Basin
the storage of carbon
nitrogen and phosphorus was 55.8~192.0
3.1~14.8
and 6.0~12.0 kg/m2
respectively. The storage of carbon and nitrogen in 20 cm soil layer in the same watershed was significantly higher than that in 20-40 cm soil layer
while phosphorus storage did not show significant difference in the soil layers of different depth in the Lijiang River Basin. (2) Carbon storage showed a significant positive correlation with C/P
N/P
Shannon-Wiener index and Simpson index of forest species diversity; nitrogen storage had a significant positive correlation with C/P
N/P
Shannon Wiener index and Simpson index
while a significant negative correlation with C/N; the phosphorus storage had a significant negative correlation with C/N
and there was no significant correlation with forest species diversity. (3) The stoichiometric characteristics of Karst forest soil chemistry in the Lijiang River Basin were the direct driving factors driving the distribution of soil carbon
nitrogen and phosphorus storages
and the stoichiometric characteristics of deep soil were the most important direct driving factors. Secondly
forest species diversity played an important role in the immobilization and input of soil nutrients
directly affecting and driving the formation of soil carbon and nitrogen storage distribution pattern. The formation of phosphorus storage was not driven by the impact of forest vegetation conditions. In the Karst forest soil in the Lijiang River basin
the stoichiometric characteristics and the diversity of forest plants had played an important role in the formation and decomposition of soil carbon
nitrogen and phosphorus reserves. It is advocated to improve the water and fertilizer storage functions of forest soil in the Lijiang River Basin by improving the species diversity of forest vegetation in the Lijiang River Basin
while protecting the fragile karst forest ecosystem in the Lijiang River Basin.
Elser J J, Fagan W F, Denno R F, et al. Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs[J].Nature,2000,408(6812):578-580.
Finn D, Page K, Catton K, et al. Ecological stoichiometry controls the transformation and retention of plant-derived organic matter to humus in response to nitrogen fertilisation[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2016,99:117-127.
Hu Y F, Shu X Y, He J A, et al. Storage of C, N, and P affected by afforestation with Salix cupularis in an alpine semiarid desert ecosystem[J].Land Degradation and Development,2018,29(1):188-198.
Sardans J, Peñuelas J, Estiarte M. Changes in soil enzymes related to C and N cycle and in soil C and N content under prolonged warming and drought in a Mediterranean shrubland[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2008,39(2):223-235.
Steffens C, Beer C, Schelfhout S, et al. Do tree species affect decadal changes in soil organic carbon and total nitrogen stocks in Danish common garden experiments?[J].European Journal of Soil Science,2022,73(1):e13206.
王绍强,于贵瑞.生态系统碳氮磷元素的生态化学计量学特征[J].生态学报,2008,28(8):3937-3947.
任璐璐,张炳学,韩凤朋,等.黄土高原不同年限刺槐土壤化学计量特征分析[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(2):339-344.
Gao Y, He N P, Yu G R, et al. Long-term effects of different land use types on C, N, and P stoichiometry and storage in subtropical ecosystems: A case study in China[J].Ecological Engineering,2014,67:171-181.
Yang Y, Tilman D, Furey G, et al. Soil carbon sequestration accelerated by restoration of grassland biodiversity[J].Nature Communications,2019,10(1):e718.
Li Y F, Yang R, Hu P L, et al. Lower sensitivity of soil carbon and nitrogen to regional temperature change in Karst forests than in non-karst forests[J].Forests,2023,14(2):e355.
吴小飘,周忠发,朱孟,等.典型喀斯特聚集区不同地貌类型干旱时空特征[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(1):336-347.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
Yang L, Wei W, Chen L D, et al. Response of deep soil moisture to land use and afforestation in the semi-arid Loess Plateau, China[J].Journal of Hydrology,2012,475:111-122.
曾祉祥,雷沛,张洪,等.丹江口水库典型消落区土壤氮磷赋存形态及释放特征研究[J].环境科学学报,2015,35(5):1383-1392.
刘文龙,谢文霞,赵全升,等.胶州湾芦苇潮滩土壤碳、氮和磷分布及生态化学计量学特征[J].湿地科学,2014,12(3):362-368.
翟政,田野,秦广震,等.杨树人工林林下植被对非生长季土壤磷素形态与转化的影响[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(12):3778-3787.
张浩,吕茂奎,江军,等.侵蚀红壤区植被恢复对表层与深层土壤有机碳矿化的影响[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(1):244-249,314.
梁振春,李静,吴靖,等.退耕还林还草对黄土高原坡地磷素的影响[J].南方农业学报,2018,49(4):688-694.
Liu R S, Wang D M. Soil C, N, P and K stoichiometry affected by vegetation restoration patterns in the alpine region of the Loess Plateau, Northwest China[J].PLoS One,2020,15(11):e0241859.
何高迅,王越,彭淑娴,等.滇中退化山地不同植被恢复下土壤碳氮磷储量与生态化学计量特征[J].生态学报,2020,40(13):4425-4435.
陈晓旋,陈淑云,曾从盛,等.螃蟹对闽江河口湿地土壤碳氮磷含量及其生态化学计量学特征影响[J].环境科学学报,2018,38(3):1179-1188.
Liang J J, Crowther T W, Picard N, et al. Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests[J].Science,2016,354(6309):79-134.
吴昊.不同类型群落物种多样性指数的比较研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2015,35(5):84-89.
Stevens C J, Quinton J N, Bailey A P, et al. The effects of minimal tillage, contour cultivation and in-field vegetative barriers on soil erosion and phosphorus loss[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2009,106(1):145-151.
杨桦,彭小瑜,杨淑琪,等.滇南喀斯特断陷盆地土地利用方式对土壤有机碳及其活性组分的影响[J].生态学报,2022,42(17):7105-7117.
0
Views
879
下载量
4
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621