XU Qiang, LIU Hongguang, LI Mingsi, et al. Effects of Different Application Methods of Biochar on Water and Salt Regulation and Wheat Seedling Growth[J]. 2023, 37(5): 363-369.
DOI:
XU Qiang, LIU Hongguang, LI Mingsi, et al. Effects of Different Application Methods of Biochar on Water and Salt Regulation and Wheat Seedling Growth[J]. 2023, 37(5): 363-369. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.044.
Effects of Different Application Methods of Biochar on Water and Salt Regulation and Wheat Seedling Growth
In order to study the effects of different application modes of biochar on water and salt regulation in saline alkali soil and wheat seedling growth
an indoor bucket planting simulation experiment was conducted. Biochar was covered on the surface of the soil in two forms of powdery and rod-shaped
with a mass percentage of 1%
3% and 5%. Under the same treatment
biochar was mixed with 10 cm of the soil surface
and the treatment without biochar was used as a control (CK). The results showed that under the condition of "dry sowing and wet emergence"
the emergence rate of wheat treated with FF (powdery cover) and GF (rod-shaped cover) was 7.33 to 9.00 and 3.00 to 3.33 times higher than that of CK
respectively. The emergence rate of FH and GH treatments increased by 66.67% to 166.67% and 33.00% to 367.00%
respectively
compared with CK. The plant height of FF and GF treatments significantly increased
with an increase of 21.52% to 34.55% and 24.54% to 40.48%
respectively
compared with CK. The plant height of FH and GH treatments increased slightly
with an increase of -1.35% to 12.22% and 3.76% to 8.59%
respectively
compared with CK. There were significant differences in post irrigation moisture content among different application modes
and FF treatment increased the surface soil moisture content by 0.31% to 15.58% compared with CK. The surface soil moisture content treated with GF decreased by 0.40% to 7.65% compared with CK. The soil moisture content of FH and GH treatments increased by 7.33% to 18.61% and 1.33% to 18.38%
respectively
compared with CK. After evaporation
the moisture content of FF and GF treatments increased by 4.34% to 45.38% and 27.08% to 53.22%
respectively
compared with CK. After evaporation
the moisture content of the 0-15 cm soil layer increased significantly. The soil moisture content of FH and GH treatments increased by 3.26% to 16.66% and 5.77% to 36.37%
respectively
compared with CK. The maximum relative change rate of conductivity in the 0-10 cm soil layer of CK was 124.76%
while that in FF and GF treatments was 59.61% to 114.73% and 18.21% to 86.47%
respectively. The relative change rate in conductivity of GH and FH treatments was 67.26% to 96.30% and 72.05% to 122.32%
respectively. Compared with CK
the evaporation of FF and GF treatments decreased by 0.76% to 27.21% and 53.49% to 77.02%
respectively. Compared with CK
the evaporation of FH and GH treatments decreased by 1.95% to 4.79% and 1.71% to 14.82%
respectively. The improvement effect of biochar depended on the amount and the application method of biochar. Under equal carbon input conditions
FF and GF treatments had better effects on water and salt distribution
inhibition of evaporation
and crop growth than FH and GH treatments
which could be used as suitable models for adding biochar to improve saline alkali land in arid areas.
关键词
Keywords
references
Akhtar S S, Andersen M N, Liu F. Biochar mitigates salinity stress in potato[J]. Jourald of Agronomy and Crop Science,2015,20(5):368-378.
Phillips C L, Meyer K M, Trippe K M. Is biochar applied as surface mulch beneficial for grassland restoration?[J].Geoderma,2020,375:e114457.
Burrell L D, Zehetner F, Rampazzo N, et al. Long-term effects of biochar on soil physical properties[J].Geoderma,2016,282:96-102.
Hansen V, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Petersen C T, et al. Effects of gasification biochar on plant-available water capacity and plant growth in two contrasting soil types[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2016,161:1-9.
Amini S, Ghadiri H, Chen C, et al. Salt-affected soils, reclamation, carbon dynamics, and biochar:A review[J].Journal of Soils and Sediments,2015,16(3):939-953.
Awan S, Ippolito J A, Ullman J L, et al. Biochars reduce irrigation water sodium adsorption ratio[J].Biochar,2021,3(1):77-87.
Baiamonte G, De Pasquale C, Marsala V, et al. Structure alteration of a sandy-clay soil by biochar amendments[J].Journal of Soils and Sediments,2014,15(4):816-824.
Ali S, Rizwan M, Qayyum M F, et al. Biochar soil amendment on alleviation of drought and salt stress in plants:A critical review[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research International,2017,24(14):12700-12712.
Zhu H, Yang J, Yao R, et al. Interactive effects of soil amendments (biochar and gypsum) and salinity on ammonia volatilization in coastal saline soil[J].Catena,2020,190(C):e104527.
Hussain R, Bordoloi S, Gupta P, et al. Effect of biochar type on infiltration, water retention and desiccation crack potential of a silty sand[J]. Biochar,2020,2:465-478.
Omondi M O, Xia X, Nahayo A, et al. Quantification of biochar effects on soil hydrological properties using meta-analysis of literature data[J].Geoderma,2016,274:28-34.
Hossain M Z, Bahar M M, Sarkar B, et al. Biochar and its importance on nutrient dynamics in soil and plant[J].Biochar,2020,2(4):379-420.
Chen W, Meng J, Han X, et al. Past, present, and future of biochar[J].Biochar,2019,1(1):75-87.
Liu Z, Dugan B, Masiello C A, et al. Biochar particle size, shape, and porosity act together to influence soil water properties[J].PLoS One,2017,12(6):e179079.
Impact of Biochar-Straw Interlayer Synergistic Improvement on Water Infiltration Processes in Saline-Alkali Soil
Effect of Biochar Application on Spatiotemporal Distribution and Loss Control of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Orchard Soil
Influence of Biochar Combined with Moss Plants on Soil Stability
Effects of Biochar Combined with Nitrification/Urease Inhibitor and Straw Mulching on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Leaching in Red Soil Tea Plantations
Effects of Water and Biochar Management on Salt Reduction Effect in Sodic Saline Soil of the Yellow River Delta
Related Author
NIU Yuting
XU Junpeng
DONG Qinge
FENG Hao
YANG Guiting
LU Chao
XU Yehong
MA Xiaochi
Related Institution
College of Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering (Institute of Soil and Water Conservation),Northwest A&F University, Yangling
State Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control, Northwest A&F University, Yangling
Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, National Agro-Environmental Observation and Experiment Station, Liuhe
College of Life Sciences, Yangtze University
College of Civil Engineering, Guilin University of Technology