

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨凌,712100
2. 西北退化生态系统恢复与重建教育部重点实验室,银川,750021
3. 宁夏大学生态环境学院,银川,750021
4. 西北农林科技大学经济管理学院, 陕西 杨凌,712100
Published:2023
移动端阅览
ZHANG Yifan, CHEN Lin, ZHANG Bangbang, et al. Characteristics of Organic Carbon Particle Size Composition and Carbon Pool Management Index in Surface Soil of Desert Grassland[J]. 2023, 37(5): 283-290.
ZHANG Yifan, CHEN Lin, ZHANG Bangbang, et al. Characteristics of Organic Carbon Particle Size Composition and Carbon Pool Management Index in Surface Soil of Desert Grassland[J]. 2023, 37(5): 283-290. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.034.
以探讨荒漠草原表层土壤粒径分布分形、不同粒径有机碳含量、碳库管理指数特征及其关系为目的
通过野外调查选取宁夏回族自治区盐池县花马池镇荒漠草原柠条锦鸡儿(Caragana korshinskii)、黑沙蒿(Artemisia ordosica)、短花针茅(Stipa breviflora)、蒙古冰草(Agropyron mongolicum)4种典型植被作为研究对象
采集典型植被冠下和丛间2种生境下表层(0-5 cm)土壤
分析不同植被表层土壤不同粒径有机碳含量、土壤碳库动态变化特征及其相关性。结果表明:(1)4种典型植被土壤粒径呈"单峰"型分布趋势
土壤颗粒主要集中分布于2~250 μm粒径
分形维数(D)为2.56~2.63
100~500 μm颗粒含量是植被间差异显著的主要原因。(2)4种典型植被冠下有机碳含量大于丛间有机碳含量
>250 μm粗砂粒组分有机碳含量最高
不同粒径组分有机碳含量在灌丛和草本植被间差异显著(p<0.05)。(3)4种典型植被土壤TOC、AOC含量均表现为冠下大于丛间
TOC在不同群落间差异显著
灌木群落冠下碳库活度(A)和碳库管理指数(CPMI)相对大于丛间
各指标在不同群落间因生境不同差异较大
表明不同典型植被在碳库循环机制中扮演不同角色
不同程度增强土壤碳汇功能。(4)土壤粒径分形与碳库稳定性关系复杂
2~50 μm细粉粒是土壤有机碳无机胶体
其含量增多明显提高土壤颗粒与有机碳形成有机-无机胶结体的机会
对维持土壤结构和有机碳库稳定性具有重要意义。研究结果表明适宜的植被恢复措施对维持荒漠草原土壤颗粒及土壤有机碳库稳定性具有一定的参考价值。
To explore the fractal distribution of surface soil particle size
organic carbon content of different particle size and the characteristics of carbon management index as well as their relationship in the desert steppe
4 kinds of typical communities in Huamachi Town
Yanchi County
Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region
including Caragana korshinskii
Artemisia ordosica
Stipa breviflora and Agropyron mongolicum
were selected as the research objects. Using surface soil (0-5 cm) under typical vegetation canopy and intercropping habitats
the dynamic changes and their correlations of organic carbon content of different particle size and soil carbon pool in different vegetation surface soils were analyzed. The results showed that:(1) The distribution of soil particle size of the four kinds of typical communities showed a "single peak" shape
soil particle concentrated in the range of 2~250 μm
the fractal dimension D in the range of 2.56 to 2.63
the content of particle within 100~500 μm was the main reason for significant differences between vegetation types. (2) The organic carbon content under the canopy of four typical vegetation types was greater than that of intercropping habitats
the organic carbon content of thick sand >250 μm was the highest
the organic carbon content of different particle size components varied significantly between the shrub and herbage vegetation (p<0.05). (3) The soil TOC and AOC contents of the four typical vegetation types were all higher under canopy than those of intercropping habitats. TOC varied significantly among different communities. The carbon pool activity (A) and carbon pool management index (CPMI) under the canopy of shrub communities were relatively higher than those of intercropping habitats. Various indicators varied greatly among different communities due to different habitats
indicating that different typical vegetations played different roles in the carbon pool cycling mechanism
and enhanced soil carbon sink function with different degrees. (4) The relationship between soil particle size fractal and carbon pool stability was complex. Fine silt with 2~50 μm was an inorganic colloid of soil organic carbon. The increasing of its content significantly increased the opportunity for soil particles and organic carbon to form organic-inorganic cement
which was of great significance for maintaining soil structure and the stability of organic carbon pool. The research results indicated that appropriate vegetation restoration measures had certain reference value for maintaining the stability of soil particles and soil organic carbon pools in desert grassland.
张义凡,陈林,李学斌,等.不同荒漠草原植被根际与非根际土壤养分及碳库管理指数特征[J].草业学报,2017,26(8):24-34.
Wang Q K, Zhong M C, Wang S L. A meta-analysis on the response of microbial biomass, dissolved organic matter respiration, and N mineralization in mineral soil to fire in forest ecosystems[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2012,27(1):91-97.
Duan Z F, Fu W L, Zhen X J, et al. Effects of land use on soil organic carbon fractions and its distribution in Karst[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,23(2):109-114.
Lützow M V, Kögel-Knabner I, Ekschmitt K, et al. Stabilization of organic matter in temperate soils:Mechanisms and their relevance under different soil conditions:A review[J].European Journal of Soil Science,2006,57(4):426-445.
Bin M. Changes of soil active organic carbon under different land use types in karst area[J].Ecology and Environment,2006,15(6):1224-1230.
王洪杰,李宪文,史学正,等.不同土地利用方式下土壤养分的分布及其与土壤颗粒组成关系[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(2):44-50.
何亚婷,何友均,王鹏,等.不同经营模式对蒙古栎林土壤有机碳组分的长效性影响[J].生态环境学报,2023,32(1):11-17.
郑子潇,王丹阳,胡保安,等.华北落叶松人工林土壤有机碳和团聚体稳定性对间伐的响应[J].生态学杂志,2023,42(4):780-787.
樊红柱,秦鱼生,陈庆瑞,等.长期施肥紫色水稻土团聚体稳定性及其固碳特征[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(6):1473-1480.
罗晓虹,王子芳,陆畅,等.土地利用方式对土壤团聚体稳定性和有机碳含量的影响[J].环境科学,2019,40(8):3816-3824.
王富华,吕盛,黄容,等.缙云山4种森林植被土壤团聚体有机碳分布特征[J].环境科学,2019,40(3):1504-1511.
王冰,周扬,张秋良.兴安落叶松林龄对土壤团聚体分布及其有机碳含量的影响[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(6):1618-1628.
Tyler S W, Wheatcraft S W. Fractal scaling of soil particle-size distributions:Analysis and limitations[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1992,56(2):362-369.
李学斌,张义凡,陈林,等.荒漠草原典型群落土壤粒径和养分的分布特征及其关系研究[J].西北植物学报,2017,37(8):1635-1644.
贾晓红,李新荣,李元寿.干旱沙区植被恢复过程中土壤颗粒分形特征[J].地理研究,2007,26(3):518-525.
赵盼盼,李国旗,邵文山,等.封育对荒漠草原苦豆子群落土壤粒径分形特征的影响[J].西北植物学报,2017,37(6):1234-1241.
Brocca L, Tullo T, Melone F, et al. Catchment scale soil moisture spatial-temporal variability[J].Journal of Hydrology,2012,422/423:63-75.
许婷婷,董智,李红丽,等.不同设障年限沙丘土壤粒径和有机碳分布特征[J].环境科学研究,2014,27(6):628-634.
Bastida F, Barberá G G, García C, et al. Influence of orientation vegetation and season soil microbial and biochemical characteristics under semiarid conditions[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2008,38(1):62-70.
Chen X M, Zhang D Q, Liang G H, et al. Effects of precipitation on soil organic carbon fractions in three subtropical forests in southern China[J].Journal of Plant Ecology,2016,9(1):10-19.
刘士丹,卢敬坤,胡宁,等.温度和水分对黑土有机碳矿化的影响[J].吉林农业大学学报,2020,42(5):552-560.
Lange M, Eisenhauer N, Sierra C A, et al. Plant diversity increases soil microbial activity and soil carbon storage[J].Nature Communications,2015,6:e6707.
蒲玉琳,叶春,张世熔,等.若尔盖沙化草地不同生态恢复模式土壤活性有机碳及碳库管理指数变化[J].生态学报,2017,37(2):367-377.
唐海明,程凯凯,肖小平,等.不同冬季覆盖作物对双季稻田土壤有机碳的影响[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(2):465-473.
Moore J M, Klose S, Tabatabai M A. Soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen as affected by cropping systems[J].Biology and Fertility of Soils,2000,31(3/4):200-210.
Shah F, Nicolás C, Bentzer J, et al. Ectomycorrhizal fungi decompose soil organic matter using oxidative mechanisms adapted from saprotrophic ancestors[J].The New Phytologist,2016,209(4):1705-1719.
徐文静,丛耀辉,张玉玲,等.黑土区水稻土水稳性团聚体有机碳及其颗粒有机碳的分布特征[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(4):210-215.
Huang S, Rui W Y, Peng X X, et al. Organic carbon fractions affected by long-term fertilization in a subtropical paddy soil[J].Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,2010,86(1):153-160.
周萍.南方典型稻田土壤有机碳固定机制研究:基于长期试验及跨地域统计分析[D].南京:南京农业大学,2009.
余健,房莉,卞正富,等.土壤碳库构成研究进展[J].生态学报,2014,34(17):4829-4838.
Guan J H, Deng L, Zhang J G, et al. Soil organic carbon density and its driving factors in forest ecosystems across a northwestern province in China[J].Geoderma,2019,352(15):1-12.
Yang Y, Li T, Wang Y Q, et al. Linkage between soil ectoenzyme stoichiometry ratios and microbial diversity following the conversion of cropland into grassland[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2021,314:e107418.
成毅,安韶山,李国辉,等.宁夏黄土丘陵区植被恢复对土壤养分和微生物生物量的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2010,18(2):261-266.
0
Views
915
下载量
3
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621