

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
西安理工大学省部共建西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室, 西安理工大学,西安,710048
Published:2023
移动端阅览
YANG Qiannan, GAO Haidong, HAN Yong, et al. Variation Characteristics of Baseflow and Its Responses to Precipitation in Wuding River Basin[J]. 2023, 37(5): 235-242.
YANG Qiannan, GAO Haidong, HAN Yong, et al. Variation Characteristics of Baseflow and Its Responses to Precipitation in Wuding River Basin[J]. 2023, 37(5): 235-242. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.028.
基流是干旱区河流水资源的重要组成部分
在维持河川径流和维护流域生态安全等方面具有重要作用。探究无定河流域基流变化特征及其对降水的响应
对优化黄土高原水资源配置意义重大。基于无定河流域1960-2019年逐日降水量、径流量数据
利用数字滤波法、小波变换、双累积曲线及弹性系数法等
分析了降水量与基流深年际和年内变化特征
探讨了降水量与基流深的时频域关系及基流对降水的时滞效应
并明确了降水-基流关系的变化方向。结果表明:无定河流域年基流深和年基流指数分别呈极显著下降趋势(p<0.001)和不显著增大趋势(p<0.1)
多年平均值分别为23.83 mm和0.67。基流深和基流指数值在春秋两季较大
夏冬两季较小;夏秋季降水对基流的控制能力在高能量和低能量区均明显强于春冬季;基流对降水的年均时滞时长为3.2天
月均(5-10月)时滞时长均在7天内。在过去60年间
流域基流储量增加7倍以上;降水量与基流深的关系发生2次变化
变化点分别为1971年和2000年;2000年后基流对降水的敏感性减弱
二者关系变化的方向更加稳定。研究结果以期为黄河中游地区水资源可持续开发利用提供理论支撑。
Baseflow is an essential part of river water resources in arid areas
which play an important role in maintaining streamflow and ecological security in the basin. Investigation on the change characteristics of baseflow and its responses to precipitation in Wuding River Basin is of great significance for optimizing the allocation of water resources on the Loess Plateau. Based on daily precipitation and runoff data of Wuding River Basin from 1960 to 2019
and combined with digital filtering method
wavelet transform
double cumulative curve and elastic coefficient method
the study analyzed inter-annual and intra-annual variation characteristics of precipitation and baseflow depth
discussed the time-frequency relationship between precipitation and baseflow depth as well as the time lag effect of baseflow on precipitation
and clarified the change direction of precipitation-baseflow relationship. The result showed that annual baseflow depth displayed a highly significant downward trend (p<0.001)
and annual baseflow index showed a non-significant upward trend (p<0.1)
with perennial average values of 23.83 mm and 0.67
respectively. The values of baseflow depth and baseflow index were higher in spring and autumn
and lower in summer and winter. The control ability of precipitation on baseflow in summer and autumn was stronger in both high and low energy regions than that in spring and winter. The average annual lag time of baseflow to precipitation was 3.2 d
and the average monthly (May-October) lag time was less than 7 d. In the past 60 years
baseflow reserves in the watershed increased by more than 7 times. The relationship between precipitation and baseflow depth changed twice
the change points were 1971 and 2000
respectively. The sensitivity of baseflow to precipitation weakened gradually after 2000
and their relationship evolution became more stable. The results would provide theoretical support for sustainable development and utilization of water resources in the middle reaches of the Yellow River.
徐宗学,武玮,于松延.生态基流研究:进展与挑战[J].水力发电学报,2016,35(4):1-11.
Tan X J, Liu B J, Tan X Z. Global changes in baseflow under the impacts of changing climate and vegetation[J].Water Resources Research,2020,56(9):1-23.
Hu W, Wang Y Q, Li H J, et al. Dominant role of climate in determining spatio-temporal distribution of potential groundwater recharge at a regional scale[J].Journal of Hydrology,2019,578:e124042.
韩鹏,王艺璇,李岱峰.黄河中游河龙区间河川基流时空变化及其对水土保持响应[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2020,28(3):505-521.
Li X, Wang X, Babovic V. Analysis of variability and trends of precipitation extremes in Singapore during 1980-2013[J].International Journal of Climatology:A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society,2018,38(1):125-141.
安彬,肖薇薇,张淑兰,等.1960-2017年黄土高原不同等级降水日数和强度时空变化特征[J].干旱区研究,2021,38(3):714-723.
Liu Y, Li Y, Li S C, et al. Spatial and temporal patterns of global NDVI trends:correlations with climate and human factors[J].Remote Sensing,2015,7(10):13233-13250.
张翀,白子怡,李学梅,等.2001-2018年黄土高原植被覆盖人为影响时空演变及归因分析[J].干旱区地理,2021,44(1):188-196.
Ficklin D L, Robeson S M, Knouft J H. Impacts of recent climate change on trends in baseflow and stormflow in United States watersheds[J].Geophysical Research Letters,2016,43(10):5079-5088.
Wilby R, Greenfield B, Glenny C. A coupled synoptic-hydrological model for climate change impact assessment[J].Journal of Hydrology,1994,153(1/2/3/4):265-290.
Ahiablame L, Sheshukov A Y, Rahmani V, et al. Annual baseflow variations as influenced by climate variability and agricultural land use change in the Missouri River Basin[J].Journal of Hydrology,2017,551:188-202.
Mwakalila S, Feyen J, Wyseure G. The influence of physical catchment properties on baseflow in semi-arid environments[J].Journal of Arid Environments,2002,52(2):245-258.
陈利群,刘昌明,郝芳华,等.黄河源区基流变化及影响因子分析[J].冰川冻土,2006,28(2):141-148.
雷泳南,张晓萍,张建军,等.窟野河流域河川基流量变化趋势及其驱动因素[J].生态学报,2013,33(5):1559-1568.
白乐,李怀恩,何宏谋.降水和人类活动对秃尾河流域基流的影响[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(12):2078-2088.
刘柏君,雷晓辉,刘争胜,等.皇甫川流域降水基流特征及其响应关系[J].人民黄河,2016,38(4):7-12.
亢小语,张志强,陈立欣,等.黄土高原中尺度流域基流变化驱动因素分析[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(3):563-572.
Torrence C, Webster P J. Interdecadal changes in the ENSO-Monsoon System[J].Journal of Climate,1999,12(8):2679-2690.
Chong K L, Huang Y F, Koo C H, et al. Spatiotemporal variability analysis of standardized precipitation indexed droughts using wavelet transform[J].Journal of Hydrology,2022,605:e127299.
Talei A M, Chua L H C. Influence of lag time on event-based rainfall-runoff modeling using the data driven approach[J].Journal of Hydrology,2012,438/439:223-233.
梁四海,万力,张建锋,等.黄河源区枯季基流的周期变化规律与成因[J].自然科学进展,2007,17(9):1222-1228.
Fan Y T, Chen Y N, Li W H. Increasing precipitation and baseflow in Aksu River since the 1950s[J].Quaternary International,2014,336:26-34.
黄珊珊,董前进.长江流域上中下游基流演变规律及与降水量关联分析[J].水电能源科学,2022,40(7):10-13.
郑爱勤,王文科,段磊.渭河流域基流及降雨的多尺度特征和突变分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(6):144-148.
Cartwright I, Morgenstern U. Transit times from rainfall to baseflow in headwater catchments estimated using tritium:The Ovens River, Australia[J].Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,2015,19(6):3771-3785.
Barbero G, Costabile P, Costanzo C, et al. 2D hydrodynamic approach supporting evaluations of hydrological response in small watersheds:Implications for lag time estimation[J].Journal of Hydrology,2022,610:e127870.
陈利群,刘昌明,李发东.基流研究综述[J].地理科学进展,2006,25(1):1-15.
刘闻,曹明明,邱海军.1956-2005年榆林地区河川基流量的小波分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2013,27(10):121-126.
农晓星,聂卫波,马孝义.无定河流域风沙滩区河道基流变化规律与驱动因素分析[J].水土保持学报,2023,37(1):103-113.
Eckhardt K. How to construct recursive digital filters for baseflow separation[J].Hydrological Processes,2005,19(2):507-515.
Si B C, Zeleke T B. Wavelet coherency analysis to relate saturated hydraulic properties to soil physical properties[J].Water Resources Research,2005,41(11):e11424.
Yu H L, Lin Y C. Analysis of space-time non-stationary patterns of rainfall-groundwater interactions by integrating empirical orthogonal function and cross wavelet transform methods[J].Journal of Hydrology,2015,525:585-597.
穆兴民,张秀勤,高鹏,等.双累积曲线方法理论及在水文气象领域应用中应注意的问题[J].水文,2010,30(4):47-51.
Sankarasubramanian A, Vogel R M, Limbrunner J F. Climate elasticity of streamflow in the United States[J].Water Resources Research,2001,37(6):1771-1781.
Li D F, Lu X X, Overeem I, et al. Exceptional increases in fluvial sediment fluxes in a warmer and wetter High Mountain Asia[J].Science,2021,374(6567):599-603.
Torrence C, Compo G P. A practical guide to wavelet analysis[J].Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society,1998,79(1):61-78.
Grinsted A, Moore J C, Jevrejeva S. Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series[J].Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics,2004,11(40):561-566.
Wittenberg H, Aksoy H, Miegel K. Fast response of groundwater to heavy rainfall[J].Journal of Hydrology,2019,571:837-842.
党丽娟,徐勇,徐学选.黄土丘陵区地表水和地下水对降水的响应:以康沟小流域为例[J].地理科学进展,2011,30(1):87-94.
Eckhardt K, Ulbrich U. Potential impacts of climate change on groundwater recharge and streamflow in a central European low mountain range[J].Journal of Hydrology,2003,284(1/2/3/4):244-252.
Koskelo A I, Fisher T R, Utz R M, et al. A new precipitation-based method of baseflow separation and event identification for small watersheds (<50 km
2
)[J].Journal of Hydrology,2012,450/451:267-278.
高东东,吴勇,陈盟,等.贡嘎山森林系统小流域基流分割与降雨入渗补给计算[J].长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(6):949-955.
Merz R, Parajka J, Bloeschl G. Time stability of catchment model parameters:Implications for climate impact analyses[J].Water Resources Research,2011,47(2):2144-2150.
Zhao Y, Cao W H, Hu C H, et al. Analysis of changes in characteristics of flood and sediment yield in typical basins of the Yellow River under extreme rainfall events[J].Catena,2019,177:31-40.
李俊,盛菲,刘士余,等.赣南九曲水流域基流变化特征及其对降水的响应[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(8):2251-2259.
Ran Q H, Tang H L, Wang F, et al. Numerical modelling shows an old check-dam still attenuates flooding and sediment transport[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2021,46(4):1549-1567.
Yuan S L, Li Z B, Chen L, et al. Influence of check dams on flood hydrology across varying stages of their lifespan in a highly erodible Catchment, Loess Plateau of China[J].Catena,2022,210:e105864.
Yan X, Sun J N, Huang Y N, et al. Detecting and attributing the changes in baseflow in China's Loess Plateau[J].Journal of Hydrology,2023,617:e128957.
Miller M P, Buto S G, Susong D D, et al. The importance of base flow in sustaining surface water flow in the Upper Colorado River Basin[J].Water Resources Research,2016,52(5):3547-3562.
Segura C, Noone D, Warren D, et al. Climate, landforms, and geology affect baseflow sources in a mountain catchment[J].Water Resources Research,2019,55(7):5238-5254.
Bryan B A, Gao L, Ye Y Q, et al. China's response to a national land-system sustainability emergency[J].Nature,2018,559(7713):193-204.
高海东,庞国伟,李占斌,等.黄土高原植被恢复潜力研究[J].地理学报,2017,72(5):863-874.
杨倩楠,李占斌,鲁克新,等.干旱区河流基流变化特征及归因分析:以无定河流域为例[J].台湾水利,2019,66(4):67-75.
王国卿.柳林泉域降水补给的时滞研究[J].山西大学学报(自然科学版),2007,29(4):53-55.
0
Views
1009
下载量
1
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621