Quantitative Effects of Land Use and Vegetation Cover Changes on Soil Erosion in Changting County in Recent 30 Years

CHEN Miao; WANG Xiaoqin; LIN Jinglan; YUE Hui; ZHOU Weidong; JIANG Hong

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.021

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Quantitative Effects of Land Use and Vegetation Cover Changes on Soil Erosion in Changting County in Recent 30 Years

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Quantitative Effects of Land Use and Vegetation Cover Changes on Soil Erosion in Changting County in Recent 30 Years
- Vol. 37, Issue 5, Pages: 168-177(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 福州大学空间数据挖掘与信息共享教育部重点实验室, 卫星空间信息技术综合应用国家地方联合工程研究中心, 数字中国研究院(福建),福州,350108
  2. 福建省水土保持试验站,福州,350001
  3. 福建省长汀县水土保持中心, 福建长汀,366300
  4. 福建省数字经济发展促进中心,福州,350003
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.021
  CLC： S157.1
- Published：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
CHEN Miao, WANG Xiaoqin, LIN Jinglan, et al. Quantitative Effects of Land Use and Vegetation Cover Changes on Soil Erosion in Changting County in Recent 30 Years[J]. 2023, 37(5): 168-177.
DOI：

CHEN Miao, WANG Xiaoqin, LIN Jinglan, et al. Quantitative Effects of Land Use and Vegetation Cover Changes on Soil Erosion in Changting County in Recent 30 Years[J]. 2023, 37(5): 168-177. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.021.

摘要

土地利用和植被覆盖是人类活动对大自然改造的直接体现

为研究人类活动对土壤侵蚀的定量影响

以中国南方红壤典型水土流失区——福建省长汀县为研究区

利用每间隔3~4年的11个年份的遥感影像

基于USLE模型评估该县1988-2020年30多年来的土壤侵蚀时空变化特征

定量分析不同土地利用和植被覆盖度(fractional vegetation cover

FVC)变化对土壤侵蚀的影响。结果表明:(1)长汀县土壤侵蚀严重区域主要集中于县域中部河田镇、三洲镇和策武镇等地

30多年来

土壤侵蚀强度呈先增后减的趋势

1988-1994年土壤侵蚀状况逐渐严重

1994年的水土流失率高达30.49%

90年代中期后开始逐渐好转

至2020年水土流失率降为6.22%。(2)1988-1994年和1994-2001年2个时期

林地转化成裸地的面积最大

导致土壤侵蚀增加量平均约占每个时期增加量的93%;2001-2010年和2010-2020年2个时期

裸地转化成林地的面积最大

引起的土壤侵蚀减少量平均约占每个时期减少量的73%。(3)30多年来长汀县FVC呈先减少后增加的趋势

1988-1994年平均FVC从44%减少到35%

随后开始增加

至2020年

FVC增加至79%;土壤侵蚀量与FVC呈反比

FVC减少对土壤侵蚀量的影响更大

FVC平均每降低1%

土壤侵蚀量增加7.49万t;而FVC平均每增加1%

土壤侵蚀量减少3.75万t。(4)FVC对土壤侵蚀的敏感性与坡度呈正比

低坡度下土壤侵蚀随FVC变化较均匀

高坡度等级下

FVC低于60%时

对土壤侵蚀的敏感性高

FVC每增加10%

土壤侵蚀模数平均减少262.73 t/(km2·a)。研究结果有助于分析长汀县土壤侵蚀在长时间序列上的时空变化及人类活动对土壤侵蚀的影响

为长汀县未来的土地利用规划和生态保护提供重要的科学支持。

Abstract

Land use and vegetation cover are direct manifestations of human activities in transforming nature. In order to quantitatively assess the impact of human activities on soil erosion

this study focuses on Changting County

a typical red soil erosion-prone area in southern China. Using remote sensing images from 11 years between 1988 and 2020 with 3- or 4-years interval

the USLE model was applied to evaluate the spatiotemporal characteristics of soil erosion in the county over the past 30 years

and the quantitative impact of different land use and Fractional Vegetation Cover (FVC) changes on soil erosion was analyzed. The results showed that:(1) The severe soil erosion in Changting County is mainly concentrated in the central areas of the county

including Hetian Town

Sanzhou Township

and Cewu Township. Over the past 30 years

the intensity of soil erosion showed an increasing trend followed by a decreasing trend. From 1988 to 1994

the situation of soil erosion became increasingly severe

with a soil erosion rate as high as 30.49% in 1994. Since the mid-1990s

the situation gradually improved

and by 2020

the soil erosion rate had decreased to 6.22%. (2) During the two periods of 1988-1994 and 1994-2001

the area of forest land converted to bare land was the largest

resulting in an average increase in soil erosion of about 93% for each period. During the two periods of 2001-2010 and 2010-2020

the area of bare land converted to forest land was the largest

resulting in an average reduction in soil erosion of about 73% for each period. (3) For over 30 years

the FVC in Changting County has shown a decreasing trend followed by an increasing trend. The average FVC decreased from 44% to 35% between 1988 and 1994

after which it began to increase. As of 2020

the FVC has increased to 79%. The soil erosion amount was inversely proportional to the FVC

and the impact of FVC reduction on soil erosion was greater. On average

for every 1% decrease in FVC

the soil erosion increased by 74 900 tons

while for every 1% increase in FVC

the soil erosion decreased by 37 500 tons. (4) The FVC in Changting County was negatively correlated with soil erosion intensity

and the sensitivity to soil erosion was positively correlated with slope. Under low slope conditions

soil erosion changed more uniformly with FVC

but under high slope conditions

when FVC was less than 60%

the sensitivity to soil erosion was high. For each 10% increase in FVC

the average soil erosion modulus in areas with a slope greater than 15° was reduced by 262.73 t/(km2·a). This study helps to analyze the spatiotemporal changes of soil erosion in Changting County over a long time series and the impact of human activities on soil erosion

providing important scientific support for future land use planning and ecological protection in Changting County.

关键词

Keywords

references

Senanayake S, Pradhan B, Alamri A, et al. A new application of deep neural network (LSTM) and RUSLE models in soil erosion prediction[J].Science of the Total Environment,2022,845:e157220.

Borrelli P, Panagos P, Alewell C, et al. Policy implications of multiple concurrent soil erosion processes in European farmland[J].Nature Sustainability,2023,6:103-112.

曹矞,高超,张晓明,等.湖北省侵蚀性降雨时空分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(1):41-46,53.

Xiao J Y, Xie B G, Zhou K C, et al. Assessment of soil erosion in the Dongting Lake Basin, China:Patterns, drivers, and implications[J].PLoS One,2021,16(12):e0261842.

王猛,王鹤松,姜超,等.基于RUSLE和地理探测器模型的西南地区土壤侵蚀格局及定量归因[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2021,29(6):1386-1402.

徐晓凤.南方红壤侵蚀原因及对策[J].绿色科技,2017(2):98,100.

分区五:南方红壤区[J].中国水利,2009(7):35-39.

Seutloali K E, Beckedahl H R. A review of road-related soil erosion:An assessment of causes, evaluation techniques and available control measures[J].Earth Sciences Research Journal,2015,19(1):73-80.

张洋,李鹏,马文东,等.黄河上游西柳沟流域土壤侵蚀对土地利用变化响应[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(5):70-76,84.

Yifeng L, Xiaoqin W, Miaojin C. Sensitivity analysis of vegetation coverage to soil loss rate in red soil region of south China//IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing, 2020, 502(1):e012040.

Wang W, Chen S M, Zhu L, et al. Research on the sensitivity assessment of soil erosion by AHP method:A case study in the Northeast of Ordos Basin//E3S Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences, 2020, 194:e04020.

Teng Y M, Zhan J Y, Liu W, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics and drivers of wind erosion on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China[J].Ecological Indicators,2021,123:e107340.

陈国光,刘红樱,陈进全,等.福建长汀县水土流失的地质影响因素及防治对策[J].水文地质工程地质,2020,47(6):26-35.

黎恬,崔煜婕,黄锦璐,等.福建省长汀县水土流失区马尾松种群对干旱的响应与恢复[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(4):42-48,55.

王培俊,刘旗,孙煌,等.南方红壤水土流失区生态系统服务价值时空变化研究[J].农业机械学报,2021,52(5):219-228.

陈樟昊,姚雄,余坤勇,等.南方典型红壤区生态脆弱性与土壤侵蚀的演化关系[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学版),2017,37(4):82-90.

师吉红,项佳,刘健,等.南方红壤典型水土流失区马尾松林地上林木碳储量的遥感监测:以长汀县河田镇为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(6):2151-2160.

张仕山,朱雄斌,汪小钦.基于年际Landsat系列数据的长汀县水土流失治理区植被恢复监测[J].长江科学院院报,2020,37(4):43-49.

汪水前.福建省长汀县不同土地利用方式下的坡地侵蚀特征[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(6):84-88.

Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Predicting rainfall erosion losses:A guide to conservation planning[R].United States Department of Agriculture.Agriculture Handbook:No.537[M].Washington:United States Department of Agriculture,1978.

Helmi A M. Quantifying catchments sediment release in arid regions using GIS-based Universal soil loss equation (USLE)[J].Ain Shams Engineering Journal,2023,14(8):e102038.

中华人民共和国水利部.SL 575-2012水利水电工程水土保持技术规范[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2012.

李宗勋,李启艳,侯晓龙,等.不同自然降雨等级下不同郁闭度马尾松林的水土流失特征[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(1):27-33,40.

周伟东,汪小钦,吴佐成,等.1988-2013年南方花岗岩红壤侵蚀区长汀县水土流失时空变化[J].中国水土保持科学,2016,14(2):49-58.

中华人民共和国水利部.SL 190-2007土壤侵蚀分类分级标准[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2008:3-12.

Getnet T, Mulu A. Assessment of soil erosion rate and hotspot areas using RUSLE and multi-criteria evaluation technique at Jedeb watershed, Upper Blue Nile, Amhara Region, Ethiopia[J].Environmental Challenges,2021,4:e100174.

Anees S A, Zhang X, Shakeel M, et al. Estimation of fractional vegetation cover dynamics based on satellite remote sensing in pakistan:A comprehensive study on the FVC and its drivers[J].Journal of King Saud University-Science,2022,34(3):e101848.

徐少杰,邓良,赵明松,等.安徽省1980-2020年土壤侵蚀时空变化特征[J].科学技术与工程,2023,23(1):109-116.

余恩旭,张明芳,蒋志魏,等.岷江上游土壤侵蚀时空演变特征及其成因分析[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(1):1-10,17.

徐少杰,邓良,赵明松,等.安徽省1980-2020年土壤侵蚀时空变化特征[J].科学技术与工程,2023,23(1):109-116.

魏艳红,焦菊英.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同土地利用方式下小流域侵蚀产沙特征[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(3):96-103.

杨凯祥,刘强,李秀红,等.三峡库区土壤侵蚀和植被覆盖变化分析[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,57(5):631-638.

张龙齐,贾国栋,吕相融,等.黄土高原典型地区不同植被覆盖下坡面土壤侵蚀阈值研究[J].水土保持学报,2023,37(2):187-198.

罗学升.长汀县稀土开发与水土保持对策[J].亚热带水土保持,2004,16(4):19-22.

高兆蔚.福建长汀河田水土流失综合治理成效与继续治理对策建议[J].福建水土保持,2004,16(4):11-13.

长汀县地方志编纂委员会.长汀县志(1988-2003)[M].北京:中华书局,2006.

Yin Z, Chang J, Huang Y. Multiscale spatiotemporal characteristics of soil erosion and its influencing factors in the Yellow River Basin[J].Water,2022,14(17):e2658.

朱永杰,王超,刘自强.降雨和植被覆盖对铁路路基边坡土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(6):8-14.

Views

1045

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Multi-Scenario Prediction of Land Use Changes and Soil Erosion in Three Gorges Reservoir Region Based on PLUS-InVEST Model

Small Watershed Erosion Model （SWEM）

Response of Soil Total Nitrogen Distribution to Erosion under Ecological Restoration in Qinling Water Source Area

Response of Slope Runoff Hydrodynamic Characteristics to Gravel Coverage in Alpine Regions under Artificial Rainfall Simulation

Impact of Hydraulic Conditions on Soil Detachment Capacity under Different Surface Roughness

Related Author

HU Xinyi

XIAO Zuolin

QIN Chuan

CHENG Xin

CHEN Jilong

JÜ Jialing

FU Suhua

LIU Baoyuan

Related Institution

Chongqing Key Laboratory of GIS Application， School of Geography and Tourism， Chongqing Normal University

Sichuan Provincial Key Laboratory of Philosophy and Social Sciences for Monitoring and Evaluation of Rural Land Utilization， School of History and Geography， Chengdu Normal University

Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology， Chinese Academy of Sciences

Chongqing River Affairs Center

State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Disaster Risk Reduction， Faculty of Geographical Science， Beijing Normal University

⁰