

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 山地表生过程与生态调控重点实验室,成都,610299
2. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
3. 重庆大足工业园区管理委员会,重庆,402368
4. 重庆市大足区农业农村委员会,重庆,402360
Published:2023
移动端阅览
ZHENG Xiaolan, BAO Yuhai, HE Xiubin, et al. Effects of Periodic Flooding on Shear Resistance of Root-Soil Composite in the Water-level Fluctuation Zone[J]. 2023, 37(5): 111-120.
ZHENG Xiaolan, BAO Yuhai, HE Xiubin, et al. Effects of Periodic Flooding on Shear Resistance of Root-Soil Composite in the Water-level Fluctuation Zone[J]. 2023, 37(5): 111-120. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.014.
为了探究三峡水库消落带根土复合体抗剪性能的影响机制
以狗牙根根土复合体为研究对象
利用三轴试验
定量分析含水率、干湿交替次数以及含根量对根土复合体抗剪性能的影响。结果表明:(1)随着干湿交替次数和含水率的增加
土壤抗剪性能逐渐劣化
含水率13%的根土复合体抗剪强度依次比含水率18%、含水率23%的土壤抗剪强度提高0.12%~14.76%
12.47%~21.14%;经历干湿交替6次与3次的根土复合体抗剪强度比经历1次的降低6.31%~14.71%与2.41%~8.19%。(2)根系含量能显著影响土壤抗剪性能
含根量为1.5 mg/cm3的土壤抗剪强度比含根量为0.5 mg/cm3的土壤抗剪强度提高0.86%~21.10%
内摩擦角增长0.09%~16.31%
黏聚力增长2.27%~30.55%。(3)含水率是影响土壤抗剪性能最主要的因素
对抗剪强度的贡献程度排序上为含水率(61.30%)>干湿交替次数(21.17%)>含根量(8.28%)。研究结果为消落带固土护岸的物种筛选、群落构建、水土保持生态建设、生态系统重建以及水库岸线管理等提供科学依据。
In order to explore the impact mechanism of the shear resistance of root-soil composite in the Three Gorges Reservoir's water-level fluctuation zone
this study took root-soil composite of Cynodon dactylon as the research object
and used the triaxial test to quantitatively analyze the influence of water content
dry-wet alternate times and root content on the shear resistance of root-soil composite. The results showed that:(1) With the increasing of dry-wet alternate times and water content
the soil shear resistance gradually deteriorated. The shear resistance of the root-soil composite with 13% water content was 0.12%~14.76% and 12.47%~21.14% higher than that of the soil with 18% water content and 23% water content
respectively. The shear resistance of the root-soil composite subjected to 6 and 3 cycles of dry-wet alternation was 6.31%~14.71% and 2.41%~8.19% lower than that subjected to one cycle of dry-wet alternation. (2) Root content could significantly affect the soil shear resistance
and the soil shear resistance with root content of 1.5 mg/cm3 was 0.86%~21.10% higher than that with root content of 0.5 mg/cm3. The internal friction angle increased by 0.09%~16.31%
and the cohesion increased by 2.27%~30.55%. (3) Water content was the dominant factor affecting the soil shear strength. The order of contribution to the shear resistance was water content (61.30%) > dry-wet alternate times (21.17%) > root content (8.28%). This study provided scientific reference for species screening
community construction
ecological construction of soil and water conservation
ecosystem reconstruction
and reservoir management in the water-level fluctuation zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir.
肖培青,姚文艺,王国庆,等.植被作用下土壤抗剪强度和径流侵蚀力的耦合效应[J].水科学进展,2016,27(2):224-230.
左小锋,王磊,郑粉莉,等.冻融循环和土壤性质对东北黑土抗剪强度的影响[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(2):30-35,42.
陈晨,杨苑君,陈奇伯,等.典型石漠化区土壤理化性质对其抗剪性能的影响[J].西部林业科学,2020,49(2):91-98.
申紫雁,刘昌义,胡夏嵩,等.黄河源区高寒草地不同深度土壤理化性质与抗剪强度关系研究[J].干旱区研究,2021,38(2):392-401.
Kokusho T, Hara T, Hiraoka R. Undrained shear strength of granular soils with different particle gradations[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2004,130(6):621-629.
周霞,魏杨,李东嵘,等.黄土区紫花苜蓿根系对土体抗剪性能的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2019,17(2):53-59.
倪九派,高明,魏朝富,等.干湿循环条件下重庆地区三种土壤抗剪强度的动态变化[J].土壤学报,2013,50(6):1090-1101.
倪九派,高明,魏朝富,等.土壤含水率对浅层滑坡体不同层次土壤抗剪强度的影响[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(6):48-50.
Hossne G, Américo J, Mayorga J, et al. Savanna soil water content effect on its shear strength-compaction relationship[J].Revista Científica Udo Agrícola,2013,12:324-337.
Goh S, Rahardjo H, Leong E. Shear strength of unsaturated soils under multiple drying-wetting cycles[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2014,140:11-15.
廖博,刘建平,周花玉.含根量对秋枫根-土复合体抗剪强度的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(3):104-110,118.
刘定辉,李勇.植物根系提高土壤抗侵蚀性机理研究[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(3):34-37,117.
梁和成,单慧媚.天然饱水-失水对三峡库岸边坡土体的影响研究[J].岩土力学,2014,35(7):1837-1842,1848.
江强强,刘路路,焦玉勇,等.干湿循环下滑带土强度特性与微观结构试验研究[J].岩土力学,2019,40(3):1005-1012,1022.
邓华锋,李建林.库水位变化对库岸边坡变形稳定的影响机理研究[J].水利学报,2014,45(增刊2):45-51.
徐文秀,鲍玉海,韦杰,等.水库消落带典型草本植物根系对土壤抗冲性能的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(4):65-71,109.
徐文秀,杨玲,鲍玉海,等.大型水库消落带2种典型耐淹草本植物单根抗拉力学特性[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(5):259-264,272.
王强,袁兴中,刘红,等.三峡水库初期蓄水对消落带植被及物种多样性的影响[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(10):1680-1693.
Tang C S, Cui Y J, Shi B, et al. Desiccation and cracking behaviour of clay layer from slurry state under wetting-drying cycles[J].Geoderma,2011,166(1):111-118.
Zhang F B, Wang Z L, Yang M Y. Assessing the applicability of the Taguchi design method to an interrill erosion study[J].Journal of Hydrology,2015,521:65-73.
Aber S, Salari D, Parsa M R. Employing the Taguchi method to obtain the optimum conditions of coagulation-flocculation process in tannery wastewater treatment[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2010,162(1):127-134.
Sadeghi S H, Moosavi V, Karami A, et al. Soil erosion assessment and prioritization of affecting factors at plot scale using the Taguchi method[J].Journal of Hydrology,2012,448/449:174-180.
Birch H F. The effect of soil drying on humus decomposition and nitrogen availability[J].Plant and Soil,1958,10(1):9-31.
邓华锋,胡玉,李建林,等.循环荷载的频率和幅值对砂岩动力特性的影响[J].岩土力学,2017,38(12):3402-3409,3418.
张素,熊东红,校亮,等.干湿交替对土壤性质影响的研究[J].土壤通报,2017,48(3):762-768.
Horn R, Taubner H, Wuttke M, et al. Soil physical properties related to soil structure[J].Soil and Tillage Research,1994,30(2/3/4):187-216.
Singer M J, Southard R J, Warrington D N, et al. Stability of synthetic sand-clay aggregates after wetting and drying cycles[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1992,56(6):1843-1848.
王士天,刘汉超,张倬元,等.大型水域水岩相互作用及其环境效应研究[J].地质灾害与环境保护,1997,8(1):69-89.
朱冬林,任光明,聂德新,等.库水位变化下对水库滑坡稳定性影响的预测[J].水文地质工程地质,2002,29(3):6-9.
于靖涵.干湿循环条件下非饱和土强度劣化特征分析[D].辽宁 鞍山:辽宁科技大学,2020.
邓华锋,李建林,朱敏,等.饱水-风干循环作用下砂岩强度劣化规律试验研究[J].岩土力学,2012,33(11):3306-3312.
王军,宗全利,岳红艳,等.干湿交替对长江荆江段典型断面岸滩土体力学性能的影响[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(2):144-152.
吕发友,鲍玉海,贺秀斌,等.三峡水库消落带淹水:落干交替下紫色土力学特性变化模拟[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(3):79-84.
万勇,薛强,吴彦,等.干湿循环作用下压实黏土力学特性与微观机制研究[J].岩土力学,2015,36(10):2815-2824.
李妍,彭义.干湿循环条件下紫色土抗剪强度与膨胀率研究[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2015,40(4):70-73.
曹玲,罗先启.三峡库区千将坪滑坡滑带土干-湿循环条件下强度特性试验研究[J].岩土力学,2007,28(增刊1):93-97.
徐宗恒,黄丽苹,杨正辉,等.不同根系含量对山原红壤抗剪强度的影响[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(5):54-59,66.
靖元孝,陈兆平,程惠青,等.淹水时水翁幼苗光合特性与不定根的关系[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2000,8(4):361-364.
Kozlowski T T, Pallardy S G. Acclimation and adaptive responses of woody plants to environmental stresses[J].The Botanical Review,2002,68(2):270-334.
裴顺祥,洪明,郭泉水,等.三峡库区消落带水淹结束后狗牙根的光合生理生态特性[J].生态学杂志,2014,33(12):3222-3229.
程谅,占海歌,郭忠录.3种草本植物根系对土壤抗蚀特性的响应[J].草业科学,2019,36(2):284-294.
李建兴,何丙辉,谌芸,等.不同护坡草本植物的根系分布特征及其对土壤抗剪强度的影响[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(10):144-152.
陈终达,肖宏彬,张春晓,等.根系分布方式对根-土复合体抗剪强度的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2016,36(8):130-135.
Ali F H, Osman N. Shear strength of a soil containing vegetation roots[J].Soils and Foundations,2008,48(4):587-596.
Hamidifar H, Keshavarzi A, Truong P. Enhancement of river bank shear strength parameters using Vetiver grass root system[J].Arabian Journal of Geosciences,2018,11(20):e611.
Pollen N. Temporal and spatial variability in root reinforcement of streambanks:Accounting for soil shear strength and moisture[J].Catena,2007,69(3):197-205.
Docker B B, Hubble T C T. Quantifying root-reinforcement of river bank soils by four Australian tree species[J].Geomorphology,2008,100(3/4):401-418.
0
Views
1052
下载量
4
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621