

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌,712100
2. 杨凌示范区行政审批服务局, 陕西 杨凌,712100
3. 长江水利委员会长江科学院,武汉,430010
Published:2023
移动端阅览
LI Kui, WANG Wenlong, LI Jianming. Response of Velocity and Sediment Production Characteristics of Spoil Heaps to Slope Length and Gravel Action[J]. 2023, 37(5): 48-56.
LI Kui, WANG Wenlong, LI Jianming. Response of Velocity and Sediment Production Characteristics of Spoil Heaps to Slope Length and Gravel Action[J]. 2023, 37(5): 48-56. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.006.
随着经济社会的高速发展以及工程建设项目的快速递增
大量生产建设项目扰动地表并破坏原地貌植被
大范围且不平衡的挖填活动使得多余的土石混合堆积
尤其在山区工程建设形成的多余土石混合介质
堆积在沟道和河道上游及边坡
在强降雨条件下易发生严重水土流失
甚至造成滑坡、泥石流等灾害。以人为重塑工程堆积体为研究对象(坡度25°)
通过模拟降雨试验
开展极端降雨条件下(降雨强度为2.5 mm/min)不同坡长(3
5
6.5
12 m)及砾石质量分数(0
10%
20%
30%)共同作用对堆积体流速空间分布特征及产沙特性影响的研究。结果表明:(1)坡长12 m时流速在降雨全过程始终处于波动状态
随砾石质量分数增大
波动幅度减小
而坡长3
5
6.5 m下的流速随产流历时呈先递增后趋于稳定的变化趋势。中下坡位平均流速是中上坡位的1.12~1.54倍
随着坡长增大
平均流速递增17.81%~335.94%
含砾石堆积体平均流速较纯土堆积体降低22.88%~54.67%
砾石质量分数比坡长对流速影响更显著。(2)纯土堆积体平均侵蚀速率随坡长显著增大
递增幅度达7.88%~87.67%
而含砾石堆积体随坡长增大在3~5 m呈下降趋势
降低9.10%~28.86%
但随后又显著增大
存在1个临界坡长。坡长为6.5
12 m的堆积体平均侵蚀速率较3 m增大22.33%~122.48%。砾石具有显著降低堆积体坡面侵蚀效果
其减沙效益达到24.99%~59.54%
且砾石对堆积体平均侵蚀速率影响的贡献是坡长的1.13倍。(3)堆积体坡面中上坡位流速对侵蚀速率影响大于中下坡位
平均侵蚀速率与流速之间呈极显著相关
流速可作为平均侵蚀速率的表征参数
其线性拟合关系较好(R2=0.67~0.95)。研究成果进一步深化了土壤侵蚀学科内涵
可为生产建设项目工程堆积体侵蚀预测模型提供数据基础
同时也为阐明工程扰动坡面侵蚀内在机制提供理论依据。
Large number of production and construction projects disturb the surface and destroy the original surface vegetation with the rapid development of economy and society and the rapid increase of engineering construction projects. Large-scale and unbalanced excavation and filling make excess soil and rock mixed and accumulated. The excess soil-rock mixed media formed in the construction of mountain projects are accumulated in the upstream and slope of ditches and rivers
which is prone to serious soil and water loss under heavy rainfall conditions
and even cause disasters such as landslides and debris flows. This study took the artificially remolded spoil heaps (with a slope degree of 25°) as the research object
and carried out the research on the influence of slope length (3 m
5 m
6.5 m
12 m) and gravel content (0
10%
20%
30%) on the spatial distribution characteristics of velocity and sediment yield characteristics of spoil heaps under extreme rainfall conditions (with a rainfall intensity of 2.5 mm/min) through the simulated rainfall test. Results showed:(1) The flow velocity was in a fluctuating state during the whole rainfall process
and the fluctuation amplitude decreased with the increase of gravel content and mass fraction under slope length by 12 m. However
the flow velocity under the slope length of 3 m
5 m and 6.5 m increased at first and then tends to be stable with the runoff duration. The average velocity of the middle and lower slope was 1.12 to 1.54 times that of the middle and upper slope. With the increased of the slope length
the average velocity of the flow increased by 17.81% to 335.94%
and the average velocity of spoil heaps with gravel was 22.88% to 54.67% lower than that of the pure spoil heaps. The mass fraction of gravel had more significant effect on the flow velocity than the slope length. (2) The average soil loss rate of pure spoil heaps increased significantly with the slope length
with an increment of 7.88% to 87.67%. However
the gravel-bearing spoil heaps decreased with the increasing of slope length from 3 to 5 m (decreased by 9.10% to 28.86%)
but then increased significantly. There is a critical slope length. The average soil loss rate of spoil heaps with slope length of 6.5 m and 12 m is 22.33% to 122.48% higher than that of slope length of 3 m. Gravel could significantly reduce the slope erosion of spoil heaps
and its sediment reduction efficiency reached 24.99% to 59.54%. The contribution rate of gravel to the average soil loss rate of spoil heaps was 1.13 times of the slope length. (3) The impact of flow velocity on the soil loss rate in the upper and middle slope of the spoil heaps was greater than that in the lower and middle slope. There was a significant correlation between the average soil loss rate and flow velocity. The flow velocity could be used as a characteristic parameter of the average soil loss rate
and its linear fitting relationship (R2 was 0.67 to 0.95). The results further deepen the connotation of soil erosion discipline
which can provide data basis for the prediction model of spoil heaps erosion of construction production and construction projects
and also provide theoretical basis for clarifying the internal mechanism of engineering disturbance slope erosion.
高儒学,戴全厚,甘艺贤,等.土石混合堆积体坡面土壤侵蚀研究进展[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(6):1-8,39.
Li J M, Wang W L, Guo M M, et al. Effects of soil texture and gravel content on the infiltration and soil loss of spoil heaps under simulated rainfall[J].Journal of Soils and Sediments,2020,20:3896-3908.
Gao Y, Yin Y P, Li B, et al. Post-failure behavior analysis of the Shenzhen "12.20" CDW landfill landslide[J].Waste Management,2019,83:171-183.
李建明,王志刚,张长伟,等.生产建设项目弃土弃渣特性及资源化利用潜力评价[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(2):1-8.
耿绍波,洪倩,卢建利,等.工程堆积体坡面侵蚀影响因素研究进展[J].人民黄河,2021,43(增刊1):104-108.
吕佼容,张文博,胡锦昇,等.连续降雨下不同砾石含量工程堆积体土壤侵蚀[J].水科学进展,2019,30(2):210-219.
Li J M, Li L, Wang Z G, et al. The contributions of the roots, stems, and leaves of three grass species to water erosion reduction on spoil heaps[J].Journal of Hydrology,2021,603:e127003.
康宏亮,王文龙,薛智德,等.北方风沙区砾石对堆积体坡面径流及侵蚀特征的影响[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(3):125-134.
李永红,牛耀彬,王正中,等.工程堆积体坡面径流水动力学参数及其相互关系[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(22):83-88.
王颢霖,焦菊英,唐柄哲,等.陕北子洲"7·26"暴雨后坡耕地细沟侵蚀及其影响因素分析[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(11):122-130.
米宏星,陈晓燕,赵宇,等.黄土坡面细沟径流流速的试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(1):66-69,110.
李勉,姚文艺,陈江南,等.草被覆盖对坡面流流速影响的人工模拟试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(12):43-47.
刘和平,王秀颖,刘宝元.人工模拟降雨下细沟与细沟间流速的沿程分布[J].地理研究,2011,30(9):1660-1668.
董月群,雷廷武,张晴雯,等.集中水流冲刷条件下浅沟径流流速特征研究[J].农业机械学报,2013,44(5):96-100.
李君兰,蔡强国,孙莉英,等.坡面水流速度与坡面含砂量的关系[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(3):73-78.
张宏鸣,杨勤科,李锐,等.流域分布式侵蚀学坡长的估算方法研究[J].水利学报,2012,43(4):437-444.
付兴涛,张丽萍.坡长对红壤侵蚀影响人工降雨模拟研究[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2015,23(3):474-483.
王玲玲,范东明,王文龙,等.水蚀风蚀交错区不同坡长坡面产流产沙过程[J].人民黄河,2016,38(3):72-75,79.
Barbosa F T, Bertol I, Wener R D, et al. Critial slope length for water erosion for three crop residue and rates in two sowing directions in no-till[J].Revista Brasileira de Ciencia do Solo,2012,36(4):1279-1290.
Xu X L, Liu W, Kong Y P, et al. Runoff and water erosion on road side-slopes:Effects of rainfall characteristics and slope length[J].Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment,2009,14(7):497-501.
王龙生,蔡强国,蔡崇法,等.黄土坡面细沟发育过程中含沙量与水动力学参数的关系[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(5):1-6.
覃超,吴红艳,郑粉莉,等.黄土坡面细沟侵蚀及水动力学参数的时空变化特征[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(8):146-154,207.
陈丽燕,雷廷武,董月群,等.不同示踪法测量砾石层中水流流速研究[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(4):141-146.
符素华,路炳军,叶芝菡.地表砾石对降雨径流及土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(2):15-18,34.
韩珍,王小燕,李馨欣.碎石含量影响下紫色土坡面径流流速变化过程及土壤侵蚀的阶段性[J].中国农业大学学报,2016,21(10):102-108.
韩鹏,倪晋仁,李天宏.细沟发育过程中的溯源侵蚀与沟壁崩塌[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2002,10(2):115-125.
马洪超,谢永生,赵暄,等.工程堆积体标准小区界定与可蚀性因子改进[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(3):59-64.
李建明,王一峰,张长伟,等.三种土壤质地工程堆积体坡面流速及产沙特征[J].长江科学院院报,2019,36(12):28-35.
雷廷武,张晴雯,闫丽娟.细沟侵蚀物理模型[M].北京:科学出版社,2009:117-129.
雷廷武, Nearing M A.侵蚀细沟水力学特性及细沟侵蚀与形态特征的试验研究[J].水利学报,2000,31(11):49-54.
0
Views
1031
下载量
2
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621