

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 内蒙古农业大学水利与土木建筑工程学院,呼和浩特,010018
2. 水利部牧区水利科学研究所,呼和浩特,010020
Published:2023
移动端阅览
CHEN Gong, LIU Hu, WEI Zhanmin. Horizontal Diffusion Characteristics and Simulation of Poor Soil in Grassland Open-pit Area[J]. 2023, 37(2): 76-82.
CHEN Gong, LIU Hu, WEI Zhanmin. Horizontal Diffusion Characteristics and Simulation of Poor Soil in Grassland Open-pit Area[J]. 2023, 37(2): 76-82. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.02.010.
为探究草原露天矿区不同类型土壤的水平扩散特征
以内蒙古鄂尔多斯市伊旗武家塔矿区的原状土、矿山堆积土和生态改造土3种不同立地类型的土壤为对象
通过土壤质地、扩散率、含水率等测试试验
采用HYDRUS-1D软件
对原状土、矿山堆积土和生态改造土入渗特性进行数值模拟
分析各因素对矿区土壤入渗规律的影响
探讨草原露天矿区不同类型土壤水平扩散过程的影响及变化规律。结果表明
在一维水平入渗运动条件下
原状土、堆积土、生态改造土3种不同粒径土壤的湿润锋运移距离与时间曲线整体呈现相似变化
随着入渗时间的增加
湿润锋运移距离呈现先快速增加
后缓慢推进趋势。同一种土壤类型条件下
土壤的湿润锋到达土柱最末端所需时间与土层深度呈反比关系
随着土层深度的增加
所需时间逐渐减少
且平均扩散速率更快;在同一入渗时间下
湿润锋运移距离与土层深度呈正比关系
随着土层深度增加
湿润锋运移距离也相应增大。Boltzmann参数(λ)随着土壤含水率的增加而逐渐减小
各土壤的λ~θ关系曲线随土壤含水率的增加呈现下降趋势。当θ达到某一临界值之后
λ急剧减少
原状土、堆积土和改造土各土层θ临界值略有差异
原状土各土层的θ临界值为0.29
堆积土各土层分别为0.24
0.28
0.30
而生态改造土除60—90 cm外
其余土层的θ临界值为0.31。通过HYDRUS-1D模型结合水平土柱剖面含水量变化对土壤水力参数进行反演
模拟3种土壤面含水量的变化
R2均大于0.91
纳什效率系数(NSE)均大于0.95
均方根误差(RMSE)均小于0.20。利用HYDRUS-1D模型反演土壤水力参数模拟矿区劣质土壤水平入渗过程
能较好地模拟入渗过程
描述矿区不同土地类型的土壤水分动态变化规律
为矿区的土壤水分动态监管及生态治理提供参考依据。
In order to explore the horizontal diffusion characteristics of different soil types of in the grassland open-pit mining area
three different soil types including undisturbed soil
mine accumulation soil and ecological transformation soil in Wujiata mining area of Yiqi
Ordos City and Inner Mongolia were taken as the objects.The soil texture
diffusion rate and water content were measured
and the infiltration characteristics of undisturbed soil
mine accumulation soil and ecological transformation soil were numerically simulated by HYDRUS-1D software
so as to analyze the influence of various factors on the soil infiltration law in mining area
and to explore the influence and variation law of horizontal diffusion process of different types of soil in grassland open-pit mine area.The results show that under the condition of one-dimensional horizontal infiltration movement
the wetting front migration distance and time curve of three different particle sizes of undisturbed soil
accumulated soil and ecologically modified soil show similar changes as a whole:with the increase of infiltration time
the wetting front migration distance increases rapidly at first and then slowly advances.Under the same soil type
the time required for the wetting front to reach the end of the soil column is inversely proportional to the soil depth:with the increase of soil depth
the time required decreases gradually
and the average diffusion rate is faster;under the same infiltration time
the wetting front migration distance is proportional to the soil depth:with the increase of soil depth
the wetting front migration distance also increases accordingly.The Boltzmann parameter λ decreased with the increase of soil moisture content
and the λ~θ relationship curve of each soil showed a decreasing trend with the increase of soil moisture content.When θ reaches a certain critical value
λ decreases sharply
and the critical values of θ in each soil layer of undisturbed soil
accumulation soil and modified soil are slightly different.The critical values of θ in each soil layer of undisturbed soil are 0.29
and those in each soil layer of accumulation soil are 0.24
0.28
0.30
respectively.However
the θ critical value in the ecological transformation soil except 60—90 cm is 0.31.The soil hydraulic parameters were inverted by HYDRUS-1D model combined with the change of water content in horizontal soil column profile.The changes of water content in three kinds of soil surface were simulated.The R2 was greater than 0.91
The NSE was greater than 0.95
and the RMSE was less than 0.20.Using HYDRUS-1D model to invert soil hydraulic parameters to simulate the horizontal infiltration process of poor quality soil in mining area can better simulate the infiltration process
describe the dynamic changes of soil moisture in different land types in mining area
and provide reference for dynamic supervision and ecological management of soil moisture in mining area.
张超,王会肖.土壤水分研究进展及简要评述[J].干旱地区农业研究,2003,21(4):117-120,125.
马迎宾,高永,张燕,等.黄土丘陵区采煤塌陷裂缝对坡面土壤水分的影响[J].中国水土保持,2013(11):54-57.
张发旺,赵红梅,宋亚新,等.神府东胜矿区采煤塌陷对水环境影响效应研究[J].地球学报,2007,28(6):521-527.
何金军,魏江生,贺晓,等.采煤塌陷对黄土丘陵区土壤物理特性的影响[J].煤炭科学技术,2008,35(12):92-96.
姚国征.采煤塌陷对生态环境的影响及恢复研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2012.
吕晶洁,胡春元,贺晓.采煤塌陷对固定沙丘土壤水分动态的影响研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2005,19(7):152-156.
张欣,王健,刘彩云.采煤塌陷对土壤水分损失影响及其机理研究[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(11):5058-5062.
姚光华,陈正华,向喜琼.采煤条件下地表水入渗特征研究[J].矿业安全与环保,2012,39(3):12-15.
甘永德,胡顺军,陈秀龙.土壤盐分对土壤水分扩散率的影响[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(6):56-59.
吴凤平,王辉,卢霞,等.砂石含量及粒径对红壤水分扩散率的影响[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(2):228-231.
雷志栋.土壤水动力学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1988.
杨诗秀,雷志栋.水平土柱入渗法测定土壤导水率[J].水利学报,1991(5):1-7.
古莱姆拜尔·艾尔肯,虎胆·吐马尔白,吴永涛.不同粒径沙壤土水分扩散率测定[J].新疆农业大学学报,2015,38(5):426-430.
范严伟,黄宁,马孝义,等.应用HYDRUS-1D模拟砂质夹层土壤入渗特性[J].土壤,2016,48(1):193-200.
曲芷程,栗云召,于君宝,等.黄河口湿地典型植物群落土壤水、盐入渗过程模拟[J].生态学杂志,2022,41(5):903-911.
胡传旺,王辉,刘常,等.南方典型土壤水力特征差异性分析[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(2):97-102.
苏帅,杨永刚,黄磊.矿区生态修复过程中不同立地类型土壤水动力学特性[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(1):18-23.
马美红,张书函,王会肖,等.非饱和土壤水分运动参数的确定:以昆明红壤土为例[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2017,53(1):38-42.
单鱼洋,马晨光,王全九,等.羧甲基纤维素钠对壤砂土水分运动及水力参数的影响[J].土壤学报,2022,59(5):1349-1358.
赵炜.水煤浆气化渣对风沙土改良效果与作物生长响应研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2021.
邓建才,卢信,陈效民,等.封丘地区土壤水分扩散率的研究[J].土壤通报,2005,36(3):317-320.
秦耀东.土壤物理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003.
魏飒,任树梅.承德围场地区土壤水分扩散率的研究[J].中国农村水利水电,2007(1):55-56,61.
王佳坤,郭月峰,祁伟,等.内蒙古砒砂岩土壤水平入渗特性及适用模型研究[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2021,42(5):46-52.
0
Views
853
下载量
1
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621