Synergistic Evolution and Interaction of Soil Erosion and Rocky Desertification in Karst Area

HE Maolin; ZHANG Yushan; GAO Jiayong; WU Qinglin; LI Rui

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.01.020

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Synergistic Evolution and Interaction of Soil Erosion and Rocky Desertification in Karst Area

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Synergistic Evolution and Interaction of Soil Erosion and Rocky Desertification in Karst Area
- Vol. 37, Issue 1, Pages: 140-150(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 贵州师范大学喀斯特研究院,贵阳,550001
  2. 国家喀斯特石漠化防治工程技术研究中心,贵阳,550001
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.01.020
  CLC： S157.1
- Published：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
HE Maolin, ZHANG Yushan, GAO Jiayong, et al. Synergistic Evolution and Interaction of Soil Erosion and Rocky Desertification in Karst Area[J]. 2023, 37(1): 140-150.
DOI：

HE Maolin, ZHANG Yushan, GAO Jiayong, et al. Synergistic Evolution and Interaction of Soil Erosion and Rocky Desertification in Karst Area[J]. 2023, 37(1): 140-150. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.01.020.

摘要

为探究喀斯特地区土壤侵蚀、石漠化协同演变规律、驱动因子及主要驱动因子下二者交互关系。采用优化后的RUSLE模型估算贵州省喀斯特地区2005—2015年土壤侵蚀

并利用贵州省全国石漠化普查数据库计算同期石漠化状况

运用地理探测器探究驱动因子以及主要驱动因子下二者交互关系。结果表明:2005—2015年贵州省喀斯特地区土壤侵蚀与石漠化均以中度及以下为主

其中土壤侵蚀中度及以下占比58%以上

而中度及以下石漠化占比达80%以上;时间上二者存在发生时间的异同性

但研究期间

二者均不同程度地趋于好转;中度及以下石漠化中土壤侵蚀发生率较大

中度以上中占比极少

其中无石漠化中土壤侵蚀发生率达70%以上;土壤侵蚀驱动因子解释力大小依次为土地利用>坡度>年降雨量>海拔>岩石裸露率>植被盖度>岩性>土层厚度

石漠化驱动因子解释力大小依次为岩石裸露率>土层厚度>年降雨量>海拔>岩性>土地利用>植被盖度>坡度。因子组合(交互)对土壤流失及石漠化的解释力均较单因子有所增强

其中土壤侵蚀的主导因子为土地利用

石漠化的主导因子为岩石裸露率;主要驱动因子下二者交互关系结果表明

土壤侵蚀与石漠化存在因果关系且土壤侵蚀先于石漠化发生发展

但简单线性关系并不能解释二者关系

而是分阶段呈正相关或负相关的复杂关系。研究结果可为喀斯特地区土壤侵蚀与石漠化防治提供理论参考。

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the co-evolution of soil erosion and rocky desertification and their interaction under driving factors and main driving factors in the karst region. In this study

Optimized RUSLE model was used to estimate soil erosion from 2005—2015 in the karst area of Guizhou Province

and the national rocky desertification census database was used to calculate the rocky desertification in the same period

and the Geographic detector was used to explore the interaction between the drivers and the main drivers. The results showed that soil erosion and rocky desertification from 2005 to 2015

karst area in Guizhou Province were mainly moderate and below

soil erosion accounted for more than 58%

and moderate and below rocky desertification accounted for more than 80%; In terms of time

there were similarities and differences in the occurrence time of these two

but during the research period

both of them tended to improve in varying degrees. The incidence of soil erosion in moderate and below rocky desertification was large

and the proportion of above moderate rocky desertification was very small

among which the incidence of soil erosion in no rocky desertification was more than 70%. The explanatory force of the soil erosion driver was the land use > slope > yearly precipitation > elevation > rock exposure rate > vegetation cover > lithology > soil thickness; The explanatory force of the rocky desertification driver was the rock exposure rate > soil thickness > yearly precipitation > elevation > lithology > land use > vegetation cover > slope. The explanatory force of factor combination (interaction) on soil loss and rocky desertification was enhanced compared with the single factor

in which the dominant factor of soil erosion was land use

and the dominant factor of rocky desertification was rock exposure rate; The results showed that the causal relationship between soil erosion and rocky desertification exists and soil erosion develops before rocky desertification

but the simple linear relationship cannot explain the two relationships

but a complex relationship with positive or negative correlation exist in stages. The results can provide theoretical reference for soil erosion and rocky desertification control in karst area.

关键词

Keywords

references

Jiang Z C, Lian Y Q, Qin X Q. Rocky desertification in Southwest China:Impacts,causes,and restoration[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2014,132(3):1-12.

熊康宁,池永宽.中国南方喀斯特生态系统面临的问题及对策[J].生态经济,2015,31(1):23-30.

Morgan R P C. Soil erosion and conservation[M].3rd ed.Oxford:Blackwell Publishing,2005.

Yuan D X. Rock desertification in the subtropical karst of south China[J].Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie Neue Folge,1997,108:81-90.

贵州日报天眼新闻记者.感恩奋进闯新路昂首阔步新征程.贵州日报,2022-1-27(3).

安娟.东北黑土区土壤侵蚀过程机理和土壤养分迁移研究[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院(教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2012.

李瑞,陈康,刘瑞禄,等.基于小流域尺度的黔北喀斯特地区产流产沙特征[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(11):139-147.

牛丽楠,邵全琴,刘国波,等.六盘水市土壤侵蚀时空特征及影响因素分析[J].地球信息科学学报,2019,21(11):1755-1767.

王欢,高江波,侯文娟.基于地理探测器的喀斯特不同地貌形态类型区土壤侵蚀定量归因[J].地理学报,2018,73(9):1674-1686.

袁道先.岩溶石漠化问题的全球视野和我国的治理对策与经验[J].草业科学,2008,25(9):19-25.

熊康宁,陈起伟.基于生态综合治理的石漠化演变规律与趋势讨论[J].中国岩溶,2010,29(3):267-273.

王正雄,蒋勇军,张远嘱,等.基于GIS与地理探测器的岩溶槽谷石漠化空间分布及驱动因素分析[J].地理学报,2019,74(5):1025-1039.

熊康宁,李晋,龙明忠.典型喀斯特石漠化治理区水土流失特征与关键问题[J].地理学报,2012,67(7):878-888.

曹建华,蒋忠诚,杨德生,等.贵州省岩溶区水土流失、石漠化受岩溶环境制约[J].中国水土保持,2009(1):20-23.

刘发勇,熊康宁,兰安军,等.贵州省喀斯特石漠化与水土流失空间相关分析[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(6):60-64,71.

张琦,蔡雄飞,汪发勇,等.喀斯特石漠化与水土流失强度耦合关系分析:以六盘水市为例[J].亚热带水土保持,2016,28(3):7-11,49.

彭旭东,戴全厚,杨智,等.喀斯特山地石漠化过程中地表地下侵蚀产沙特征[J].土壤学报,2016,53(5):1237-1248.

魏兴萍,袁道先,谢世友.西南岩溶区水土流失与石漠化的变化关系研究:以重庆南川岩溶区为例[J].中国岩溶,2010,29(1):20-26.

Dai Q H, Peng X D, Yang Z, et al. Runoff and erosion processes on bare slopes in the Karst Rocky Desertifification Area[J].Catena,2017,152:218-226.

张珊珊,周忠发,孙小涛,等.基于坡度等级的喀斯特山区石漠化与水土流失相关性研究:以贵州省盘县为例[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(2):79-86.

罗旭玲,白晓永,谭秋,等.不同岩性背景下土壤侵蚀与石漠化关联性分析[J].生态学报,2018,38(24):8717-8725.

周正朝,上官周平.土壤侵蚀模型研究综述[J].中国水土保持科学,2004,2(1):52-56.

Laflen J M, Lwonard J L, Foster G R. WEPP:A new generationof erosion prediction technology[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,46(1):34-38.

Morgan R P C, Quinton J N, Smith R E, et al. The Europeansoil erosion model (EUROSEM):A dynamic approach for pre-dicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,1998,23(1):527-544.

林晨,周生路,吴绍华.30年来东南红壤丘陵区土壤侵蚀度时空演变研究:以长汀县为例[J].地理科学,2011,31(10):1235-1241.

李瑞,盘礼东.岩石裸露与水土流失关系研究现状及石漠化因子研究存在的问题[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(5):10-15,23.

Gao J B, Wang H. Temporal analysis on quantitative attribution of karst soil erosion:A case study of a peak-cluster depression basin in Southwest China[J].Catena,2019,172,369-377.

王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J].地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134.

马士彬,安裕伦,杨广斌,等.喀斯特地区不同植被类型NDVI变化及驱动因素分析:以贵州为例[J].生态环境学报,2016,25(7):1106-1114.

秦松,范成五,孙锐锋.贵州土壤资源的特点、问题及利用对策[J].贵州农业科学,2009,37(5):94-98.

熊康宁.喀斯特石漠化的遥感-GIS典型研究:以贵州省为例[M].北京:地质出版社,2006.

Zhu D Y, Xiong K N, Xiao H. Multi-time scale variability of rainfall erosivity and erosivity density in the karst region of southern china, 1960-2017.[J]Catena,2021,197:e104977.

Yu B, Rosewell C J. An assessment of a daily rainfall erosivity model for NSW[J]. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 1996,34(1):139-152.

Sharpley A N, Williams J R. EPIC-erosion/productivi-tyimpact calculator(1):Model documentation[J].Technical Bulletin-United States Department of Agri-culture,1990,4(4):206-207.

Zhang H M, Yang Q K, Li R, et al. Extension of a GIS procedure for calculating the RUSLE equation LS factor[J].Computers and Geosciences,2013,52:177-188.

Mc Cool D K, Brown L C, Foster G R, et al. Revised slope steepness factor for the universal soil loss equation[J].Transactions of the ASAE,1987,30(5):1387-1396.

Mc Cool D K, Foster G R, MutchlerC K, et al. Revised slope length factor for the universal soil loss equation[J].Transaction of the ASAE,1989,32(5):1571-1576.

许月卿,邵晓梅.基于GIS和RUSLE的土壤侵蚀量计算:以贵州省猫跳河流域为例[J].北京林业大学学报,2006,28(4):67-71.

Feng T, Chen H S, Polyakov V O, et al. Soil erosion rates in two karst peak-cluster depression basins of northwest Guangxi, China:Comparison of the RUSLE model with

137

Cs measurements[J].Geomorphology, 2016,253:217-224.

何永彬,张信宝,文安邦.西南喀斯特山地的土壤侵蚀研究探讨[J].生态环境学报,2009,18(6):2393-2398.

孙德亮,赵卫权,李威,等.基于GIS与RUSLE模型的喀斯特地区土壤侵蚀研究:以贵州省为例[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(3):271-276,283.

文林琴,栗忠飞.2004-2016年贵州省石漠化状况及动态演变特征[J].生态学报,2020,40(17):5928-5939.

陈金珂,蒲俊兵,李建鸿,等.典型岩溶流域不同坡度等级下的土壤侵蚀与石漠化分布特征耦合分析[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(5):1-9.

Lal R. Soil erosion and the global carbon budg[J].Environment International,2003,29(4):437-450.

黄凯,李瑞,李勇,等.贵州省黔南区不同侵蚀性雨型条件下生物措施对坡面产流产沙的响应[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(6):14-21.

Huang Q H, Cai Y L. Spatial pattern of Karst rock de-sertification in the middle of Guizhou Province South-western China[J].Environmental Geology,2007,52(7):1325-1330.

Views

787

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Characteristics and Drivers of Spatial and Temporal Soil Erosion in Anshun City, Karst Region

Spatial-temporal Variation and Attribution Analysis of Soil Erosion in Dongting Lake Basin in Recent 40 Years Based on CSLE-TLSD Coupling Model

Research on Soil Erosion and Influencing Factors in Qingyi River Basin Based on InVEST Model

Effects of Exposed Rock on Soil and Water Loss and Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Karst Slope Land

Quantitative Attribution Analysis of Driving Factors of Soil Erosion in Xiaolangdi Reservoir Area of the Yellow River

Related Author

WU Wenxian

LI Yuan

LIU Ziqi

LI Zhongwu

LI Jiaqi

WANG Lingxia

LI Yazhe

HUANG Zhenhua

Related Institution

School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University

Guizhou Karst Mountain Land Ecology and Land Use Observation and Research Station, MNR, Guanling

School of Geographic Sciences, Hunan Normal University

College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University

School of Geography and Tourism, Anhui Normal University

⁰