Comparative Experimental Study on Soil Water Transport Characteristics Between Vertiacl Pipe Surface Drip Irrigation and Common Surface Drip Irrigation

FAN Yanwei; WANG Yanxiang; SHI Jinhong; MA Liangjun; YIN Weifan

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.021

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Comparative Experimental Study on Soil Water Transport Characteristics Between Vertiacl Pipe Surface Drip Irrigation and Common Surface Drip Irrigation

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Comparative Experimental Study on Soil Water Transport Characteristics Between Vertiacl Pipe Surface Drip Irrigation and Common Surface Drip Irrigation
- Vol. 36, Issue 6, Pages: 163-170(2022)
- 作者机构：
  
  兰州理工大学能源与动力工程学院,兰州,730050
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.021
  CLC： S152.7
- Published：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
FAN Yanwei, WANG Yanxiang, SHI Jinhong, et al. Comparative Experimental Study on Soil Water Transport Characteristics Between Vertiacl Pipe Surface Drip Irrigation and Common Surface Drip Irrigation[J]. 2022, 36(6): 163-170.
DOI：

FAN Yanwei, WANG Yanxiang, SHI Jinhong, et al. Comparative Experimental Study on Soil Water Transport Characteristics Between Vertiacl Pipe Surface Drip Irrigation and Common Surface Drip Irrigation[J]. 2022, 36(6): 163-170. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.021.

摘要

为探究竖管地表滴灌和普通地表滴灌土壤水分运动规律及区别

在室外同步进行2种滴灌模式下风沙土入渗和蒸发试验

对比分析了土壤水分分布、蒸发规律和土壤湿润锋运移特性。结果表明:(1)灌水量为2 L

2种滴灌模式下

随着滴头流量的增大

湿润体体积和灌水均匀度逐渐减小

湿润体含水率平均值逐渐增大

当滴头流量一定

竖管地表滴灌的湿润体体积大于普通地表滴灌

而灌水均匀系数小于普通地表滴灌;(2)不同滴头流量处理(0.3

0.4

0.6 L/h)蒸发7天结束后

普通地表滴灌土壤蒸发量分别占灌水量的32.5%

35.0%和40.0%

而竖管地表滴灌土壤蒸发量仅占灌水量的22.5%

说明竖管地表滴灌对土壤蒸发有明显的抑制作用;(3)相同灌水量(2 L)时

普通地表滴灌水平和垂直湿润锋运移距离均随滴头流量的增大而略有减小

竖管地表滴灌垂直向下湿润锋运移规律与普通地表滴灌相同

而水平和垂直向上方向运移规律相反;随着时间的延长

普通地表滴灌与竖管地表滴灌水平和垂直方向湿润锋比值均呈不断减小趋势

最后趋于稳定;(4)构建了包括滴头流量和灌水时间在内的普通地表滴灌湿润锋运移距离经验公式

验证所建经验公式的可靠性

均方根误差介于0.24~0.27 cm

纳什效率系数均大于0.985。研究结果可为竖管地表滴灌技术应用提供理论参考。

Abstract

In order to explore the laws and differences of soil water movement between the vertical-pipe drip irrigation and the common surface drip irrigation

two types of sand infiltration and evaporation tests were carried out simultaneously outdoors. And the distribution of soil water

evaporation regularities and transport characteristics of soil wetting front were compared and analyzed. The results showed that: (1) When the irrigation volume was fixed 2 L

the volume and uniformity of irrigation water gradually decreased with the increasing drip emitter flow

while the average water content of the wetting pattern dimensions gradually increased. When the drip emitter flow was constant

the water content of the wetted body in the vertical-pipe drip irrigation was higher than that in the common surface drip irrigation

while the irrigation uniformity was lower. (2) After 7 days of evaporation

with different drip emitter flow treatments

the soil evaporation of the surface drip irrigation accounted for 32.5%

35.0% and 40.0% of irrigation amount respectively

while the vertical-pipe drip irrigation only accounted for 22.5%

indicating that the vertical pipe drip irrigation significantly inhibited the soil evaporation. (3) When the irrigation amount was 2 L

the migration distances of wetting fronts of the common surface drip irrigation in horizontal and vertical directions decreased slightly with the increase of drip emitter discharge. In the law of the vertical downward movement of vertical surface drip irrigation was similar to the common surface drip irrigation

while the movement in the horizontal and vertical upward directions were opposite. However

with the increase of infiltration time

the transport distance ratios of wetting front in horizontal and vertical direction between common surface drip irrigation and vertical surface drip irrigation showed a decreasing trend and finally tended to be stable. (4) The wetting front migration distance empirical formula

including drip emitter flow and irrigation time

was constructed. And the reliability was verified with the prediction error statistics. That is

the mean square root errors were between 0.24 and 0.27 cm and the Nash efficiency coefficients were greater than 0.985. The research results are expected to provide references for the further researches of vertical pipe drip irrigation.

关键词

Keywords

references

Middleton N J. Desert dust hazards: A global review[J].Aeolian Research,2017,24:53-63.

Duan H C, Wang T, Xue X, et al. Dynamics of aeolian desertification and its driving forces in the Horqin Sandy Land, Northern China[J].Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2014,186(10):6083-6096.

王涛.中国风沙防治工程[M].北京:科学出版社,2011.

李生宇,雷加强,徐新文,等.中国交通干线风沙危害防治模式及应用[J].中国科学院院刊,2020,35(6):665-674.

Breckle S W, Veste M, Wucherer W. The role of biological soil crusts on desert sand dunes in the Northwestern Negev, Israel[J].Springer Berlin Heidelberg,2001,38:357-367.

张克存,屈建军,鱼燕萍,等.中国铁路风沙防治的研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2019,34(6):573-583.

Li X R, Zhang Z S, Tan H J, et al. Ecological restoration and recovery in the wind-blown sand hazard areas of northern China: Relationship between soil water and carrying capacity for vegetation in the Tengger Desert[J].Science China,2014,57(5):539-548.

麻浩,张桦,马林,等.无灌溉管件防护梭梭荒漠造林新技术及其示范推广[J].中国科学:生命科学,2014,44(3):248-256.

Li X R, Zhang Z S, Huang L, et al. Review of the ecohydrological processes and feedback mechanisms controlling sand-binding vegetation systems in sandy desert regions of China[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2013,58(13):1483-1496.

Bita C E, Gerats. Plant tolerance to high temperature in a changing environment: Scientific fundamentals and production of heat stress-tolerant crops[J].Frontiers in Plant Science,2013,4:1-17.

Yu T, Ren C, Zhang J, et al. Effect of high desert surface layer temperature stress on

Haloxylon ammodendron

(C.A. Mey.) Bunge[J].Flora,2012,207(8):572-580.

范严伟,王延祥,朱鹏程,等.竖管地表滴灌下风沙土稳定入渗率与湿润体估算模型[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(7):103-111.

Meshkat M, Wamer R C, Workman S R. Comparison of water and temperature distribution profiles under sand tubeirrigation[J].Transactions of the ASAE,1998,41(6):1657-1663.

Meshkat M, Warner R C, Workman S R. Evaporation reduction potential in an undisturbed soil irrigated with surface and sand tube irrigation[J].Transactions of the ASAE,2000,43(1):79-86.

Yanni S, Nimah M N, Bashour I. Gravel vertical mulching for improving water use efficiency of drip irrigated orchards[J].Acta Horticulturae,2004,664:673-681.

赵伟霞,张振华,蔡焕杰,等.间接地下滴灌导水装置规格参数模型研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2009,28(1):5-9.

赵伟霞,张振华,蔡焕杰,等.间接地下滴灌土壤湿润体特征参数[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(4):87-92.

孙三民,安巧霞,蔡焕杰,等.枣树间接地下滴灌根区土壤盐分运移规律研究[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(1):160-169.

孙三民,安巧霞,杨培岭,等.间接地下滴灌灌溉深度对枣树根系和水分的影响[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(8):81-90.

谢恒星,张振华,冯雪.沙管滴灌水分运移关键参数初探[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(3):112-114.

张国祥,申丽霞,郭云梅.微润灌溉条件下土壤质地对水分入渗的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2016,35(7):35-39.

原翠萍,张心平,雷廷武,等.砂石覆盖粒径对土壤蒸发的影响[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(7):25-28.

Willmott, Cort J. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance[J].Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society,1982,63(11):1309-1369.

范严伟,杨志伟,胡五龙.均质土微润灌湿润体模型构建及验证[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(13):83-91.

白丹,孙淑贞,任培琦,等.地下灌竖管灌水器湿润体时空变化规律[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(7):107-113.

Views

735

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Effects of Biochar on Soil Water Infiltration and Evaporation in Soils with Different Compaction Degrees in Mining Areas

Effect of Soil Moisture Content on Strength Characteristics of Root-soil Complex Based on Triaxial UU Test

Responses of Loess Ground with Different Slopes and Vegetation Covers to Rainfall Infiltration

Influence of Active Carbon on Soil Infiltration and Evaporation Characteristics and Nutrient Leaching Loss

Effects of Bacillus subtilis on Evaporation of Soil Surface and Water and Salt Dsitritution in Saline-alkali Soil

Related Author

XU Qinxue

LIN Yuze

FU Zhiyong

SHU Xiaohua

ZHANG Shuaipu

SI Dantong

LUO Pizhao

WANG Yunqi

Related Institution

Huanjiang Observation and Research Station of Karst Ecosystem， Chinese Academy of Sciences， Huanjiang

Key Laboratory of Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region， Institute of Subtropical Agriculture， Chinese Academy of Sciences

Engineering Research Center of Watershed Protection and Green Development， University of Guangxi， Guilin University of Technology

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control Theory and Technology， Guilin University of Technology

Jinyun Forest Ecosystem Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University

⁰