

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 浙江师范大学植物学实验室,浙江,金华,321004
2. 杭州师范大学生命与环境科学学院,杭州,310036
3. 中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所,沈阳,110016
Published:2022
移动端阅览
GUO Shuya, TANG Ke, WANG Yanyan, et al. Effects of IAA and KT on Cadmium Accumulation and Physiological Response of[J]. 2022, 36(4): 375-384.
GUO Shuya, TANG Ke, WANG Yanyan, et al. Effects of IAA and KT on Cadmium Accumulation and Physiological Response of[J]. 2022, 36(4): 375-384. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.04.046.
为探究吲哚乙酸(indole-3-acetic acid,IAA)和激动素(kinetin,KT)对镉胁迫下菊芋(Helianthus tuberosus L.)生理响应及耐镉性的影响,以耐镉型榆林菊芋和镉敏感型成都菊芋为研究对象,设置CK (空白对照,无Cd)、T1(Cd300 mg/kg)、T2(Cd300 mg/kg+IAA4 mg/L)、T3(Cd300 mg/kg+KT8 mg/L)及T4(Cd300 mg/kg+IAA4 mg/L+KT8 mg/L)5个处理组,研究了IAA、KT对镉胁迫下菊芋幼苗生长、抗氧化系统、叶绿素荧光特性及镉富集能力的影响。结果表明:2个产地菊芋T1处理下的株高伸长率、叶面积、根系伸长率及干重较CK组均有所下降;激素喷施后可有效提高叶绿素含量,其中榆林菊芋T4处理最大增幅为162.87%。各组脯氨酸(Pro)含量随处理时间呈上升趋势,2个产地菊芋T4处理的最大增幅分别达223.94%和112.73%;而T4处理MDA降幅大于T2、T3处理。T1处理的抗氧化酶活性总体低于T2~T4处理,各组酶活性随植株生长差距逐渐拉大,共同喷施下3种保护酶活性的增幅较为理想。喷施激素显著提升菊芋的根系活力(p<0.05),榆林菊芋、成都菊芋T4处理的根系活力分别提高39.00%和9.10%。T4处理条件下菊芋茎髓部的气泡数目远大于T1~T3处理,2个产地植株黑色区域分别扩增142.59%,700.00%。植物激素单一或共同喷施均可促进菊芋根、茎、叶器官对镉的吸收,根部镉含量最高,茎次之,各器官的镉富集系数均大于2,转运系数大于1,菊芋T4处理的镉含量大于T1~T3处理。综上所述,4 mg/L IAA、8 mg/L KT主要通过提升抗氧化酶活性和Pro含量,以维持活性氧自由基(ROS)产生与清除的动态平衡,减轻膜脂的过氧化并提高根系活力等途径帮助菊芋有效应对镉胁迫环境并强化其富集能力,这为菊芋在镉污染地区的栽培及植物修复土壤镉污染研究提供理论指导。
In order to explore the regulatory effects of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and kinetin (KT) on the physiological response and cadmium (Cd) tolerance of Helianthus tuberosus L. under Cd stress
taking H. tuberosus of Yulin and Chengdu as research objects
five treatment groups were set up
which were CK (no Cd)
T1(Cd300 mg/kg)
T2(Cd300 mg/kg+IAA4 mg/L)
T3(Cd300 mg/kg+KT8 mg/L) and T4(Cd300 mg/kg+IAA4 mg/L+ KT8 mg/L)
respectively
to study the effects of IAA and KT on the growth
antioxidant system
ChlorophyⅡ fluorescence properties and Cd accumulation ability of H. tuberosus seedlings under Cd stress. The results showed that the plant height elongation
leaf area
root elongation and dry weight of plants in the T1 group all decreased compared with CK. Spraying hormone could effectively increase chlorophyⅡ content
and the maximum increase was 162.87% in the T4 group of Yulin H. tuberosus. The proline (Pro) content of each group increased with the treatment time
the maximum increase of H. tuberosu T4 group in two places was 223.94% and 112.73%
respectively
while the decrease of MDA in T4 group was greater than that in T2 and T3.The antioxidant enzyme activity of T1 group was generally lower than that of other groups
and the gap in enzyme activities between groups was gradually widening with the plant growth. The increase ofthe three protective enzyme activities in T4 group was ideal. Hormone spraying significantly improved the root vigor of H. tuberosus (p<0.05)
and the H. tuberosus T4 group in two places increased by 39.00% and 9.10%
respectively. In the treatment group of T4
the number of bubbles in the pith of H. tuberosus stem was much larger than that of T1 to T3
and the black area of plants from the two producing areas increased by 142.59% and 700.00%
respectively. Single or combined spraying of plant hormones could promote absorption of Cd in the root
stem and leaf organs of H. tuberosus
the content of Cd in root was the highest
followed by the stem. The Cd enrichment coefficient of each organ was all greater than 2
and transport coefficient was greater than 1. The Cd content of H. tuberosus T4 group was greater than T1 to T3.In summary
4 mg/L IAA and 8 mg/L KT could help H. tuberosuseffectively respond to the Cd stress environment and strengthen its accumulation capacity by increasing the antioxidant enzyme activity and Pro content
so as to maintain the dynamic balance of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and removal
reduce membrane lipid peroxidation
and improve root vitality. The results could provide theoretical guidance for the cultivation of H. tuberosus in Cd-polluted areas and phytore mediation of soil Cd pollution.
Mou H Y, Chen W Q, Xue Z, et al. Effect of irrigation water system's distribution on rice cadmium accumulation in large mild cadmium contaminated paddy field areas of Southwest China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 746:e141248.
Chen Z Q, Liu X, Ai Y W, et al. Effects and mechanisms of revegetation modes on cadmium and lead pollution in artificial soil on railway rock-cut slopes[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 644:1602-1611.
Chen L, Yuan S K, Liu X G, et al. Genotoxicity response of Viciafaba seedlings to cadmium in soils as characterized by direct soil exposure and micronucleus test[J]. Ecotoxicology, 2020, 29(1):65-74.
Seth C S, Chaturvedi P K, Misra V. The role of phytochelatins and antioxidants in tolerance to Cd accumulation in Brassica juncea L.[J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2008, 71(1):76-85.
赵书晗, 王海娟, 王宏镔.砷胁迫下吲哚乙酸对不同砷富集能力植物光合作用的影响[J].农业环境科学学报, 2017, 36(6):1093-1101.
Zhou J H, Cheng K, Huang G M, et al. Effects of exogenous 3-indoleacetic acid and cadmium stress on the physiological and biochemical characteristics of Cinnamomum camphora[J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2020, 191:e109998.
Feng L, Yan H L, Dai C H, et al. The systematic exploration of cadmium-accumulation characteristics of maize kernel in acidic soil with different pollution levels in China[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 729:e138972.
孔垂华.中国植物化感作用研究16年[J].应用生态学报, 2020, 31(7):2139-2140.
Bao C, Sha L, Wu Y J, et al. The effects of the endophytic bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens Sasm05 and IAA on the plant growth and cadmium uptake of Sedum alfredii Hance[J].Frontiers in Microbiology, 2017, 8:e2538.
Aldesuquy H S, Haroun S A, Abo-Hamed S A, et al. Ameliorating effect of kinetin on pigments, photosynthetic characteristics, carbohydrate contents and productivity of cadmium treated Sorghum bicolor plants[J].Acta Botanica Hungarica, 2004, 46(1/2):1-21.
韩丽, 张金梅, 卢新雄, 等.菊芋耐性胁迫及种质保存研究进展[J].植物遗传资源学报, 2014, 15(5):999-1005.
Kosaric N, Cosentino G P, Wieczorek A, et al. The Jerusalem artichoke as an agricultural crop[J].Biomass, 1984, 5(1):1-36.
舒展, 张晓素, 陈娟, 等.叶绿素含量测定的简化[J].植物生理学报, 2010, 46(4):399-402.
Kalaji H M, Schansker G, Brestic M, et al. Frequently asked questions about chlorophyll fluorescence, the sequel[J]. Photosynthesis Research, 2016, 132(1):13-66.
李小方, 张志良.植物生理学实验指导[M].5版.北京:高等教育出版社, 2016.
李子英, 丛日春, 杨庆山, 等.盐碱胁迫对柳树幼苗生长和渗透调节物质含量的影响[J].生态学报, 2017, 37(24):8511-8517.
Mi R L, Cheol S K, Tusan P, et al. Optimization of the ninhydrin reaction and development of a multiwell plate-based high-throughput proline detection assay[J].Analytical Biochemistry, 2018, 556:57-62.
李建霞, 张出兰, 夏晓飞, 等.植物冰冻切片条件的优化及其与石蜡切片在组织化学应用中的比较[J].植物学报, 2013, 48(6):643-650.
王丽英, 高树林, 李志华.火焰原子荧光光谱法快速测定饲料中的镉[J].食品安全质量检测学报, 2020, 11(9):2856-2860.
Marco L, Alessia D L, Valeria P, et al. Early responses to cadmium exposure in barley plants:Effects on biometric and physiological parameters[J].Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2018, 40(10):1-11.
Alyemeni M N, Ahanger M A, Wijaya L, et al. Selenium mitigates cadmium-induced oxidative stress in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants by modulating chlorophyll fluorescence, osmolyte accumulalation, and antioxidant system[J].Protoplasma, 2018, 255(2):459-469.
王家利, 刘冬成, 郭小丽, 等.生长素合成途径的研究进展[J].植物学报, 2012, 47(3):292-301.
宋松泉, 刘军, 杨华, 等.细胞分裂素调控种子发育、休眠与萌发的研究进展[J].植物学报, 2021, 56(2):218-231.
张婷婷, 朱叶心怡, 吴玉环, 等.镉胁迫下外源IAA对栝楼生理变化和耐镉性的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2019, 33(4):335-341.
张星雨, 叶志彪, 张余洋.植物响应镉胁迫的生理与分子机制研究进展[J].植物生理学报, 2021, 57(7):1437-1450.
王艳, 高鹏, 黄敏, 等.高温对水稻开花期剑叶抗氧化酶活性及基因表达的影响[J].植物科学学报, 2015, 33(3):355-361.
吴东墨, 王宏镔, 王海娟, 等.吲哚乙酸和激动素配合施用对蜈蚣草土壤砷提取效率的影响[J].农业环境科学学报, 2018, 37(8):1705-1715.
Xu J, Yin H X, Li X. Protective effects of proline against cadmium toxicity in micropropagated hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L.[J].Plant Cell Reports, 2009, 28:325-333.
Tian L X, Li J. The effects of exogenous ABA applied to maize (Zea mays L.) roots on plant responses to chilling stress[J].Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2018, 40(4):77-78.
李萍, 郭喜丰, 徐莉莉, 等.细胞分裂素类物质对玉米幼苗镉吸收和转运的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2011, 25(1):119-122.
Shen F Y, Guo R, Sun Q, et al. Possible causes for embolism repair in xylem[J].Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2007, 62(2):139-144.
徐爱春, 陈益泰.镉污染土壤根际环境的调节与植物修复研究进展[J].中国土壤与肥料, 2007(2):1-6.
Liang Y Q, Xiao X Y, Guo Z H, et al. Co-application of indole-3-acetic acid/gibberellin and oxalic acid for phytoextraction of cadmium and lead with Sedum alfredii Hance from contaminated soil[J].Chemosphere, 2021, 285:e131420.
0
Views
749
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621