ZHAO Xiaohan, ZHANG Fangmin, LU Qi, et al. Characteristics of Evapotranspiration and Water Availability in Inner Mongolia Under Future Climate Scenarios[J]. 2022, 36(4): 151-159.
DOI:
ZHAO Xiaohan, ZHANG Fangmin, LU Qi, et al. Characteristics of Evapotranspiration and Water Availability in Inner Mongolia Under Future Climate Scenarios[J]. 2022, 36(4): 151-159. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.04.020.
Characteristics of Evapotranspiration and Water Availability in Inner Mongolia Under Future Climate Scenarios
It is vital to evaluate and predict regional water resource variation and its influencing factors for sustainable development of arid and semi-arid areas. Based on four global climate models of CMIP5 and CLM 4.5
the temporal and spatial characteristics of evapotranspiration and water availability were studied in Inner Mongolia under two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) from 2020 to 2099. The results showed that under RCP 6.0 and RCP 8.5 scenarios
the future evapotranspiration in Inner Mongolia would increase at a rate of 0.37 mm/a and 0.69 mm/a
respectively (p<0.05)
decreasing form east to west. Water availability in Inner Mongolia did not show a significantly trend under the two scenarios (p>0.05)
but there were significant spatial differences.From a spatial perspective
water availability in most areas showed an increasing trend and increased by more than 10 mm/a in the southern semi-arid and semi-humid regions of temperate zone by 2090s; however
the area with reduced water availability accounted for 46.32% of the entire territory under the RCP 8.5 scenario
especially in the arid
semi-arid and semi-humid areas. There were great regional differences influencing of driving factors in evapotranspiration. Precipitation was the main influencingfactor of evapotranspiration changes in arid and semi-arid area. The changes in semi humid area were jointly affected by precipitation and temperature. The changes in humid area were dominated by temperature and in the higher heating scenario
the effect further increased with temperature increased. At the same time
vegetation was also an important factor affecting evapotranspiration with less than climate factor.
关键词
Keywords
references
IPCC. Climate Change 2021:The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[R].Cambridge and New York:Cambridge University Press, 2021.
Liang W, Bai D, Wang F Y, et al. Quantifying the impacts of climate change and ecological restoration on streamflow changes based on a Budyko hydrological model in China's Loess Plateau[J].Water Resources Research, 2015, 51(8):6500-6519.
Huntington T G. Evidence for intensification of the global water cycle:Review and synthesis[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2006, 319(1):83-95.
Qu Y, Zhuang Q L. Evapotranspiration in North America:Implications for water resources in a changing climate[J].Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2020, 25(1):205-220.
Frieler K, Lange S, Piontek F, et al. Assessing the impacts of 1.5℃ global warming-simulation protocol of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMI2B)[J].Geoscientific Model Development, 2017, 10(12):4321-4345.
Vuuren D, Edmonds J, Kainuma M, et al. The representative concentration pathways:An overview[J].Climatic Change, 2011, 109(1):5-31.
Ma X F, Zhao C Y, Tao H, et al. Projections of actual evapotranspiration under the 1.5℃ and 2.0℃ global warming scenarios in sandy areas in Northern China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 645:1496-1508.
Liu Y, Liu R G, Chen J M. Retrospective retrieval of long-term consistent global leaf area index (1981-2011) from combined AVHRR and MODIS Data[J/OL].Journal of Geophysical Research:Biogeosciences, 2012, 117(G4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JG002084.
Tian D S, Niu S L, Pan Q M, et al. Nonlinear responses of ecosystem carbon fluxes and water-use efficiency to nitrogen addition in Inner Mongolia grassland[J].Functional Ecology, 2016, 30(3):490-499.
Niu Z E, He H L, Zhu G F, et al. A spatial-temporal continuous dataset of the transpiration to evapotranspiration ratio in China from 1981-2015[J].Scientific Data, 2020, 7(1):e369.
Hare F K. Long-term annual surface heat and water balances over Canada and the United States South of 60°N:Reconciliation of precipitation, run-off and temperature fields[J].Atmosphere Ocean, 1980, 18(2):127-153.
Bai P, Liu X M, Zhang Y Q, et al. Assessing the impacts of vegetation greenness change on evapotranspiration and water yield in China[J].Water Resources Research, 2020, 56(10):e2019WR027019.
Liu Y B, Xiao J F, Ju W M, et al. Recent trends in vegetation greenness in China significantly altered annual evapotranspiration and water yield[J].Environmental Research Letters, 2016, 11(9):e94010.
Chen H P, Sun J Q, Chen X L. Future changes of drought and flood events in China under a global warming scenario[J].Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters, 2013, 6(1):8-13.
Li S J, Wang G J, Sun S L, et al. Long-term changes in evapotranspiration over China and attribution to climatic drivers during 1980-2010[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 595(1/4):e126037.
Lu J, Wang G J, Li S J, et al. Projected land evaporation and its response to vegetation greening over China under multiple scenarios in the Cmip6 Models[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Biogeosciences, 2021, 126(9):e2021JG006327.
Massmann A, Lin C J, Gentine P. When does vapor pressure deficit drive or reduce evapotranspiration[J].Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 2019, 11:3305-3320.
Liu Y L, Kumar M, Katul G G, et al. Plant hydraulics accentuates the effect of atmospheric moisture stress on transpiration[J].Nature Climate Change, 2020, 10:691-695.