Study on Soil Erosion of Engineering Accumulation with Structure

LI Zhen; ZHANG Wenbo; Lü Jiaorong; LUO Han; XIE Yongsheng

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.04.008

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Study on Soil Erosion of Engineering Accumulation with Structure

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Study on Soil Erosion of Engineering Accumulation with Structure
- Vol. 36, Issue 4, Pages: 53-62(2022)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
  2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.04.008
  CLC： S157.1
- Published：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
LI Zhen, ZHANG Wenbo, Lü Jiaorong, et al. Study on Soil Erosion of Engineering Accumulation with Structure[J]. 2022, 36(4): 53-62.
DOI：

LI Zhen, ZHANG Wenbo, Lü Jiaorong, et al. Study on Soil Erosion of Engineering Accumulation with Structure[J]. 2022, 36(4): 53-62. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.04.008.

摘要

为探究野外实际调查中常见的含结构体工程堆积体土壤侵蚀过程，设计含结构体工程堆积体和对照组2种试验材料（对照组为不含结构体工程堆积体，后文中对2种试验材料简称为结构体和堆积体），通过室内模拟降雨试验，研究了结构体和堆积体坡面径流侵蚀特征与雨强和场次的关系。结果表明：（1）初产历时随雨强和场次的增加而减小，结构体对初产历时有延缓作用，这与结构体的土壤特性和下垫面特征有关；（2）平均径流率和平均流速均随雨强和场次的增加而增大，堆积体平均流速和平均径流率分别是结构体的1.11~1.22，1.11~1.37倍，而结构体流速和径流率快速增加和趋于稳定的时间均较堆积体提前，且用时更短；（3）雨强对侵蚀速率、流速和径流率的贡献率较大，场次与侵蚀速率负相关，各条件下结构体的侵蚀速率均大于堆积体，且侵蚀速率和总侵蚀量分别是堆积体的1.03~2.15，1.36~2.63倍；（4）径流功率能够更好地描述结构体和堆积体侵蚀动力过程，结构体发生侵蚀的临界径流剪切力和径流功率均小于堆积体。

Abstract

In this paper

taking the common engineering accumulation with structure in field investigation as the research background

two test materials including structural engineering accumulation and control group were designed (the control group is engineering accumulation without structures

which will be referred to as structure and accumulation for short in the later paper). Using the method of indoor rainfall simulation

the effects of rainfall intensity and rainfall field on slope runoff erosion of structure and accumulation were studied. The results show that:(1) the initial production duration decreases with the increase of rainfall intensity and rainfall field times

and the structure can delay the initial production duration

which is related to the soil characteristics and underlying surface characteristics of the structure; (2) The average runoff rate and average velocity increase with the increase of rainfall intensity and rainfall times. The average velocity and average runoff rate of the accumulation are 1.11~1.22 and1.11~1.37 times that of the structure

respectively. The time for the rapid increase and stabilization of the velocity and runoff rate of the structure is earlier and shorter than that of the accumulation; (3) The contribution rate of rainfall intensity to erosion rate

velocity and runoff rate is large

and the rainfall times is negatively correlated with erosion rate. Under all conditions

the erosion rate of structure is greater than that of accumulation

and the erosion rate and total erosion amount are 1.03~2.15 and 1.36~2.63 times of accumulation; (4) Runoff power can better describe the erosion dynamic process of structure and accumulation. The critical runoff shear force and runoff power of structure erosion are less than those of accumulation.

关键词

Keywords

references

王朋冲, 孙婕, 刘然, 等.浅析生产建设项目水土保持监督检查工作方法[J].水土保持应用技术, 2022(1):46-49.

纪丽静, 王文龙, 康宏亮, 等.黄土区土质与土石质塿土堆积体水力侵蚀过程差异[J].应用生态学报, 2020, 31(5):1587-1598.

王萍, 王燕.民勤荒漠-绿洲过渡带不同下垫面条件的土壤风蚀特征[J].农业工程学报, 2012, 28(11):138-145.

张文博.土壤结构体对工程堆积体坡面侵蚀产沙及微地形的影响[D].陕西杨陵:西北农林科技大学, 2020.

赵暄.生产建设项目弃土堆置体下垫面概化与水土流失特征研究[D].陕西杨陵:西北农林科技大学, 2013.

赵暄, 谢永生, 景民晓, 等.生产建设项目弃土堆置体下垫面仿真模拟标准化参数[J].水土保持学报, 2012, 26(5):229-234.

杨凯.黄土丘陵区生物结皮对土壤结构体稳定性的影响[D].陕西杨陵:西北农林科技大学, 2013.

张桃林, 潘剑君, 赵其国.土壤质量研究进展与方向[J].土壤, 1999(1):2-8.

周建明, 沈仁芳.土壤学大辞典[M].北京:科学出版社, 2013:15-25.

董盛盛, 霍连飞, 丁启朔, 等.机械耕作土壤结构体的数字图像分析[J].土壤通报, 2016, 47(5):1102-1106.

李毅, 邵明安.间歇降雨和多场次降雨条件下黄土坡面土壤水分入渗特性[J].应用生态学报, 2008, 19(7):1511-1516.

蒋芳市, 黄炎和, 林金石, 等.多场次降雨对崩岗崩积体细沟侵蚀的影响[J].中国水土保持科学, 2014, 12(6):1-7.

袁和第, 信忠保, 蒋秋玲, 等.连续降雨作用下褐土坡面侵蚀及其水动力学特征[J].水土保持学报, 2020, 34(4):14-20, 30.

吕佼容, 张文博, 胡锦昇, 等.连续降雨下不同砾石含量工程堆积体土壤侵蚀[J].水科学进展, 2019, 30(2):210-219.

Lv J R, Xie Y S, Luo H. Erosion process and temporal variations in the soil surface roughness of spoil heaps under multi-day rainfall simulation[J].Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(14):e2192.

郑粉莉, 赵军.人工模拟降雨大厅及模拟降雨设备简介[J].水土保持研究, 2004, 11(4):177-178.

戎玉博, 王森, 白玉洁, 等.含砾石锥状工程堆积体侵蚀水动力学特性和细沟形态特征[J].水土保持学报, 2018, 32(2):134-141.

杨帅, 高照良, 李永红, 等.工程堆积体坡面植物篱的控蚀效果及其机制研究[J].农业工程学报, 2017, 33(15):147-154.

方荣杰, 朱晓锋, 江斌伟, 等.模拟降雨条件下岩溶坡耕地产流产沙特征[J].水土保持研究, 2018, 25(3):11-16.

袁建平, 蒋定生, 甘淑.影响坡地降雨产流历时的因子分析[J].山地学报, 1999, 17(3):259-264.

张文博, 吕佼容, 谢永生, 等.不同形态工程堆积体产流产沙对比研究[J].水土保持学报, 2020, 34(3):49-54.

Ban Y Y, Lei T W, Gao Y, et al. Effect of stone content on water flow velocity over Loess slope:Non-frozen soil[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2017, 549:525-533.

王林华, 汪亚峰, 王健, 等.地表粗糙度对黄土坡面产流机制的影响[J].农业工程学报, 2018, 34(5):120-128.

陈卓鑫, 王文龙, 康宏亮, 等.砾石对红壤工程堆积体边坡径流产沙的影响[J].生态学报, 2019, 39(17):6545-6556.

Peng X D, Shi D M, Jiang D et al. Runoff erosion process on different underlying surfaces from disturbed soils in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China[J].Catena, 2014, 23(123):215-224.

王雪松, 谢永生.模拟降雨条件下锥状工程堆积体侵蚀水动力特征[J].农业工程学报, 2015, 31(1):117-124.

Views

780

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Small Watershed Erosion Model （SWEM）

Response of Soil Total Nitrogen Distribution to Erosion under Ecological Restoration in Qinling Water Source Area

Response of Slope Runoff Hydrodynamic Characteristics to Gravel Coverage in Alpine Regions under Artificial Rainfall Simulation

Impact of Hydraulic Conditions on Soil Detachment Capacity under Different Surface Roughness

Spatiotemporal Variation Characteristics and Driving Factors of Soil Erosion in Ecological Barrier Zone of Three Gorges Reservoir Area

Related Author

FU Suhua

LIU Baoyuan

XU Mingzhu

XU Guoce

LI Zhanbin

ZHANG Jiaxin

WANG Bin

FANG Kang

Related Institution

State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Disaster Risk Reduction， Faculty of Geographical Science， Beijing Normal University

Faculty of Arts and Sciences， Beijing Normal University at Zhuhai

State Key Laboratory of Water Engineering Ecology and Environment in Arid Area， Xi'an University of Technology

State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering， Hohai University

State Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control，College of Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering （Institute of Soil and Water Conservation）， Yangling

⁰