Evaluation of Soil Anti-Erodibility of Unstable Slope in Debris Flow Basin

YU Chenhui; TIAN Xue; LIU Xinming; YU Xier; LIN Yongming

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.04.003

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Evaluation of Soil Anti-Erodibility of Unstable Slope in Debris Flow Basin

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Evaluation of Soil Anti-Erodibility of Unstable Slope in Debris Flow Basin
- Vol. 36, Issue 4, Pages: 13-21(2022)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 福建农林大学林学院,福州,350002
  2. 福建省高校森林生态系统过程与经营重点实验室,福州,350002
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.04.003
  CLC： S157.1
- Published：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
YU Chenhui, TIAN Xue, LIU Xinming, et al. Evaluation of Soil Anti-Erodibility of Unstable Slope in Debris Flow Basin[J]. 2022, 36(4): 13-21.
DOI：

YU Chenhui, TIAN Xue, LIU Xinming, et al. Evaluation of Soil Anti-Erodibility of Unstable Slope in Debris Flow Basin[J]. 2022, 36(4): 13-21. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.04.003.

摘要

为探究失稳性坡面不同区段对土壤抗蚀性的影响效应，加深滑坡对坡面土壤结构作用机制的认识，以云南省昆明市东川区蒋家沟流域为研究区，选取区内3个气候区（温带湿润山岭区、亚热带和暖温带半湿润区、亚热带干热河谷区）共5个样地（大地阴坡、小尖风阳坡、多照沟阳坡、查菁沟阳坡、大凹子沟阴坡），分析土壤样品的理化性质，并运用主成分分析法对5个样地失稳性坡面土壤抗蚀性进行综合研究。结果表明：（1）5个样地的土壤持水量、孔隙结构、有机质含量、水解氮含量、速效钾含量、土壤团聚体粒径≥0.25 mm占比、土壤团聚体平均重量直径在稳定区显著大于堆积区，呈现稳定区>失稳区>堆积区趋势；而土壤容重、有效磷含量、全磷含量、土壤团聚体粒径<0.25 mm占比则在稳定区显著小于堆积区。（2）5个样地的土壤抗蚀性综合得分（F）均表现出稳定区（2.401）>失稳区（0.017）>堆积区的规律（-2.417），且3个坡面区段间差异显著（p<0.05）。3个坡面区段土壤抗冲指数大小依次为稳定区（45.873 L/（s·g））>失稳区（33.245 L/（s·g））>堆积区（15.723 L/（s·g）），稳定区与堆积区差异显著（p<0.05）。抗冲指数与抗蚀性具有极显著正相关关系。（3）土壤持水性、孔隙度、有机质含量、氮钾含量、粒径≥0.25 mm团聚体含量和团聚体平均重量直径与土壤抗蚀性综合得分呈显著正相关；而土壤容重、有效磷含量、粒径<0.25 mm的微团聚体含量则与土壤抗蚀性综合得分呈显著负相关。研究结果阐明了泥石流流域土壤抗蚀性对失稳性坡面的响应机制，促进了灾害对土壤结构影响效应的认识，为总结提升失稳性坡面土壤抗蚀性的综合措施提供参考依据。

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate the effect of different sections of unstable slope on soil anti-erodibility and deepen the understanding of the action mechanism of landslide on slope soil structure. Totally five sample plots (including Dadi shady slope

Xiaojianfeng sunny slope

Duozhao gully sunny slope

Chajing gully sunny slope and Daaozi gully shady slope) in three climate regions (including temperate humid mountain ridge region

subtropical and warm temperate sub-humid region

subtropical dry-hot valley region) were selected as a research area in the Jiangjia gully watershed

Dongchuan district

Kunming

Yunnan Province. We analyzed the physical and chemical properties of soil samples and used principal component analysis (PCA) to study the soil erosion resistance of unstable slopes in the study plots. The results showed that:(1) The soil water-holding capacity

porosity structure

organicmatter content

hydrolyzed nitrogen

available potassium

the proportion of particle size ≥ 0.25 mm

mean weight diameter of soil aggregate in the stable area were significantly larger than those in the accumulation area. The above indicators showed the trend of stable area> unstable area>accumulation area

while the soil bulk density

available phosphorus

total phosphorus

and the proportion of particle size<0.25 mm in the stable area were significantly smaller than those in the accumulation area. (2) The comprehensive index of soil anti-erodibility (F) of the 5 sample plots ranged as:stable area (2.401)>unstable area (0.017)>accumulation area (-2.417)

and the difference among 3 slope sections was significant (p<0.05). The indexes of soil anti-scourability followed the rule as stable area (45.873 L/(s·g))>unstable area (33.245 L/(s·g))>accumulation area (15.723 L/(s·g)). There were significant differences between the stable zone and theaccumulation zone (p<0.05). There was a significantly positive relationship between the comprehensive index of soil anti-erodibility and the indexes of soil anti-scourability. (3) The soil water-holding capacity

porosity

organic matter content

nitrogen and potassium content

the proportion of particle size ≥ 0.25 mm and mean weight diameter in the study area were significantly positively correlated with the comprehensive scores of soil anti-erodibility

while the soil bulk density

available phosphorus content

and particle size <0.25mm were significantly negatively correlated with the comprehensive scores of soil anti-erodibility. This study clarifies the corresponding mechanism of soil erosion resistance in debris flow basin on landslide induced unstable slope

promotes the understanding of the impact of disasters on soil structure

and has reference value for comprehensive measures to improve soil erosion resistance on unstable slope.

关键词

Keywords

references

马芊红, 张科利.西南喀斯特地区土壤侵蚀研究进展与展望[J].地球科学进展, 2018, 33(11):1130-1141.

李菊艳.基于CSLE模型全覆盖和抽样调查法的天山北坡县域尺度土壤侵蚀计算方法的比较[J/OL].农业资源与环境学报:1-13[2021-11-24].https://doi.org/10.13254/j.jare.2021.0213.

陈爱民, 严思维, 林勇明, 等.泥石流频发区不同林龄新银合欢土壤抗蚀性评价[J].北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(9):62-70.

Frank B, Jasper V R, Eelke J, et al. Loss of plant species diversity reduces soil erosion resistance[J].Ecosystems, 2015, 18(5):881-888.

吴丽丽, 张仁陟, 康立军.紫色丘陵区坡耕地生物埂的土壤抗蚀性综合评价[J].中国生态农业学报, 2014, 22(11):1310-1317.

谢贤健, 李永飞.不同巨桉林下紫色土壤抗蚀性与土壤因子的耦合关系分析[J].水土保持学报, 2017, 31(1):97-102.

邱陆旸, 张丽萍, 陆芳春, 等.基于熵权法的林下土壤抗蚀性评价及影响因素分析[J].水土保持学报, 2016, 30(4):74-79.

姜爱国, 万福绪, 胡菲.南京紫金山灵谷寺不同林地土壤抗蚀性研究[J].水土保持研究, 2018, 25(1):12-16.

任改.重庆四面山主要植物群落土壤抗侵蚀性研究[D].北京:北京林业大学, 2010.

王春燕, 黄丽, 谭文峰, 等.几种侵蚀红壤中有机质和团聚体的关系[J].水土保持学报, 2007, 21(3):52-56.

骆东奇, 侯春霞, 魏朝富, 等.紫色土团聚体抗蚀特征研究[J].水土保持学报, 2003, 17(2):20-23, 27.

方迎潮, 王道杰, 何松膛, 等.云南东川蒋家沟泥石流2003-2014年冲淤演变特征[J].山地学报, 2018, 36(6):907-916.

谢贤健, 韦方强.泥石流频发区不同盖度草地土壤颗粒的分形特征[J].水土保持学报, 2011, 25(4):202-206.

李松阳, 林静远, 潘佳虹, 等.泥石流频发区不同土地利用类型土壤粒径分布多重分形特征[J].应用与环境生物学报, 2021, 27(4):893-900.

陈中学, 汪稔, 胡明鉴, 等.云南东川蒋家沟泥石流形成内因初探[J].岩土力学, 2009, 30(10):3053-3056, 3070.

郭晓军, 崔鹏, 苏凤环, 等.蒋家沟流域非泥石流活动期的输沙特征[J].长江科学院院报, 2013, 30(5):27-33.

黄英, 丁明涛, 庙成, 等.云南蒋家沟泥石流运动特征及其发展趋势[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(8):1434-1442.

陈爱民, 邓浩俊, 严思维, 等.蒋家沟5种植被土壤分形特征与养分关系[J].山地学报, 2016, 34(3):290-296.

贺静雯, 刘颖, 李松阳, 等.蒋家沟流域不同海拔灌草层群落特征与土壤关系的研究[J].广西植物, 2020, 40(8):1092-1100.

刘颖, 贺静雯, 李松阳, 等.蒋家沟流域不同海拔梯度的土壤种子库与地上植被的关系[J].西南林业大学学报, 2021, 41(2):54-67.

廖超林, 何毓蓉, 徐佩.泥石流源地土壤团聚体抗蚀特征研究:以蒋家沟为例[J].地球与环境, 2005, 33(4):69-73.

张有富.云南蒋家沟泥石流区干热退化山地引种拟金茅的技术与效果[J].山地学报, 2000, 18(6):563-567.

郭晓军, 崔鹏, 朱兴华.典型泥石流流域蒋家沟的降雨-径流模拟[J].水土保持通报, 2011, 31(1):175-179.

崔鹏, 王道杰, 韦方强.干热河谷生态修复模式及其效应:以中国科学院东川泥石流观测研究站为例[J].中国水土保持科学, 2005, 3(3):60-64.

吴建召, 孙凡, 崔羽, 等.不同气候区失稳性坡面植被生物量与土壤密度的关系:以云南省昆明市东川区蒋家沟流域为例[J].北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(3):24-35.

中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化分析[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社, 1978:132-502.

国家质量监督检验检疫总局.JJG 694-2009原子吸收分光光度计检定规程[S].北京:中国计量出版社, 2009:1-7.

陈舜, 王道杰, 梅永丽, 等.泥石流源区崩滑土体粒度特征及其产沙特性[J].山地学报, 2014, 32(1):66-73.

王针针, 刘枭宏, 谌芸, 等.紫色土区植物篱篱前淤积带与篱下土坎土壤抗蚀性研究[J].水土保持学报, 2020, 34(5):61-67.

De Baets S, Poesen J, Knapen A, et al. Impact of root architecture on the erosion-reducing potential of roots during concentrated flow[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2007, 32(9):1323-1345.

张学权.不同植被恢复土壤容重和孔隙度特征分析[J].成都大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 36(3):325-327.

陈国靖, 蔡进军, 马璠, 等.宁夏黄土丘陵区典型林草植被类型对土壤水稳性团聚体的影响[J].水土保持研究, 2018, 25(5):49-53, 60.

张建辉, 刘刚才, 倪师军, 等.紫色土不同土地利用条件下的土壤抗冲性研究[J].中国科学E辑:科学技术, 2003, 33(增刊1):61-68.

戴全厚, 刘国彬, 薛萐, 等.侵蚀环境退耕撂荒地水稳性团聚体演变特征及土壤养分效应[J].水土保持学报, 2007, 21(2):61-64, 77.

王清奎, 汪思龙.土壤团聚体形成与稳定机制及影响因素[J].土壤通报, 2005, 36(3):415-421.

Felipe G, Robert L S, Eugene K. Effects of slash-and-burn management on soil aggregate organic C and N in a tropical deciduous forest[J].Geoderma, 1999, 88(1/2):1-12.

严方晨, 焦菊英, 曹斌挺, 等.黄土丘陵沟壑区撂荒地不同演替阶段植物群落的土壤抗蚀性:以坊塌流域为例[J].应用生态学报, 2016, 27(1):64-72.

唐国勇, 李昆, 孙永玉, 等.干热河谷4种固氮植物根瘤固氮潜力及其影响因素[J].林业科学研究, 2012, 25(4):432-437.

李新悦, 李冰, 莫太相, 等.长期秸秆还田对水稻土团聚体及氮磷钾分配的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2021, 32(9):3257-3266.

Sonal S, Jamuna S S. Water-stable aggregates and associated organic matter in forest, savanna, and cropland soils of a seasonally dry tropical region, India[J].Biology and Fertility of Soils, 1996, 22(1/2):76-82.

张履勤, 章明奎.林地与农地转换过程中红壤有机碳、氮和磷库的演变[J].浙江林学院学报, 2006, 23(1):75-79.

胡钟胜, 解燕, 刘国庆, 等.云南宣威市烟田耕作层土壤颗粒分形特征研究[J].土壤通报, 2014, 45(5):1038-1041.

Andre E, Kyungsoo Y, Peter C A, et al. Does soil erosion rejuvenate the soil phosphorus inventory[J].Geoderma, 2018, 332:45-59.

丁文峰, 丁登山.黄土高原植被破坏前后土壤团粒结构分形特征[J].地理研究, 2002, 21(6):700-706.

罗清虎, 孙凡, 崔羽, 等.泥石流频发流域失稳性坡面主要植物种间关联性[J].应用与环境生物学报, 2018, 24(4):689-696.

李泽霞, 董彦丽, 马涛.黄土区梯化坡地不同土地利用方式对土壤理化性质的影响[J].水土保持通报, 2020, 40(3):43-49.

袁勇, 熊东红, 校亮, 等.元谋干热河谷冲沟不同部位土壤质量评价[J].西南农业学报, 2018, 31(10):2165-2172.

肖鹏.海州露天煤矿排土场不同复垦模式土壤抗蚀性抗冲性研究[D].辽宁阜新:辽宁工程技术大学, 2019.

黎建强, 张洪江, 陈奇伯, 等.长江上游不同植物篱系统土壤抗冲、抗蚀特征[J].生态环境学报, 2012, 21(7):1223-1228.

Views

765

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

In Situ Experimental Study on the Characteristics of Soil Pore and Strength in Coastal Reclamation Areas

Soil Quality Assessment of Five Typical Forest Stands in the Dianchi Lake Basin based on MDS

Effects of Biological Soil Crusts Development on Soil Anti-erodibility on Karst Slope

Spatial and Temporal Changes and Driving Mechanism of Cultivated Land Conversion in Central Yunnan Urban Agglomeration from 1990 to 2020

Soil Quality Evaluation and Obstacle Factors of Erosion Slop in Karst Trough Valley Area

Related Author

SUN Xiaoqin

PAN Yongchun

TANG Shengqiang

SHE Dongli

JIANG Ziyu

WANG Hongde

JIN Zhehao

WANG Keqin

Related Institution

College of Soil and Water Conservation， Hohai University

College of Agricultural Science and Engineering， Hohai University

National Plateau Wetland Research Center

School of Soil and Water Conservation, Southwest Forestry University

Key Laboratory for Plateau Wetland Conservation, Restoration, and Ecosystem Services of Yunnan Province, School of Ecology and Environment (Wetland College), Southwest Forestry University

⁰