WANG Jiahao, LI Tingliang, HUANG Lu, et al. Effects of Straw Returning Instead of Fertilizer on Wheat Yield and Water and Fertilizer Utilization in Loess Dryland[J]. 2022, 36(3): 236-243.
DOI:
WANG Jiahao, LI Tingliang, HUANG Lu, et al. Effects of Straw Returning Instead of Fertilizer on Wheat Yield and Water and Fertilizer Utilization in Loess Dryland[J]. 2022, 36(3): 236-243. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.03.034.
Effects of Straw Returning Instead of Fertilizer on Wheat Yield and Water and Fertilizer Utilization in Loess Dryland
In order to determine the effects of different straw returning amounts instead of some chemical fertilizers on yield
water and fertilizer use efficiency and nitrate accumulation characteristics of winter wheat
from 2018 to 2021
an experiment including four treatments
which were no straw returning (S0)
half of straw returning (S1/2)
total straw returning (S1) and two times straw returning (S2)
was conducted in the Winter wheat planting region in loess dryland of southern Shanxi to study the effects of different straw returning amounts instead of some chemical fertilizers on yield formation of winter wheat
water and fertilizer use efficiency and soil nitrate-N residue. The results showed that on the basis of straw instead of 8.3%~31.9% N and 15.7%~63.2% P2O5 in winter wheat growing region of loess dryland
the yield of winter wheat generally increased with the increasing of straw returning amount
and in wet year
increasing the amount of straw returning could produce greater yield effect. The 3-year experiment showed that the average yield of winter wheat in the treatment of S2 was 17.5% (P<0.05)
10.4% (P<0.05) and 4.3% higher than that in S0
S1/2 and S1 treatment
respectively. The spike number per hectare of winter wheat was increased by returning straw to the field for three consecutive years. The average spike number of winter wheat in S2 treatment was higher 17.1% (P<0.05)
12.3% (P<0.05) and 3.6% higher than that in S0
S1/2 and S1 treatment
respectively
but there was no significant difference in Kernels number per spik and thousand kernel weight among different treatments. The 0-2 m soil water storage before seeding gradually increased with the increasing of straw returning amount to the field
and during the experiment
the average soil storage of S2 was 8.3% higher than that of S0 treatment (P<0.05). Water consumption also increased with the increasing of straw returning amount
and the average water consumption of S2 was 10.0% (P<0.05) higher than that of S0 treatment. There was no significant difference in water production efficiency among different treatments
with an average of 14.9 kg/(hm2·mm). Based on straw returning instead of partial fertilizer
the fertilizer use efficiency of winter wheat in loess dryland increased with the increasing of straw increasing amount
and the average nitrogen partial fertilizer productivity of N (PEPN)
agronomic efficiencies of N (AEN)
current recovery efficiencies of N (REN) and partial fertilizer productivity of P(PEPP) of S2 treatment were 66.4%
155.8%
113.5% and 105.2% higher than those of S0 treatment
respectively. After three consecutive years of no straw returning
the soil nitrate-N residue of 2 m soil layer increased by 100.6% compared with that pre-sowing in 2018
and nitrate nitrogen accumulated in deep soil layer with downward leaching of water. The accumulation of nitrate nitrogen in 2 m soil layer of straw returning treatment was lower than that pre-sowing in 2018
and the residue of nitrate nitrogen in 2 m soil treated with S2 was the lowest
244.8 kg/hm2. Comprehensively considered
in the wheat planting region of loess Dryland in southern Shanxi
straw instead of 8.3%~31.9% N and 15.7%~63.2% P2O5 could increase soil moisture before sowing
reduce fertilizer residue
improve fertilizer use efficiency and obtain remarkable yield. Among the different treatments
the yield and water and fertilizer effect in the S2 treatment (average straw returning amount 7 477 kg/hm2) were the best. The results could provide theoretical basis for the prevention and control of non-point source pollution and the high-yield and high-efficiency green production of winter wheat in the dryland of wheat area.
关键词
Keywords
references
Gao Y J, Li Y, Zhang J C, et al. Effects of mulch, N fertilizer, and plant density on wheat yield, wheat nitrogen uptake, and residual soil nitrate in a dryland area of China[J].Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,2009,85(2):109-121.
Chen Y L, Liu T, Tian X H, et al. Effects of plastic film combined with straw mulch on grain yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat in Loess Plateau[J].Field Crops Research,2015,172:53-58.
Wang X J, Jia Z K, Liang L Y, et al. Changes in soil characteristics and maize yield under straw returning system in dryland farming[J].Field Crops Research,2018,218:11-17.
Dai J, Wang Z H, Li M H, et al. Winter wheat grain yield and summer nitrate leaching:Long-term effects of nitrogen and phosphorus rates on the Loess Plateau of China[J].Field Crops Research,2016,196:180-190.