

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 华中师范大学地理过程分析与模拟湖北省重点实验室,武汉,430079
2. 华中师范大学城市与环境科学学院,武汉,430079
Published:2022
移动端阅览
ZUO Qian, ZHOU Yong, LI Qing, et al. Analysis of Spatial and Temporal Changes and Trajectory Characteristics of Land Use Pattern in the Southwest Hubei[J]. 2022, 36(1): 161-169.
ZUO Qian, ZHOU Yong, LI Qing, et al. Analysis of Spatial and Temporal Changes and Trajectory Characteristics of Land Use Pattern in the Southwest Hubei[J]. 2022, 36(1): 161-169. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.01.022.
准确识别土地利用格局时空演变规律和轨迹特征
对科学推进该地区生态保护和社会经济高质量发展具有重要意义。采用1990年、2005年和2018年3期土地利用数据构建鄂西南地区土地利用变化轨迹序列
利用土地利用变化各项指数、弦图可视化、标准差椭圆方法
从地类总量变化特征、数量变化轨迹特征和空间变化轨迹特征3个方面开展
揭示近30年来鄂西南地区土地利用格局时空演变特征与变化趋势。结果表明: (1)土地利用总量变化稳定性特征明显。林地和耕地始终是研究区主要土地利用类型
耕地持续减少
建设用地持续增加
土地利用变化活跃但整体态势平缓。(2)土地利用格局数量变化轨迹主导性特征鲜明。1990—2005年以耕地和林地之间相互转换及林地的流出为主
2005—2018年以耕地、林地和草地之间的相互转换、建设用地的进一步扩张为主
整体上地类的变化表现为空间位置上的转移。2005—2018年比1990—2005年土地利用变化类型更多样
土地利用变化行为更活跃。(3)空间变化轨迹集聚性和分异性特征显著。2005—2018年综合土地利用动态变化强度更大。近30年来研究区土地利用格局变化重心、面积、方向和扩散趋势存在空间变化。研究成果为鄂西南地区土地利用研究和国土空间规划提供了参考依据。
Accurate identification of the temporal and spatial evolution law and trajectory characteristics of land use pattern is of great significance to scientifically promote ecological protection and high-quality socio-economic development in the region. Three periods of land use data in 1990
2005 and 2018 were used to construct the trajectory sequence of land use change in the southwest Hubei. In order to reveal the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics and change trend of land use pattern in the southwest Hubei over the past 30 years
using various indices of land use change
chord diagram visualization and standard deviation ellipse methods
this study carried out from three aspects: total land use change characteristics
quantitative change trajectory characteristics and spatial change trajectory characteristics. The results showed that: (1) Stability characteristic of total land use change was obvious. Forestland and cultivated land were always been the main land use types in the study area. The area of cultivated land decreased continuously
while the area of built-up land increased continuously. The change of land use was active
but the overall trend was flat. (2) The dominant characteristics of the quantitative change trajectory of land use pattern were obvious. From 1990 to 2005
it was dominated by the mutual conversion between cultivated land and forestland and outflow of forestland. From 2005 to 2018
it was dominated by mutual conversion between cultivated land
forestland and grassland and further expansion of built-up land. On the whole
the change of land type was manifested in the transfer of spatial location. Land use change types were more diverse
and land use change behavior was more active in 2005—2018 than those in 1990—2005. (3) The spatial change trajectory was characterized by significant clustering and divergence. From 2005 to 2018
the dynamics change intensity of comprehensive land use was greater. There were spatial variations in the center of gravity
area
direction and diffusion trends of land use pattern change in the study area over the past 30 years. The results could provid a reference basis for land use research and territorial spatial planning in the southwest Hubei Province.
Akodéwou A, Oszwald J, Saïdi S, et al. Land use and land cover dynamics analysis of the togodo protected area and its surroundings in Southeastern Togo, West Africa[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(13): 5439-5459.
Wang Q, Yan M, Liu J, et al. Impacts of land use/cover change on spatial patterns of summer precipitation at decadal scale over eastern China[J]. International Journal of Climatology, 2021, 41(3): 1939-1951.
Zhao J J, Dong Y Y, Zhang M M, et al. Comparison of identifying land cover tempo-spatial changes using GlobCover and MCD12Q1 global land cover products[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2020, 13(16): 1-12.
Akbar T A, Hassan Q K, Ishaq S, et al. Investigative spatial distribution and modelling of existing and future urban land changes and its impact on urbanization and economy[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(2): 105-120.
唐常春, 李亚平. 多中心城市群土地利用/覆被变化地学信息图谱研究: 以长株潭城市群为例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(11): 2626-2641.
王福红, 赵锐锋, 张丽华, 等. 黑河中游土地利用转型过程及其对区域生态质量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(12): 4057-4066.
肖东洋, 牛海鹏, 闫弘轩, 等. 1990—2018年黄河流域(河南段)土地利用格局时空演变[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(15): 271-281.
黄方, 张学敏. 白山市土地利用/覆被变化轨迹分析与趋势预测[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2015, 23(3): 439-451.
鲁亚楠, 姚顺波, 邓元杰, 等. 陕北地区土地利用及景观格局变化对生态服务价值的影响: 基于退耕还林(草)背景[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019, 40(11): 180-192.
杨爱民, 朱磊, 陈署晃, 等. 1975—2015年玛纳斯河流域土地利用变化的地学信息图谱分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(11): 3863-3874.
Hu Q, Xiang M T, Chen D, et al. Global cropland intensification surpassed expansion between 2000 and 2010: A spatio-temporal analysis based on GlobeLand30[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 746: 141035-141046.
刘纪远, 宁佳, 匡文慧, 等. 2010—2015年中国土地利用变化的时空格局与新特征[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5): 789-802.
于元赫, 李子君, 林锦阔, 等. 沂河流域土地利用时空变化图谱特征分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(5): 975-988.
刘金雅, 汪东川, 孙然好, 等. 基于变化轨迹分析方法的生态用地流失空间关联研究[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(1): 103-114.
程琳琳, 刘华, 刘焱序. 半干旱区县域景观格局变化轨迹识别: 以宁夏盐池县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(5): 1066-1078.
黄勇, 王凤友, 蔡体久, 等. 环渤海地区景观格局动态变化轨迹分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(2): 314-319.
张文慧, 吕晓, 史洋洋, 等. 黄河流域土地利用转型图谱特征[J]. 中国土地科学, 2020, 34(8): 80-88.
陈玮, 胡静, 王圣先. 浅述湖北省重点生态功能区林业生态建设重点[J]. 湖北林业科技, 2017, 46(5): 59-61.
邓念梅, 詹丽, 黄进. 鄂西南民族地区民宿旅游发展现状、风险及对策探讨[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2014, 30(7): 880-882.
杨春娥, 赵君. 少数民族特色村寨振兴的实践困境及路径探索: 基于鄂西南民族地区的考察[J]. 民族学刊, 2020, 11(6): 17-28, 152-154.
陈斌, 王宏志, 李仁东. 鄂西南山地土地利用时空格局的梯度效应研究[J]. 湖北大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(2): 109-117.
田培, 龚雨薇, 朱占亮, 等. 三峡水库坝区生态屏障区近25年土地利用变化评价[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(2): 78-85.
张韵, 彭建东, 王晶晶, 等. 基于地学信息图谱的江汉平原土地利用时空变化分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(4): 85-92.
伊木然江·阿卜来提, 张永福, 孜比布拉·司马义. 基于GlobeLand30的哈密市2000—2020年土地利用格局变化研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021, 41(1): 182-189.
李颉, 郑步云, 王劲峰. 2008—2018年中国手足口病时空分异特征[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(3): 419-430.
夏利恒, 刘京, 尉芳, 等. 陕西渭北旱塬区耕地时空格局变化分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(5): 256-264.
胡昕利, 易扬, 康宏樟, 等. 近25年长江中游地区土地利用时空变化格局与驱动因素[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(6): 1877-1886.
刘学全, 汪鹏, 吴翠. 湖北省生态敏感性分区与生态退耕标准及规模[J]. 湖北林业科技, 2009(6): 36-39.
詹丽, 张小月, 阚如良. 鄂西南民族地区县域经济实力综合评价[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2016, 32(3): 259-262.
柯俊, 刘芳震. 以最严责任、最强力度、最实举措书写优良答卷: 决战脱贫攻坚、决胜全面小康看恩施[J]. 中国民族, 2020(12): 27-29.
0
Views
1476
下载量
13
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621