LIU Hailong, DING Yanan, WANG Yuefei, et al. Analysis of Temporal-spatial Correlation and Spatial Effect Between Urbanization and Ecosystem Services in Shanxi Province[J]. 2022, 36(1): 124-134.
DOI:
LIU Hailong, DING Yanan, WANG Yuefei, et al. Analysis of Temporal-spatial Correlation and Spatial Effect Between Urbanization and Ecosystem Services in Shanxi Province[J]. 2022, 36(1): 124-134. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.01.018.
Analysis of Temporal-spatial Correlation and Spatial Effect Between Urbanization and Ecosystem Services in Shanxi Province
In order to deeply explore the driving factors of urbanization on ecosystem service value and the spatial spillover effect of ecosystem service
taking the county of Shanxi Province as the research unit
based on the land use data and socio-economic data from 2000 to 2018
constructs a comprehensive evaluation system of ecosystem service value and urbanization level
and analyzes the spatial characteristics of the correlation between urbanization and ecosystem service value through bivariate spatial autocorrelation
In addition
the spatial econometric model is used to explore the driving factors of urbanization on ecosystem service value and the spatial spillover effect of ecosystem service. The results showed that: During the study period
the ecosystem service value of Shanxi Province showed a downward trend as a whole
and the comprehensive level of urbanization was significantly improved
but the overall level was low. There is a significant negative correlation between urbanization and ecosystem service value in the study area
showing a U-shaped development trend. The results of spatial econometric model show that the urbanization rate
built-up area and ecosystem services are significantly negatively correlated
while the per capita retail sales of social consumer goods and the square of urbanization level are significantly positively correlated with ecosystem services. Ecosystem service value has a positive spillover effect on neighboring counties. Under the premise of controlling other explanatory variables unchanged
every 1% increase in the ecological value of neighboring counties will have a 0.243% promotion effect on the county. Ecosystem services in the study area are integrated and unstable
which makes the county governments lose their enthusiasm for environmental protection.
Grossman G, Krueger A. Economic growth and the environment[M]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995, 110(2): 353-377.
Halecki W, Stachura T. Evaluation of soil hydrophysical parameters along a semiurban small river: Soil ecosystem services for enhancing water retention in urban and suburban green areas[J]. Catena, 2021, 3: e196.
Merga L B, Mengistie A A, Faber J H, et al. Trends in chemical pollution and ecological status of Lake Ziway, Ethiopia: A review focussing on nutrients[J]. Metals and Pesticides, 2020, 45(4): 386-400.
Christine W, Lisa N, Beery T H, et al. Operationalizing ecosystem-based adaptation: harnessing ecosystem services to buffer communities against climate change[J]. Ecology and Society, 2016, 21(1): 31-35.