Seasonal Variation of Soil Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Stoichiometry Under Different Vegetation Types in Loess Hilly Region

LIU Shuainan; LI Guang; YANG Chuanjie; DU Jianan; XU Wanheng; XIE Mingjun

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.046

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Seasonal Variation of Soil Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Stoichiometry Under Different Vegetation Types in Loess Hilly Region

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Seasonal Variation of Soil Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Stoichiometry Under Different Vegetation Types in Loess Hilly Region
- Vol. 35, Issue 6, Pages: 343-349(2021)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 甘肃农业大学林学院,兰州,730070
  2. 甘肃农业大学信息科学技术学院,兰州,730070
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.046
  CLC： S153.6
- Published：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
LIU Shuainan, LI Guang, YANG Chuanjie, et al. Seasonal Variation of Soil Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Stoichiometry Under Different Vegetation Types in Loess Hilly Region[J]. 2021, 35(6): 343-349.
DOI：

LIU Shuainan, LI Guang, YANG Chuanjie, et al. Seasonal Variation of Soil Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Stoichiometry Under Different Vegetation Types in Loess Hilly Region[J]. 2021, 35(6): 343-349. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.046.

摘要

为探讨植被类型及生长季阶段对土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征的影响，揭示黄土丘陵区陆地生态系统养分限制及循环规律。以黄土丘陵区典型荒草地（Grassland）、苜蓿（Medicago Sativa）地、沙棘（Hippophae rhamnoides）灌木地、文冠果（Xanthoceras sorbifolium）林地、云杉（Picea asperata）林地为研究对象，分析其0—60 cm土壤有机碳（SOC）、全氮（TN）、全磷（TP）含量及化学计量比特征在植被类型间及生长季阶段内的差异。结果表明：（1）全生长季下乔木林地土壤SOC、TN、TP含量不同程度地显著高于灌草地0.7%~39.7%（P<0.05），且各植被类型土壤SOC、TN含量均随植被生长而逐渐降低，土壤TP含量在生长季末期有一定的储集；（2）全生长季下5种植被类型土壤化学计量比（C：N、C：P、N：P）均值分别为24.70，77.56，4.26，其C：N、C：P均较全国平均值（12.3，61.0）偏大，而N：P较全国平均值（5.2）小；且该区灌木地土壤化学计量比与荒草地间均存在显著性差异，而乔木林地间土壤化学计量比及草地间土壤C：P、N：P间均无显著性差异；（3）土壤C：N在时间上具有较好的稳定性，同时各植被类型土壤化学计量比在生长季阶段间均表现为生长季旺期>生长季初期>生长季末期，但植被在生长季旺期下N：P （6.37）及生长季末期下C：P （40.84）与全生长季和全国均值的比较趋势相反。植被类型及生长季阶段对土壤养分及化学计量比特征均有一定的影响，同时黄土丘陵区植被生长受土壤N、P养分限制程度为N > P，因此应根据植被类型及生长阶段实际情况，合理施加氮磷肥，进而有助于土壤养分存留，加快生态修复进程。

Abstract

In order to explore the effects of vegetation types and growing season stages on ecological stoichiometric characteristics of soil carbon

nitrogen and phosphorus

reveal the nutrient limitation and circulation law of terrestrial ecosystem in Loess Hilly Area

taking the typical grassland

Medicago Sativa land

Hippophae rhamnoides shrub land

Xanthoceras sorbifolium woodland and Picea asperata wood land as the research objects in Loess Hilly Area

we analyzed the contents of organic carbon (SOC)

total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) of the 0—60 cm soil layer and their stoichiometric ratio characteristics as well as the differences between vegetation types and growth season stages. The results showed that: (1) The contents of SOC

TN and TP of arbor forest land were significantly higher than those of shrub grassland (0.7%~39.7%) in the whole growing season(P<0.05)

and the contents of SOC and TN of five vegetation types gradually decreased with the growth of vegetation. The content of TP had a certain accumulation at the end of growing season. (2) In the whole growing season

the mean stoichiometric ratios (C∶N

C∶P and N∶P) of the five vegetation types were 24.70

77.56 and 4.26

respectively. The C∶N and C∶P were larger than the national average (12.3

61.0)

while the N∶P was smaller than the national average (5.2). There were significant differences in soil stoichiometric ratio between shrub land and wasteland

but there was no significant difference in soil stoichiometric ratio between arbor forest land and in soil C∶P and N∶P between grassland. (3) The soil C∶N had good stability in time. At the same time

the soil stoichiometric ratio of each vegetation type in the growing season stage followed the order of the peak period of the growth season > the early period of the growth season > the end of the growth season. However

the comparison trend of N∶P (6.37) under the peak period of the growth season and C∶P (40.84) under the end of the growth season were opposite to those of the whole growing season and the national average. Vegetation type and growing season stage had a certain impact on soil nutrients and stoichiometric characteristics. Meanwhile

vegetation growth in Loess Hilly Area was limited by soil N rather than soil P. Therefore

nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer should be reasonably applied according to the actual situation of vegetation type and growing stage

so as to help soil nutrient retention and accelerate the process of ecological restoration.

关键词

Keywords

references

Sardans J, Janssens I A, Ciais P, et al. Recent advances and future research in ecological stoichiometry[J].Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 2021, 17:e125611.

Du C J, Gao Y H. Grazing exclusion alters ecological stoichiometry of plant and soil in degraded alpine grassland[J].Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 2021, 308:e107256.

刘帅楠, 李广, 吴江琪, 等.黄土丘陵区不同土地类型下土壤养分特征:基于生态化学计量学[J].草业学报, 2021, 30(3):200-207.

贾培龙, 安韶山, 李程程, 等.黄土高原森林带土壤养分和微生物量及其生态化学计量变化特征[J].水土保持学报, 2020, 34(1):315-321.

欧延升.甘肃陇南山地不同植被恢复模式下土壤酶活性特征及其影响因素研究[D].兰州:兰州大学, 2019.

高君亮, 罗凤敏, 高永, 等.农牧交错带不同土地利用类型土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征[J].生态学报, 2019, 39(15):5594-5602.

吴江琪, 马维伟, 李广, 等.黄土高原4种植被类型对土壤物理特征及渗透性的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2018, 32(4):133-138.

周沁.闽楠杉木及其混交人工林土壤和凋落物养分季节动态变化特征[D].长沙:中南林业科技大学, 2020.

濮阳雪华, 王月玲, 赵志杰, 等.陕北黄土区不同植被恢复模式植被与土壤耦合关系研究[J].草业学报, 2021, 30(5):13-24.

李少华, 王学全, 包岩峰, 等.不同类型植被对高寒沙区土壤改良效果的差异分析[J].土壤通报, 2016, 47(1):60-64.

罗梦娇, 艾宁, 刘长海, 等.半干旱黄土区不同植被类型对土壤水分的影响[J].四川农业大学学报, 2019, 37(2):177-184, 191.

Loch R J. Effects of vegetation cover on runoff and erosion under simulated rain and overland flow on a rehabilitated site on the Meandu Mine, Tarong, Queensland[J].Soil Research, 2000, 38(2):299-213.

刘新春, 赵勇钢, 刘小芳, 等.晋西黄土区典型人工植被生长季深层土壤储水量与细根生物量分布特征[J].中国水土保持科学, 2019, 17(1):95-101.

Zhu J B, Zhang F W, Li H Q, et al. Seasonal and inter-annual variations in CO

fluxes over 10 years in an alpine shrubland on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2016, 228/229:95-103.

何高迅, 王越, 彭淑娴, 等.滇中退化山地不同植被恢复下土壤碳氮磷储量与生态化学计量特征[J].生态学报, 2020, 40(13):4425-4435.

Yu Z P, Wang M H, Huang Z Q, et al. Temporal changes in soil C-N-P stoichiometry over the past 60 years across subtropical China[J].Global Change Biology, 2018, 24(3):1308-1320.

温晨, 杨智姣, 杨磊, 等.半干旱黄土小流域不同植被类型植物与土壤生态化学计量特征[J].生态学报, 2021, 41(5):1824-1834.

高德新, 张伟, 任成杰, 等.黄土高原典型植被恢复过程土壤与叶片生态化学计量特征[J].生态学报, 2019, 39(10):3622-3630.

王治国, 张超, 孙保平, 等.全国水土保持区划概述[J].中国水土保持, 2015(12):12-17.

孙倩倩.黄土高原植被生长对气候响应的延迟规律与时间多尺度特征分析[D].安徽淮南:安徽理工大学, 2020.

曹流芳.滨海湿地围垦区灌草群落对土壤养分特性改良测评[D].上海:华东师范大学, 2014.

Zhang Y L, Li Y, Wang S Z, et al. Soil phosphorus fractionation and its association with soil phosphate-solubilizing bacteria in a chronosequence of vegetation restoration[J].Ecological Engineering, 2021, 164:e106208.

赵满兴, 余光美, 白二磊, 等.陕北黄土高原植被恢复对土壤理化性状的影响[J].中国农学通报, 2020, 36(25):86-94.

何容, 王国兵, 汪家社, 等.武夷山不同海拔植被土壤微生物量的季节动态及主要影响因子[J].生态学杂志, 2009, 28(3):394-399.

涂志华, 尉永键, 范志平, 等.太子河源流域不同类型水源涵养林土壤微生物生物量碳、氮的季节动态[J].生态学杂志, 2018, 37(7):2139-2147.

刘瑞龙, 杨万勤, 谭波, 等.土壤动物对川西亚高山和高山森林凋落叶第一年不同分解时期N和P元素动态的影响[J].植物生态学报, 2013, 37(12):1080-1090.

Tian H Q, Chen G S, Zhang C, et al. Pattern and variation of C:N:P ratios in China's soils:A synthesis of observational data[J].Biogeochemistry, 2010, 98(1/2/3):139-151.

朱秋莲.黄土丘陵区不同植被带立地条件对植物-枯落物-土壤生态化学计量特征的影响[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2013.

张芸, 李惠通, 张辉, 等.不同林龄杉木人工林土壤C:N:P化学计量特征及其与土壤理化性质的关系[J].生态学报, 2019, 39(7):2520-2531.

闫丽娟, 王海燕, 李广, 等.黄土丘陵区4种典型植被对土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2019, 33(5):190-196, 204.

Views

768

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Soil Microbial Carbon Use Efficiency in Pinus armandii Forests in Central Yunnan Responds to Nitrogen Deposition in Different Seasons

Soil Moisture Dynamics of Armeniaca sibirica Plantation at Different Time Scales in Loess Hilly Region of Ningxia and the Influencing Factors

Soil Physicochemical Properties and Enzyme Activity Characteristics of Four Typical Vegetation Types in Saline-alkali Lands of the Hexi Corridor

Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Soil Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Community Under Different Environmental Conditions in Poyang Lake Wetland

Responses of Loess Ground with Different Slopes and Vegetation Covers to Rainfall Infiltration

Related Author

LIANG Xiaoling

ZHANG Long

WANG Keqin

SONG Yali

SHU Haiyuan

ZHOU Yuxi

ZHANG Xi

HAN Xinsheng

Related Institution

College of Ecology and Environment， Southwest Forestry University

College of Soil and Water Conservation， Southwest Forestry University

College of Forestry， Northwest A&F University， Yangling

China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research， State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin

Institute of Forestry and Grassland Ecology， Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences， Ningxia Key Laboratory of Desertification Control and Soil and Water Conservation， Research Center for Ecological Restoration and Multi-Functional Forestry of Ningxia

⁰