Evaluation of Soil Erosion Resistance Under Different Treatment Modes in Erosion Degraded Land of Granite Red Soil

JIANG Xingxue; ZHA Ruibo; MAO Lanhua; ZHA Xuan; CHEN Shiting; LIU Chuan

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.005

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Evaluation of Soil Erosion Resistance Under Different Treatment Modes in Erosion Degraded Land of Granite Red Soil

更新时间：2025-03-12

- Evaluation of Soil Erosion Resistance Under Different Treatment Modes in Erosion Degraded Land of Granite Red Soil
- Vol. 35, Issue 6, Pages: 31-37(2021)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 福建师范大学地理科学学院,福州,350007
  2. 湿润亚热带山地生态国家重点实验室培育基地,福州,350007
  3. 福建师范大学旅游学院,福州,350007
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.005
  CLC： S157.1
- Published：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
JIANG Xingxue, ZHA Ruibo, MAO Lanhua, et al. Evaluation of Soil Erosion Resistance Under Different Treatment Modes in Erosion Degraded Land of Granite Red Soil[J]. 2021, 35(6): 31-37.
DOI：

JIANG Xingxue, ZHA Ruibo, MAO Lanhua, et al. Evaluation of Soil Erosion Resistance Under Different Treatment Modes in Erosion Degraded Land of Granite Red Soil[J]. 2021, 35(6): 31-37. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.005.

摘要

为探究花岗岩红壤侵蚀退化地不同治理模式对土壤抗蚀性的影响，通过野外调查与室内外试验，以长汀县封禁（M1）、乔灌草混交（M2）、全坡面播草（M3）、低效林改造（M4）、条沟草灌带（M5）这5种治理模式的土壤为研究对象，选取开垦地（CK1）和裸露地（CK2）为对照，利用主成分分析法揭示土壤抗蚀性主要影响因子，并结合灰色关联分析和耦合分析对土壤抗蚀性进行综合评价。结果表明：（1）不同治理模式的土壤抗蚀性由强到弱依次为M5 > M2 > M3 > M4 > M1 > CK2 > CK1；（2）> 0.25 mm水稳性团聚体含量和有机质含量是影响土壤抗蚀性的主要因子；（3）土壤抗蚀性与土壤理化性质的灰色关联度较高（0.696），M3的土壤抗蚀性与土壤理化性质之间系统耦合度最高（0.883）。研究结果为花岗岩红壤侵蚀退化地的水土流失治理及生态恢复提供科学依据。

Abstract

To explore the effects of different treatment modes on soil erosion resistance in eroded degraded land of granite red soil

field investigation and laboratory experiment were conducted. Soil of five treatment modes in Changting county

including banned (M1)

arbor-shrub-grass mixed forest (M2)

whole slope grass sowing (M3)

low efficiency forest transformation (M4) and the furrow grass shrub zone (M5)

were taken as the research objects

clearage (CK1) and the bare land (CK2) were selected as the control. The main influencing factors of soil erosion resistance were revealed by principal component analysis

and the comprehensive evaluation of soil erosion resistance was carried out by combining grey correlation analysis and coupling analysis. The results showed that: (1) The order of soil erosion resistance under different treatment modes was M5 > M2 > M3 > M4 > M1 > CK2 > CK1. (2) The content of water-stable aggregate > 0.25 mm and organic matter content were the main factors affected soil erosion resistance. (3) The soil erosion resistance index was strongly correlated with the soil physical and chemical properties (0.696)

and the coupling degree between soil erosion resistance and soil physical and chemical properties of M3 was the highest (0.883). The results provide a scientific basis for soil and water loss control and ecological restoration in eroded degraded land of granite red soil areas.

关键词

Keywords

references

邱陆旸.浙江省瓯江流域源头区林地土壤抗蚀特性及影响因素研究[D].杭州:浙江大学, 2016.

何淑勤, 宫渊波, 郑子成, 等.不同植被类型条件下土壤抗蚀性变化特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报, 2013, 27(5):17-22.

张华渝, 王克勤, 宋娅丽.滇中尖山河流域不同土地利用类型土壤抗蚀性[J].水土保持学报, 2019, 33(5):50-57.

Yakupoglu T, Gundogan R, Dindaroglu T, et al. Effects of land conversion from native shrub to pistachio orchard on soil erodibility in an arid region[J/OL].Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2017, 189(11). DOI:10.1007/s10661-017-6313-8.

Olaniya M, Bora P K, Das S, et al. Soil erodibility indices under different land uses in Ri-Bhoi district of Meghalaya (India)[J].Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1):e14986.

Ostovari Y, Dashtaki S G, Kumar L, et al. Soil erodibility and its prediction in semi-arid regions[J].Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 2019, 65(12):1688-1703.

Fattahi S M, Soroush A, Huang N, et al. Physicochemical and strength properties of soil affecting erosion induced by saltating particles[J/OL].Journal of Environmental Geotechnics, 2020. DOI:10.1680/jenge.19.00230.

王计磊, 吴发启.不同生长期大豆坡耕地土壤抗侵蚀能力特征[J].土壤学报, 2016, 53(6):1389-1398.

余晓章, 魏鹏, 范川, 等.两种巨桉人工林地土壤抗蚀性的比较研究[J].水土保持通报, 2015, 35(2):58-63.

刘宽梅, 周秋文.典型喀斯特森林土壤的抗蚀性[J].生态学报, 2020, 40(2):568-577.

严方晨, 焦菊英, 曹斌挺, 等.黄土丘陵沟壑区撂荒地不同演替阶段植物群落的土壤抗蚀性:以坊塌流域为例[J].应用生态学报, 2016, 27(1):64-72.

刘旦旦, 张鹏辉, 王健, 等.黄土坡面不同土地利用类型土壤抗蚀性对比[J].林业科学, 2013, 49(9):102-106.

朱鹤健.我国亚热带山地生态系统脆弱区生态恢复的战略思想:基于长汀水土保持11年研究成果[J].自然资源学报, 2013, 28(9):1498-1506.

张灿, 徐涵秋, 张好, 等.南方红壤典型水土流失区植被覆盖度变化及其生态效应评估:以福建省长汀县为例[J].自然资源学报, 2015, 30(6):917-928.

邱陆旸, 张丽萍, 陆芳春, 等.基于熵权法的林下土壤抗蚀性评价及影响因素分析[J].水土保持学报, 2016, 30(4):74-79.

李英, 林圣玉, 张龙, 等.鄱阳湖生态经济区坡耕地表土抗蚀性评价[J].中国水土保持, 2016(7):48-51.

张杰, 郑太辉, 肖胜生, 等.不同植被恢复模式对红砂岩土壤化学性质及抗蚀特征的影响[J].农业工程学报, 2018, 34(24):115-122.

朱鹤健, 陈志彪, 林惠花, 等.长汀水土保持研究[M].北京:科学出版社, 2013:1-9.

刘根华.严重侵蚀退化地不同治理模式对土壤理化性质的调控研究[D].福州:福建师范大学, 2017.

孙丽丽, 査轩, 黄少燕, 等.花岗岩红壤区不同治理模式土壤抗冲性因素试验[J].水土保持学报, 2019, 33(5):34-40, 49.

谢贤健, 李永飞.不同巨桉林下紫色土壤抗蚀性与土壤因子的耦合关系分析[J].水土保持学报, 2017, 31(1):97-102.

肖盛杨, 舒英格, 陈梦军.喀斯特高原峡谷区不同植被类型的土壤抗蚀性[J].水土保持通报, 2019, 39(4):30-35, 81.

赵锦梅, 徐长林, 马瑞, 等.东祁连山不同高寒灌丛草地土壤抗蚀性研究[J].水土保持学报, 2016, 30(5):119-123.

白秀梅, 韩有志, 郭汉清.关帝山不同植被恢复类型土壤抗蚀性研究[J].水土保持学报, 2014, 28(2):79-84.

王针针, 刘枭宏, 谌芸, 等.紫色土区植物篱篱前淤积带与篱下土坎土壤抗蚀性研究[J].水土保持学报, 2020, 34(5):61-67.

Views

831

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Effects of Nitrogen Application on Rhizosphere and Non-rhizosphere Soil Fertility of Alpine Elymus Nutions Grassland

Effect of Weathering Intensity on Physical and Chemical Properties of Typical Benggang Profile in Granite Red Soil Area of Southeast Guangxi

Influence of Headcut Height on the Developmental Processes of Gully Bed Plunge Pool on a Granite Red Soil Slope

Studies on Soil Properties of Aeolian Sandy Land Improvement and Utilization in South Edge of Musu Desert

Study on Physical and Chemical Properties and Erodibility of Soil in Different Parts of Erosion Gully in the Mountainous Area of South Ningxia

Related Author

ZHANG Xia

MA Shumin

CHEN Xin

JIAO Ting

MU Ren

GAO Haocheng

DENG Yusong

DUAN Xiaoqian

Related Institution

College of Prataculture, Gansu Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Prataculture Ecosystem, Ministry of Dducation, Sino American Research Center for Sustainable Development of Grassland Animal Husbandry, Key Laboratory of Forage Gerplasm Innovation and Variety Breeding of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs

College of Agriculture, Guangxi University

Soil and Water Conservation Monitoring Station of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region

College of Forestry, Guangxi University

Agricultural College of Guangxi University

⁰