

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
Published:2021
移动端阅览
XUE Dongming, GUO Xiaoping, ZHANG Xiaoxia. Runoff and Sediment Reduction Under Different Slope Ecological Restoration Modes of Waste Dump in Arid Mining Area[J]. 2021, 35(6): 15-21.
XUE Dongming, GUO Xiaoping, ZHANG Xiaoxia. Runoff and Sediment Reduction Under Different Slope Ecological Restoration Modes of Waste Dump in Arid Mining Area[J]. 2021, 35(6): 15-21. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.003.
为探究不同生态修复模式对露天矿区排土场边坡产流产沙规律的影响,采用野外径流小区试验方法,对矿区排土场边坡不同生态修复模式的产流产沙进行了1个雨季的连续观测。结果表明:(1)研究区降雨年内分配不均,主要集中在汛期7—9月,该时期降雨量占到年均降雨量的77.03%,是年内径流泥沙损失最多的时期。(2)不同生态修复模式与对照(只撒播灌草种子)相比均具有减流减沙效果,但是不同生态修复模式的减流减沙效益有显著差异,减流效果从大到小依次为沙柳网格模式(64.35%)>生态棒模式(56.56%)>生态袋模式(52.74%)>铁丝石笼模式(48.70%)>植物篱模式(45.51%)>土壤改良模式(35.89%)>无纺布覆盖模式(33.97%)>砾石压盖模式(8.19%);减沙效果依次为沙柳网格模式(69.41%)>生态棒模式(61.28%)>生态袋模式(55.09%)>铁丝石笼模式(52.43%)>植物篱模式(48.72%)>土壤改良模式(42.09%)>无纺布覆盖模式(38.31%)>砾石压盖模式(19.34%)。(3)不同生态修复模式产沙量对产流量响应特征均呈极显著正相关(P<0.05,r>0),沙柳网格模式产沙量对产流量响应程度较小,生态棒模式次之,对照产沙量对产流量响应程度最大。
In order to explore the impact of different ecological restoration modes on the runoff and sediment production law of the dump in the opencast coal mine
according to the field runoff plot methods
the field standard runoff plot method was used to observe the runoff and sediment production of the dump in the mining area with different ecological restoration modes for a continuous rainy season. The results showed that: (1) The rainfall distribution in the study area is uneven during the year
mainly concentrated in the flood season from July to September
the rainfall in this period accounted for 77.03% of the average annual rainfall
which was the period with the largest loss of runoff and sediment in the year; (2) Compared with the bare slope (sowing only shrub and grass seeds)
different ecological restoration modes had the effect of runoff and sediment reduction
but the benefits of different ecological restoration modes for runoff and sediment reduction were significantly different. Runoff reduction effect from large to small listed in the order of Salix psammophila checkerboard mode (64.35%) > Ecological rods mode (56.56%) > Ecological geo-textile bag mode (52.74%) > Wire gabion mode (48.70%) > Hedgerows mode (45.51%) > Soil improvement mode (35.89%) > Non-woven fabric covering mode (33.97%) > Gravel capping mode (8.19%);The sediment reduction effect were Salix psammophila checkerboard mode (69.41%) > Ecological rods mode (61.28%) > Ecological geo-textile bag mode (55.09%) > Wire gabion mode (52.43%) > Hedgerows mode (48.72%) > Soil improvement mode(42.09%) > Non-woven fabric covering mode (38.31%) > Gravel capping mode (19.34%); (3) The response characteristics of sediment yield from different ecological restoration modes were all significantly positively correlated (P<0.05
r>0)
the Salix psammophila checker board mode had a smaller response to runoff
followed by the Ecological rods mode
and the Rock cover mode had the greatest response to runoff.
王海宁.中国煤炭资源分布特征及其基础性作用新思考[J].中国煤炭地质, 2018, 30(7):5-9.
杨波, 王文龙, 郭明明, 等.矿区排土场边坡不同植被配置模式的控蚀效益研究[J].土壤学报, 2019, 56(6):1347-1358.
卞正富, 沈渭寿.西部重点矿区土地退化因素调查[J].生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(2):173-177.
郭建英, 何京丽, 李锦荣, 等.典型草原大型露天煤矿排土场边坡水蚀控制效果[J].农业工程学报, 2015, 31(3):296-303.
史倩华, 李垚林, 王文龙, 等.不同植被措施对露天煤矿排土场边坡径流产沙影响[J].草地学报, 2016, 24(6):1263-1271.
李宏伟, 王文龙, 王贞, 等.神府东胜煤田扰动地面野外降雨试验[J].水土保持学报, 2012, 26(2):11-15.
郭建英, 何京丽, 李锦荣, 等.矿区人工再塑地貌对锡林郭勒草原土壤侵蚀的影响及其控制效果[J].水土保持学报, 2015, 29(1):56-61.
花东文, 温仲明.黄土丘陵区不同植被恢复阶段下的暴雨产流产沙研究[J].水土保持学报, 2015, 29(4):27-31.
中国气象局.降雨量等级GB/T 28592-2012[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2012.
李铁, 谌芸, 何丙辉, 等.天然降雨下川中丘陵区不同年限植物篱水土保持效用[J].水土保持学报, 2019, 33(3):27-35.
景民晓, 谢永生, 李文华, 等.不同土石比例弃土堆置体产流产沙模拟研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2014, 28(3):78-82.
马晨雷, 戴翠婷, 刘窑军, 等.砾石覆盖对紫色土坡面流水动力学参数的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2019, 33(6):150-155.
樊春华, 赵龙山, 李开凤, 等.多场次降雨条件下不同土岩镶嵌坡面土壤侵蚀特征[J/OL].土壤学报, 2020 DOI:10.11766/trxb202011020606.
赵暄, 谢永生, 景民晓, 等.生产建设项目弃土堆置体的类型与特征[J].中国水土保持科学, 2013, 11(1):88-94.
陈心逸, 李丽, 佘冬立.砾石覆盖条件下盐碱土边坡降雨侵蚀水动力学特征[J].水土保持学报, 2018, 32(1):116-120.
吴冰, 朱元骏, 邵明安.含砾石土壤坡面流速及产流产沙过程研究[J].中国水土保持科学, 2011, 9(1):99-103.
王雪松.红粘土工程堆积体侵蚀规律研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2016.
李宗勋, 李启艳, 侯晓龙, 等.不同自然降雨等级下不同郁闭度马尾松林的水土流失特征[J].水土保持学报, 2020, 34(1):27-33.
徐露, 张丹, 向宇国, 等.不同耕作措施下金沙江下游紫色土区坡耕地产流产沙特征[J].山地学报, 2020, 38(6):851-860.
张杰, 陈晓安, 汤崇军, 等.典型水土保持措施对红壤坡地柑橘园水土保持效益的影响[J].农业工程学报, 2017, 33(24):165-173.
宋江平, 李忠武, 刘春, 等.湘北红壤低山丘陵区典型水土流失治理模式径流泥沙效应[J].水土保持学报, 2018, 32(1):32-38.
康宏亮, 王文龙, 薛智德, 等.北方风沙区砾石对堆积体坡面径流及侵蚀特征的影响[J].农业工程学报, 2016, 32(3):125-134.
Zhao Z M, Shen Y X, Shan Z J, et al. Infiltration patterns and ecological function of outcrop runoff in Epikarst Areas of Southern China[J].Vadose Zone Journal, 2018, 17(1):1-10.
史倩华, 王文龙, 郭明明, 等.模拟降雨条件下含砾石红壤工程堆积体产流产沙过程[J].应用生态学报, 2015, 26(9):2673-2680.
朱燕琴, 赵志斌, 齐广平.黄土丘陵区植被类型和降雨对坡面侵蚀产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2019, 33(2):9-16.
0
Views
821
下载量
12
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621